Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: locations of binaries and separate /usr

2011-12-31 Thread prometheanfire
s currently have a seperate /usr that is mounted at boot. Unfortunately I do agree that this is not something that we can fight. This was brought up earlier and the only thing we can do for people like myself (who mount /usr at boot) is to create a simple initramfs that only has the purpose of

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: locations of binaries and separate /usr

2012-01-06 Thread prometheanfire
never been the sysadmin of that kind of setup. > Not saying it's just you, but people should stop being dicks. Being antagonistic against everyone is not getting us anywhere and only serves to divide the community. People shouldn't use the hate in dealing with whether or not to change on other people, use it on the actual argument :D -- Matthew Thode (prometheanfire) signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: locations of binaries and separate /usr

2012-01-11 Thread prometheanfire
it should be possible to mount rootfs read-only with > separate /var. Of course, that would require the software to be > actually FHS-compliant and not put runtime-written files in /etc. > security? -- Matthew Thode (prometheanfire) signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Can we get PIE on all SUID binaries by default, por favor?

2012-02-01 Thread prometheanfire
5m43.402s user5m42.510s sys 0m0.002s hardened kernel/vanilla gcc real5m29.271s user5m28.417s sys 0m0.003s hardened kernel/vanilla userland real5m29.495s user5m28.599s sys 0m0.030s vanilla all (disabled pax and grsec on hardened kernel, compiled kernel with h

[gentoo-dev] Re: Package up for grabs: dev-python/suds

2020-04-30 Thread prometheanfire
On 20-04-30 17:01:27, Michał Górny wrote: > Hi, > > The following package is now looking for a new maintainer: > > dev-python/suds > > Its revdeps are dev-python/oslo-vmware, sys-cluster/cinder (openstack@ / > prometheanfire@), net-wireless/chirp (zerochaos@ / radi