On Mon, 24 Jan 2011 13:31:20 +0100
Christian Faulhammer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> over the course of the years the x86 (and other architectures as well)
> has given away permissions to maintainers/teams to mark packages
> stable themselves. As there never was a definitive list what
> exceptions exist, I
On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 12:38:03 +0100
Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
> Every arch teams should stabilise OR write out reason why they can't do
> so to stable bug in 90 days. If any arch team fails to do so the
> maintainer can decide to drop their keywords to testing. Given depgraph
> breakages the maintainer
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 16:30:12 +
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 10:19:51 -0600
> Jeremy Olexa wrote:
> > Probably OT, sorry. Isn't it time we gained this concept of "noarch"
> > for packages that only install text files or packages that don't
> > compile anything...
>
> No, s
On Sat, 5 Feb 2011 18:04:03 +0100
Luca Longinotti wrote:
> On Fri, 04 Feb 2011 13:50:20 -0600
> Jeremy Olexa wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > The CVS->RSYNC service has moved hosts and now we generate the
> > use.local.desc file via egencache.
>
> Hi, could any of this cause a (kinda) full res
On Mon, 7 Feb 2011 16:09:30 +0100
Luca Longinotti wrote:
> On Mon, 07 Feb 2011 13:47:55 +0100
> Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
>
> > Le dimanche 06 février 2011 à 23:52 -0600, Jeremy Olexa a écrit :
> > > As for the "re-syncing all files thing" - I can't reproduce that,
> > > though I've seen mul
On Tue, 08 Feb 2011 09:52:55 +0100
"Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
> It seems that with glibc-2.13 there are some serious compatibility
> issues. There are good warnings on the planet
> (http://psykil.livejournal.com/340806.html), but not every ~arch user
> reads the planet, so how about creating news
On Tue, 8 Feb 2011 22:29:11 +0100
Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> EAPI 4 introduced the REQUIRED_USE variable, which allows to impose
> restrictions on the allowed USE flag combinations for an ebuild.
>
> On the other hand, according to the devmanual, our policy on
> conflicting USE flags is as follows:
On Wed, 9 Feb 2011 13:04:11 +0100
Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> Maybe we also need a guideline that whenever possible, ebuilds should
> accept the default USE flags from our profiles as a valid combination?
> Or, in the exceptional case when that isn't possible, a package.use
> entry should be added to
On Thu, 10 Feb 2011 17:23:08 +0200
Samuli Suominen wrote:
> # Samuli Suominen (10 Feb 2011)
> # Unmaintained and completely broken wrt bugs
> # 185475, 211262, 247268, 276220, 287751, 293501, 298109,
> # 301729, 308801, 311763, 311765, 328691, 340605, 348483,
> # 352506, 237366, 250054
> # Remov
On Thu, 10 Feb 2011 21:49:53 +0100
Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
> Il giorno gio, 10/02/2011 alle 14.08 -0600, Ryan Hill ha scritto:
> > Hey, here's an idea. Before you go making big masks like this for
> > packages
> > several people depend on, maybe try looking for a
On Fri, 11 Feb 2011 16:24:14 +0100
Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
> Il giorno ven, 11/02/2011 alle 14.23 +0100, Michael Haubenwallner ha
> scritto:
> >
> > But both that document as well as uncountable lines of source code are
> > rather old.
> > While the source code isn't that large a problem for G
On Fri, 11 Feb 2011 07:40:53 +0200
Samuli Suominen wrote:
> On 02/10/2011 11:03 PM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> I'm not sure if you understand opensync then, there's 3-4 series in tree
> and mostly not compatible with each other:
> 0.22, 0.36, 0.39 and latest being live .
0.39 is fixed. 0.3
On Mon, 14 Feb 2011 12:37:27 -0300
Alexis Ballier wrote:
> Have you thought about doing something like what was done for wxwidgets ?
>
> - an eselect module for out of portage builds
> - an eclass creating symlinks for libpng.pc/.so in $T and setting the correct
> -L flag for the linker and PKG
On Tue, 08 Mar 2011 16:23:03 +0100
Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
> 1) it has freedesktop web page, and we should preffer fdo alternatives
> anyway
> 2) it has existing git repo (could not find repo for the va you use)
> 3) debian/archlinux/fedora use this one I commited, not former one.
> 4) the bug was re
On Fri, 11 Mar 2011 04:52:19 +0100
Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Mar 2011 21:06:54 +0100
> Amadeusz Żołnowski wrote:
>
> > > Status = NEW && Assignee = bug-wranglers -> Status = UNCONFIRMED
> > > Status = NEW && Assignee = [maintainer] -> Status = CONFIRMED
> >
> > Who confirms the bug?
On Thu, 10 Mar 2011 20:25:10 +
"Kevin F. Quinn" wrote:
> I would guess these old untouched bugs aren't actually going to be
> touched, ever - a lot simply won't be relevant any more for one reason
> or another. All they're doing is cluttering up bugzilla.
I never understand this argument.
# Ryan Hill (12 Mar 2011)
# Mask net-p2p/bittorrent for removal 20110412 (#336166)
# Dead upstream. Requires wxpython-2.6 which is being removed.
# Doesn't build with python-2.6. Doesn't start.
net-p2p/bittorrent
--
fonts, gcc-porting, it makes no sense how it make
On Sat, 12 Mar 2011 11:37:28 +0100
"Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
> Shouldn't that last line look more like this (notice $retval instead of $?):
>
> [[ $retval -ne 0 ]] && die "${FUNCNAME}: the ${VIRTALX_COMMAND} failed."
Sure looks like it to me.
--
fonts, gcc-porting, it m
On Sat, 12 Mar 2011 00:27:21 -0600
Ryan Hill wrote:
> # Ryan Hill (12 Mar 2011)
> # Mask net-p2p/bittorrent for removal 20110412 (#336166)
> # Dead upstream. Requires wxpython-2.6 which is being removed.
> # Doesn't build with python-2.6. Doesn't start.
> net-p2p/b
On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 13:07:33 +0100
"Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
> sys-devel/gcc runs tests, but the results are ignored and I remember the
> tests fail most of the time.
s/most/all
> Because the tests take long time to run and fail anyway (I understand
> it's non-trivial to fix those on Gentoo s
On Tue, 22 Mar 2011 13:09:46 +0100
"Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
> On 3/21/11 11:02 PM, Ryan Hill wrote:
> > It does to me, I use them all the time. ;) The important part is that we
> > install the test results, which can then be used for regression testing when
> >
On Tue, 22 Mar 2011 19:08:53 -0400
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > rsync -rlpgo . "${EGIT_SOURCEDIR}" \
>
> this means you need to have DEPEND="net-misc/rsync". why not just use
> `cp -pPR` instead ? i vaguely recall rsync being slower than a
> straight cp too ... not much point of doing a rsync wh
On Tue, 22 Mar 2011 17:41:27 -0600
Ryan Hill wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Mar 2011 19:08:53 -0400
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
>
>
> > > rsync -rlpgo . "${EGIT_SOURCEDIR}" \
> >
> > this means you need to have DEPEND="net-misc/rsync". why not just use
On Sun, 27 Mar 2011 15:09:09 +0530
Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 3:59 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 01:17:46PM +0530, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
> >> I propose that we should be more aggressive about package.masking (for
> >> removal) all maintainer-nee
On Mon, 28 Mar 2011 02:55:14 +0530
Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
> The current problem is burnt-out or semi-active devs who commit
> occasionally, but aren't able to help with any herd-related work
> because they're out of touch. As such, their presence in the team
> gives a false indication of strengt
On Tue, 29 Mar 2011 17:05:01 -0400
"Aaron W. Swenson" wrote:
> > - Suppressing stdout of commands like "do_action env update" is fine,
> > but why suppress stderr?
> >
> Because 'ls' would complain that files didn't exist, such as lib*.dylib
> when on a Linux system. It doesn't matter. But, us
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 07:00:21 -0400
"Aaron W. Swenson" wrote:
> As for the lib_dir(), I'm unsure if that's a good way to handle things.
> Or, if it's really the best way, even though it's ugly. There's nothing
> preventing me from making it a user configurable...it's just that at
> some point I do
I just added 4.6.0 to the tree. We probably won't be unmasking it any time
soon (after 4.6.1 for sure), but please start testing your packages now so we
can get things rolling.
http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.6/changes.html
For general testing you may want to add the gcc-porting overlay to avoid
known
On Sun, 3 Apr 2011 05:50:32 + (UTC)
Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
> Ryan Hill posted on Sat, 02 Apr 2011 22:11:12 -0600 as excerpted:
>
> > You may also want to test your packages with the new -Ofast option to
> > be sure it doesn't have any hardcod
Masked for removal in 30 days. The last release was 2007 and there better
alternatives for every toolkit (chmsee (gtk), kchmviewer (qt), xchm (wxGTK)).
--
fonts, gcc-porting, it makes no sense how it makes no sense
toolchain, wxwidgets but i'll take it
On Fri, 22 Apr 2011 13:31:30 +0200
Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi,
> I am quite getting annoyed by bugzilla attached outputs in various
> interesting languages like Portugalese or French. I can read Russian so
> that is at least bit ok :)
>
> I can
On Fri, 22 Apr 2011 14:57:06 +0200
Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote:
> Alternatively, portage could alert the user to submit bug reports only
> with a C or English locale if a different one is detected.
+1
--
fonts, gcc-porting, it makes no sense how it makes no sense
toolc
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 06:02:37 +0200
Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Apr 2011 20:05:03 -0600
> Ryan Hill wrote:
>
> > You want to force English on all our users because you can't be
> > bothered to ask a reporter to repost an error message using LC_ALL=C?
>
>
On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 18:26:02 +0200
Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 02:47:46 -0600
> Ryan Hill wrote:
>
> > > Are you saying you are setting up the tree-wide project that
> > > automatically translates LC_MESSAGES? Round of applause!
> >
> > N
On Thu, 28 Apr 2011 14:00:23 +0200
Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 21:10:55 -0600
> Ryan Hill wrote:
> > See, you're thinking primarily in terms of bugzilla. Like the only
> > reason someone would want to see this stuff is to paste it to a bug
> > r
On Mon, 11 Jul 2011 15:00:41 + (UTC)
"Patrick McLean (chutzpah)" wrote:
> chutzpah11/07/11 15:00:41
>
> Modified: ChangeLog
> Added:nspluginwrapper-1.4.4-r1.ebuild
> Removed: nspluginwrapper-1.3.0.ebuild
> Log:
> Revision bump, workaroun
On Sun, 17 Jul 2011 11:19:31 +0200
justin wrote:
> On 17/07/11 11:16, Michał Górny wrote:
> > On Sun, 17 Jul 2011 11:05:39 +0200
> > justin wrote:
> >
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> the following change has some bad effects on packages in the tree. I
> >> found it with a package having this inherit lin
On Sun, 31 Jul 2011 05:29:52 -0400
Michael Sterrett wrote:
> Just as a reminder - you can't break the stable tree by removing
> ebuilds even if there's a big scary security bug.
Well it wasn't done on purpose.
> I restored the latest stable ebuild until the arch teams do their
> thing for bu
Now that I finally have some time for Gentoo.I'd like to get GCC 4.6 unmasked
sometime in the next month. Thanks to everyone but me, we only have a few
bugs remaining on the tracker. None of them I consider critical except maybe
mplayer (I'd like someone from media-video to look at applying that
On Sun, 25 Sep 2011 15:10:13 +0200
Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
> Il giorno ven, 23/09/2011 alle 20.38 -0600, Ryan Hill ha scritto:
> > If you have any issues with 4.6 itself or patches you need applied,
> > now is
> > the time to speak up.
>
> There should be alread
On Tue, 27 Sep 2011 11:19:26 +0300
Samuli Suominen wrote:
> >17 tools
> > 9 utils
>
> tools, and utils, what's the difference? perhaps pick one and unify them
> into global USE flag
Saying what? "Install optional tools or utilities." That's pretty useless as
far as descriptions go
On Sat, 8 Oct 2011 11:33:07 +
Sven Vermeulen wrote:
> Hi guys
>
> There is some FUD regarding GCC upgrades and I don't have the proper
> knowledge to write a correct document on GCC upgrades. As you are currently
> aware, we have a GCC upgrade guide [1], but it has seen its last update in
>
On Sun, 09 Oct 2011 02:41:15 +0100
Markos Chandras wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> On 10/08/11 22:45, Matt Turner wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Markos Chandras
> > wrote:
> >> On 10/08/2011 02:19 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
> >>> On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 4:
On Sat, 08 Oct 2011 18:33:15 +0300
Samuli Suominen wrote:
> It's not like fastened lastriting hasn't happened before. I question
> your motives in picking this particular one. It's not like I expected
> cookies for the time I've put into this porting effort, but not this
> "attack" either.
Then
On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 03:27:04 + (UTC)
Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
> The problem generally occurs when I decided I've waited long enough for a
> long released upstream gcc (4.x.1 and often 4.x.2 are released already!)
> to get unmasked even to ~arch. Of course, having been thru this
On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 17:52:42 +0100
Markos Chandras wrote:
> Seems like none of you ever bothered to read the bug about pngcrush
> and what was discussed there. It is getting a little bit of a habit to
> escalate minor problems to flames in Gentoo. So feel free to
> write/say/do whatever you want(
On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 08:09:21 +0100
Markos Chandras wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> On 10/11/11 04:00, Ryan Hill wrote:
> > On Sat, 08 Oct 2011 18:33:15 +0300 Samuli Suominen
> > wrote:
> >
> >> It's not like f
On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 19:41:21 -0600
Ryan Hill wrote:
> > Isn't this the same situation with gcc stabilizations? Once the
> > timeframe for fixing broken packages with e.g gcc-4.5 is passed, the
> > remaining broken packages will be gone.
>
> Absolutely not. They a
On Fri, 14 Oct 2011 01:01:50 +0300
Samuli Suominen wrote:
> Title: Upgrade to libpng15
> Author: Samuli Suominen
> Content-Type: text/plain
> Posted: 2011-10-14
> Revision: 1
> News-Item-Format: 1.0
> Display-If-Installed:
> After upgrading from libpng14 to libpng15 it's important that you reb
On Fri, 14 Oct 2011 01:01:50 +0300
Samuli Suominen wrote:
> Title: Upgrade to libpng15
> Author: Samuli Suominen
> Content-Type: text/plain
> Posted: 2011-10-14
> Revision: 1
> News-Item-Format: 1.0
> Display-If-Installed:
> After upgrading from libpng14 to libpng15 it's important that you reb
On Sat, 15 Oct 2011 19:17:17 +0300
Samuli Suominen wrote:
> Ocne you have identified the broken files, you can either delete them,
^
> edit them in place and replace png14 with png15, or re-emerge the packages
Otherwise good.
--
fonts, gcc-porting, it makes no sense how it
On Thu, 20 Oct 2011 06:40:43 -0400
"Anthony G. Basile" wrote:
> USE=hardened refers to only toolchain hardening. The problems there are
> mostly packages which break with PIE because they (ab)use assembly.
> Things like virtualbox and some codecs. This can become a thorny mess.
>
> It would p
On Mon, 24 Oct 2011 13:26:01 +0200
""Paweł Hajdan, Jr."" wrote:
> On 10/24/11 12:58 PM, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
> > Well not totally on their own, they'd report it and we'd have to see
> > what we want to do on an ad hoc basis.
>
> Fair enough, that's why I suggested to make the hardened spec
>
On Wed, 26 Oct 2011 19:33:56 +0200
Bruno wrote:
> Is there some guideline about old entries in the ChangeLog?
>
> Over the past months ChangeLogs represent a big part of the tree, some
> of them being pretty big and going back many changes (hundreds of them)
> and years (even for actively mainta
On Thu, 27 Oct 2011 23:03:12 +0530
Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
> So, I honestly see no reason why toolchain should not start using EAPI 2.
I await your patch to toolchain.eclass. :P
--
fonts, gcc-porting, it makes no sense how it makes no sense
toolchain, wxwidgets
On Fri, 20 May 2011 17:39:22 +0200
Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> for a while now I've been wondering if all those sed scripts in all
> those ebuilds are really effective.
>
> To find out, I've tried a couple of angles on a sed hook that basically
> dissects the sed command line provided, divides every
On Fri, 23 Sep 2011 20:38:32 -0600
Ryan Hill wrote:
> Now that I finally have some time for Gentoo.I'd like to get GCC 4.6 unmasked
> sometime in the next month. Thanks to everyone but me, we only have a few
> bugs remaining on the tracker. None of them I consider critica
On Mon, 31 Oct 2011 00:24:12 +0200
Petteri Räty wrote:
> On 28.10.2011 2.50, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 01:47, Ryan Hill wrote:
> >> On Thu, 27 Oct 2011 23:03:12 +0530 Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
> >>> So, I honestly see no reason why toolchain
On Wed, 26 Oct 2011 19:46:30 +0200
"Andreas K. Huettel" wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> two small suggestions regarding ChangeLogs:
>
> 1) Why is there no ChangeLog in the eclass directory?
> In my personal opinion this is missing there, if only for historical
> reasons... Should we still start one?
On Mon, 31 Oct 2011 08:39:39 +
Markos Chandras wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> On 10/31/2011 05:45 AM, Ryan Hill wrote:
> > On Wed, 26 Oct 2011 19:46:30 +0200 "Andreas K. Huettel"
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Dea
On Thu, 3 Nov 2011 01:11:46 +0100
"Andreas K. Huettel" wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> > 1) Why is there no ChangeLog in the eclass directory?
> > In my personal opinion this is missing there, if only for historical
> > reasons... Should we still start one?
>
> as there was only positive feedback to
On Thu, 3 Nov 2011 01:41:29 +0100
"Andreas K. Huettel" wrote:
> On Donnerstag 03 November 2011 01:42:44 Ryan Hill wrote:
> > On Thu, 3 Nov 2011 01:11:46 +0100
> >
> > "Andreas K. Huettel" wrote:
> > > as there was only positive feedback to this
On Sat, 05 Nov 2011 09:58:00 +0100
Kacper Kowalik wrote:
> Hi,
> I'd like to ask that we enable verbose building by default. I have
> cmake-utils.eclass in mind, because it's dead easy there, but there's a
> lot of packages that support things like "make V=1" or "make VERBOSE=1" too.
>
> I've se
On Sat, 5 Nov 2011 21:00:32 +0100
Maciej Mrozowski wrote:
> > I've seen too many bugs reports today that gave me cute, colorful
> > build.logs and almost no information about underlaying bug...
>
> That's usually because users sometimes attach only "relevant" parts of build
> log (well, relevan
On Thu, 10 Nov 2011 20:56:22 -0500
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Thursday 10 November 2011 20:39:11 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Thursday 10 November 2011 19:09:28 Luca Barbato wrote:
> > > That could be done, but I'd advise to make sure our users know that the
> > > could have a quiet/silent output
On Sun, 30 Oct 2011 15:22:17 -0600
Ryan Hill wrote:
> 4.6.2 is now in the tree. It will be unmasked next weekend.
Yeah I'm a tease. Looks like we have enough issues that I want to do
another patchset. We also have showstopper bugs in grub:0 and libmpeg2 that
need looking at. As al
On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 18:33:40 +0200
Samuli Suominen wrote:
> # Samuli Suominen (12 Nov 2011)
> # Masked for removal in 30 days wrt bug 330683. Use at least 2.8.
> =dev-python/wxpython-2.6*
> =dev-python/wxpython-docs-2.6*
> =x11-libs/wxGTK-2.6*
Thanks again. If anyone wants to take over mainta
On Sun, 13 Nov 2011 16:42:39 -0500
Mike Gilbert wrote:
> www-client/google-chrome has RDEPEND=">=sys-devel/gcc-4.4.0[-nocxx]" to
> ensure that we have a recent version of libstdc++. We basically need to
> match Ubuntu LTS since that is what Google builds with.
E.
--
fonts, gcc-porting,
On Fri, 02 Dec 2011 20:36:16 -0500
Mike Gilbert wrote:
> I've never thought of -mfpmath=sse as a "ricer" flag. If anything, it
> should make floating point calculations more consistent.
Not really. It's it's extremely target processor dependent and generally the
defaults are the best settings.
On Sun, 4 Dec 2011 04:50:00 +0100
Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> Subject says it all. More and more bug attachments appear that have
> been generated with non-English locales, and it's a nuisance for both
> bug reporters and bug wranglers to request/provide the sane alternative
> that every developer sh
On Sun, 4 Dec 2011 07:51:09 +0100
Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> On Sun, 4 Dec 2011 00:51:17 -0600
> Ryan Hill wrote:
>
> > How many times have you needed to request build logs in english since
> > the last time you brought this up? How many times have you had to
> > req
On Sun, 04 Dec 2011 12:58:06 +0100
Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote:
> I too think it is sufficient to have
> LC_MESSAGES=C
> in the default make.conf (or somewhere else where the user can easily
> change it), with a comment to leave it like this for build.log when
> reporting bugs.
Now that I
On Thu, 8 Dec 2011 02:12:37 + (UTC)
Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
> 2) What about grub-2, and while we're on it, is a switch to that expected
> any time soon, and/or is there a grub-static-2 in the wings? With the
> grub-1 gpt patches (and hopefully btrfs support at some point) I'm n
On Sat, 31 Dec 2011 19:59:47 -0600
William Hubbs wrote:
> Udev, kmod (which is a replacement for module-init-tools which will be needed
> by >=udev-176), systemd, and soon others, are advocating a major change
> to the locations where binaries and libraries are stored on linux
> systems.
>
> The
A bunch of users have been emailing me asking when 4.6 will be unmasked. I
really want to get it out the door already but we have a (IMO) substantial
blocker. A small number of users have reported that grub built with 4.6
fails to boot their systems. See the last half of bug #360513 for details.
On Sun, 8 Jan 2012 16:22:24 + (UTC)
"Thomas Beierlein (tomjbe)" wrote:
> tomjbe 12/01/08 16:22:24
>
> Modified: ChangeLog
> Added:gtkwave-3.3.28.ebuild
> Log:
> Strip flags (bug #377935). Version bump. Drop old unstable versions
Please avoid doing t
I've run into this three times today, so I'm a little grumpy. When you bump
to a new ~arch version, please consider keeping at least one previous ~arch
version around, so if people run into major issues they can at lease try the
previously installed version to determine if it's your package at fau
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 16:58:30 -0500
"Walter Dnes" wrote:
> A question about LINGUAS settings, or the documentation thereof. The
> URL you pointed to says "LINGUAS should then contain a space separated
> list of two-letter codes, stating which languages are allowed.". But
> "emerge -pv firefox"
On Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:50:39 -0800
Hilco Wijbenga wrote:
> The following USE changes are necessary to proceed:
> #required by net-libs/gnutls-2.12.16[nettle], required by gnutls (argument)
> >=dev-libs/nettle-2.4 gmp
I've been tripped up by this in the past. Can we change the order of the
lines
On Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:20:30 -0800
Zac Medico wrote:
> On 02/10/2012 06:17 PM, Ryan Hill wrote:
> > On Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:50:39 -0800
> > Hilco Wijbenga wrote:
> >
> >> The following USE changes are necessary to proceed:
> >> #required by net-libs/gnu
On Sun, 12 Feb 2012 10:44:41 +
Markos Chandras wrote:
> Just a heads up. There are more than 5 packages using the 'ayatana'
> use flag so I will add it to global use flags in 48 hours.
Post the description so we can bikeshed it to death.
--
fonts, gcc-porting
toolchain, wxwidgets
@ gentoo
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 19:47:01 +
Markos Chandras wrote:
> > Post the description so we can bikeshed it to death.
> You got me. I did not post it on purpose to avoid all the bikeshedding
> for no reason. The flag is now global so the description is:
;)
> ayatana - Build in support for Ayatan
On Fri, 17 Feb 2012 22:58:06 +0100
Piotr Szymaniak wrote:
> localepurge will be removed from portage [1]. As I was (/am) heavy
> user of it I found it funny that "linguas takes care of the proper
> locale installation" [2]. Maybe it should, but there's some major
> failure in lots of packages.
I
On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 21:34:14 +0100
Pacho Ramos wrote:
> I don't know if this has been discussed before but, what issues are
> preventing us from unmasking gcc-4.6 (and think on a near
> stabilization)?
>
> I have read hardmask message but it simply explains that it's masked for
> testing purpose
On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 20:30:40 -0500
Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-02-20 at 19:03 -0600, Ryan Hill wrote:
> > Grub is the only blocker. I don't want to unmask something that makes
> > people's systems unbootable.
> >
> > I'm also out of
On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 17:17:30 -0800
Zac Medico wrote:
> On 02/20/2012 05:03 PM, Ryan Hill wrote:
> > On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 21:34:14 +0100
> > Pacho Ramos wrote:
> >
> >> I don't know if this has been discussed before but, what issues are
> >> preventi
On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 20:37:39 -0500
Richard Yao wrote:
> Ryan,
>
> I took a look at the problem cited in your bug report. I suggest
> compiling sys-boot/grub with CFLAGS="-O0 -ggdb3", attaching gdb to
> grub-install and then watching what happens in the debugger. If you
> compare runs with a GCC
On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 10:26:38 +0100
Pacho Ramos wrote:
> El lun, 20-02-2012 a las 20:02 -0600, Ryan Hill escribió:
> > On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 17:17:30 -0800
> > Zac Medico wrote:
> >
> > > On 02/20/2012 05:03 PM, Ryan Hill wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 20 F
I just got this warning and had to do some digging to figure out where it
came from and what it wanted me to do. Can you add a comment to the eclass
(maybe a link to your mail which explained things well) and a pointer to the
eclass in the message?
--
Ryan Hillpsn: dirtye
or the moment, they will re-open
> tomorrow.
So for someone who hasn't been following any of this, is there an idiot's guide
on how make the Gentoo?
--
Ryan Hillpsn: dirtyepic_sk
gcc-porting/toolchain/wxwidgets @ gentoo.org
47C3 6D62 4864 0E49 8E9E 7F92 ED38 BD49 957A 8463
pgpgeqSe7dvLl.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Sun, 9 Aug 2015 13:22:43 +0200
hasufell wrote:
> On 08/09/2015 12:16 PM, Ryan Hill wrote:
> > On Sun, 9 Aug 2015 05:36:16 +
> > "Robin H. Johnson" wrote:
> >
> >> On Sat, Aug 08, 2015 at 05:47:14PM +, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> >>&g
. Bug number can be easily typed, URL has to be copied or
> generated by some tool.
> 3. Too many text, hard to read. Some bugs may refer to a dozen of
> URLs.
> 4. It is easier to copy a number, than selecting and copying whole
> string. Not all terminals support running browser on
s URL
> > equivalent.
> >
>
> So, would this replace the bug number reference in the summary? Should
> we tell people to reference the bug only in the commit message description?
>
> Or do we say:
> * bug number in summary optional
> * bug number in description mand
I would like to see this be more common:
---
cat-pkg: Make the thingy work again.
Gentoo-Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/504321 or 504321 Idon'tcarewhich
If we're limiting the summary to 1 line, 70-75 chars, manditory cat/package
and bug number there's not a lot of room to summari
ognition. Try it out.
> 3. A lot of duplicated and useless information consumes time and
> space, irritating people.
Arg, that is so irritating how I have easily-clickable machine-parsable links in
my git log. Look at all the space we could have saved! How much time have I
wasted readin
d to https://bugs.gentoo.org/333531 (or whatever
is decided on). That way everyone can use whatever they like best and it'll
all come out consistent.
--
Ryan Hillpsn: dirtyepic_sk
gcc-porting/toolchain/wxwidgets @ gentoo.org
47C3 6D62 4864 0E49 8E9E 7F92 ED38 B
't care. "Bug" gets the job done.
I don't care that much either. We never had URLs in the changelogs before so
it's not like we're losing anything.
--
Ryan Hillpsn: dirtyepic_sk
gcc-porting/toolchain/wxwidgets @ gentoo.org
47C3 6D62 48
ere, but what is this warning? A couple
days ago I started seeing it every time I sync even though I've yet to push
anything to git.
--
Ryan Hillpsn: dirtyepic_sk
gcc-porting/toolchain/wxwidgets @ gentoo.org
47C3 6D62 4864 0E49 8E9E 7F92 ED38 BD49 957A 8463
p
> [0] I am pretty sure some arches will want to opt out of this
> scheme, at least for some more critical packages.
ALLARCHES shouldn't be used on critical packages.
--
Ryan Hillpsn: dirtyepic_sk
gcc-porting/toolchain/wxwidgets @ gentoo.org
47C3 6D62 4
have to emerge -e
@world after this one or they could have a bad time.
FWIW I updated one system from 4.9 to 5.2 by rebuilding ~700 packages in random
order just to see how bad the ABI breakage would be and only ran into it once.
I may have just gotten lucky though.
--
Ryan Hill
801 - 900 of 906 matches
Mail list logo
