The current set of ebuilds for MakeMaker were originally added to
address some major differences between how perl 5.6.X and 5.8.X built
modules. Since we no longer support 5.6.X at all, these ebuilds do
little more than complicate people's understandings of what they need on
their box for a fun
Zou, Yixiong wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to create a gentoo package for some internal software. I
> followed
> several Howtos online and created the ebuild file for my package. But
> somehow
> ebuild always return me the same error over and over again:
>
> $ ebuild ./component-template-0.1.
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82513
>
Anyone know why jstubbs closed the bug without comment? I don't see
where it was particualrly resolved.
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Jason Stubbs wrote:
> There are several requests on the bug, the majority are now fixed and
> everybody (at least within the portage team) is agreed that FEATURES
> should not be added to USE_EXPAND. Essentially, I didn't take the time
> to read through all the follow-ups related (and unrelated) t
[Background]
The way perl modules are currently created using the perl-module eclass,
man3 files are generated in duplication of the current pod docs. This
leads to both a waste of disk space (anyone working with a perl module
first thinks to perldoc it - not man it), and more importantly porta
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> man pages can't be considered optional (despite what RMS says). They're
not fancy extra HTML API documentation, they're core, so they don't get
a USE flag.
(not advocating a USE flag bug...) what about when the man pages are a
duplication of the native documentation?
"Tom Martin"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
... and he
participated in the Google Summer of Code in writing a generational
garbage collector, GMC, for the Perl 6 VM (http://www.parrotcode.org).
>
Sweet! Does this mean he can help us get parrot/pugs functional again in
portage? :)
(sorry for
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> Here's the deal. We have a new user that installs Gentoo. After
> installing Gentoo, he tries to "emerge nagios" and it dies on building
> apache over a bug that has been known for some time and still isn't
> resolved. How exactly does that make us look? How exactly do
On Tue, 2005-12-06 at 18:39 +, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> the more the merrier !
>
> http://vapier.people.gentoo.org/ -> http://dev.gentoo.org/~vapier/
> http://people.gentoo.org/~vapier/ -> http://dev.gentoo.org/~vapier/
> http://www.gentoo.org/~vapier/ -> http://dev.gentoo.org/~vapier/
> -mike
On Mon, 2005-12-12 at 18:45 -0500, Jeffrey Forman wrote:
> I apologize for my mishap. Goes to show that testing on live hardware is
> not the way to go ;)
What is this "testing" thing you speak of? Should I buy one? Will santa
give me one if i sit on his lap?
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing lis
Gee, wouldn't it be nice for us lazy folks if the word [Security] (in
some common fashion) were included in the summary line of security
related bugs? i should seriously hope this doesn't warrant a glep, more
of a "anyone else think it'd be worth asking the security folks about"
question. (reason b
On Wed, 2005-12-14 at 13:55 +, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> this really should have been sent to the security mailing list and
> cc-ed the security team
>
> this has come up before on those lists, i just dont remember the
> outcome :P
See, this is my (*cough*lazy*cough*) ignorance shining bright a
On Thu, 2005-12-15 at 02:37 +0900, Chris White wrote:
> On Wednesday 14 December 2005 20:00, Michael Cummings wrote:
>
> er.. why not just do an advanced query for all bugs assigned / cc'ed to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] How that doesn't accomplish the same thing...
>
Following the bugzilla upgrade, looks like email is now setting a field
procmail can filter on. so, ah, thanks! 'cause i know this bugzilla
upgrade was all secretly to satisfy me ;)
~mcummings, advocate of saving jforman from further torment without a
good cause, like sheer fun or something
--
g
On Thu, 2006-01-05 at 09:42 -0600, Lance Albertson wrote:
> Chris Gianelloni wrote:
>
> > Really, I don't have any vision for Gentoo and I like it that way.
I know you meant this as sarcasm - but i'd second that. I originally
favored just calling them snapshots since that's all the iso's were -
On Thu, 2006-01-05 at 16:46 +0100, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
> On Thursday 05 January 2006 15:59, Stuart Herbert wrote:
> > Page title: "Gentoo Linux - Gentoo Linux News"
> Yeah ok, let me end up these holidays, and I'll prepare a written request to
> change the Linux part in something else
On Tue, 2006-01-10 at 08:20 -0600, Lance Albertson wrote:
> But herd != project. They are two distinct things. There are a couple of
> cases where they both are the same, but others where it isn't. For
> example, what project would netmon fit under? They aren't actively
> trying to create a specifi
Just curious whether there is any value at continuing to offer a libperl
ebuild (which creates libperl.so for you) and then having perl
statically built against an internally generated libperl.a (substitute
your platforms appropriate names porters :) Traditionally we offered
both libperl's, and per
Protocol doesn't demand it - but human decency sure as heck does. I just
wanted to apologize to everyone for my erroneous commit to the 1Q-2006
file yesterday.
The boring background is that some upstream cpan authors use a numbering
scheme that makes sense in a decimal fashion, where .29001 is les
On Tue, 2006-01-17 at 20:18 -0800, Drake Wyrm wrote:
> Portage is not the only important system tool. Some of us actually use
> Perl. Please do not be with the breaking.
Is this to say there is a valid need for both libperl.a and libperl.so
on your box? (really asking, honest). This isn't about b
On Tue, 2006-01-17 at 21:25 -0700, Joshua Baergen wrote:
> My point is that this isn't like the libstdc++ situation.
>
wasn't implying it was - different thread, different thought :)
> Many people have things dependent on Perl, but my impression is not that
> things would break, but rather that
On Wed, 2006-01-18 at 06:27 -0800, Drake Wyrm wrote:
> Personally, no, but others do. I should have been less ambiguous (and
> obnoxious) in my initial response. Please don't assume that just because
> _you_ don't need a static Perl, that _nobody_ needs a static Perl.
Actually, the whole point to
On Wed, 2006-01-18 at 09:52 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> if the lib is meant to be used by other packages, then a static version
> should
> probably be offered for people who want to build static binaries ... although
> atm, the libperl ebuild doesnt actually produce a libperl.a does it ? and
Nothing in the meta - would whoever is currently considering themselves
to be maintainer pop into bug 115861? I don't want to be misled by the
last dev who did a bump to think they might be the same person as the
maintainer ;)
~mcummings
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed mess
Hey kids,
It's always something...perl-5.8.8 (~arch) is our first perl install
that correctly utilizes /usr/lib64. In itself, a good thing, but the
@INC that gets generated is geared towards /usr/lib64 (still a good
thing), but as such perl-cleaner gets confused because your old perl
modul
On Mon, 2006-02-13 at 02:50 -0700, Duncan wrote:
>
> What I'd do with such bugs is thank the user, but say next time, please
> give me a few days, at least a week (or whatever a dev feels comfortable
> with for that package, again, it'll vary) -- if it's /just/ a bump
> request. If I take over a
On Fri, 2006-02-17 at 02:36 +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> dev-perl/XML-AutoWriter-0.38: description:
> major: DESCRIPTION equal to $PN? You can do better than that.
slightly off topic (fixed btw - perl herd didn't add it, but it was
'given' to us) but if you're (NOT ciaranm, general reply) g
On Thu, 2006-03-02 at 20:49 +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> Now, you've heard that dropping keywords is bad. But you have a clever
> idea, and make the dep alsa? ( !sparc? ( alsa libraries ) ). This gets
> past repoman just fine.
>
As any arch can tell you, that's never stopped me - *IF* you do
On Thursday 09 March 2006 11:00, Doug Goldstein wrote:
> Don't be so hard on yourself. Everyone thinks you did a great job with
> MySQL.
Ditto - and I voted against a slotted mysql at that :/
Maybe there needs to be an IWANTSLOTS feature or something, because the same
rationale for why I was ag
On Tuesday 21 March 2006 14:25, Karol Wojtaszek wrote:
> Welcome aboard Karol! One more person from Poland! Let's takeover Gentoo
> and make it Polish distro! ;>
i thought it was polished alreadyoh...polish ;)
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Friday 24 March 2006 10:41, Andres Loeh wrote:
> At the moment, Haskell is only a herd and a team, not a project.
Then stand up my brother! perl wasn't so different, so we snuck in a project
page. no one said anything. i'm going with we're a project to govern the
direction and maintenance of
On Monday 03 April 2006 19:11, Stephen P. Becker wrote:
> Whether it is meant to be flamebait or not is irrelevant. This list
> isn't for whining about (the lack of) stable keywords for any particular
> ebuild or set of ebuilds.
Probably missing part of the thread or something, but I think the OP
On Tuesday 04 April 2006 05:42, Jan Kundrát wrote:
> Michael Cummings wrote:
> > Relax, spb, it's all good :)
>
> spb != geoman :)
BAH! People shouldn't be allowed to have overlapping initials or something
/me puts moritorium on other mcummings and MPC&#
I have to ask, please refrain from adding packages to the tree and assigning
them to a herd that you have no part in. The folks that watch those herds
would appreciate it. It'd also be nice if you did this if you at least got
all of the deps correct.
Please refrain from arbitrarily bumping pac
On Friday 07 April 2006 11:15, Thomas de Grenier de Latour wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Apr 2006 10:21:54 +0100,
>
> I would also suggest creation of a gentoo-dev-help@ mailing-list.
Not to be a wet blanket (I'm all for making current users happier and
encouraging new folks to take the bold step) but isn't
On Mon, 10 Apr 2006 08:44:49 -0400
Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday 10 April 2006 04:19, Michael Sterrett -Mr. Bones.- wrote:
> > On Mon, 10 Apr 2006, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
> > > On Monday 10 April 2006 05:26, Daniel Ahlberg wrote:
> > >> * if ebuild has $PN in SRC_URI (cosmet
On Thu, 2006-05-04 at 18:09 -0500, Daniel Goller wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> ./dev-perl/Event-ExecFlow (dvd::rip dep)
> ./dev-perl/AnyEvent(dvd::rip dep)
Perl herd will grab these. For that matter, the metadata already points
to us...
~mcummings
signature.asc
Descripti
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
mod_parrot hasn't been updated upstream in a *long* time, doesn't build
against an even remotely current version of parrot, and seems for all
intents to be pretty dead upstream (a nice idea that never panned out).
Unless there are objections, I will be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Once upon a time ago, we added ExtUtils-MakeMaker to the tree to deal
with some dramatic changes between perl versions and what they
supported. The time for that has passed, and this package only serves to
cause problems with the perl tree. Unless ther
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael Cummings wrote:
> mod_parrot hasn't been updated upstream in a *long* time, doesn't build
> against an even remotely current version of parrot, and seems for all
> intents to be pretty dead upstream (a nice idea th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
> No! It's a flying pig! :)
(a little late) someone is lacking in proper Gentoo spirit. We have
flying cows , not pigs.
~mcummings
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with M
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> Using your example, if it will *never* make it into the tree, then what
> is it doing on *.gentoo.org infrastructure?
OK, I'll speak up. I plan on using overlay.gentoo.org for the perl team
overlay repository. dev-perl alone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
OK, when I get invoked by name, then I have to respond :) (obligatory
bah) Mind you, this conversation really deserves its own thread since my
comments stray far, far away from the sunset project (that's going to be
my project for retired ebuilds avail
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kevin F. Quinn wrote:
>
If RDEPEND is not set, it is defaulted to $DEPEND by portage.
Alas, if only. If you inherit an eclass with deps this carry over won't
happen. (And I have the bugs to prove it ;)
~mcummings
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Ver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
OK, I attempted this in November of 05 (then forgot?), but since no one
responded to my last round, it has been removed. Happy gentoo'ing,
~mcummings
Michael Cummings wrote:
> Once upon a time ago, we added ExtUtils-MakeMaker to the tree
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ryan Hill wrote:
> Michael Cummings wrote:
>> OK, I attempted this in November of 05 (then forgot?), but since no one
>> responded to my last round, it has been removed. Happy gentoo'ing,
>
> *yay*
heh - only bug I've
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alec Warner wrote:
> I'd prefer if you are going to remove a package and you want
> treecleaners to do it; either talk to a treecleaners project member on
> irc or via the alias first, or just assign it to maintainer-needed and
> CC treecleaners.
> [1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dan Podeanu wrote:
> help
help: help [-s] [pattern ...]
Display helpful information about builtin commands. If PATTERN is
specified, gives detailed help on all commands matching PATTERN,
otherwise a list of the builtins is printed. The
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> Congrats... So how does it feel to fork(); ? ;)
>
Silly, that's how you *make* the kid - he that about 30+ weeks ago...
- --
- -o()o------
Michael Cummings |#gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl
3, they would have to
get the sources anyway to proceed forward, so this would fill the
initial gap...or am I missing something more critical?)
- --
- -o()o------
Michael Cummings |#gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl
Gentoo Perl Dev|on irc.freen
come with their own patch solutions :)
- --
- -o()o--
Michael Cummings |#gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl
Gentoo Perl Dev|on irc.freenode.net
Gentoo/SPARC
Gentoo/AMD64
GPG: 0543 6FA3 5F82 3A76 3BF7 8323 AB5C ED4E 9E7F 4E2E
- -o()o-
ync ('cept maybe timeliness of your mirror)
- --
- -o()o--
Michael Cummings |#gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl
Gentoo Perl Dev|on irc.freenode.net
Gentoo/SPARC
Gentoo/AMD64
GPG: 0543 6FA3 5F82 3A76 3BF7 8323 AB5C ED4E 9E7F 4E2E
- ---
vant bug number if you are really super
curious).
~mcummings
- --
- -o()o------
Michael Cummings |#gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl
Gentoo Perl Dev|on irc.freenode.net
Gentoo/SPARC
Gentoo/AMD64
GPG: 0543 6FA3 5F82 3A76 3BF7 8323 AB5C ED4E 9E7F 4
rl use flag is to avoid make perl a dep for every package that
inherits the eclass even if perl isn't in your personal USE flags.
- --
- -o()o--
Michael Cummings |#gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl
Gent
lp prepare him for the volume of mail on
this list. So let's all give it up for yuval!
- --
- -o()o------
Michael Cummings |#gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl
Gentoo Perl Dev|on irc.freenode.net
Gentoo/SPARC
Gentoo/AMD64
GPG: 0543 6FA3 5F82 3A
ng it (due to a lack of love, attention, and
time). Thanks!
- --
- -o()o------
Michael Cummings |#gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl
Gentoo Perl Dev|on irc.freenode.net
Gentoo/SPARC
Gentoo/AMD64
GPG: 0543 6FA3 5F82 3A76 3BF7 8323 AB5C ED4E 9E7F 4E2
aludis was
not up to this job if the repository didn't fit some rather strict
guidelines.
- --
- -o()o--
Michael Cummings |#gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl
Gentoo Perl Dev|on irc.freenode.net
Gentoo/SPARC
Gentoo/AMD64
GPG:
l
it might be working towards at the moment.
somebody shoot me, my job in middle management is finally getting to me.
- --
- -----o()o------
Michael Cummings |#gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl
Gentoo Perl Dev|on irc.freenode.net
Gentoo/SPARC
Gentoo/A
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael Cummings wrote:
> This package was absorbed back into perl-core/Test-Simple as of the 0.62
> release (which you have either via dev-lang/perl-5.8.8 or as the ebuild
> at this point). I'm package.mask'ing it and will be r
#x27;t believe I read through all that to get insulted.
- --
- -o()o------
Michael Cummings |#gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl
Gentoo Perl Dev|on irc.freenode.net
Gentoo/SPARC
Gentoo/AMD64
GPG: 0543 6FA3 5F82 3A76 3BF7 8323 AB
lining the role) and so there is still 1 slot
open?
- --
- -o()o--
Michael Cummings |#gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl
Gentoo Perl Dev|on irc.freenode.net
Gentoo/SPARC
Gentoo/AMD64
GPG: 0543 6FA3 5F
.1.0 ebuild.
- --
- -o()o------
Michael Cummings |#gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl
Gentoo Perl Dev|on irc.freenode.net
Gentoo/SPARC
Gentoo/AMD64
GPG: 0543 6FA3 5F82 3A76 3BF7 8323 AB5C ED4E 9E7F 4E2E
_cfg* files, haven't I?
- --
- -o()o------
Michael Cummings |#gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl
Gentoo Perl Dev|on irc.freenode.net
Gentoo/SPARC
Gentoo/AMD64
GPG: 0543 6FA3 5F82 3A76 3BF7 8323 AB5C ED4E 9E7F 4E2E
- -o()o--
-BEGIN PGP
st checking reverse deps in case it
impacted any of the gimp perl deps
- --
- -o()o------
Michael Cummings |#gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl
Gentoo Perl Dev|on irc.freenode.net
Gentoo/SPARC
Gentoo/AMD64
GPG: 0543 6FA3 5F82 3A76 3BF7 8
tant as security fixed, but well - if the new
> imagemagick-version, which became stabel recently, would have a new
> version for the libMagick.so, then users would have a broken perl-module
> again.
>
>
Makes me wonder if we shouldn't just resurect the perlmagic ebuild again
and b
use flag is a recent
edition in the scheme of things.
--
-o()o------
Michael Cummings |#gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl
Gentoo Perl Dev|on irc.freenode.net
Gentoo/SPARC
Gentoo/AMD64
GPG: 0543 6FA3 5F82 3A76 3BF7 8323 AB5C ED4E 9E7F
used to build
imagemagick and reuse it for building perlmagick, building only the perl
portions and ensuring that we were binding against the correct libraries
on $root. But hey, what do I know, I only maintained it for 2 or 3
years.
--
-o()o-
ke.conf variable for allowed
licenses and block based on that?
--
-o()o----------
Michael Cummings |#gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl
Gentoo Perl Dev|on irc.freenode.net
Gentoo/SPARC
Gentoo/AMD64
GPG: 0543 6FA3 5F82 3A76 3BF7 8323 AB5C ED4E
a new cd over the old install and it worked fine" would
be nice. so maybe i'm already biased in all of this.
nb2. maybe i'm also missing the point of parts of this discussion.
nb3. there is no nb3.
--
-o()o--
Michael Cummings |
+++ Mark Stier [28/09/06 15:35 +0200]:
How about entering the removed ebuilds into bugzilla under an adequate
section?
I think my original reply got lost, so just in case - seems like a time for
sunset overlays ;0
~mcummings
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
bug 21549
perl-PBS
perlmenu: bug 136223
perlrapi: bug 17419
perlsieve: bug 23893
set-scalar: bug 24607
tagged: bug 21174
--
-o()o----------
Michael Cummings |#gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl
Gentoo Perl Dev|on irc.freenode.net
Gentoo/SPARC
Gentoo/A
Mark it in the meta then. or learn to use g-cpan.
On Sun, 2006-10-01 at 15:19 +0200, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
> On Sunday 01 October 2006 15:08, Michael Cummings wrote:
> > RPC-XML
> This is needed for CIA commit scripts, might be a good idea to leave it there
&g
On Sun, 2006-10-01 at 15:48 +0200, Jakub Moc wrote:
> Michael Cummings wrote:
>
> > Geo-IP
>
> Can you please leave this one, it's rather useful :)
>
>
Just let me know what in the tree is using it :)
Mind you, the actual removal of packages will be a group
eff
nd
> svn are down. Starts at $5, who'se in?
>
Depends - is it a forfeit if I'm both in the pool and one of the first
to ask?
--
-o()o------
Michael Cummings |#gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl
Gentoo Perl Dev|on irc.freenode.net
s that you can get copies of the
irc logs from by subscribing to the mailing list. Oh, the humanity! The
subterfuge!! The sarcasm!!!
--
-o()o----------
Michael Cummings |#gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl
Gentoo Perl Dev|on irc.freenode.net
Gentoo/SPARC
e!
>
> And soon there will be three of us - I'm moving to Israel some time
> next year ;-)
>
yuval too.
--
-o()o--
Michael Cummings |#gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl
Gentoo Perl Dev
Can I be the first to point out that drobbins is on the list, so it's a
fair guess that whenever Gentoo started was his start date...?
Aw, come on, there's one of us in every crowd. :)
--
-o()o------
Michael Cummings |#gentoo-dev, #g
boojum
> wolf31o2
> mcummings
> stuart
> rl03
> pauldv
>
>
>
>
> Cheers,
> /Alexandre
--
-o()o--
Michael Cummings |#gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl
Gentoo Perl Dev|on irc.freenode.net
Gent
of promoting
the next "winner" in the elections. There were 2 more candidates than
positions on the ballot, which means they didn't come in next by default
but by actual votes.
--
-o()o------
Michael Cummings |#gentoo-dev, #g
tux
> media-plugins/xmms-xf86audio
> media-plugins/xmms-xmmsd
> media-plugins/xmms-xmmsmplayer
> media-sound/ctrlxmms
> media-sound/longplayer
> media-sound/madman
> media-sound/xmms
> x11-plugins/gaim-xmms-remote
> x11-themes/xmms-themes
>
> They'
n
later.
--
-o()o------
Michael Cummings |#gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl
Gentoo Perl Dev|on irc.freenode.net
Gentoo/SPARC
Gentoo/AMD64
GPG: 0543 6FA3 5F82 3A76 3BF7 8323 AB5C ED4E 9E7F 4E2E
-o()o--
signature.asc
Descrip
ey and space
to personally house more than a handful of machines at home.
--
-o()o------
Michael Cummings |#gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl
Gentoo Perl Dev|on irc.freenode.net
Gentoo/SPARC
Gentoo/AMD64
GPG: 0543 6FA3 5F82 3A76 3BF7 8323 AB5
,
doesn't allow 25 to leave their network. To send mail, I *have* to relay
through their mail servers.
--
-o()o------
Michael Cummings |#gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl
Gentoo Perl Dev|on irc.freenode.net
Gentoo/SPARC
Gentoo/AMD64
GPG: 0543
On Tue, 2006-11-07 at 08:06 -0600, Lance Albertson wrote:
> Michael Cummings wrote:
> > On Mon, 2006-11-06 at 17:48 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >> - make sending gentoo.org mail via gentoo.org mail server
> >> friendly/recommended
> >> -mike
> >
&g
oolkit keychain portage
nice work! is there a tracker bug for requesting other sources.g.o svn's to be
added?
--
-o()o----------
Michael Cummings |#gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl
Gentoo Perl Dev|on irc.freenode.net
Gentoo/SPARC
Gentoo/AMD64
Masked since 23 Oct 2006, removed.
--
-o()o--
Michael Cummings |#gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl
Gentoo Perl Dev|on irc.freenode.net
Gentoo/SPARC
Gentoo/AMD64
GPG: 0543 6FA3 5F82 3A76 3BF7 8323 AB5C ED4E 9E7F 4E2E
-o()o
On Fri, 2006-12-01 at 05:15 -0500, Alec Warner wrote:
> [1] http://spaceparanoids.org/gentoo/gpnl/qa.php?q=no-herd-maintainer
If someone takes adocman, would you be willing to move it out of
dev-perl? (since it isn't a module)
--
-o()o------
On Thu, 2006-11-30 at 00:59 -0500, Alec Warner wrote:
> In the meantime, please don't remove stuff.
Just to be a pain - you're referring only to treecleaner removals,
right?
--
-o()o------
Michael Cummings |#gentoo-dev, #gentoo-per
the rest of us are fine, jolly even (though i just
learned chriswhite is absent, which explains the lack of pole dancing
comments in my life) - no reason to despair because a couple of kids
are fighting it out in stunning ascii.
--
-o()o------
Michael C
way - I never have a good reference).
And yes, given the option, I'd do away with sys-devel/libperl all together and
just build the library once, preferably dynamically since it leaves a smaller
footprint for perl ;)
~mcummings
--
-o()o----------
Mich
On Tue, 6 Mar 2007 15:17:46 -0500
Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 06 March 2007, Michael Cummings wrote:
> i dont think this has really been documented properly, but the logic
> behind it is pretty simple ...
>
> not providing static libraries and o
It isn't maintained (last update was in 1998), doesn't build, and isn't
dep'd by anything. Package masked for removal at the end of the month.
--
-o()o----------
Michael Cummings |#gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl
Gentoo Perl Dev|
to
be added - didn't realize it hadn't been tbh (new subject line, so
hopefully unless your mail client threads but message-id's this should
break the chain)
--
-o()o------
Michael Cummings |#gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl
Gentoo Perl Dev
On Thu, 8 Mar 2007 17:34:39 -0500
Michael Cummings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 08 Mar 2007 22:43:01 +0100
> Thibaut Fernagut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > To start this I'm opening with a -dev question :
> > Why is mod_perl not in the default /e
ime,
--
-o()o----------
Michael Cummings |#gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl
Gentoo Perl Dev|on irc.freenode.net
Gentoo/SPARC
Gentoo/AMD64
GPG: 0543 6FA3 5F82 3A76 3BF7 8323 AB5C ED4E 9E7F 4E2E
-o()o--
signa
On Tue, 13 Mar 2007 09:28:50 -0400
Chris Gianelloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-03-13 at 07:30 -0400, Michael Cummings wrote:
> > banning/suspending a user from a mailing list. They would retain the
> > right to receive the mail, just not comment fo
one of the
longest running new-dev bugs, congrats!
--
-o()o------
Michael Cummings |#gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl
Gentoo Perl Dev|on irc.freenode.net
Gentoo/SPARC
Gentoo/AMD64
GPG: 0543 6FA3 5F82 3A76 3BF7 8323 AB5C ED4E
how much they would whither
and die without a gentoo core. There was an example of gentoo+gnome integration
(i think) in a previous email - that wouldn't be any more appropriate. Unless
there's the Gentoo Inc copyright in the header, it isn't eligible in my opinion.
~mcummings, the
on, not
more convoluted closure flags, is the solution. IMHO. You know. Word.
~mcummings
--
-o()o------
Michael Cummings |#gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl
Gentoo Perl Dev|on irc.freenode.net
Gentoo/SPARC
Gentoo/AMD64
GPG: 0543 6FA3 5F82 3A76
ects people are working on?
Anyone?
--
-o()o------
Michael Cummings |#gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl
Gentoo Perl Dev|on irc.freenode.net
Gentoo/SPARC
Gentoo/AMD64
GPG: 0543 6FA3 5F82 3A76 3BF7 8323 AB5C ED4E 9E7F
1 - 100 of 176 matches
Mail list logo
