Re: [gentoo-dev] The importance of test suites

2010-02-21 Thread Tobias Klausmann
Hi! On Sat, 20 Feb 2010, Ryan Hill wrote: [... "Please use the test suites, you're making lives easier." ...] Also, if the test failure is "portable", you don't waste the time of N arch maintainers that run into the same problem on wy slower machines than yours. Thanks, Tobias

[gentoo-dev] Lib_users, a post-upgrade helper

2010-07-28 Thread Tobias Klausmann
Hi! Short version: Upgrades happen, libs get deleted/replaced; my script (links below) tells you what processes to restart. Long version: I've recently realized that many admins aren't aware of a problem when upgrading their systems. Usually, people are told to run revdep-rebuild and do sundry

Re: [gentoo-dev] Lib_users, a post-upgrade helper

2010-07-28 Thread Tobias Klausmann
Hi! On Wed, 28 Jul 2010, Jeroen Roovers wrote: > > To make a long posting boring: I've hacked up a Python script > > that does all that and prints out a nice summary. It's available > > from here: > > > > http://schwarzvogel.de/software-misc.shtml > > Is it like checkrestart[1], originally from

Re: [gentoo-dev] Lib_users, a post-upgrade helper

2010-07-28 Thread Tobias Klausmann
Hi! On Wed, 28 Jul 2010, Jeroen Roovers wrote: > > While that approach has the advantage of not only catching mapped > > files but every open FD, I am thinking about implementing something > > similar with lib_users (but using /proc//fd/). > > The great advantage would be that it also discovers

Re: [gentoo-dev] Lib_users, a post-upgrade helper

2010-07-28 Thread Tobias Klausmann
Hi! On Wed, 28 Jul 2010, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote: > It would be interesting to integrated it with portage, similarly to how > it now displays "you have xx configuration files to update". It could > print "you have xx services to restart". Definitely. One of the reasons why I expressly mention

Re: [gentoo-dev] Lib_users, a post-upgrade helper

2010-07-28 Thread Tobias Klausmann
Hi! And hot off the tar, here's v0.2: http://www.schwarzvogel.de/software-misc.shtml http://www.schwarzvogel.de/pkgs/lib_users-0.2.tar.gz Several suggestions were implemented, including more Pythonic code in a few spots and new patterns for the blacklist. Please test and comment. Regards, Tobi

Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc stabilization update

2010-09-20 Thread Tobias Klausmann
Hi! On Mon, 20 Sep 2010, Michał Górny wrote: > William Hubbs wrote: > > What about newnet. Should we keep it at all? If we do, should we put > > it behind a use flag which would be off by default? > > I insist on keeping it as I use it myself. The new approach seems more > desktop-targeted to

Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc stabilization update

2010-09-20 Thread Tobias Klausmann
Hi! On Mon, 20 Sep 2010, Benedikt Böhm wrote: > On Mon, Sep 20, 2010, Tobias Klausmann wrote: > > who runs servers: DHCP is uncommon there, WLAN is very unusual, > > as a result, they would not only have to switch the way they > > configure their nets (people don't

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: package.keywords-compatible snippets when stabilizing multiple packages

2011-02-16 Thread Tobias Klausmann
Hi! On Tue, 15 Feb 2011, Donnie Berkholz wrote: > On 09:10 Tue 15 Feb, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote: > > Le lundi 14 février 2011 à 19:19 +0100, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." a écrit : > > > On 2/14/11 9:13 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote: > > > > And http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=349053#c1 ? I tried t

Re: [gentoo-dev] Bugzilla 4 migration

2011-03-07 Thread Tobias Klausmann
Hi! On Mon, 07 Mar 2011, Mike Frysinger wrote: > >> If *anybody* can't use SSL for any reason please yell so that we can > >> decide if we leave it as it is (plain + encrypted) or not. > > > > Is there any *real* reason to force SSL? It is *hell* slow. > > it should of course be force for loggin

Re: [gentoo-dev] How help in arch testing work

2012-01-18 Thread Tobias Klausmann
Hi! On Wed, 18 Jan 2012, Agostino Sarubbo wrote: > 4) Nobody knows how work all packages in tree, so there are > obvious packages like a browsers, IM, audio player,that is easy > decide if is ok or not, but there are also packages that an > Arch tester has never seen, so is a lack of time everyti

Re: [gentoo-dev] util-linux build time increase?

2019-02-25 Thread Tobias Klausmann
Hi! On Thu, 21 Feb 2019, Georgy Yakovlev wrote: > On Thursday, February 21, 2019 1:36:24 AM PST Joshua Kinard wrote: > > Does anyone have an idea why util-linux's build time would go up > > significantly from 2.32.x to 2.33.x? It may be a MIPS thing, as my x86_64 > > box shows no discernible cha

Re: [gentoo-dev] Announcing RISC-V

2019-05-04 Thread Tobias Klausmann
Hi! On Fri, 03 May 2019, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: > after some preparations, we're happy to announce (initially experimental) > support for a new arch: riscv > > * The project page is at https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:RISC-V > Feel free to join if you want to help and/or even have hard

[gentoo-dev] An update on monolith (our dev machine)

2019-08-02 Thread Tobias Klausmann
Hi everybody, over twelve years ago, a mail with these headers was sent to alpha@gentoo org: Subject: New dev box! To: al...@gentoo.org

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: dev-python/* leaf packages

2019-12-05 Thread Tobias Klausmann
Hi! On Wed, 04 Dec 2019, Aaron Bauman wrote: > dev-python/eyeD3 > media-sound/abcde > media-sound/gpodder FWIW, eyeD3 has a Py3 (only!) version available. Since abcde is a shell script that just calls the eyeD3 binary, the API changes don't matter. And gpodder is Py3 only itself, so it can't hav

Re: [gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2015-01-25 23:59 UTC

2015-01-28 Thread Tobias Klausmann
Hi! A while back, Daniel Quinn asked what the Gentoo devs that follow the G+ Gentoo Account what they think of making it possible to thank/donate to Gentoo developers for their work on the Distribution: https://plus.google.com/105563703093466990245/posts/XNi6GoDbV9t The feedback was mostly pos

Re: [gentoo-dev] Hey arch teams, we need your input!

2015-04-28 Thread Tobias Klausmann
Hi! On Sun, 26 Apr 2015, Jeroen Roovers wrote: > On Sun, 26 Apr 2015 08:04:11 -0400 > Rich Freeman wrote: > > If we're talking about human parsing, can you give an example of how > > variation makes your life more difficult today? I'm just trying to > > understand what we're trying to fix... >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Anti-spam changes: proposal to drop spammy mail

2015-05-11 Thread Tobias Klausmann
Hi! On Mon, 11 May 2015, Eray Aslan wrote: > On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 04:26:01AM +, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > > TL;DR: As of May 17, @gentoo.org will drop incoming spammy mail instead of > > delivering it. Speak now or hold your peace. > > Believe me I understand your pain. Been there done t

Re: Code Review Systems Was: [gentoo-dev] Git Migration: launch plan & schedule

2015-07-08 Thread Tobias Klausmann
Hi! This got a bit rambly, sorry 'bout that. tl;dr: Continuous Integration is a neat idea if you have the Hardware. The off-mainstream arch teams don't. On Tue, 07 Jul 2015, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Tue, 07 Jul 2015 08:04:47 +0800 > Patrick Lauer wrote: > > I'll laugh about it next time I

Re: Code Review Systems Was: [gentoo-dev] Git Migration: launch plan & schedule

2015-07-08 Thread Tobias Klausmann
Hi! On Wed, 08 Jul 2015, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Wed, 8 Jul 2015 20:07:34 +0200 > Tobias Klausmann wrote: > > In essence, assuming we can "just scale" to make CI work is > > ignoring the matter of the slower archs. And I suspect the "it > > wor

Re: Code Review Systems Was: [gentoo-dev] Git Migration: launch plan & schedule

2015-07-08 Thread Tobias Klausmann
Hi! On Wed, 08 Jul 2015, Alec Warner wrote: > On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 11:07 AM, Tobias Klausmann > wrote: > > > tl;dr: Continuous Integration is a neat idea if you have the > > Hardware. The off-mainstream arch teams don't. > > Clearly because we cannot be

Re: Code Review Systems Was: [gentoo-dev] Git Migration: launch plan & schedule

2015-07-09 Thread Tobias Klausmann
Hi! On Thu, 09 Jul 2015, Steev Klimaszewski wrote: > On Wed, 2015-07-08 at 21:11 +0200, Tobias Klausmann wrote: > > The truly arch-dependent bugs are what wastes my time: > > > > For example: > > > > - dependencies not being keyworded for arch or

Re: Code Review Systems Was: [gentoo-dev] Git Migration: launch plan & schedule

2015-07-10 Thread Tobias Klausmann
Hi! On Thu, 09 Jul 2015, Rich Freeman wrote: > On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 10:51 AM, Tobias Klausmann wrote: > > What I meant is when I get a stabilization bug for > > cat-egory/foo-1.2.3 which depends on >=other-cat/bar-1.0.5. The > > latter is amd64 but not alpha or ~alp

Re: [gentoo-dev] Referencing bug reports in git (WAS: Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: sci-libs/opencascade/)

2015-08-09 Thread Tobias Klausmann
Hi! On Sun, 09 Aug 2015, Sven Vermeulen wrote: > On Sun, Aug 09, 2015 at 04:43:36PM +0200, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: > > > I think "X-Gentoo-Bug: 557022" also makes the job easier for tools that > > > parse commit messages. > > > > I don't. Just the "bug " prefix should be fine for almost all > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Referencing bug reports in git

2015-08-11 Thread Tobias Klausmann
Hi! On Tue, 11 Aug 2015, Duncan wrote: > Ryan Hill posted on Mon, 10 Aug 2015 18:17:30 -0600 as excerpted: > > > On Mon, 10 Aug 2015 12:25:58 + (UTC) > > Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote: > >> What about: > >> > >> * bug number in summary strongly recommended > > > > Making the bug num

Re: [gentoo-dev] Developer branches on proj/gentoo

2015-08-11 Thread Tobias Klausmann
Hi! On Tue, 11 Aug 2015, Michał Górny wrote: > Dnia 2015-08-11, o godz. 15:52:16 > Patrice Clement napisał(a): > > > According to > > https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Gentoo_git_workflow#Branching_Model, > > "there may be developer-specific, task-specific, project-specific branches > > etc". As fa

[gentoo-dev] code.google.com readonly starting on 25/Aug/15

2015-08-24 Thread Tobias Klausmann
Hi! Tomorrow, code.google.com will turn off write access to all remaining projects[0]. As such, Gentoo ebuilds which still have HOMEPAGE= pointing there should be updated. I've already created a list of possible edits: http://skade.schwarzvogel.de/~klausman/cgc_urls.html Note that there are a

Re: [gentoo-dev] code.google.com readonly starting on 25/Aug/15

2015-08-31 Thread Tobias Klausmann
Hi! On Mon, 24 Aug 2015, Tobias Klausmann wrote: > The change itself will happen sometime this week to allow > people to do the changes on their own. Due to work interfering, this got delayed. I hope to make the edits this week. Regards, Tobias -- Sent from aboard the Cultur

Re: [gentoo-dev] code.google.com readonly starting on 25/Aug/15

2015-09-01 Thread Tobias Klausmann
Hi! On Mon, 31 Aug 2015, Tobias Klausmann wrote: > On Mon, 24 Aug 2015, Tobias Klausmann wrote: > > The change itself will happen sometime this week to allow > > people to do the changes on their own. > > Due to work interfering, this got delayed. I hope to make the > ed

Re: [gentoo-dev] ALLARCHES and the maintainer action(s)

2015-09-20 Thread Tobias Klausmann
Hi! On Sat, 19 Sep 2015, Agostino Sarubbo wrote: > The ALLARCHES keyword is out since some time. For who does not > remeber, the announcement is here [1] > > So, if an arch developer tests the package(s) on one > architecture, he is allowed to stabilize/keyword for all. This can lead to an inte

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: ALLARCHES and the maintainer action(s)

2015-09-20 Thread Tobias Klausmann
Hi! On Sun, 20 Sep 2015, Ryan Hill wrote: > On Sun, 20 Sep 2015 13:23:21 +0200 Tobias Klausmann > wrote: > > arch_A maintainer sees ALLARCHES keyworded bug, and tests > > everything on A. Upon keywording and running repoman, she > > finds that two other arches need add

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: ALLARCHES and the maintainer action(s)

2015-09-21 Thread Tobias Klausmann
Hi! On Sun, 20 Sep 2015, Anthony G. Basile wrote: > On 9/20/15 1:23 PM, Ryan Hill wrote: > > > >> [0] I am pretty sure some arches will want to opt out of this > >> scheme, at least for some more critical packages. > > ALLARCHES shouldn't be used on critical packages. > > Exactly. So suppose th

Re: [gentoo-dev] [rfc] drop iputils from @system (i.e. ping)

2015-10-15 Thread Tobias Klausmann
Hi! On Wed, 14 Oct 2015, Mike Frysinger wrote: > iputils is currently in @system for everyone. by default, it only > installs `ping`. do we feel strongly enough about this to require > all systems include it ? or should this wait for the long idea of > releasing stage4's instead of stage3's ?

Re: [gentoo-dev] [rfc] enable USE=xattr by default

2015-10-15 Thread Tobias Klausmann
Hi! On Wed, 14 Oct 2015, Mike Frysinger wrote: > anyone opposed to flipping this flag on by default ? > > reference: > https://bugs.gentoo.org/506198 > https://bugs.gentoo.org/556408 No objection, but a bit of a datapoint. I use btrfs on one of my machines, and that filesystem (apparently) does

Re: [gentoo-dev] [rfc] enable USE=xattr by default

2015-10-15 Thread Tobias Klausmann
Hi! On Thu, 15 Oct 2015, Jason Zaman wrote: > Can you try this: > > # getfattr -d -m- /bin/ping > security.capability=0sAQAAAgAgAAA= > # setfattr -n user.test -v "foo" ./ping > # setfattr -n user.pax.flags -v "me" ./ping > # getfattr -d -m- /bin/ping > security.capability=0sAQAAA

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: ChangeLog

2015-11-02 Thread Tobias Klausmann
Hi! On Sun, 01 Nov 2015, Martin Vaeth wrote: > Мисбах-Соловьёв Вадим wrote: > > > >> Now how can this user display the ChangeLog for > >> a certain package? > > ``` > > git log -- pkg-category/pkg-name/ > > You removed the crucial part of my posting: > > >> git clone --depth=1 For the combine

[gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs: net-im/prosody

2020-05-11 Thread Tobias Klausmann
Hi! As per subject. I am not running any Jabber infrastructure anymore. Package is in decent shape. Lua 5.2 compatibility is not there, but I don't see 5.2 happening soon anyway. The rest of the bugs are nice-to-haves and cosmetic stuff. I'll keep myself in the maintainers file for another mont

[gentoo-dev] Python packages up for grabs

2021-11-29 Thread Tobias Klausmann
Hi! I don't really use any of these anymore, so I'd love for someone else to maintain them: dev-python/pockets dev-python/pycodestyle dev-python/pynacl Pockets has no revdeps, so ditching it entirely is also an option. Pycodestyle is heavily intertwined with autopep8 and friends, so it might b

Re: [gentoo-dev] Python packages up for grabs

2021-11-30 Thread Tobias Klausmann
Hi! On Mon, 29 Nov 2021, Michał Górny wrote: > On Mon, 2021-11-29 at 14:44 +0100, Tobias Klausmann wrote: > > I don't really use any of these anymore, so I'd love for someone else to > > maintain them: > > > > dev-python/pockets > > dev-python/py

<    1   2