Re: [gentoo-dev] Help offered - Portage tree

2008-03-13 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
Most librairies don't cause this problem though so I don't really see this as a bug on the gentoo side even if it's annoying. Anyway, to keep machines using binary in sync without much headache, my current solution is to use a squashfsed portage tree with --deep. It works pretty well. -- Gilles Dartiguelongue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Gentoo -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Help offered - Portage tree

2008-03-14 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
hese are the roots of the rest I believe. -- Gilles Dartiguelongue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Gentoo -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Major changes to the Gnome2 Eclasses

2008-03-17 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
and there might be simpler/faster solutions but oh well... it gave me an output of 62 packages. -- Gilles Dartiguelongue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Gentoo signature.asc Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée

[gentoo-dev] masking app-admin/gnome-system-tools-2.14

2008-04-12 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
Hello list, 12 Apr 2008; Gilles Dartiguelongue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> package.mask: Masking gnome-system-tools because it is broken, to help fix it, see bug #214265. --- Comment #3 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-12 15:19 --- ok guys, here is the situation. We need s

[gentoo-dev] xmpp vs. jabber USE flag

2008-04-12 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
for people that do not know that > jabber and XMPP is (at least in this context) the same thing. I thought it would be better handled on the mailing list and would like to hear from your opinions. -- Gilles Dartiguelongue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Gentoo signature.asc Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée

Re: [gentoo-dev] New global USE flag: keyring

2008-04-20 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
be renamed. Gnome makes things optional for other to reuse (like xfce) but afaik no other "keyring" like programs are optional deps of another package in portage. Let's not cast a simple change into breakage for users already using it (even in stable, and yes I'm lazy :D). -

Re: [gentoo-dev] New global USE flag: keyring

2008-04-20 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
Le dimanche 20 avril 2008 à 20:25 +0300, Alon Bar-Lev a écrit : > On 4/20/08, Gilles Dartiguelongue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > for what it's worth, as a gnome dev I didn't see any convincing > > arguments as to why it should be renamed. Gnome makes things o

Re: [gentoo-dev] New developer : Markus Duft (mduft)

2008-04-30 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
Le mercredi 30 avril 2008 à 13:35 +0200, Denis Dupeyron a écrit : [snip] > Please everybody, give a very warm welcome to mduft. may I use a flamethrower for that ? welcome Markus :) -- Gilles Dartiguelongue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Gentoo signature.asc Description: Ceci est une partie d

Re: [gentoo-dev] bindnow-flags going the way of the dodo

2008-05-04 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
at dates back 10 months ago (bug #218925 for the curious). -- Gilles Dartiguelongue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Gentoo signature.asc Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: gnome-extra/shermans-aquarium

2008-05-08 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
# Gilles Dartiguelongue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (08 May 2008) # Masked for removal on 8 June 2008. # Builds but as issues here and there. # Not bumpable without fixing dead libs. # See bug #216566. gnome-extra/shermans-aquarium btw, gai for example is masked for removal since January or so

Re: [gentoo-dev] packages up for grabs

2008-05-31 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
> net-libs/libvncserver > net-misc/vnc > > I wouldn't mind taking app-editors/hexcurse over as well. > > What is the procedure be for me to take over maintenance of these > three packages? Option 1: become a gentoo developer Option 2: find a gentoo developer willing to

Re: [gentoo-dev] Assigning bugs back to bug-wranglers@

2008-06-30 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
se you _think_ the package is owned by ${HERD}. -- Gilles Dartiguelongue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Gentoo signature.asc Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Multislot dependencies

2008-06-30 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
ag was and that was with only 1 package with 2 slots. Now think about say db (berkeleydb) or gtkhtml (and I'm still probably overlooking the most important point). -- Gilles Dartiguelongue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Gentoo signature.asc Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée

Re: [gentoo-dev] Assigning bugs back to bug-wranglers@

2008-06-30 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
Le lundi 30 juin 2008 à 13:33 -0700, Donnie Berkholz a écrit : > On 22:04 Mon 30 Jun , Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote: > > PS: I'd like to remind users reading here that assigning bugs directly > > is _bad_ if you didn't perform the above checks. It is _not_ ok to > &g

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [v3] Planning for automatic assignment of bugs

2008-07-02 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
nything that fell thru the cracks or if the > wranglers all disappeared or went on strike/vacation/whatever. Then if > folks ever suddenly find themselves inundated with "raw" bugs, it'd be a > serious indication that the wranglers needed some help. sounds like a plan --

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: 0-day bump requests

2008-07-03 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
ot;). If we aren't done one week later, then it's probably that we missed it on our radar or we haven't had enough man power at this time. In either case it's fine to fill a bug at this time. -- Gilles Dartiguelongue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Gentoo signature.asc Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée

Re: [gentoo-dev] [2 GLEPs] metadata improvements

2008-07-06 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
Le samedi 05 juillet 2008 à 10:01 +0200, Rémi Cardona a écrit : > The Gnome Team has 3 herds : gnome, gnome-mm and gnome-office. While > officially we (us gnomies) are all maintainers of all 3 herds, having 3 > herds makes for better housekeeping. > you forgot gnome-accessibility :p

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] New policy: LDFLAGS should be respected

2008-07-25 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
ually small and easy to write. > > This policy is required to allow QA team to fix packages which ignore LDFLAGS. > this question might sound stupid, but what are you actually trying to fix ? What do these packages do or do not do by ignoring your ldflags that is so crucial to you ? -

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] New policy: LDFLAGS should be respected

2008-07-26 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
CFLAGS or doing pre-stripping. If making this a policy can make you happy, I see no problem with that. It won't make bugs fix themselves either way. -- Gilles Dartiguelongue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Gentoo signature.asc Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] New policy: LDFLAGS should be respected

2008-07-26 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
t up in the relevant thread. It breaks with --as-needed as expected. -- Gilles Dartiguelongue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Gentoo signature.asc Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-misc/anki: metadata.xml Manifest anki-0.9.8.1.ebuild ChangeLog

2008-10-04 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
t work transparently with old pysqlite module. Upstream has to had support for it. This occurred recently on hamster-applet which received this support only with a patch from Nirbheek Chauhan before gnome 2.24 release. -- Gilles Dartiguelongue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Gentoo signature.asc Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing doc use flag on gtk-doc packages to gtk-doc-rebuild or something else

2008-10-05 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
the INSTALL_MASK option (I know it's for l33t users reading mans, but...). -- Gilles Dartiguelongue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Gentoo signature.asc Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée

Re: [gentoo-dev] zeroconf/avahi USE flag

2008-11-04 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
Le mardi 04 novembre 2008 à 12:11 -0500, Doug Goldstein a écrit : > Hey all, > > A few ebuilds treat things differently with regard to this situation > and > it really needs to get rectified. [snip] > Maybe we should clean the whole thing up and do like net-misc/ntp does > it. Thoughts? since I'm

Re: [gentoo-dev] Please review: function epunt_la_files for eutils.eclass

2008-11-14 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
ATURES flag for individual > packages. See above. yes you can, can't find the related doc (it's not in portage man), but that's what /etc/portage/env/ can do for you. -- Gilles Dartiguelongue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grab

2008-11-16 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
/logjam https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181236 If no-one takes them, I'll proceed to package removal. -- Gilles Dartiguelongue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Gentoo signature.asc Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Saving package emerge output (einfo, elog, ewarn, etc.) somewhere official

2008-12-01 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
derstand me, some stuff can get ouf of the radar of everyone, it's ok, real people are still here to point you in the right direction. If you find a better way to convey these information to the users, then please surprise me. For now I think we are in a good shape. -- Gilles D

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Moving HOMEPAGE out of ebuilds for the future

2008-12-03 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
itable variable expression > in the > HOMEPAGE variable, but now we'd have to edit it into metadata.xml as > well. > actually I thought it was strictly forbidden to put any kind of variable in the HOMEPAGE value. Did I miss something, is it an old restriction that does

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council Reminder for February 26

2009-02-25 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
overlay. I didn't know something used in gentoo-x86 couldn't be used in an overlay. Could you point me to the PMS section that treat this ? -- Gilles Dartiguelongue Gentoo

Re: [gentoo-dev] Repository stacking and complementary overlays

2009-03-02 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
rting with implementation is the wrong approach. We didn't implement anything but let's just talk about what we wanted to see. We simply wanted overlay users to keep testing gnome 2.24 components that were masked or using masked packages in base/package.mask so we just made sure those pac

Re: [gentoo-dev] Repository stacking and complementary overlays

2009-03-04 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
Le lundi 02 mars 2009 à 23:59 +, Ciaran McCreesh a écrit : > On Tue, 03 Mar 2009 00:55:38 +0100 > Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote: > > We didn't implement anything but let's just talk about what we wanted > > to see. We simply wanted overlay users to keep testing gn

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Make the "policykit" USE flag global

2009-03-19 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
ssing with diego about issues with where pam_ck_connector is placed in our pam stack having someone with a real problem with how things are today would probably help to iron out this once and for all. Also you might want to try consolekit-0.3 (and especially read the elog messages). --

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

2009-03-23 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
ver 1.6 and xinput-2. > sys-auth/nss-mdns unless it goes to base-system or someone else that has more time, I'll take care of it. -- Gilles Dartiguelongue Gentoo

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs: genstef gems special edition

2009-03-23 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
ug > and where genstef is the maintainer. > media-video/isight-firmware-tools I haven't had much time outside of gnome stuff but I still work on this as time permits. Any help would of course be appreciated. -- Gilles Dartiguelongue Gentoo signature.asc Description: Ceci

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gsoc Idea: EeePC Script/Build

2009-03-29 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
l p4 @3ghz (1 week if you're not so familiar with gentoo maybe) so I don't see anything challenging here. Working on enhancing stage builder or stage4 generation (or whatever you name it) would be more interesting for the project as a whole and require much more time which would probably satisf

Re: [gentoo-dev] net-www category

2009-04-06 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
: Cette catégorie contient des plugins pour navigateurs Web. fr: Cette catégorie contient des plugins pour navigateurs Web. plugins -> greffons is the official translation. > Cheers, > > Rémi -- Gilles Dartiguelongue Gentoo

Re: [gentoo-dev] net-www category

2009-04-06 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
stemmed from the desktop I use where plugins is translated while browser stays "navigateur" and not "butineur". Now we're addressing knowledgeable people (aren't we) so using either plugins or greffons should work. -- Gilles Dartiguelongue Gentoo

Re: [gentoo-dev] Removing .la files...

2009-04-13 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
ur users base by changing this starting from low level libs ? ok maybe that's rhetoric questions but I can't help it. -- Gilles Dartiguelongue Gentoo signature.asc Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée

[gentoo-dev] On git and pushing official gentoo branches

2009-04-26 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
Hello list, As many of you might already know, gnome switched to git about 2 weeks ago so I'd like to take a pick at what people do concerning upstream using git. How do you present patches you maintain for gentoo to upstream ? Own maintained git server, gentoo hosted git, others ? -- G

Re: [gentoo-dev] On git and pushing official gentoo branches

2009-04-26 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
Le dimanche 26 avril 2009 à 15:33 -0500, William Hubbs a écrit : > Hi Gilles, > > On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 11:55:55PM +0200, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote: > > As many of you might already know, gnome switched to git about 2 weeks > > ago so I'd like to take a pick at

Re: Training points for users interested in helping out with ebuild development (was: Re: [gentoo-dev] Retiring)

2009-05-06 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
dicate unreviewed patches. It's sad we don't have the ability to set per attachment status other than obsolete in our bugzie but we can still figure ways to work without it. -- Gilles Dartiguelongue Gentoo

Re: [gentoo-dev] Files owned by multiple slots

2009-05-12 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
nstalled in a separate eselect sort of package ? If those kind of wrappers are generic enough, it could even be a single eselect package and gems would enable (symlink to wrapper) themselves at postinst. I'm an eselect n00b but this all sound like something an eselect module could do. -- Gilles Dartiguelongue Gentoo

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Files owned by multiple slots

2009-05-13 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
> > themselves at > > postinst. I'm an eselect n00b but this all sound like something an > > eselect module could do. > > The wrappers can't be boiled down to one unified wrapper. > Cheers, -sven > > -- Gilles Dartiguelongue Gentoo

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: gnome-base/libghttp

2009-05-16 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
# Gilles Dartiguelongue (15 May 2009) # Masked for removal wrt bug #244128. Old, rotten and # unused. Removal in 30 days. gnome-base/libghttp another one bites the dust. (resent from my gentoo address) -- Gilles Dartiguelongue Gentoo signature.asc Description: Ceci est une partie de

Re: [gentoo-dev] USE_EXPAND instead of SANE_BACKENDS for media-gfx/sane-backends

2009-06-23 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
harder to pick > invalid backend names. Any objections or questions? I think sane is perfectly fit to make use of this, but since I reported this bug [1] I guess you want the opinion of other devs :) [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=244501 -- Gilles Dartiguelongue Gentoo

Re: [gentoo-dev] About time to unify "cdda" and "cdaudio" USE flags and make the remaining one global?

2009-07-07 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
Le lundi 06 juillet 2009 à 14:18 -0700, Josh Saddler a écrit : > Sebastian Pipping wrote: > > Rémi Cardona wrote: > >> And now for some bikeshedding fun, which flag are we going to keep? ;) > > > > My vote would be for cdaudio as that > > > > - is more general (including analog playback) > > -

Re: [gentoo-dev] About time to unify "cdda" and "cdaudio" USE flags and make the remaining one global?

2009-07-07 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
onfusing wrt to [1], why would we use the correct technical abbreviation in one case and not in the other ? Or should we rename jabber to gtalk ? [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216300 -- Gilles Dartiguelongue Gentoo

[gentoo-dev] gnome2 and gnome2-utils eclass changes

2012-04-19 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
. If there is no objection, I will push the changes this weekend (it has been reviewed by a few gnome team members already). [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=301311 -- Gilles Dartiguelongue Gentoo Index: gnome2.eclass

Re: [gentoo-dev] gnome2 and gnome2-utils eclass changes

2012-05-02 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
Le jeudi 19 avril 2012 à 22:47 +0200, Gilles Dartiguelongue a écrit : > Per bug #301311 [1], I decided to fix a couple of issue I had with the > current way of dealing with scrollkeeper. [...] > [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=301311 FTR, since there were no complaints, I com

Re: [gentoo-dev] ebuild laziness and binpkg overhead

2012-06-16 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
ting to write gnome2_src_configure all the time but if there is a reason (like the one you exposed) to do it this way, then it'll become our new standard pratice :) -- Gilles Dartiguelongue Gentoo signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [gentoo-dev] gtk3 useflag and support of older toolkits

2012-06-23 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
ame version in two slots. We added a suffix that allows differenciation and still easy reading of which slot the upgrade is about. -- Gilles Dartiguelongue Gentoo

Re: [gentoo-dev] gtk3 useflag and support of older toolkits

2012-06-23 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
, we will be more than happy to switch to it. So please stop complaining and do what you are best known for, find a solution that can fit PMS. TIA. -- Gilles Dartiguelongue Gentoo signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [gentoo-dev] gtk3 useflag and support of older toolkits

2012-06-23 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
Le samedi 23 juin 2012 à 14:08 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh a écrit : > On Sat, 23 Jun 2012 15:02:41 +0200 > Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote: > > > It is handled better by working out what exactly the problem is, > > > and if you can't implement it nicely using exis

Re: [gentoo-dev] gtk3 useflag and support of older toolkits

2012-06-23 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
things much harder to maintain. -- Gilles Dartiguelongue Gentoo signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [gentoo-dev] gtk3 useflag and support of older toolkits

2012-06-23 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
" hence the guidelines already exposed back when we introduced gtk3 to the tree. As you may have noticed, this is still the solution applied for things hard to split or slot like gtk-vnc or avahi but we didn't see the need to have such USE flags when the library was so easily slottable. -

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: PROPERTIES=funky-slots

2012-06-23 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
;, just as it tries to bring in a > newer GCC and so on. I'm stopping my reading of this thread a minute to answer here. This is actually true when you think of it, gtk3 bindings are newer than gtk2. -- Gilles Dartiguelongue Gentoo signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [gentoo-dev] gtk3 useflag and support of older toolkits

2012-06-24 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
e issue was not brought formally to PMS team earlier. Again, this approach was exposed months ago to this very ml and most likely to #gentoo-dev as well and nobody raised an objection on the method used. -- Gilles Dartiguelongue Gentoo signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: PROPERTIES=funky-slots

2012-06-24 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
Le dimanche 24 juin 2012 à 16:48 +0800, Ben de Groot a écrit : > On 24 June 2012 06:50, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote: > > Le samedi 23 juin 2012 à 18:30 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh a écrit : > >> > >> It treats -r300 as being newer than -r200, and so will treat "the

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: PROPERTIES=funky-slots

2012-06-27 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
e of symbols conflict iirc. Anyway, I think that we got off track on the basics of the problem. The problem is that you cannot have two ebuilds of the same ${CAT}/${PN} with the same version simply because the files would have the same name. Adding a new property or whatever does not solve this probl

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] euscan: Need to add more upstream info in metadata.xml

2012-08-10 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
C_URI in ebuilds if that info is now available in metadata.xml ? (granted that we might still want to keep over-riding this information in ebuilds) -- Gilles Dartiguelongue Gentoo

Re: [gentoo-dev] SRC_URI in metadata.xml

2012-08-13 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
Le vendredi 10 août 2012 à 16:21 +0200, Jeroen Roovers a écrit : > On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 14:03:23 +0200 > Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote: > > > Since you are proposing this, a side question is: > > Why should we write SRC_URI in ebuilds if that info is now available > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] adns & ares USE flags

2012-08-29 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
Then it's like the ssl: openssl gnutls nss case :) -- Gilles Dartiguelongue Gentoo signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [gentoo-dev] making USE=upnp a global flag

2012-09-17 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
rts on the router for torrents/games * makes PC talk to TV/console for audio/video I'll admit this does not fit tracker but that's because I wasn't inspired when I had to find a USE flag to select a video metadata extractor :). -- Gilles Dartiguelongue Gentoo

Re: [gentoo-dev] making USE=upnp a global flag

2012-09-18 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
Le mardi 18 septembre 2012 à 10:05 +0200, Michał Górny a écrit : > On Tue, 18 Sep 2012 00:55:16 +0200 > Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote: > > > Le samedi 08 septembre 2012 à 20:29 +0200, Michał Górny a écrit : > > > On Sat, 8 Sep 2012 10:37:49 -0700 > > > Mike Fry

Re: [gentoo-dev] making USE=upnp a global flag

2012-09-30 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
nspired. [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_Living_Network_Alliance#DLNA_technology_components -- Gilles Dartiguelongue Gentoo

[gentoo-dev] About disabling DISABLE_DEPRECATED

2012-09-30 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
s not take care of packages providing --disable-deprecations{,-flags} on purpose for now since I have not found a MACRO and hence a reliable way to make sure this works in upstream tarballs. Some packages do have such configure switch but it does not always work. -- Gilles Dartiguelongue Gentoo Ind

Re: [gentoo-dev] making USE=upnp a global flag

2012-10-08 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
Le jeudi 04 octobre 2012 à 11:30 +0200, Michał Górny a écrit : > On Sun, 30 Sep 2012 17:44:42 +0200 > Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote: > > > Le mercredi 19 septembre 2012 à 10:19 +0200, Michał Górny a écrit : > > > > > > Just to make it clear: > > > - USE

Re: [gentoo-dev] About disabling DISABLE_DEPRECATED

2012-10-23 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
I have just commited a version adapted from your comments with the addition of fixing configure* files as well. Thanks guys for the review. -- Gilles Dartiguelongue Gentoo signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: gentoo-x86/eclass: udev.eclass

2012-10-31 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
. I do not have enough popcorn the enjoy it truly though so please stop and act in a constructive way like actually sending the eclass for review (again if you will). -- Gilles Dartiguelongue Gentoo

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] Check for USE_PYTHON <-> PYTHON_TARGETS equiv.

2012-11-05 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
t be called in pkg_setup in relevant EAPI ? -- Gilles Dartiguelongue Gentoo

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] Check for USE_PYTHON <-> PYTHON_TARGETS equiv.

2012-11-06 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
ay. Feel free to stab me if I telling atrocities or ask more details if that looks insufficient, I'm sure this will help draft the roadmap and/or enhance eclass documentation you'd like to see. -- Gilles Dartiguelongue Gentoo

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] Check for USE_PYTHON <-> PYTHON_TARGETS equiv.

2012-11-06 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
Le mardi 06 novembre 2012 à 14:13 +0100, Gilles Dartiguelongue a écrit : [snip] Forgot to add that obviously, as already explained by Michał, distutils-r1 being (almost) the only demo out there to make use of this new eclass, most the of little things that would make it a success may still be

Re: [gentoo-dev] Reminder: open season on robbat2's packages

2012-11-18 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
Le dimanche 18 novembre 2012 à 11:11 +, Robin H. Johnson a écrit : > net-nds/nsscache > sys-auth/nss_ldap If nobody else want them and I don't forget about them, I'll take care of these. -- Gilles Dartiguelongue Gentoo

[gentoo-dev] gstreamer eclass review

2012-11-18 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
ee inclusion by next week. There should be little to no breakage and this would help bump last 0.10 releases as well. -- Gilles Dartiguelongue Gentoo # Copyright 1999-2012 Gentoo Foundation # Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2 # $Header: $ # @ECLASS: gst-p

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: gstreamer eclass review

2012-11-18 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
Le dimanche 18 novembre 2012 à 20:45 +, Duncan a écrit : > Gilles Dartiguelongue posted on Sun, 18 Nov 2012 20:06:30 +0100 as > excerpted: > [...] > But as I said up top, that's (mostly, the pattern matching vs string > matching will occasionally bite if you're

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH python-r1] Move common utility functions to python-utils-r1.

2012-11-21 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
Le mercredi 21 novembre 2012 à 08:54 -0500, Ian Stakenvicius a écrit : > On 21/11/12 04:43 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > > Moved: python_export, getters, python_domodule, python_doscript and > > the necessary internal functions. No global-scope variables, no > > phase functions. [ Snip! ] > > So remin

Re: [gentoo-dev] gstreamer eclass review

2012-11-21 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
'm not a fan of +=, it seems alien to shell for me, but if this is preferred, I have no problem changing it. -- Gilles Dartiguelongue Gentoo signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [gentoo-dev] [python-single-r1 1/3] A conceptual eclass for packages not supporting multiple Python impls.

2012-11-22 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
Le mercredi 21 novembre 2012 à 23:19 +0100, Michał Górny a écrit : > diff --git a/gx86/eclass/python-single-r1.eclass > b/gx86/eclass/python-single-r1.eclass > new file mode 100644 > index 000..3d21ea8 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/gx86/eclass/python-single-r1.eclass > @@ -0,0 +1,93 @@ > +# Copyrigh

Re: [gentoo-dev] New global useflag proposals

2012-11-23 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
ew years now (at least 2 by gnome release count), and nothing comparable has emerged in gentoo (at least). So, can we go forward with this now ? -- Gilles Dartiguelongue Gentoo

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: new eclass - pkgconfig.eclass

2012-11-29 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
select which implementation to get without further patching of either upstream or downstream packages. -- Gilles Dartiguelongue Gentoo signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 4/4] Example conversion of pygobject to python-r1 + autotools-utils.

2012-11-29 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
tualmake > + > + python_execute_function -s testing > +} > + dbus variables needs to be unset for tests to work when you do your builds from a terminal started from your desktop, is that really equivalent ? -- Gilles Dartiguelongue Gentoo

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: new eclass - pkgconfig.eclass

2012-11-29 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
Le jeudi 29 novembre 2012 à 10:07 +0100, justin a écrit : > On 29/11/12 09:48, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote: > > Le jeudi 29 novembre 2012 à 08:52 +0100, justin a écrit : > >> Currently we have an eselect module to switch between different > >> implementations by setti

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] rsync.gentoo.org rsync modules: gentoo-repo-changelog added, gentoo-x86-portage & gentoo-sec discontinued.

2017-02-06 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
ortage. I tried asking #gentoo-dev but the best answer I was given was to switch to git clone and to generate the changelogs myself. Problem is, I am not always on a dev machine or on a machine that can spare these CPU cycles so it does not seem appropriate. Is there any way to get this back that doesn't involve extra operations over emerge --sync ? -- Gilles Dartiguelongue signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/7] gnome2-utils.eclass: Make gnome2_icon_cache_update update all themes

2017-04-17 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
t; explicitly (i.e. knows that themes are installed), while the overhead > of > regenerating multiple caches is neglible. Looks good. -- Gilles Dartiguelongue Gentoo signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] gnome2-utils.eclass: gnome2_query_immodules*, use EROOT, #611030

2017-04-25 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
27;t look like > any > of the remaining code was done like this, nor the GTK+ ebuild which > calls this function. But I'll wait for the GNOME team to confirm what > they want. > Looking at the ebuilds, it looks like your patch is correct. I honestly cannot remember why we used EPREFIX and not EROOT. -- Gilles Dartiguelongue signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/5] use.desc: Introduce 'luajit' as a global flag

2018-03-26 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
t supposed to match library names but features so this would seem more correct. -- Gilles Dartiguelongue

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Repoman to warn about suspicious =-dependencies

2018-03-26 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
Le dimanche 04 mars 2018 à 12:37 +0100, Michał Górny a écrit : > Hi, everyone. > > I have proposed a new check for repoman [1] (with a patch at [2]) > that > would warn developers about suspicious '=' deps. > > By suspicious, I mean dependencies '=foo-1.2.3' which are sometimes > mistakenly used

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/5] use.desc: Introduce 'luajit' as a global flag

2018-03-26 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
Le lundi 26 mars 2018 à 13:55 +0200, Michał Górny a écrit : > Dnia 26 marca 2018 10:47:04 CEST, Gilles Dartiguelongue rg> napisał(a): > > Le lundi 26 février 2018 à 23:24 +0100, Michał Górny a écrit : > > > 'luajit' is used consistently in 25+ packages. Make it a

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: media-libs/gstreamer/

2016-02-26 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
be used (and they are not used in this case anyway). -- Gilles Dartiguelongue signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: profiles/base/, net-misc/modemmanager/

2016-09-17 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
 # This file requires >=portage-2.1.1 >  # New entries go on top. >   > +# Pacho Ramos (17 Sep 2016) > +# Unmask when needed versions are in the tree > +>=net-misc/modemmanager-1.6.2 mbim qmi > + did you push a bump request with this ? I had delayed the commit due to this issue. -- Gilles Dartiguelongue Gentoo

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] metadata: add vcs tag

2016-10-18 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
ge|sourcefo > rge-jp|vim) #REQUIRED> > + > + I am probably nitpicking here but if you expect this element to contain a valid URL, then maybe using #CDATA makes more sense ? -- Gilles Dartiguelongue Gentoo signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Multiple misc. Python packages for grabs

2016-10-31 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
east to fix its default configuration which is annoying me. PS: re-posting as it went to the wrong ml. -- Gilles Dartiguelongue Gentoo signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [gentoo-dev] Step on my toes, please.

2016-11-03 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
Le jeudi 03 novembre 2016 à 11:15 +0100, Jason A. Donenfeld a écrit : > Hey guys, > > Every other day on IRC, I see people arguing about touching each > others packages, despite our policies against it. (Sometimes it's > even > me who's doing the touching!) My instinctive reaction is always, > "ca

Re: [gentoo-dev] Revisiting version-related tree policies

2016-11-28 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
still mandate > that the package manager can handle arbitrary long versions. > > Looks like using multiples of 100 is best practice if there is > the same PV in different slots. Not sure if we should codify that > somewhere. (If nobody contradicts, this message could be used as > fu

Re: [gentoo-dev] MANPATH handling in ebuilds

2017-01-19 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
Could you open a bug report on https://bugzilla.gentoo.org/, I think this could be a very long standing bug. -- Gilles Dartiguelongue signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [gentoo-dev] News item review: python-exec 2.3 reclaims python* symlinks

2017-01-21 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
g. > > The potentially colliding files are: > >  * /usr/bin/2to3 >  * /usr/bin/pydoc >  * /usr/bin/python >  * /usr/bin/python2 >  * /usr/bin/python3 >  * /usr/bin/python-config > > For more information on python-exec, please see: > https://wiki.gentoo.org/wik

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] gnome2.eclass does not respect ECONF_SOURCE

2012-12-05 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
t need to apply these fixes to gstreamer eclasses as well. -- Gilles Dartiguelongue Gentoo signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [gentoo-dev] gstreamer eclass review

2012-12-06 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
, vp8 plugin both inherits from the eclas, and has an explicit > dependency on media-libs/gst-plugins-bad — perhaps one or the other > should be removed. > Please open bug reports at gentoo's bugzilla if you have problem with the ebuilds. -- Gilles Dartiguelongue Gentoo signature.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Handy pybugz wrappers

2013-01-12 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
th pybugz. Here is my dummy wrapper for that. I wrote a variation of that as a git hooks for overlays if that is what you are really after. -- Gilles Dartiguelongue Gentoo ecommit.sh Description: application/shellscript

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH eutils] Introduce run_in_build_dir() used in a few ebuilds.

2013-01-13 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
BUILD_DIR, e.g.: > > python_foreach_impl run_in_build_dir ... > > with python_foreach_impl setting BUILD_DIR. FTR, this function is used as-is in quite a few gnome ebuilds that use python-r1 eclass. We thought that it could probably be used in other places but it would be nice if we could have changes to would make it not suitable for this purpose. -- Gilles Dartiguelongue Gentoo

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH eutils] Introduce run_in_build_dir() used in a few ebuilds.

2013-01-13 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
ld_dir ... > > Can you not change the logic so it doesn't die if build_dir isn't set, > but uses the value of $1 and calls shift? I guess an explicit option would be less error prone, eg. : run_in_dir -d foodir barfunc arg1 arg2 or run_in_dir --directory foodir barfunc arg1 arg2 documentation could then mention that the function defaults to BUILD_DIR if this option is not set and fails if nothing is set. -- Gilles Dartiguelongue Gentoo

  1   2   3   >