On Mon, 2005-11-21 at 21:43 +0100, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
> On Monday 21 November 2005 21:15, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
> > Please make a habit of always supplying a list of
> > alternates/replacements when writing a "last rites" email - saves us
> > someone having to ask:
> Sorry, too
On Sun, 2005-11-27 at 15:09 +0200, Ivan Yosifov wrote:
> On Sun, 2005-11-27 at 07:24 -0500, Ned Ludd wrote:
> > On Sat, 2005-11-26 at 13:20 -0600, R Hill wrote:
> > > Ned Ludd wrote:
> > > > Good afternoon,
> > > >
> > > > probably in portage-2.0.54 a patch will be added to emit split debug
> > >
On Sun, 2005-11-27 at 08:40 -0500, Ned Ludd wrote:
> On Sun, 2005-11-27 at 15:09 +0200, Ivan Yosifov wrote:
> > And one more thing. For proper debugging, don't I need the source to be
> > present ?
>
> -g3 -ggdb embeds the source code in the debug info so I don't see the
> point.
It doesn't; at
On Sun, 2005-11-27 at 09:39 -0500, Dan Meltzer wrote:
> On 11/27/05, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sunday 27 November 2005 00:10, Luca Barbato wrote:
> > > It's great!
> > > Make it a FEATURE default on for common profiles.
> > +1, and it would be better if the FEATURE
On Mon, 2005-11-28 at 10:18 +0900, Georgi Georgiev wrote:
> maillog: 27/11/2005-13:54:33(+0100): Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò types
> > On Sunday 27 November 2005 00:10, Luca Barbato wrote:
> > > It's great!
> > > Make it a FEATURE default on for common profiles.
> > +1, and it would be better if the
On Sun, 2006-02-12 at 19:56 -0500, Forrest Voight wrote:
> On 2/12/06, Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Forrest Voight wrote:
> > > I was using an old gentoo system. Forget about KEYMAP.
> > > But, what about UNICODE? That is related to KEYMAP and consolefont.
> > > Shouldn't EDITOR a
On Sun, 2006-03-05 at 14:35 -0600, MIkey wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> Regardless, I would rather see noman/nodoc/noinfo implemented in USE flags,
> so they can be applied package by package, implemented perhaps in something
> like dodoc/doman/doinfo/dohtml. In some cases I might actually want
On Sat, 2006-03-25 at 13:28 +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> As of now, vim 7 alpha is unsupported and should no longer be used. For
> those of you who don't think I'm a "security risk", there're vim 7 beta
> ebuilds at:
>
> http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm/tmp/vim-beta-overlay.tar.bz2
>
> Note that
On Fri, 2006-04-28 at 14:01 -0700, Drake Wyrm wrote:
> "A. Khattri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Ah, I see now that the actual make install is trying to do this.
> [snip]
> > 1. So I need to set --enable-conf-install=no which also implies I need
> >to override src_compile
>
> You shouldn't n
On Thu, 2006-05-18 at 16:37 +0200, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
> On Thursday 18 May 2006 16:03, Stephen Bennett wrote:
> > On Thu, 18 May 2006 15:34:28 +0200
> >
> > Paul de Vrieze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Requiring duplication of profiles for every package manager.
> >
> > It requires duplicatin
On Fri, 2006-06-09 at 02:53 +0200, Stefan Schweizer wrote:
> Stefan Schweizer wrote:
> it is actually encouraged to update bugzilla when changes are made in the
> overlay.
Encouraged? If you leave it at that, people will forget, and things will
get out of sync. At the very least you should supply
On Fri, 2006-06-09 at 10:28 +0200, Patrick Lauer wrote:
> > > > Except that I can *look* at an ebuild without having to break out a
> > > > subversion client currently.
> > > See my answer in 3)
> > See mine. ;]
> Hmmm ... bugzilla.
> Instead of a simple cvs up; cd /usr/local/portage/category/pack
On Sat, 2006-06-24 at 13:05 +0200, Luca Barbato wrote:
> (from critics)
> - What is wrong with the model (each point 2 lines at least, 4 at most)
> - What you'd do as alternative as the criticized point ( 2 lines again)
* Simplicity: The FAQ claims that Sunrise is simpler than Bugzilla. It
is - fo
On Mon, 2006-08-07 at 15:01 +0200, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> Lets say, if I've, installed foo-1.1, and it gets masked due
> some bug(s), but 1.0 isn't, I want to get informed with an big
> fat warning, *before* anything actually done, ie.
>
> [...]
> # WARNING: installed package foo-1.1 has been ma
On Mon, 2006-08-07 at 09:31 -0500, Mike Doty wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Noack, Sebastian wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > I like to try bleeding edge beta versions. But I hate that if I will
> > install for example the new firefox 2 beta via portage, it will unmerge
On Mon, 2006-08-07 at 09:52 -0500, Andrew Gaffney wrote:
> Edward Catmur wrote:
> > Is it possible to get Portage (or ebuild) to build a package for
> > installation into /opt? If not, how much work would that be?
> >
> > What would be great would be to have emerge
On Thu, 2006-12-21 at 21:47 -0600, Steev Klimaszewski wrote:
> Steve Long wrote:
> > Alec Warner wrote:
> >> http://dev.gentoo.org/~solar/bashrc
> >>
> >> At the bottom of solar's bashrc you will find some lines dealing with
> >> AUTOPATCH, I don't see the bashrc.autopatch in his dev space, but you
On Wed, 2007-01-10 at 13:32 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Wednesday 10 January 2007 13:03, Jakub Moc wrote:
> > And RESTRICT=sandbox is still completely unneeded,
> > commercial packages or not... We don't need to introduce a special
> > RESTRICT because of two borked packages in the tree and w
18 matches
Mail list logo
