Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Moving HOMEPAGE out of ebuilds for the future

2008-11-30 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
On Sunday 30 November 2008 14:23:48 Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote: > I have a very quick proposal: why don't we move the packages' homepage > in metadata.xml (since it's usually unique for all the versions) and we > get rid of the variable for the next EAPI version? I would rather see something l

Re: [gentoo-dev] USE dependencies

2009-01-04 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
Dne neděle 04 Leden 2009 16:34:02 Nirbheek Chauhan napsal(a): > On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 7:24 PM, Christian Faulhammer wrote: > > Hi, > > > > regarding USE dependencies what is the correct way if a package needs > > one out of two USE flags? > > > > || ( cat-egory/package[foo] cat-egory/package[bar

[gentoo-dev] kde-project meeting anouncement

2009-01-04 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
Hi, again month has passed and it is time for our "periodic" meeting. We will hold this meeting on our irc channel (#gentoo-kde @irc.freenode.net). Schedule will be that we try to start at 19:00 UTC on January 8th. Previous meeting: log - [1] | summary - [2] Topics for current meeting: - sumarize

[gentoo-dev] Anouncement: Updated kde4 eclasses in the tree.

2009-01-12 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
Hi, we gentoo kde devs and our herd testers would like to anounce that we have prepared new kde4 eclasses which supports working with more kdes and has many many features. I will try to give you some info about usage and so on. So first let take look under the hood (supported stuff): * koffice2 (

Re: [gentoo-dev] Anouncement: Updated kde4 eclasses in the tree.

2009-01-12 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
Well that is the problem, I didnt hit reply but new message button :D (i guess kmail4.2 is doing something fancy :D) Tomas signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

[gentoo-dev] KDE Team meeting for february (12.2.2009 20.00:00)

2009-02-09 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
Heya, time has reach for us that we have to meet again, so interesting stuff for this time: electing a team lead (i suggest jmbsvicetto or yngwin :]) chit-chat about kde3 planning cooperation with debian and other normal distros (that dont insanely patch the kde) talking with upstream about the f

Re: [gentoo-dev] Suggestion for next bugday: Mass use deps migration

2009-02-22 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
Dne neděle 22 Únor 2009 22:34:19 > Carsten Lohrke wrote: > On Freitag, 20. Februar 2009, Petteri Räty wrote: > > Suggestions/objections? > > If you mean by "mass migration" doing that more or less blindly, I do > object. When an ebuild directly or indirectly inherits an eclass, which is > EAPI 2 en

[gentoo-dev] March KDE Team meeting.

2009-03-03 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
Hi, as usual there is again one month gone so we are going to have meeting. This time it will be on Thursday 5.3. at 19:00 UTC in #gentoo-kde. We have on our TODO for this meeting: - kde3 eapi2 and other kde3 stuff that needs to be done. - kde4.2 things we have to do for its stabilisation. - cmake

[gentoo-dev] Git eclass update

2009-03-03 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
Hi, I am currently messing with git.eclass and i would like to see some other sets of eyes on it. I am throwing in full new eclass [1] and its diff [2]. I will be really happy for comments and even more for diffs :D [1] http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=dev/scarabeus.git;a=blob;f=eclass/g

Re: [gentoo-dev] Git eclass update

2009-03-04 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
Dne středa 04 Březen 2009 11:22:54 Rémi Cardona napsal(a): > Tomáš Chvátal a écrit : > > Hi, > > I am currently messing with git.eclass and i would like to see some other > > sets of eyes on it. > > I am throwing in full new eclass [1] and its diff [2]. > > I will

Re: [gentoo-dev] Git eclass update

2009-03-04 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
Dne středa 04 Březen 2009 11:29:44 Rémi Cardona napsal(a): > Tomáš Chvátal a écrit : > > Hi, > > I am currently messing with git.eclass and i would like to see some other > > sets of eyes on it. > > I am throwing in full new eclass [1] and its diff [2]. > > I will

Re: [gentoo-dev] Git eclass update

2009-03-04 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
Dne úterý 03 Březen 2009 20:47:28 Tomáš Chvátal napsal(a): > [2] http://dev.gentoo.org/~scarabeus/git.eclass.diff As for now the diff is really obsolete so use direct link and make diff yourself (sorry but i preffer fast including patches :]) Tomas signature.asc Description: This i

[gentoo-dev] LC_ALL=C Set by default for portage

2009-03-08 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
Hi, lately i see that in our bugzilla most of the build reports are reported with localized build logs which we dont understand. This leads to us asking the user to run the emerge once more with LC_ALL=C. Wont it be nice to have this variable set by default in portage so users reporting bugs re

[gentoo-dev] Packages needing manitainer

2009-03-08 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
We (kde team) have some packages that we are not interested much/are so popular that we cant handle their bugload/releases/etc. So here they are: media-sound/amarok for both kde3 and kde4 version net-misc/mDNSResponder Is there around some brave soul that would became maintainer for this two (or

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages needing manitainer

2009-03-08 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
Dne neděle 08 Březen 2009 22:54:23 Rémi Cardona napsal(a): > How about dropping this one in favor of avahi? Or am I missing something > obvious? Well we can do it, but first i would love to see if somebody is interested. Dont you think? Tomas signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signe

Re: [gentoo-dev] LC_ALL=C Set by default for portage

2009-03-08 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
Dne pondělí 09 Březen 2009 01:35:07 Mike Frysinger napsal(a): > On Sunday 08 March 2009 16:20:14 Tomáš Chvátal wrote: > > lately i see that in our bugzilla most of the build reports are reported > > with localized build logs which we dont understand. This leads to us > > askin

[gentoo-dev] cmake-utils.eclass udpate

2009-03-09 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
terms of the GNU General Public License v2 -# $Header: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass,v 1.16 2008/12/24 15:41:06 scarabeus Exp $ +# $Header: $ # @ECLASS: cmake-utils.eclass # @MAINTAINER: # k...@gentoo.org +# @AUTHORS: +# Tomáš Chvátal +# Maciej Mrozowski +# (undisclosed

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Developer Retirements

2009-03-12 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
Dne čtvrtek 12 Březen 2009 09:25:17 Peter Hjalmarsson napsal(a): > tis 2009-03-10 klockan 08:29 -0700 skrev Alec Warner: > > > With some devs reviewing gentoo-commits@, I highly doubt that this > > > commit could go unnoticed more than a few hours. > > > > really? cause I bet I could slip something

Re: [gentoo-dev] gentoo KVM images now available :)

2009-03-13 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
Dne pátek 13 Březen 2009 19:19:00 Donnie Berkholz napsal(a): > Cool! How did you make these? Can you make them with Catalyst? Actualy i think alex did them as normal gentoo instalation :]. But instead of installing onto normal pc he installed into kvm image. When i tried catalyst few months back

Re: [gentoo-dev] devs on IRC (was :Regen2 ( was QA Overlay Layout support ))

2009-03-13 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
Dne pátek 13 Březen 2009 19:52:59 Alec Warner napsal(a): > > I think that summarizing "IRC" is insane. Remember we barely got > summaries of council meetings (which are at a fixed time and date) > until we got a secretary devoted explicitly to that task. Maybe more > teams should take up the meet

[gentoo-dev] Live ebuilds management.

2009-03-14 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
hi, if you find your time would you mind pointing your eyes on bug 262010 [1]. There is interesting idea about loging usefull informations about repository for further usage (that thing i find interesting and already implemented [2]). But in comment 4 user ask about updates itself. If we have li

Re: [gentoo-dev] Live ebuilds management.

2009-03-14 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
Dne sobota 14 Březen 2009 20:32:52 Ciaran McCreesh napsal(a): > Doing this properly is an awful lot of work and a lot trickier than > initially apparent. There was a discussion in #gentoo-council about it > after the last meeting; unfortunately I don't have logs. Hm i try to crawl around if i find

Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI 3 PMS Draft

2009-03-16 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
Dne úterý 17 Březen 2009 00:20:11 Ciaran McCreesh napsal(a): > On Mon, 16 Mar 2009 23:59:45 +0100 > > Maciej Mrozowski wrote: > > To avoid further confusion I'd suggest removing all traces of > > kdebuild- format and its features (like PDEPEND labels, ranged > > dependencies) from PMS document, es

Re: [gentoo-dev] please stop using foo-${PV}-bar.patch in other ebuild versions than ${PV}

2009-03-23 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
Dne neděle 22 Březen 2009 17:50:26 Alin Năstac napsal(a): > Please do not apply patches that have ${P} prefix in other ebuild > versions than ${PV}. > Is that hard to create a new patch with a proper name? > > Cheers, > Alin Hi, I was working on patches glep [1] (nothing final and it is highly in p

Re: [gentoo-dev] Please review: poppler.eclass

2009-03-25 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
Dne středa 25 Březen 2009 19:25:02 Peter Alfredsen napsal(a): I will just pick parts with notes. Some of them apply on more places :] > # @ECLASS-VARIABLE: HOMEPAGE > # @DESCRIPTION: > # HOMEPAGE is set to http://poppler.freedesktop.org > HOMEPAGE="http://poppler.freedesktop.org/"; Why you describ

[gentoo-dev] April KDE team meeting anouncement.

2009-03-25 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
Hi, it is time for me to anounce the meeting for April. This month topics are: - unprefixing misc stuff - moving plasmoids to the tree - kde3 state - moving printing to the tree - upstream responses on packaging snapshots - removing dead members - pykde fixing - handling kdeprefix for base... esele

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs: genstef gems special edition

2009-03-26 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
Dne pondělí 23 Březen 2009 23:08:53 Peter Alfredsen napsal(a): > Since genstef has been .away for some time, I arranged with him that I'd > send a list of his ebuilds that need maintenance to be put up for grabs. > This list contains all ebuilds that have no herd, at least one open bug > and where

[gentoo-dev] Default XDG env.d configuration placement

2009-04-09 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
quite simple, where do you think it should belong. Some new fake package or added as part of some other package (currently the candidate is xdg-utils)... [1] - http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=264647 Cheers Tomáš Chvátal Gentoo Linux Developer [KDE/Sunrise/X11] E-Mail

Re: [gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2009-04-19 23h59 UTC

2009-04-23 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
Dne čtvrtek 23 Duben 2009 21:46:44 James Cloos napsal(a): > Wierd. > > I must've fat-fingered while reading the list yesterday. > > I didn't even see the message buffer > > -JimC I was just thinking about "THE SECRET MAIL IS SECRET" :D Tomas signature.asc Description: This is a digitally sig

Re: [gentoo-dev] Project summaries

2009-05-06 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
> Future projects: > revdep-rebuild support for mono! > AOT support > Getting Mono tests to not fail in Sandbox. > Reducing the bus-factor. I have too much of this stuff in my head. I > should write docs... Later. Add to your todo: Making mono working on KDE4. It has bindings, but i dont have guts

Re: [gentoo-dev] The fallacies of GLEP55

2009-05-14 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
Dne čtvrtek 14 Květen 2009 20:39:07 Ciaran McCreesh napsal(a): > Where on earth are you getting the idea that GLEP 55 makes things > slower? The only difference to the code with GLEP 55 is in checking > file extensions against a slightly larger set of strings, which is > nowhere near a measurable i

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council 2009/2010 - Nominations are now open

2009-06-01 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
I agree with patrick nominees expect one addition. I add patrick himself to prove us that he can not only do benchmarks but to force us to do them :D signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [gentoo-dev] New metadata fields

2009-06-03 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
Dne středa 03 Červen 2009 16:38:28 Steve Dibb napsal(a): > I had an idea for some new fields to go in metadata.xml. Not sure if we > would need a GLEP for this or not? Anyway, what do you guys think: > > Two things I can think of adding that would be useful: > > - ChangeLog URL > - Bug Tracker >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council 2009/2010 - Nominations are now open

2009-06-04 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
Dne úterý 02 Červen 2009 21:21:06 Mounir Lamouri napsal(a): > I would like to nominate: > darkside > scarabeus > tanderson > > Mounir Thanks for the nomination, since at least 2 person said that they would like to see me there and I have the meetings at reasonable time in my TZ, I say ACK ;] Now

Re: [gentoo-dev] Old eclasses - candidates for removal?

2009-06-04 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
Dne čtvrtek 04 Červen 2009 23:05:57 Ulrich Mueller napsal(a): > A quick scan shows that the following eclasses were deprecated more > than three years ago, and are used by no ebuild in the tree: > >2002-05-25 inherit.eclass >2003-12-11 kde-i18n.eclass >2004-04-16 koffice-i18n.ecla

Re: [gentoo-dev] Screenshot contest 2009

2009-06-13 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
Why not, we might even get some theme for branding from it. User would have to submit actual screenshot and write out what he used to make it look that way. Cheers signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

[gentoo-dev] KDE Team meeting, June 2009

2009-06-16 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
Hi, yay this time i forgot to sent the mail sooner, hope you won't be angry on me. Important info: Where: #gentoo-kde @ freenode.net When: 18.6.2009 19:00 UTC This time topics: - Solving the final question about kdeprefix. - KDE 4 Stabilisation. - handle the PyQt3 qscintilla dependencies - Progres

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Review a new (unofficial) eclass

2009-06-16 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
Dne úterý 16 Červen 2009 18:34:46 Christian Faulhammer napsal(a): > You could make it EAPI 2 safe and use the src_prepare function for all > your tarball magic. See other eclasses that handle EAPI case switching. Specialy x-modular, git or cmake-utils It has most readable output, when we get to m

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] new vala.eclass

2012-08-25 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
2012/8/25 Alexandre Rostovtsev : Hi man, *snip* > > case "${EAPI:-0}" in > 0|1|2) > die "EAPI=${EAPI} is not supported" > ;; > *) > EXPORT_FUNCTIONS pkg_setup > ;; > esac Any reson for not supporting ALL known eapis?

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Initial python-r1.eclass & distutils-r1.eclass

2012-09-29 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
2012/9/29 Michał Górny : > Hello, > > Instead of the floating patches and p-d-ng modifications I sent > earlier, here are the two complete (so far, well, initial :P) eclasses > for review. > > They are designed as 'mostly' drop-in python-distutils-ng replacement. > Hi, the eclasses look pretty, so

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Dropping slotted boost

2012-10-30 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
Dne Út 30. října 2012 20:24:26, Michał Górny napsal(a): > On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 11:30:16 -0700 > > Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: > > Given the amount of headaches that Boost seems to give us all, now > > thanks to the recent changes even more because Gentoo's boost is > > different from all others and

Re: [gentoo-dev] [warning] the bug queue has 100 bugs

2012-10-31 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
2012/10/31 Dirkjan Ochtman : > That's rather unsurprising... > > If you're going to file bugs "in a semi-automated manner", might as > well try to assign to the correct maintainer? > Yep he should've assign them, but anyway the annoying elog messages are an issue. And quite few packages suffer from

Re: [gentoo-dev] gstreamer eclass review

2012-11-21 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
Hi Gilles, The eclass itself looks fine, I would just ask if you would not mind to use the bash += syntax rather than VAR="VAR something" as it is shorter and easier to read. Cheers Tom

[gentoo-dev] New global useflag proposals

2012-11-23 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
Hi guys, wayland: Enable dev-libs/wayland backend vdpau: Enable the Video Decode and Presentation API for Unix acceleration interface. Cheers Tom

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/2] Set default EGIT_SOURCEDIR to point to standard ${WORKDIR}/${P}. It allows "${S}" overriding in user's code as other eclasses do:

2012-11-27 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
Why not use tools already in the eclass? The egit_sourcedir is exactly for this... also you can just define s after the inherit... Dne 27.11.2012 20:27 "Sergei Trofimovich" napsal(a): > Before the patch I had to move subdir(not very reliable): > EGIT_REPO_URI="git://github.com/UU-ComputerScie

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 2/2] Allow user mangle distfiles' "${EGIT_DIR}" after actual git fetch.

2012-11-27 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
This is bad idea. It breaks live rebuild and other stuff. You should just clone each repo yourself, see how i did in libreoffice ebuild Dne 27.11.2012 20:28 "Sergei Trofimovich" napsal(a): > EGIT_REPO_URI="https://github.com/ghc/ghc.git"; > requires user to run './sync-all fetch / ./sync-

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lavajoe retirement

2012-11-30 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
Dne Pá 30. listopadu 2012 20:37:22, Pacho Ramos napsal(a): > media-sound/logitechmediaserver-bin -> this package is "special", it's > maintained by a proxy maintainer but it was reassigned to > maintainer-needed instead of proxy-maint herd. Was reviewing to reassign > it when I saw: > https://bugs.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lavajoe retirement

2012-12-01 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
Dne So 1. prosince 2012 06:42:13, Rich Freeman napsal(a): > On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Tomáš Chvátal wrote: > > Dne Pá 30. listopadu 2012 20:37:22, Pacho Ramos napsal(a): > >> media-sound/logitechmediaserver-bin -> this package is "special", it's >

Re: [gentoo-dev] games.eclass: handle verbose build log for egamesconf in EAPI<5

2012-12-02 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
There are better ways to do this. For example you can just grep through the configure file, not having to invoke it, see the xorg-2.elass Tom 2012/12/2 hasufell : > already filed a bug, but no response so far > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=78 > > any comments? > > This is sane imo

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Defaulting desktop profiles to net-nds/openldap[minimal]

2012-12-02 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
2012/12/2 Michał Górny : > And when was poppler split a library/server split? > I think it was 2k8 or so, before the kde team took over its maintenance.

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Global USE=systemd

2012-12-08 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
Does it really have to be useflag? Can't we simply just install the file every time like we do with everything else? Logrotate/normal initscripts/etc/etc. There should be no issue with that if we install the service files every time, they just take few kbs in /etc/

Re: [gentoo-dev] Cleaning tree of outdated packages

2012-12-13 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
2012/12/13 Jory A. Pratt : > > As many of us are aware the tree is growing to a size that is really > unacceptable for many. We have many packages that have excessive amounts > of versions laying around that are not used any more. Many of these > packages with excessive revisions most likely do not

Re: [gentoo-dev] Cleaning tree of outdated packages

2012-12-13 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
2012/12/13 Tomáš Chvátal : > > But there is one big ass but. We have some packages that were > stabilised last time few year back and they provide multiple testing > versions on top of that. > Who is the one to deterimine which one should go stable and which to get rid > of? &g

[gentoo-dev] Defaulting for debug information in profiles

2012-12-17 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
Hi lads, lately I am having bit of problems from getting relevant debug info from users. Since we already have splitdebug for quite time (and I suppose quite few of us are using it) how about making it to default profiles default enabled and add -g to default cflags. Currently it is only enabled i

[gentoo-dev] Moving our/portage stuff to var

2012-12-17 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
Currently we put portage into /usr/portage and all related stuff is to be in the subfolders there (distfiles, binpkg). I've always myself override these defaults in make.conf to point for /var/portage/ (not /var/lib because I never bothered enough how to make world and config files to be put elsew

Re: [gentoo-dev] Defaulting for debug information in profiles

2012-12-17 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
2012/12/17 Diego Elio Pettenò : > On 17/12/2012 11:11, Tomáš Chvátal wrote: >> Since we already have splitdebug for quite time (and I suppose quite >> few of us are using it) how about making it to default profiles >> default enabled and add -g to default cflags. Currently it

Re: [gentoo-dev] Moving our/portage stuff to var

2012-12-17 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
2012/12/17 Diego Elio Pettenò : > On 17/12/2012 11:19, Tomáš Chvátal wrote: >> >> I've always myself override these defaults in make.conf to point for >> /var/portage/ (not /var/lib because I never bothered enough how to >> make world and config files to be put else

Re: [gentoo-dev] Defaulting for debug information in profiles

2012-12-17 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
2012/12/17 Sven Eden : > Hello Tomáš, > > on my system I have set up everything with splitdebug enabled. My CFLAGS use - > march=native, -O2 and -ggdb. > And this is the result: (Yes, I have a dedictated partition for that.) > > ~ $ LC_ALL=C df -h /usr/lib/debug/. > Filesystem Size Used Avai

Re: [gentoo-dev] Defaulting for debug information in profiles

2012-12-17 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
2012/12/17 Alexandre Rostovtsev : > > The bigger problem is not disk space but memory usage at link time. Try > building something like *-webkit-* or firefox with debugging CFLAGS on a > machine with limited memory. > > That ain't problem, we acutally can patch in those packages to strip the debug

Re: [gentoo-dev] Defaulting for debug information in profiles

2012-12-17 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
2012/12/17 Ben de Groot : > Please don't. For most users this is a waste of resources. > On first look it seems like waste of resources. On second hand it makes stuff easy wrt bugreports provided by users. And believe me when I say most upstreams are pissed by gentoo reports because they lack any g

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in virtual/ffmpeg: ffmpeg-9.ebuild ChangeLog ffmpeg-0.10.2-r1.ebuild

2013-01-17 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
2013/1/17 Markos Chandras : > On 16 January 2013 20:09, Alexis Ballier wrote: >> On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 12:40:02 + (UTC) >> "Tomas Chvatal (scarabeus)" wrote: >> >>> scarabeus13/01/16 12:40:02 >>> >>> Modified: ChangeLog >>> Added:ffmpeg-9.ebuild >>> Removed

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in virtual/ffmpeg: ffmpeg-9.ebuild ChangeLog ffmpeg-0.10.2-r1.ebuild

2013-01-17 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
2013/1/17 Ben de Groot : > On the other hand I have used libav and mplayer2 for a long time, and have > not run into any problems. The only thing missing is mencoder. Which is sovled by the mplayer1 supporting libav since yesterday. :-)

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in virtual/ffmpeg: ffmpeg-9.ebuild ChangeLog ffmpeg-0.10.2-r1.ebuild

2013-01-21 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
Dne St 16. ledna 2013 17:09:07, Alexis Ballier napsal(a): > On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 12:40:02 + (UTC) > > "Tomas Chvatal (scarabeus)" wrote: > > scarabeus13/01/16 12:40:02 > > > > Modified: ChangeLog > > Added:ffmpeg-9.ebuild > > Removed: ffmpeg-

Re: [gentoo-dev] January stabilization candidates

2013-01-21 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
Dne So 12. ledna 2013 14:49:52, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. napsal(a): > Please review attached automatically generated stabilization candidates > for January. > > I don't want to annoy people with automatically filed bugs, and at the > same time I also received lots of positive feedback about the effort to

Re: [gentoo-dev] readme.gentoo.eclass: Add a readme.gentoo_force_print_elog function to force elog printing

2013-01-21 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
2013/1/21 Pacho Ramos : > This can be useful when, for example, doc contents are modified. You can > then rely on using REPLACING_VERSIONS in your ebuild to print messages > when people updates from versions using old docs > > Patch to review attached > Would'nt be better to just set some variable

Re: [gentoo-dev] readme.gentoo.eclass: Add a readme.gentoo_force_print_elog function to force elog printing

2013-01-22 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
2013/1/22 Pacho Ramos : > El mar, 22-01-2013 a las 08:16 +0100, Tomáš Chvátal escribió: >> Would'nt be better to just set some variable in the ebuild, rather >> than call function that touches empty file? >> >> Tom >> >> > > I think it can be done

Re: [gentoo-dev] January stabilization candidates

2013-01-22 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
2013/1/22 Petteri Räty : > > I have an RSS feed for this purpose at: > > http://gentoo.petteriraty.eu/stable.rss > > Sources are available here: > > https://github.com/betelgeuse/scripts/blob/master/rss-changelog > > Maybe this is something that should be pushed to official Gentoo > infrastructure

Re: [gentoo-dev] readme.gentoo.eclass: Add a readme.gentoo_force_print_elog function to force elog printing

2013-01-22 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
Dne Út 22. ledna 2013 19:37:12, Pacho Ramos napsal(a): > I agree, thanks for pointing it. Just attached patch should handle it. Still not nice enough for me :D Use the ECLASS_VARIABLE to describe it @DEFAULT_UNSET is what you seek, see git-2.eclass. Tom signature.asc Description: This is a digi

[gentoo-dev] Subslots progress in main tree

2013-01-23 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
Hi guys, do we have some scans that report libraries converted to subslots and lists their rdeps checked if they are updated accordingly? It might be pretty usefull to actually see where the deps needed to be updated so we can take use of this feature where possible (also its a hint for lib mainta

Re: [gentoo-dev] readme.gentoo.eclass: Add a readme.gentoo_force_print_elog function to force elog printing

2013-01-24 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
Dne Čt 24. ledna 2013 21:33:45, Pacho Ramos napsal(a): > El mar, 22-01-2013 a las 19:42 +0100, Tomáš Chvátal escribió: > > Dne Út 22. ledna 2013 19:37:12, Pacho Ramos napsal(a): > > > I agree, thanks for pointing it. Just attached patch should handle it. > > > > S

[gentoo-dev] Removals reply (I am not going to figure out which tread of those all should i reply to)

2013-02-01 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
Hello guys, just to be sure here "Removals are completely up to the maintainer to decide", with expection of QA removal where the package must be already broken to get punted. If you as developers and users find some package useful you can retake the maintainership (or became proxy-maint) which a

Re: [gentoo-dev] Removals reply (I am not going to figure out which tread of those all should i reply to)

2013-02-01 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
2013/2/1 Rich Freeman : > On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 8:53 AM, Tomáš Chvátal wrote: >> If you as developers and users find some package useful you can retake >> the maintainership (or became proxy-maint) which also expects you to >> take care of the bugs (QA can prune it

Re: [gentoo-dev] Removals reply

2013-02-01 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
Dne Pá 1. února 2013 18:40:32, Vaeth napsal(a): > > [...] and if anyone wants to start where we left he > > can pick out the ebuild from attic and put into his own overlay where > > it might work for him or even put it back to tree fixed. > > And this is exactly what *cannot* be done after a while

Re: [gentoo-dev] Removals reply

2013-02-02 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
Dne So 2. února 2013 12:44:30, Vaeth napsal(a): > > When I came to Gentoo many years ago, this was a very rare problem, > but the removal of packages has tremendously increased, and it is > not only me who is observing this problem - there were already some > threads in the forums, and people plan

Re: [gentoo-dev] Half of the firmware packages in tree install to wrong directory

2013-02-08 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
2013/2/8 Diego Elio Pettenò : > On 08/02/2013 18:53, Samuli Suominen wrote: >> >> Then intrested parties get to fix what they want and unmask? > > I would say that we might want to review linux-firmware, and if the > newest firmware _is_ there, just get rid of the split one. > That should be probab

Re: [gentoo-dev] Lastrites: media-gfx/picasa, dev-python/papyon, net-voip/telepathy-butterfly, sci-visualization/paraview, x11-misc/xdaf

2013-02-10 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
Dne Ne 10. února 2013 19:47:58, Patrick Lauer napsal(a): > On 02/10/2013 05:01 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > > # Pacho Ramos (10 Feb 2013) > > # Fails with gcc-4.7, crashes (#301946, #312073), problems with > > # boost (#319921), problems with python-2.7 (#338826), really old > > # version in the tree,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Lastrites: media-gfx/picasa, dev-python/papyon, net-voip/telepathy-butterfly, sci-visualization/paraview, x11-misc/xdaf

2013-02-10 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
Dne Ne 10. února 2013 13:51:16, Alexander Berntsen napsal(a): > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > On 10/02/13 12:47, Patrick Lauer wrote: > > So instead of moving things from random overlays to the tree we > > remove packages now, remove features from other packages because of

[gentoo-dev] Last time touched bugs by year

2013-02-14 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
Hi, I added the bug queries to http://qa-reports.gentoo.org/ based by year of last being touched. Take look, try to close the oldest ones/invalid ones and so on. I think it is lame we have bugs last touched in 2k5 :-P Cheers Tom

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last time touched bugs by year

2013-02-14 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
Dne Čt 14. února 2013 18:34:10, Markos Chandras napsal(a): > > Why not 2011 and 2012 as well? Feel free to add more, its on qa-scripts git repository.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last time touched bugs by year

2013-02-15 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
2013/2/14 Agostino Sarubbo : > Probably we don't need to see maintainer-wanted stuff.. Oh but we need to see them, quite few of those can be closed as invalid because the upstream is long ago dead. Tom

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last time touched bugs by year

2013-02-15 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
2013/2/15 Alec Warner : > > I was under the impression we just left those bugs open forever...are > we closing them now? > Why should we keep them opened forever. They should be closed when the package is no longer provided anywhere or obsoleted by something else.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last time touched bugs by year

2013-02-15 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
2013/2/15 Markos Chandras : > On 14 February 2013 19:26, Tomáš Chvátal wrote: >> Dne Čt 14. února 2013 18:34:10, Markos Chandras napsal(a): >>> >>> Why not 2011 and 2012 as well? >> >> Feel free to add more, its on qa-scripts git repository. >> >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last time touched bugs by year

2013-02-15 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
2013/2/15 Gilles Dartiguelongue : > On another note, I just saw a report for EAPI per eclass which is super > nice but unfortunately, EAPI=5 is listed but actually unsupported by the > result of the scan :) > This can't be done better right now, as we use pkgcore to gather these stats and it is sti

Re: [gentoo-dev] app-dicts herd needs new people

2013-02-16 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
2013/2/16 Pacho Ramos : > As it's now empty > > Thanks for joining, I am unsure about releasing its packages for up for > grabs and removing the herd if nobody joins :/ I did some work there wrt myspell dictionaries that are to be ported to new official layout so if anyone wants to finish that it

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: linux-firmware

2013-02-20 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
2013/2/20 Rich Freeman : > There is a current QA policy that anything using an scm to download > sources cannot be stabilized, because there is no way to verify the > manifest. > > I'm actually wondering if that makes sense with git when a specific > commit is referenced, since everything is conten

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in dev-libs/confuse: confuse-2.7.ebuild ChangeLog

2013-03-03 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
If I remember correctly the damn rule is to put it for 30 days into testing, and as you said there was no previous version on arm so users could've reported some issues, i agree that sometimes you have to ignore the rules to really fix stable, but was this such case for sure? Dne 3.3.2013 3:43 "Mik

Re: [gentoo-dev] C++ TR1 virtuals

2013-03-05 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
2013/3/4 Diego Elio Pettenò : > virtual/c++-tr1-functional > virtual/c++-tr1-memory > virtual/c++-tr1-type-traits > > Given that these will have a (bad) GCC dependnecy and a boost dependency > on them, should we just drop them? > Sounds like best solution, so i would go for it. Cheers Tom

Re: [gentoo-dev] Collecting items for EAPI 6

2013-03-29 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
Dne Čt 28. března 2013 19:15:59, Michał Górny napsal(a): > Hello, > > As discussed with ulm, I'd like to start a thread for collecting > initial items for EAPI 6. Preferably items which are either almost > ready or are easy to implement and are non-controversial. In other > words, thing which are p

Re: [gentoo-dev] How shall we name the EAPI 6 patch applying function?

2013-04-03 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
Dne St 3. dubna 2013 16:29:48, Ciaran McCreesh napsal(a): > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 14:33:30 +0200 > hasufell wrote: > > > You also have to rename the PATCHES array, because base.eclass already > > uses that name with epatch. > > > base.eclass sh

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages using -Werror

2013-05-03 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
Dne Pá 3. května 2013 10:39:29, Rich Freeman napsal(a): > On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 10:15 AM, hasufell wrote: > > We don't need that. We already get QA warnings for severe compiler > > warnings with a note that it should be reported upstream. > > > > Turning them into errors does not improve anythin

[gentoo-dev] Removal of office-ext.eclass

2013-05-17 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
As per summary this eclass should be removed in 30 days from now. It is replaced by office-ext-r1 in cvs. Cheers Tom

Re: [gentoo-dev] PSA: python-r1.eclass, python-single-r1.eclass, and REQUIRED_USE

2013-05-27 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
Is there actually list of current offenders? It would be pretty nice to have bugs opened if someone forgot to set it. Tom

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Review Board for Gentoo

2013-05-29 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
He is probably thinking about buildtests and automatic commit merges which are not possible with reviewboard. Dne 29.5.2013 9:09 "Michael Palimaka" napsal(a): > On 29/05/2013 02:07, Alexey Shvetsov wrote: > >> Hi! >> >> Cool! I didnt use RB before, but i use gerrit. Do you pan to integrate it >>

[gentoo-dev] app-dict team needs help

2013-06-04 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
Hello guys, the app-dict team is almost-non existent altho it provides one of the most core features for our daily desktop usage as without dictionaries and spell checking we could not imagine much work nowdays. So what is needed there: aspell - all various bugs around, per language file bumps

Re: [gentoo-dev] app-dict team needs help

2013-06-08 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
2013/6/7 Dennis Lan (dlan) > > stardict: trivial bugs around but i don't use stardict. >> >> Hi Tomas >I'm a stardict user, let me know what I can help > Hello Dennis, Currently there are 18 open bugs [1], so just looking into them would be nice. Checking if the ebuilds could be moved to l

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last time touched bugs by year

2013-06-21 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
2013/6/21 Pacho Ramos > Could "maintainer-wanted" assigned bugs be filtered? Otherwise we see a > ton of that kind of bugs that, I think, we already know can become > really old ;) > > Thanks! > > You can do such yourself. Just clone the repo [1] and commit the updated links. Also my plan was to

Re: [gentoo-dev] unmasking USE="system-ffmpeg" for stable www-client/chromium ebuilds

2013-07-26 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
2013/7/26 Diego Elio Pettenò > Does this still allow me to use libav? If not I'd like to veto it. > You can use testing version. Stable is too old, be happy I fixed all those buildcrashes so we can have it in testing. If you want start some tracker to get it stable tho, i would not mind, as all

[gentoo-dev] Changes in libreoffice ebuild

2013-08-13 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
As per my comment in bugzilla [1] I said that the patch should be submitted upstream prior having it in cvs. Yet you decided to completely ignore my statement and just smash in the patch anyway [2]. Please don't do this ever again. We had shitload of distro patches before and it is hell to strip

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo commit in xml/htdocs/proj/en/bug-cleaners: index.xml

2013-11-16 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
2013/11/16 Tom Wijsman > On Sat, 16 Nov 2013 11:29:20 + > Markos Chandras wrote: > > > > > I think this is unnecessary. Infra requested all new projects to be in > > the Wiki so I don't think that you are supposed to add a proj/en page > > anymore just so you can redirect it to the Wiki > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: The request to abolish games team policy

2014-07-08 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
2014-07-08 14:42 GMT+02:00 Ulrich Mueller : > > On Tue, 8 Jul 2014, Michał Górny wrote: > > > In fact, they did remove ebuilds from the tree in the past for this > > reason [1]. > > Given that this was a live ebuild that failed to compile [2] and was > dumped onto the games team few weeks afte

  1   2   3   4   >