Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: allow -1 for ACCT_USER_ID and ACCT_GROUP_ID in ::gentoo

2021-11-29 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On Mon, 2021-11-29 at 05:05 +, Sam James wrote: > > What I wish we had done (and there's still time to do, albeit belated -- > it's still useful for the remaining big bits like Apache and nginx) is > write a news item explaining the implications and linked to a page > like https://wiki.gentoo.

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: allow -1 for ACCT_USER_ID and ACCT_GROUP_ID in ::gentoo

2021-11-30 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On Tue, 2021-11-30 at 19:32 -0600, William Hubbs wrote: > > This is the part of this that I don't understand. If we aren't enforcing > an ID, why do we care which ID to try first? It seems to be an > unnecessary step since users can pick the IDs they want by putting > settings in make.conf. > Th

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: allow -1 for ACCT_USER_ID and ACCT_GROUP_ID in ::gentoo

2021-12-01 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On Tue, 2021-11-30 at 22:45 -0800, Alec Warner wrote: > > So questions from my side are: > Does your cluster not have human users? > Do the userids for the human users also not have to match between > hosts in the cluster? > > You can easily create ebuilds for the human users who access the sys

Re: [gentoo-dev] Common options missed in OpenRC declarative scripts and how to improve them

2021-12-02 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 2021-12-01 21:02:20, Brian Evans wrote: > After a cursory scan of the Gentoo repository, I've noticed an > overabundance of start_stop_daemon_args being declared in scripts committed. > > I would like to draw attention and see if we can clean these up together. A lot of this is covered in the

Re: [gentoo-dev] Common options missed in OpenRC declarative scripts and how to improve them

2021-12-02 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 2021-12-02 08:12:55, Alec Warner wrote: > > Can we automate any of it? Emit QA warnings? etc. > I would love to be proven wrong, but I don't think so. We have two main problems. First, The service scripts are POSIX sh, which is better than bash, but still can't easily be parsed for semantic i

Re: [gentoo-dev] Rationalizing USE flags by narrowing the scope of them.

2022-01-03 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On Mon, 2022-01-03 at 21:29 +0100, Piotr Karbowski wrote: > > Perhaps the 'pam' example was extreme, but ipv6, or threads as Sam > shared, does not make sense to be togglable. > Many packages need their ipv6 code disabled if the kernel has no ipv6 support, and enabling ipv6 in the kernel is a p

Re: [gentoo-dev] Rationalizing USE flags by narrowing the scope of them.

2022-01-03 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On Mon, 2022-01-03 at 16:51 -0800, Alec Warner wrote: > > > > > > Many packages need their ipv6 code disabled if the kernel has no ipv6 > > support, and enabling ipv6 in the kernel is a pointless security risk > > for pretty much anyone in the United States. > > https://www.google.com/intl/en/ip

Re: [gentoo-dev] Rationalizing USE flags by narrowing the scope of them.

2022-01-03 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On Tue, 2022-01-04 at 03:38 +, Sam James wrote: > > ACL is kind of similar to what Ionen said for PAM, i.e. sometimes > people may want to turn it off and it makes sense to expose > this option for those who do, but we don't need to try support it. > This is another important one. It has sec

Re: [gentoo-dev] Rationalizing USE flags by narrowing the scope of them.

2022-01-04 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On Tue, 2022-01-04 at 12:03 -0500, Mike Gilbert wrote: > > I disagree with the claim that "most people" should disable ACL > support at build time. That just gives you partially functional tools. > The ACL behavior can generally be controlled using runtime options. I understand why people would d

Re: [gentoo-dev] Rationalizing USE flags by narrowing the scope of them.

2022-01-04 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On Tue, 2022-01-04 at 19:26 +0100, Piotr Karbowski wrote: > > And none of which happens unless you intentionally trigger it. > > ... > > Sure, acl and how chmod manipulate mask on ACL-enabled entities is not > very simple, but nothing will break by itself just because you have acl > support en

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] making rust-bin ordered first in virtual/rust

2022-01-20 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 2022-01-20 16:32:30, Brian Evans wrote: > > GNOME and Mozilla products still pull in spidermonkey but other users > will have a much reduced requirement for rust. > Avoiding librsvg used to be difficult because it's required by our GTK icon packages to render PNGs from SVGs. Luckily dilfridg

[gentoo-dev] Feature request: auto-CC for bugs modified via commit tags

2022-01-25 Thread Michael Orlitzky
Can I request that Bug: and Closes: tags in our commits automatically CC the committer on the bug that is modified? Use case: I often fix (sci-*) bugs that I'm not CCed on, and a user will leave a comment like "it still crashes on x86" that I never see. Of course, I could manually CC myself on eve

Re: [gentoo-dev] Feature request: auto-CC for bugs modified via commit tags

2022-01-25 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On Tue, 2022-01-25 at 11:29 -0800, Alec Warner wrote: > > Just to clarify here: > For your own commits (e.g. fixing a package you own) you are already > typically on the bug..right? Right. > I assume the major use case here is proxying commits for others (where > they are on the bug, but you ar

Re: [gentoo-dev] Feature request: auto-CC for bugs modified via commit tags

2022-01-25 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On Tue, 2022-01-25 at 21:59 +0100, Agostino Sarubbo wrote: > > - If you are CC'ed by the hook and you are part of the alias that is the > assignee of the bug, > you will receive two emails unless the hook integrates the alias. > > - Based on the previous point, I'd suggest to use a wrapper if y

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: IUSE for system/notification sounds: sound vs. libcanberra vs. notification-sound

2024-11-01 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On Fri, 2024-11-01 at 14:39 +0100, Andreas Sturmlechner wrote: > It seems we currently have several IUSE for the same purpose, with **sound** > probably having oldest mentions[1]. > This came up while working on virtual/sound-theme and splitting up > media-libs/libcanberra[2], and could be dealt

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/5] zig-toolchain.eclass: new eclass

2024-10-30 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 2024-10-24 10:50:55, Florian Schmaus wrote: > On 24/10/2024 09.38, Matt Jolly wrote: > > Is anyone actually using an 80-column display in 2024? Could we look > > at relaxing this to something more sane / modern like 120? Are there > > any accessibility concerns, etc.? > > In present days, its n

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] profiles/default/linux: export cache variables for sed and friends

2024-12-10 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 2024-12-10 00:54:11, Eli Schwartz wrote: > > What circumstances other than a shebang might break without a full path? When PATH is not reliable, like inside a cron job. Or arguments to execve().

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] profiles/default/linux: export cache variables for sed and friends

2024-12-10 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 2024-12-10 14:33:26, Eli Schwartz wrote: > On 12/10/24 1:31 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > > On 2024-12-10 00:54:11, Eli Schwartz wrote: > >> > >> What circumstances other than a shebang might break without a full path? > > > > When PATH is not reliable,

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] profiles/default/linux: export cache variables for sed and friends

2024-12-05 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 2024-12-04 22:55:22, Sam James wrote: > Prompted by yet another instance of this, this time at > https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-1171999.html. > > The results of these tests are often hardcoded into installed files > which causes issues if using a binpkg of them from a merged-usr system >

<    5   6   7   8   9   10