you make valid points regarding the overall improvement of the handling of
test suites. I am not opposed to something like that being done...
it still seems like there is agreement around the fact that something
needs to be done about src_test. currently you cant run a system which
generally en
> This thread belongs to gentoo-project.
perhaps its time to reduce the number of mailinglists again. IMHO it
doesnt hurt to have this thread on gentoo-dev and the volume of messages
and their tone here has been sufficiently normal to again allow for more
subjects.
just my 2 cents
kind regards
Pacho Ramos said:
> Hello
>
> Let my explain the problem and my suggestion to handle it better (at
> least from my point of view) with an example:
>
> Sometime ago I bumped bluez version from 4.39-r2 to 4.60, with that
> bump, a new and *optional* RDEPEND on sys-libs/libcap-ng was added.
> Since
Domen Kožar said:
> This should probably be updated:
>
> http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/gentoo-amd64-faq.xml#flash
Thanks for noticing this. Everybodies input makes Gentoo a great place to
be!
Now, if you want that extra chocolate chip cookie, please head over to
https://bugs.gentoo.org and rep
Markos Chandras said:
> On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 08:15:32PM +0200, Auke Booij wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 7:16 PM, Markos Chandras
wrote:
> > > What? I am talking about exotic arches and I didn't say to drop to
> > > entire stable tree. Just to shrink it in order to keep it up to
> > > dat
Christian Faulhammer said:
> Hi,
>
> please avoid having stabilisation requests
> like http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=327877, blocking a
> security bug. That way, architecture teams may not see the severity
> directly and it slips, leaving users with vulnerable versions longer
> than nee
Markos Chandras said:
> On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 06:31:52PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 5:53 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
> > >> It seems like few of our fellow developers don't know how to track
> > >> down
> > >> packages that don't respect LDFLAGS. Adding -Wl,--hash-st
Ben de Groot said:
> On 7 August 2010 02:18, Brian Harring wrote:
> > The thing you're ignoring out of this g55 idiocy is that people don't
> > particularly seem to want it. There has been an extremely vocal
> > subgroup of paludis/exherbo devs pushing for it while everyone else
> > seems to hav
Ben de Groot said:
> On 9 August 2010 14:29, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > sure would be nice if someone picked up the installer again ...
>
> No, it wouldn't. Best leave that dead and buried.
Could you explain why you think so?
>
> Cheers,
> Ben
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally
> 1) I assume most people who are crazy enough to 'install gentoo on
> thousands of machines' use some kind of image based installation
> process and not a color-by-numbers install vis-a-vis the handbook?
> Has anyone written a Gentoo installer that is not image based?
> 1.5) There is a hidden ass
Richard Freeman said:
> On 08/14/2010 10:29 AM, Markos Chandras wrote:
> > So do I. Fixing your package and you don't even bother to send a
> > *ready to go* patch upstream seems like a bit rude to me as well.
> > Perhaps, we do have a complete different point of view in this one.
> > Recent examp
> So you want me to force everyone to update the package just to respect
> the LDFLAGS.
yes. IIRC it has been stated on this list before, that a change which
changes the resulting binary always needs to be done in a revbump.
> Why, since until recently, nobody gave a crap about this
> kind of Q
Markos Chandras said:
> Hi
>
> The Treecleaners project introduced ( over a month ) and new page[1] to
> track maintainer-needed packages. This page is automatically
> generated. You can make use of this page to track packages that needs
> your love instead of searching bugzilla or grep the entir
>
> The script is running daily at 4:15 AM (UTC) I think but it only
> updates the page when needed.
> Using pquery it finds all the maintainer-needed packages. Then it
> compares this list to the yesterdays' one and decides if an update to
> the page is necessary or not
perhaps you can add a ti
Dear all,
can somebody summarize what the status is for one or more wikies for
gentoo - its users and/or its developers or whatever.
I can see this:
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/wiki/
and this:
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75855
I'd like to know what and where someone interested in
Mike Frysinger said:
> the front page of http://gentoo.org/ now links to a Google Calendar
> (see side bar). this has been around for a while, but it seems it's
> been more of an "underground" thing, so it's time to raise its
> awareness.
>
> like other aspects of Gentoo, all Gentoo developers h
> >
> > has somebody found a way to access the gentoo calendar at google via
> > anonymous caldav or a plain ics read only url? i'd like to add the
> > gentoo calendar to my favorite calendaring software.
>
> the link from the Gentoo page shows you the Google calendar ID:
> 88di0t0pl2cfau7oak48r
Alex Legler said:
> On Fri, 20 Aug 2010 23:01:42 +0200, Thilo Bangert
>
> wrote:
> > Dear all,
> >
> > can somebody summarize what the status is for one or more wikies for
> > gentoo - its users and/or its developers or whatever.
> >
> > I can see
> Or you just let a shell handle it. Does most of the things
> automatically, has a pretty low memory and startup overhead, and it
> tends to be quite human-readable.
>
> ... why would I want to remove a
> stable
the biggest complaint about openrc is that its not in stable - go figure.
> , eff
Mike Frysinger said:
> On Tuesday, August 24, 2010 08:57:45 Thilo Bangert wrote:
> > > , efficient, known-good solution
> > > that does what you'd expect it to do and replace it with a new
> > > thingy that doesn't provide all the features, is harder to deb
Alec Warner said:
> On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 1:18 PM, Diego E. Pettenò
wrote:
> > # Diego E. Pettenņ (30 Aug 2010)
> > # on behalf of QA team
> > #
> > # Initial import in 2005 and never bumped; no users in tree;
>
> What does 'no users in tree' mean? No revdeps?
I read this as:
nothing in t
Christian Faulhammer said:
> Hi,
>
> a security stabilisation for Chromium [1] wants Cups 1.4 stable. My
> test requests on Planet Gentoo and via identi.ca revealed no real
> blockers, although people report that they needed to readd their
> printers in order to work. Does anybody here know an
On Thursday 03 March 2011 22:26:38 Ole Markus With wrote:
> # Ole Markus With (03 Mar 2011)
> # Masked 30 days for removal.
> # Fetch restrictions. Does not work with >=dev-lang/php-5.3
> dev-php5/ZendOptimizer
i dont run ZendOptimizer currently, but i have used it in the past to run
commercial
101 - 123 of 123 matches
Mail list logo
