Re: [gentoo-dev] Lastrite: lilypond and reverse dependencies

2012-03-12 Thread Nathan Phillip Brink
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:29:47PM -0500, Matthew Summers wrote: > On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 11:29 AM, Samuli Suominen > wrote: > > # Samuli Suominen (12 Mar 2012) > > # Severely broken wrt bugs #179178, #331181, #334835, #350059, > > # #372839, #380155, #380627, #381055, #383515, #383553, #384687

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [Survey || RFC] autotools-utils.eclass

2010-06-02 Thread Nathan Phillip Brink
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 03:29:01PM +0200, Maciej Mrozowski wrote: > On Wednesday 26 of May 2010 19:27:43 Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Wednesday 26 May 2010 05:38:00 Maciej Mrozowski wrote: > > > I've updated documentation, added example usage and option to keep > > > libtool files (ltdl.so supposed

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [funtoo] [bugzilla-daemon-abrp7r+bbdudnm+yrof...@public.gmane.org: [Bug 322157] [mail-filter/procmail] new ebuild + autocreate maildirs]

2010-07-11 Thread Nathan Phillip Brink
On Wed, Jul 07, 2010 at 06:03:49PM -0600, Ryan Hill wrote: > On Thu, 8 Jul 2010 00:56:52 +0200 > Enrico Weigelt wrote: > > > > > Hi folks, > > > > > > YFYI: yet another of my ebuilds kicked-down. > > > > It's an improved version of procmail, which automatically creates > > missing maildir dir

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Removing .la files

2010-10-24 Thread Nathan Phillip Brink
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 09:57:33PM +, Duncan wrote: > Enrico Weigelt posted on Sun, 24 Oct 2010 22:09:30 +0200 as excerpted: > > > I'm doing some investigation on which .la files are still needed and > > which are not. In general, .la files only are in use by very few > > packages which use th

Re: [gentoo-dev] MULTI_ABI support addition to main tree portage

2011-01-29 Thread Nathan Phillip Brink
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 06:03:10PM +0100, Pacho Ramos wrote: > > Hello > > I would like to know what is "blocking" this from landing main tree in > the "near" future, as I reviewed: > > http://www.mail-archive.com/gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org/msg41737.html > > and looks like there wasn't major p

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packaging LSB symlinks for ld-linux.so

2011-01-31 Thread Nathan Phillip Brink
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 04:14:47PM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > Hi, > > when trying to bump sci-geosciences/googleearth to a 6 beta version [1], > there's a problem with missing /lib/ld-lsb.so.3 file, which the binary > somehow requires, and otherwise fails with a rather cryptic error > mess

Re: [gentoo-dev] Bugzilla 4 migration

2011-03-08 Thread Nathan Phillip Brink
On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 03:53:01PM +0100, Micha?? G??rny wrote: > On Tue, 08 Mar 2011 16:41:08 +0200 > Antoni Grzyma??a wrote: > > > On Tue, 8 Mar 2011 15:26:34 +0100, Micha? Grny wrote: > > > On Mon, 07 Mar 2011 15:06:25 -0500 > > > Olivier Cr??te wrote: > > > > > >> On Mon, 2011-03-07

Re: [gentoo-dev] Using Jabber for developer communication

2011-04-10 Thread Nathan Phillip Brink
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 10:29:56PM -0300, Zhu Sha Zang wrote: > Em 10-04-2011 08:54, George Prowse escreveu: > > Currently, research has told us that that the best format for > > communication is MSN > > It is a joke too, right? This idea of MSN is very much a joke. Noone would possibly support u

Re: [gentoo-dev] RDEPENDing on packages from overlays?

2011-04-23 Thread Nathan Phillip Brink
On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 04:02:24AM -0700, Zac Medico wrote: > On 04/22/2011 11:05 PM, Eray Aslan wrote: > > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=364445 > > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=364401 > > > > Basically, there are requests to add packages to RDEPEND in virtual/mda > > and virt

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: net-irc/oer, net-irc/oer-mysql

2011-05-13 Thread Nathan Phillip Brink
# Nathan Phillip Brink (13 May 2011) # # Abandoned by upstream. QA issues, such as failing _FORTIFY_SOURCE # checks. Bugs 240918, 252000, 332111, 339545, 354493. # # Removal on 2011-07-12. net-irc/oer net-irc/oer-mysql -- binki Look out for missing or extraneous apostrophes

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: better policy for ChageLogs

2011-06-01 Thread Nathan Phillip Brink
On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 04:15:31PM +0100, Markos Chandras wrote: > On 01/06/2011 04:08 , Peter Volkov wrote: > > ?? ??, 30/05/2011 ?? 14:55 -0700, Brian Harring ??: > >> The problem is, that's a *fuzzy* definition. > > > > Ok, let's start with something and then we'll add more ite

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Tags (Was: RFC: split up media-sound/ category)

2011-06-24 Thread Nathan Phillip Brink
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 11:20:40PM -0400, Wyatt Epp wrote: > I bring this up because there are several packages with the same name > and different qualification. Obviously, they'll have different tags > because they're not the same thing, but neither should they share the > same directory. So the

Re: [gentoo-dev] Tags (Was: RFC: split up media-sound/ category)

2011-06-24 Thread Nathan Phillip Brink
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 08:57:47PM -0400, Wyatt Epp wrote: > Tags are basically keywords you can use to describe packages, allowing > you to easily search and explore your options based on what the > packages actually does (if we want to get technical, anything that > identifies a package is a sort

Re: [gentoo-dev] demanual update (was: Don't use / when applying sed with CFLAGS)

2011-06-28 Thread Nathan Phillip Brink
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 10:24:26PM +0400, Peter Volkov wrote: > ?? ??, 28/06/2011 ?? 12:23 -0400, Mike Frysinger ??: > > On Tuesday, June 28, 2011 02:54:03 Micha?? G??rny wrote: > > > emake CC="$(tc-getCC)" CFLAGS="${CFLAGS}"... > > > > this is easily dangerous when it comes to package

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] gentoo-x86 migration to repo-per-package

2011-08-07 Thread Nathan Phillip Brink
On Sat, Aug 06, 2011 at 04:13:52PM +0200, Fabian Groffen wrote: > - tree generation is dynamic > + easy to move packages around, their category is specified by the > tree configuration, the repository the package lives in doesn't change, > probably overlays, betagarden, graveyard, sunset,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Implicit system dependencies

2011-08-23 Thread Nathan Phillip Brink
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 03:53:26AM +1000, Michael wrote: > Also, on a related note, would it be appropriate to report the following > undeclared deps, given that the package in question already has DEPEND for > gtk+? > > * Checking app-arch/guitar-0.1.4 for undeclared dependencies > * /usr/bi

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] office-ext.eclass

2011-08-29 Thread Nathan Phillip Brink
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 10:35:41AM +0200, Tom Chv??tal wrote: > How about this attachment? :) > # @FUNCTION: openoffice-ext_add_extension > # @DESCRIPTION: > # Install the extension into the office suite. > openoffice-ext_add_extension() { > debug-print-function ${FUNCNAME} "$@" >

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: using /libexec

2011-09-07 Thread Nathan Phillip Brink
On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 05:31:23PM -0400, Joshua Kinard wrote: > Are there possibilities about breaking off just a small piece of openrc and > putting that into /run (or /boot)? Enough of the core scripts so that it > can find /usr and mount it before continuing? Isn't /run something that's suppo

Re: [gentoo-dev] multilib setup

2011-09-12 Thread Nathan Phillip Brink
On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 03:55:49PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > as for no-multilib systems, "lib64" will be the same, and "lib" will be > symlinked to "lib64". this will be easier i think to share files between > multilib and non-multilib 64bit systems. Isn't this slightly more complicated th

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due tanderson retirement

2011-09-13 Thread Nathan Phillip Brink
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 08:31:33PM +0200, Pacho Ramos wrote: > Due tanderson retirement the following packages need a new maintainer: > > dev-libs/check > dev-libs/stfl > net-libs/udns > > > Thanks for taking them I'll take dev-libs/check. -- binki Look out for missing or extraneous apostrop

Re: [gentoo-dev] Suggestion for getting rid of udev

2011-10-11 Thread Nathan Phillip Brink
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 12:40:23AM -0400, Walter Dnes wrote: > Hi all > > Recently, there was a firestorm on the gentoo-user list over the idea > that udev would eventually require /usr to be on the same physical > parition as /, or else use initramfs, which is its own can of worms. I'm > not a

Re: [gentoo-dev] Suggestion for getting rid of udev

2011-10-12 Thread Nathan Phillip Brink
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 09:09:24AM -0400, Walter Dnes wrote: > On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 05:32:05AM +0000, Nathan Phillip Brink wrote > > > You can already try out what using mdev instead of udev is like in > > Gentoo. Just add `sys-apps/busybox mdev' to /etc/portage/p

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH scons-utils] Support setting common SCons arguments using myesconsargs.

2011-10-23 Thread Nathan Phillip Brink
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 08:20:37PM +0200, Micha?? G??rny wrote: > --- > scons-utils.eclass | 33 + > 1 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) ... > +# @ECLASS-VARIABLE: myesconsargs > +# @DEFAULT_UNSET > +# @DESCRIPTION: > +# List of package-specific opti

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

2011-11-11 Thread Nathan Phillip Brink
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 09:38:24AM -0500, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: > OK, to clarify i'm just re-listing which packages ppl have spoken up for: > > > On 11/11/11 06:38 AM, Tomáš Chvátal wrote: > > > > app-misc/dsgui > > app-misc/klavaro > > dev-cpp/yaml-cpp - neurogeek > > dev-libs/softhsm - mschi

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due dragonheart retirement

2011-12-01 Thread Nathan Phillip Brink
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 05:08:57PM +0200, Pacho Ramos wrote: > Due dragonheart retirement the following packages need a new maintainer: ... > app-arch/lzop > dev-libs/lzo I've taken the remainder of the lzo family. -- binki Look out for missing or extraneous apostrophes! pgpdP6uhTaIrq.pgp Des

Re: [gentoo-dev] Linking Stage, building a ebuild

2011-12-01 Thread Nathan Phillip Brink
On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 12:22:30AM -0300, Willian Vale da Rocha wrote: > I'm writing a ebuild for GNU Radio, just to learn how to write and i > doesn't found any where(or i was looking for wrong) how to define a LDFLAGS > for the linking stage. GNU Radio need this because they use their library. >