[gentoo-dev] 2.6.31 stable plans

2009-11-04 Thread Mike Pagano
ernal packages in the stable tree are tracked in bug #291927. If any arise, please make every effort to fix these. Thanks, Mike Pagano -- Mike Pagano Gentoo Developer - Kernel Project E-Mail : mpag...@gentoo.org GnuPG FP : EEE2 601D 0763 B60F 848C 9E14 3C33 C650 B576 E4E3 Public Key :

[gentoo-dev] gentoo-sources 2.6.32 stable plans

2010-02-24 Thread Mike Pagano
ernal packages in the stable tree are tracked in bug #300324. If any arise, please make every effort to fix these. Thanks, Mike Pagano Gentoo Developer - Kernel Project E-Mail : mpag...@gentoo.org GnuPG FP : EEE2 601D 0763 B60F 848C 9E14 3C33 C650 B576 E4E3 Public Key : http://pgp.mit.edu:1137

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Gentoo Wiki Project

2010-04-09 Thread Mike Pagano
wiki running on nonGentoo infrastructure. We've been looking for a new 'home' for awhile. [1] [1]http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=176186 --- Mike Pagano Gentoo Developer - Kernel Project E-Mail : mpag...@gentoo.org GnuPG FP : EEE2 601D 0763 B60F 848C 9E14 3C33 C650

Re: Notify people about empty herds (Was: Re: [gentoo-dev] FTR: media-opti...@g.o has no developers)

2010-06-03 Thread Mike Pagano
On Thursday, June 03, 2010 10:44:10 am Markos Chandras wrote: > kernel can merge with kernel-misc. Please don't do this.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council 2010/2011 - Nominations are now open

2010-06-15 Thread Mike Pagano
time to enable positive change. Thanks, again. MIke Mike Pagano Gentoo Developer - Kernel Project E-Mail : mpag...@gentoo.org GnuPG FP : EEE2 601D 0763 B60F 848C 9E14 3C33 C650 B576 E4E3 Public Key : http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=0xB576E4E3&op=index

Re: [gentoo-dev] Going inactive

2010-09-27 Thread Mike Pagano
answering all of my questions along the way. You set an example with your intelligence in technical matters and patience with users that goes years beyond your age. You will be missed and I hope you find your way back here someday. Best regards, Mike -- Mike Pagano Gentoo Developer - Ke

[gentoo-dev] question about non-dev submitting snapshot ebuild to bugzilla

2005-05-23 Thread Mike Pagano
I am working on a new ebuild for a currently open bug in bugzilla. This ebuild happens to be a snapshot as upstream provides anonymous web cvs but does not provide a nice tar. When a non-dev submits a snapshot ebuild to bugzilla what is the proper method of providing access to the snapshot I cre

[gentoo-dev] Kernel maintainers that use genpatches

2010-11-22 Thread Mike Pagano
For all the kernel maintainers that use genpatches in their kernel package, please make sure you are subscribed to gentoo-kernel so that I know I can reach all of you easily. Thanks, -- Mike Pagano Gentoo Developer - Kernel Project Gentoo Sources - Lead E-Mail : mpag...@gentoo.org GnuPG FP

Re: [gentoo-dev] gentoo-src cvs repo and svn repos migration to git

2011-01-31 Thread Mike Pagano
h as the structure of the git repo or any > hooks I should be aware of. > Thanks > -- > Theo Chatzimichos (tampakrap) > Gentoo KDE/Qt, Planet, Overlays linux-patches is still active and I would like it to remain in svn. Thanks. -- Mike Pagano Gentoo Developer - Kernel Project

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: use of the /run directory

2011-05-20 Thread Mike Pagano
On Friday 20 May 2011 04:58:12 Luca Barbato wrote: > On 5/17/11 6:57 PM, William Hubbs wrote: > That shouldn't be read as endorsing the peculiar and conceptually broken > init replacement called systemd. > > lu Just curious, would you mind elaborating on it's peculiarities and conceptual broken

Re: [gentoo-dev] systemd project created.

2011-06-21 Thread Mike Pagano
On Tuesday, June 21, 2011 05:43:10 AM Michał Górny wrote: > Hello, > > I'd like to announce that I've created an initial project page for > Gentoo systemd project [1]. > > The main purpose of that project page would be keeping docs for systemd > users in Gentoo. Hopefully, we will include some so

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/1] kernel-2.eclass: Support move of genpatches tarballs from /space/distfiles-local to devspace

2019-10-09 Thread Mike Pagano
This change will support moving the genpatches tarballs from /space/distfiles-local to the devspace ~developer/public_html/dist/genpatches Signed-off-by: Mike Pagano --- eclass/kernel-2.eclass | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/eclass/kernel-2.eclass b

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH v2 1/1] kernel-2.eclass: Support move of genpatches tarballs from /space/distfiles-local to devspace

2019-10-09 Thread Mike Pagano
Thanks for the suggestion. This is version 2 This change will support moving the genpatches tarballs from /space/distfiles-local to the devspace ~developer/public_html/dist/genpatches. Signed-off-by: Mike Pagano --- eclass/kernel-2.eclass | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH v3 1/1] kernel-2.eclass: Support move of genpatches tarballs from /space/distfiles-local to devspace

2019-10-09 Thread Mike Pagano
This change will support moving the genpatches tarballs from /space/distfiles-local to the devspace ~developer/public_html/dist/genpatches. Co-authored-by: Thomas Deutschmann Signed-off-by: Mike Pagano --- eclass/kernel-2.eclass | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/1] kernel-2.eclass: Support move of genpatches tarballs from /space/distfiles-local to devspace

2019-10-10 Thread Mike Pagano
On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 06:23:06PM -0700, Alec Warner wrote: >On Wed, Oct 9, 2019 at 10:01 AM Mike Pagano <[1]mpag...@gentoo.org> >wrote: > > This change will support moving the genpatches tarballs from > /space/distfiles-local to > the devspace ~de

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH v4 1/1] kernel-2.eclass: Support move of genpatches tarballs from /space/distfiles-local to devspace

2019-10-10 Thread Mike Pagano
This change will support moving the genpatches tarballs from /space/distfiles-local to the devspace ~developer/public_html/dist/genpatches. Additional modifications based on feedback. Signed-off-by: Mike Pagano --- eclass/kernel-2.eclass | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/1] kernel-2.eclass: Support move of genpatches tarballs from /space/distfiles-local to devspace

2019-10-11 Thread Mike Pagano
On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 11:28:48AM -0700, Alec Warner wrote: >On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 3:04 AM Mike Pagano <[1]mpag...@gentoo.org> >wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 06:23:06PM -0700, Alec Warner wrote: > >Â Â On Wed, Oct 9, 2019 at 10:01 AM Mike P

Re: [gentoo-dev] Keywordreqs and slacking arch teams

2020-01-02 Thread Mike Pagano
On Thursday, January 2, 2020 3:32:12 PM EST Rolf Eike Beer wrote: > > - Allowed a simple "Add keyword(s) for package " interface, > > > > that intelligently created an issue and a target list, and then once > > the list was built, constantly ensured the list to be valid, or > > determined a

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: sys-firmware/iwl6050-ucode

2020-02-07 Thread Mike Pagano
# Mike Pagano (2020-02-07) # The standalone ebuild for this driver is made # unnecessary as it is included in the package: # sys-kernel/linux-firmware sys-firmware/iwl6050-ucode -- Mike Pagano Gentoo Developer - Kernel Project Gentoo Sources - Member E-Mail : mpag...@gentoo.org GnuPG FP

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: sys-firmware/iwl6050-ucode

2020-02-07 Thread Mike Pagano
On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 12:10:38PM -0500, Mike Pagano wrote: > # Mike Pagano (2020-02-07) > # The standalone ebuild for this driver is made > # unnecessary as it is included in the package: > # sys-kernel/linux-firmware > sys-firmware/iwl6050-ucode Bug #708622 > -- >

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 3/3] app-admin/kube-bench: convert to go-module go.sum

2020-02-13 Thread Mike Pagano
es > of opinion' in the past; but I don't believe this is one of those occasions. > > Calling out bad actors (not saying veremit is one, I just mean in the general > sense) is an unfortunate but important task, but call them out on bad > behaviour, not for what appears to

[gentoo-dev] Gentoo-sources - should we stable?

2015-01-02 Thread Mike Pagano
nel&m=137182668616082&w=2 [2] http://packages.gentoo.org/package/sys-kernel/gentoo-sources -- Mike Pagano Gentoo Developer - Kernel Project Team Lead - Gentoo Sources E-Mail : mpag...@gentoo.org GnuPG FP : EEE2 601D 0763 B60F 848C 9E14 3C33 C650 B576 E4E3 Public Key : http://pgp.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo-sources - should we stable?

2015-01-02 Thread Mike Pagano
On Friday, January 02, 2015 01:10:21 PM Ian Stakenvicius wrote: Resending as I replied to Ian instead of the list by accident. (sorry, Ian) > On 02/01/15 12:25 PM, Mike Pagano wrote: > > Hello, Everyone, > > > > Are there solid arguments for stabilizing any version of &

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo-sources - should we stable?

2015-01-02 Thread Mike Pagano
Gentoo users at > kernels that were mainline release candidates only a day before. I understand your point. Maybe waiting a few days to auto stable makes sense, because less than 7 days later, a new version with bug/security fixes is released. Isn't our current rate of stabilization "sell

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo-sources - should we stable?

2015-01-02 Thread Mike Pagano
On Friday, January 02, 2015 03:11:22 PM Ian Stakenvicius wrote: > On 02/01/15 02:57 PM, Mike Pagano wrote: > > I understand your point. Maybe waiting a few days to auto stable > > makes sense, because less than 7 days later, a new version with > > bug/security fixes is release

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo-sources - should we stable?

2015-01-02 Thread Mike Pagano
On Friday, January 02, 2015 03:22:31 PM Ian Stakenvicius wrote: > On 02/01/15 03:17 PM, Mike Pagano wrote: > > On Friday, January 02, 2015 03:11:22 PM Ian Stakenvicius wrote: > >> On 02/01/15 02:57 PM, Mike Pagano wrote: > >>> I understand your point. Maybe waiting a

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo-sources - should we stable?

2015-01-02 Thread Mike Pagano
On Friday, January 02, 2015 03:30:40 PM Rich Freeman wrote: > On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 3:11 PM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA256 > > > > On 02/01/15 02:57 PM, Mike Pagano wrote: > >> I understand your point. May

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo-sources - should we stable?

2015-01-02 Thread Mike Pagano
On Friday, January 02, 2015 04:05:42 PM Rich Freeman wrote: > On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 3:44 PM, Mike Pagano wrote: > > To summarize. > > > > In this instance, as this moment: > > > > 1. Only enter stable req bugs for 3.18 and 3.17. > > I assume this bit i

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo-sources - should we stable?

2015-01-02 Thread Mike Pagano
On Saturday, January 03, 2015 12:39:39 AM Mikle Kolyada wrote: > 02.01.2015 20:25, Mike Pagano пишет: > > This is in no way complaining about how long it takes to stabilize a > > kernel. > As for this fact. > > > > The main problem is that: we only can test sour

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo-sources - should we stable?

2015-01-03 Thread Mike Pagano
On Saturday, January 03, 2015 11:18:26 AM Pacho Ramos wrote: > El vie, 02-01-2015 a las 12:25 -0500, Mike Pagano escribió: > > Hello, Everyone, > > > > [2] http://packages.gentoo.org/package/sys-kernel/gentoo-sources > > In my case I still run only "stable&quo

Re: [gentoo-dev] qa last rites multiple packages

2015-01-07 Thread Mike Pagano
em corruption. Of couse, 3.17.0 is out of the tree but when is it appropiate to say that a user has had enough time to upgarde their systems and we can remove this entry? Mike -- Mike Pagano Gentoo Developer - Kernel Project Gentoo Sources - Lead E-Mail : mpag...@gentoo.org GnuPG FP :

Re: [gentoo-dev] qa last rites multiple packages

2015-01-07 Thread Mike Pagano
On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 12:14:23PM -0500, Mike Gilbert wrote: > On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 12:11 PM, William Hubbs wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 11:21:56AM -0500, Mike Pagano wrote: > >> On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 05:47:10PM -0600, William Hubbs wrote: > >> > All, >

Re: [gentoo-dev] qa last rites multiple packages

2015-01-07 Thread Mike Pagano
On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 11:11:32AM -0600, William Hubbs wrote: > On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 11:21:56AM -0500, Mike Pagano wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 05:47:10PM -0600, William Hubbs wrote: > > > All, > > > # > > > # Pinkie Pie discovered an issue

Re: [gentoo-dev] qa last rites multiple packages

2015-01-07 Thread Mike Pagano
On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 01:08:21PM -0600, William Hubbs wrote: > On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 01:29:15PM -0500, Mike Pagano wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 11:11:32AM -0600, William Hubbs wrote: > > > On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 11:21:56AM -0500, Mike Pagano wrote: > > > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: eclass/

2015-11-17 Thread Mike Pagano
On Tuesday, November 17, 2015 08:19:29 AM Michał Górny wrote: > On Mon, 16 Nov 2015 23:38:08 + (UTC) > > "Mike Pagano" wrote: > > commit: aac24917ebe254a23990f0d7fff9f6f570b99d15 > > Author: Mike Pagano gentoo org> Thanks for the review and

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: packages.g.o: new features available

2020-07-08 Thread Mike Pagano
On Tuesday, July 7, 2020 10:57:57 PM EDT Max Magorsch wrote: > Hi all, > > I am glad to announce further progress at packages.gentoo.org (pgo in > the following). Compared to previous work during the last months, > which mostly addressed the back end, the new changes are rather > comprehensive. Th

Re: [gentoo-dev] Idea: User centric kernel configuration

2021-03-12 Thread Mike Pagano
On 3/12/21 11:34 AM, Gerion Entrup wrote: Am Donnerstag, 11. März 2021, 17:41:45 CET schrieb Peter Stuge: Hi, Gerion Entrup wrote: the Linux kernel has _a lot of_ configuration options, way too many to configure them by hand. I actually disagree strongly with that; I think it's important

Re: [gentoo-dev] Idea: User centric kernel configuration

2021-03-12 Thread Mike Pagano
On 3/12/21 1:04 PM, Gerion Entrup wrote: Am Freitag, 12. März 2021, 17:40:02 CET schrieb Mike Pagano: On 3/12/21 11:34 AM, Gerion Entrup wrote: Am Donnerstag, 11. März 2021, 17:41:45 CET schrieb Peter Stuge: Hi, Gerion Entrup wrote: the Linux kernel has _a lot of_ configuration options

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH v2] Transitional changes to the kernel-2 eclass to support future CPU OPT

2021-04-30 Thread Mike Pagano
On 4/29/21 9:48 AM, mpag...@gentoo.org wrote: From: Mike Pagano Thanks, Ulm, for the review. I have modified the code as suggested. The CPU OPT patch now contains gcc ver checks within the patch itself. This transitional change is to start supporting just that patch while trying not to

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH] linux-mod.eclass: respect INSTALL_MOD_PATH

2021-08-23 Thread Mike Pagano
Change to respect INSTALL_MOD_PATH Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/642240 Signed-off-by: Mike Pagano --- eclass/linux-mod.eclass | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/eclass/linux-mod.eclass b/eclass/linux-mod.eclass index e87c5ec0c..48d7a8cbb 100644 --- a/eclass

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH v2] linux-mod.eclass: respect INSTALL_MOD_PATH

2021-08-23 Thread Mike Pagano
Change to respect INSTALL_MOD_PATH Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/642240 Signed-off-by: Mike Pagano --- eclass/linux-mod.eclass | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/eclass/linux-mod.eclass b/eclass/linux-mod.eclass index e87c5ec0c..7e47a2e20 100644 --- a/eclass

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH] linux-mod.eclass : Fix eclassdoc problems

2021-08-27 Thread Mike Pagano
linux-mod.eclass : Fix eclassdoc problems Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/637782 Signed-off-by: Mike Pagano --- eclass/linux-mod.eclass | 13 + 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+) diff --git a/eclass/linux-mod.eclass b/eclass/linux-mod.eclass index 7e47a2e20..eda5e9aee 100644 --- a

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH] Support Makefiles that set variables to a non-static value

2021-09-01 Thread Mike Pagano
Previously, the kernel Makefile had to define version variables as static string literals to be read. This change will allow varibles defined as non-static values to be read. Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/490328 Signed-off-by: Mike Pagano --- eclass/linux-info.eclass | 13 + 1 file

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH] linux-info.eclass : Support valid Make files

2021-09-02 Thread Mike Pagano
-off-by: Mike Pagano --- eclass/linux-info.eclass | 33 + 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/eclass/linux-info.eclass b/eclass/linux-info.eclass index 0b6df1bf5..2dfc8979f 100644 --- a/eclass/linux-info.eclass +++ b/eclass/linux

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH v4] linux-info.eclass : Support valid Make files

2021-09-03 Thread Mike Pagano
names: GNUMakefile, makefile, Makefile Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/663368 Signed-off-by: Mike Pagano --- eclass/linux-info.eclass | 30 ++ 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/eclass/linux-info.eclass b/eclass/linux-info.eclass index

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH v4] linux-info.eclass : Support valid Make files

2021-09-04 Thread Mike Pagano
On 9/3/21 10:25 AM, Mike Pagano wrote: Thanks to Sam, mgorny and Ulm for the review. Committed

[gentoo-dev] Subject: [PATCH] kernel-2.eclass: Remove < 2.6 support for kernel headers

2021-09-08 Thread Mike Pagano
e build target headers_install was introduced. Remove supporting function compile_headers_tweak_config. Additionally, remove 2.6 support from install_headers. Signed-off-by: Mike Pagano --- eclass/kernel-2.eclass | 112 ++--- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 107 dele

Re: [gentoo-dev] Guidance on adding kernel config checks to ebuilds

2021-09-27 Thread Mike Pagano
On 9/27/21 12:10 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote: I'm looking to solicit opinions on when it is appropriate for an ebuild to check for kernel config options using linux-info.eclass. I don't think we have any guidelines documented, instead leaving it up to the "common sense" of package maintainers. Adding

Re: [gentoo-dev] Guidance on adding kernel config checks to ebuilds

2021-09-27 Thread Mike Pagano
On 9/27/21 2:15 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote: On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 1:44 PM Robin H. Johnson wrote: On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 01:15:10PM -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote: On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 12:23 PM Mike Pagano wrote: Adding linux-info calls to pkg_pretend or pkg_setup causes slowdowns when

[gentoo-dev] Last-rites: net-misc/AQtion

2025-02-07 Thread Mike Pagano
# Mike Pagano (2025-02-07) # Last release 3 years ago, no version compiles; ours or upstreams. # Ack from maintainer. Driver is available in the Linux Kernel # Removal on 2025-03-07. Bug: 949318 net-misc/AQtion

<    1   2