Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] 3dprint Project

erd. > > https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:3dprint > > > > Glad to see it, even if your email is in the same style as my email from earlier. :) - -- NP-Hardass -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJWhgk9AAoJEBzZQR2yrxj7w7EP/iDQQpmlM8Tdmv/stl86WQg6

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 05/16] ebuild-writing/misc-files: replace the code for cvs commit with git #558642

mple of > adding a category with a proper message rather than suggesting a > workflow. Note that the section for committing packages suggests > "repoman commit" which opens up an editor by default. > > Is there a particular reason why we should discourage

[gentoo-dev] [RFD] Adopt-a-package, proxy-maintenance, and other musings

ents on the dev ML, and thought it might be worth discussing. I've cc'd proxy-maint as a lot of this discussion is likely to involve them, and would like them to put in their official opinion as well. - -- NP-Hardass -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJWnc1RAA

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFD] Adopt-a-package, proxy-maintenance, and other musings

ikely to make an impact than an ad hoc, unofficial one, IMO. On January 19, 2016 5:51:27 PM EST, "Michał Górny" wrote: >On Tue, 19 Jan 2016 00:44:49 -0500 >NP-Hardass wrote: > >> With all of the unclaimed herds and unclaimed packages within them, I >> started to wo

Re: [gentoo-dev] About merging "ayatana", "indicator", "libindicate", "appindicator" in one global USE flag

t;> or "appindicator" would be more meaningful for most users than "ayatana", >> what >> do you think? >> >> Thanks > > Personally I would opt for global "appindicator" as it seems to be more widely > used and I think it is a bit more self-explanatory :/ > SGTM -- NP-Hardass signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

<    1   2