On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 11:08:07PM -0800, Joshua Saddler wrote:
>
> > On 3 March 2010 19:45, Mart Raudsepp wrote:
> > > I don't believe we should selectively cripple one GUI toolkit with not
> > > having proper printing support out of the box on a desktop profile,
> > > while others do, just beca
On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 10:19:05PM -0600, Dale wrote:
> chrome://messenger/locale/messengercompose/composeMsgs.properties:
> > Richard Freeman writes:
> >
> >
> >> I think that is separate from the circular dependency issue. As long
> >> as we have an unresolved circular dependency I think cu
On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 03:46:50PM +0200, Theo Chatzimichos wrote:
> On Friday 05 March 2010 14:57:32 Ben de Groot wrote:
> > On 5 March 2010 09:28, Joshua Saddler wrote:
> > > Feel free to submit some documentation patches now that all our docs are
> > > #...@ed. Thanks.
> >
> > No need for the
On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 07:01:09PM +, Duncan wrote:
> Zeerak Mustafa Waseem posted on Fri, 05 Mar 2010 18:59:39 +0100 as
> excerpted:
>
> > How about the Handbook? As far as I remember you're asked to choose a
> > profile :-) I can file a bug it needs to be
On Sun, Mar 07, 2010 at 09:08:14PM -0600, Ryan Hill wrote:
> On Sun, 7 Mar 2010 12:11:47 -0500
> Mark Loeser wrote:
>
> > > Has QA given their blessing to this?
> >
> > Absolutely not. Its actually the opposite. Until 90+% of the tree just
> > works with the new version of python, it should no
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 09:36:52PM +0100, Ben de Groot wrote:
> On 24 March 2010 21:25, William Hubbs wrote:
> > If we make it clear in the news item that python-3 cannot be used as the
> > default python, so if users do not want it they should mask it, we have
> > done our job imho. In other wor
esOn Sat, Apr 03, 2010 at 07:33:53AM -0400, Richard Freeman wrote:
> On 04/03/2010 06:19 AM, Tobias Scherbaum wrote:
>
> I really think that the Gentoo recruitment process needs improvement.
> Right now it seems like a LOT of effort is required both to become a
> Gentoo dev and to help somebody b
On Sun, Apr 04, 2010 at 04:13:19PM +0100, AllenJB wrote:
> The unofficial wiki may have been created because there wasn't an
> official one, but that doesn't mean it's any less of a community in its
> own right.
>
> Starting the official wiki by effectively ripping off others work and
> attempting
On Sun, Apr 04, 2010 at 11:21:13PM +0100, AllenJB wrote:
> The way I see it, the "official" wiki has to earn my respect as a
> project. The unofficial wiki already has already been through this
> process. It's no different whether I'm trying a new piece of software or
> a new distro.
>
> It's not
On Mon, Apr 05, 2010 at 04:07:01PM +, Jon Portnoy wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 05, 2010 at 08:50:49AM +0300, Eray Aslan wrote:
> > Just replying randomly.
> >
> > On 05.04.2010 04:33, Tobias Heinlein wrote:
> > > I think this is a good starting point to get rid of the "some important
> > > questions a
On Mon, Apr 05, 2010 at 10:15:21PM +0300, Markos Chandras wrote:
> On Monday 05 April 2010 21:12:49 Ben de Groot wrote:
> > After the mostly positive feedback on the recent wiki discussion, we
> > have now gone ahead, formed a preliminary team consisting of both
> > users and developers, and put up
On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 03:00:10PM +0200, Ben de Groot wrote:
> On 6 April 2010 07:16, Stuart Longland wrote:
> > How are you off for moderators? I don't have a lot of time to sit
> > around waiting for stuff to compile these days (which is why I've been
> > very inactive on the MIPS and Mozilla
On Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 06:02:40PM +0100, George Prowse wrote:
> On 09/04/2010 13:38, Ben de Groot wrote:
> > On 9 April 2010 13:26, Guy Fontaine wrote:
> >> There are things I know about Gentoo Linux and I'm pleased to share my
> >> knowledge with others as well as I'm glad to learn from others.
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 04:04:57PM +0200, Matti Bickel wrote:
> /me puts on his asbestos underwear
>
> Markos Chandras wrote:
> > So the attendance to council meetings is enough to prove that a member is
> > active? 0_o
>
> Yes. Anything else is just too hard to measure, imo. If you notice a
>
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 10:10:32PM +, Duncan wrote:
> Ryan Hill posted on Sun, 21 Nov 2010 13:30:15 -0600 as excerpted:
>
> > On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 19:05:44 +
> > Markos Chandras wrote:
> >
> >> > Isn't that the point? People should be discouraged in every way not
> >> > to use live ebuil
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 08:30:34PM -0500, Mark Loeser wrote:
> Markos Chandras said:
> > Hi there,
> >
> > The official policy for live ebuilds is the following one:
> >
> > http://devmanual.gentoo.org/ebuild-writing/functions/src_unpack/cvs-sources/index.html
> >
> > I don't quite agree with t
Hey guys,
Just wondering if Gentoo will be represented at FOSDEM this year?
--
Zeerak Waseem
Hey guys,
I ran with ACCEPT_LICENSE="*" for a while and a few days ago I decided to look
into the licenses the programs I'm using need and read up on them, then add
them manually.
I then remembered the license groups and proceeded to specify my own license
group in /usr/portage/profiles/license
18 matches
Mail list logo
