Stephen Bennett wrote:
> The proposal means that all variables listed in USE_EXPAND get handled
> exactly as USE does where profile inheritance is concerned. Subprofiles
> can add to and remove from the value in the parent profile just as they
> can for USE.
Did I misread what you said earlier?
S
Stephen Bennett wrote:
> On Mon, 01 Jan 2007 17:24:03 -0800
> Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Stephen Bennett wrote:
>>> The proposal means that all variables listed in USE_EXPAND get
>>> handled exactly as USE does where profile inheritanc
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> There's a ChangeLog file in profiles/ChangeLog now. Please use it when
> making changes to things in profiles/*...
Should we prefer this location for trees that already have a ChangeLog
in them as well? It's kind of random which places have a ChangeLog and
which don't.
Greg KH wrote:
On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 01:53:12AM +0100, Markus Ullmann wrote:
I've talked to a friend of mine recently. He's a FreeBSD dev and he said
they tried git for their ports tree (which is basically the same what
we're talking about) and it was more or less a big pain for multiple
rea
Markus Ullmann wrote:
And the last thing was the idea about distribution. There is one
"centrally" maintained tree and people commit to it all day. So the
chance of getting conflicts in pushes if one is on tour for three days
would be very likely and so the distributed part of the VCs wouldn't
Josh Saddler wrote:
> *shrug* Why would it need to? The Gentoo site, as it is now, is a
> helluva lot more usable and prettier than anything in the redesign ever
> was, in my opinion.
Do you really think that the huge collection of links all over the top
and left is something anyone would call us
Steve Long wrote:
> I'm thinking in any case that a db app can save old revisions or use a svn
> backend. I'm looking at this from a workflow perspective, in terms
> especially of the security issue around giving commit access to the whole
> tree. If the individual maintainer only has permission
Marcus D. Hanwell wrote:
> It is my pleasure to introduce Sebastien Fabbro (also known as bicatali) to
> you as the latest addition to the Gentoo scientific applications team. In his
> own words he is a French guy (don't worry - we won't hold that against
> you ;) ) living and working n Portugal
Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 09:44:20PM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> On Wednesday 07 February 2007, Roy Marples wrote:
>>> Welcome to baselayout-ng
>> please god do not use this name ... just call it baselayout-2
>
> Especially as what will you call the replacement for baselayout-ng
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Wednesday 07 February 2007, Roy Marples wrote:
>> We still need something that is "array like" for want of a better
>> phrase, so how about delimiting using ; like so
>> config_eth0="10.1.1.1 netmask 255.255.255.0; 10.1.1.2/24"
>
> if you want to allow one liners, then i
Jakub Moc wrote:
> Mike Frysinger napsal(a):
>> On Thursday 08 February 2007, Roy Marples wrote:
>>> The actual scripts themselves can be re-worked if they need to be -
>>> this problem only when the arrays are used in config files.
>> i guess my point was i think we really need to be consistent he
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Monday 26 March 2007, bret curtis wrote:
>> Only wimps use tape backup: *real **men* just upload their important
>> stuff on *ftp*, and let the rest of the world mirror it. -- LT :1996
>
> actually, i wonder if this would be useful ... we set up a master backup
> server
Mike Doty wrote:
apparent decline of QA in our packages.
Anyone got numbers for that? Talking opinions, as in the SCM discussion,
isn't real meaningful.
Thanks,
Donnie
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Alexandre Buisse wrote:
I won't take this to the council myself, but I think this should be
discussed at the very least: we need a way to limit the council power,
since it seems there is nothing to this effect in the metastructure
glep.
I'm not going to write an essay because I don't have the t
Roy Marples wrote:
A new version of resolvconf-gentoo is about to be released which also
works with dash and busybox. Also, the next resolvconf script for
dnsmasq will (also due out soon) supports updating dnsmasq via dbus
which means the local resolver is never down which is important.
Is ther
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> sys-apps/byld
> sys-apps/yard
> sys-apps/mkinitrd
> app-admin/superadduser
I can probably pick these up if nobody else wants them.
> sys-boot/syslinux
And this, but a bit less interested...
Thanks,
Donnie
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Mike Kelly wrote:
- Help dberkholz with autofoo magic for ltsp (sorry I've slacked so
long on this, I'll have more time to dig into it in a month).
Good to hear it! People keep bugging me about this, but seems like most
of them aren't willing to put any effort into it. I'm glad you still a
Mike Frysinger wrote:
three of those should be a cake walk ... mkinitrd is a friggin mess though, so
after you check the open bugs on it, i dont feel bad if you change your mind
on it
Maybe I will take it over, then decide it's obsolete and send out a
removal notice. =)
Thanks,
Donnie
--
ge
Robin H. Johnson wrote:
- GLEP on bug-wrangling process (nailing down the good and the bad of what
our wranglers like Jakub are doing, so would-be wranglers can have a
good idea of what to do).
I'm sorry, I don't understand why something that's already happening
qualifies as an enhancement pro
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
Why bother restructuring, then? Why not just dump the gentoo-dev
mailing list entirely and have everyone use the individual project lists
that already exist for intra-project communications and have no official
facility for inter-project or global issues. This sounds lik
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
On Wed, 2007-04-11 at 00:17 +0300, Petteri Räty wrote:
Chris Gianelloni kirjoitti:
On Tue, 2007-04-10 at 23:34 +0300, Petteri Räty wrote:
Then we require this file to be updated
monthly. What do you think?
I think Release Engineering would kill you in our off time. T
Stephen Bennett wrote:
The open bug list is down to two, on which I want more input before
resolving them. We could also use more eyes again to bring up any other
issues before it's reckoned final.
The PDF is still at http://dev.gentoo.org/~spb/pms.pdf; anon SVN is
still available at http://svn.
Hans de Graaff wrote:
dev-lang/ruby-cvs builds the latest Ruby 1.9.x version from CVS.
Except... upstream has moved to SVN, so this ebuild no longer works. It's
now masked and will be removed in 30 days.
Not sure there's any point to waiting the usual 30 days when the ebuild
just can't work
Rémi Cardona wrote:
Right now, the reworked patch saves a file in
/usr/share/gnome2-eclass/${PF}.icons
Since committing this will affect everybody including stable users, I
would like ebuild/eclass gurus to review this small patch and tell me if
there's anything wrong with it.
Why is this g
Can you guys move all this garbage to the gentoo-devrel mailing list?
This is exactly the kind of discussion it exists for. This has nothing
to do with development.
Thanks,
Donnie
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Robin H. Johnson wrote:
In my original email, I also suggested this solution, but it seems that nobody
read it:
] Alternatively, follow the example of any ebuild that uses a dated
] patchset, and just have the date of the patchset in the ebuild, and only
] increment $PR singly.
This solution alr
Dawid Węgliński wrote:
As a fresh developer i would like to introduce you all new subproject I
have just started. It is Gentoo Artwork Project. Its official webpage is
under [1]. Project consists of two members so far, so this is why we
enlist everyone who would like to help us in creating artwor
Michael Cummings wrote:
Worth a shot, it seemed to work last time (and I just noticed that a neglected
-dev mail folder is a bad thing).
We're working on getting X.Org 7.2 stable. The hot new stuff, video
hotplugging et al, is in xorg-server 1.3 and xf86-video-i810 2.0. Other
drivers remain t
Drake Wyrm wrote:
> Wernfried Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 07:54:00AM +0200, Steffen Brumm wrote:
>>> and darwin is satan, other beliefs than christianity - death
>>> penalty, fight the sciences, womans have to go behind the cooker or
>>> into the open flame, only cons
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> Michael Cummings wrote:
>> Worth a shot, it seemed to work last time (and I just noticed that a
>> neglected
>> -dev mail folder is a bad thing).
>
> We're working on getting X.Org 7.2 stable. The hot new stuff, video
> hotplugging et
Rémi Cardona wrote:
> Since I don't have any thing other than Gentoo : does anyone know how
> other distros handle static libs in their -dev packages? Does anyone
> care about static libs except for maybe really really low level stuff?
Anyone who wants to build a static binary wants the static lib
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> Please get with me some time over the next week as I'd like to discuss a
> few things. We've been doing some artwork wrt our releases and would
> *love* to have your project take over that work, which means I might
> have a recruit for you. ;]
I was hoping the artwork t
Peter Gordon wrote:
> Back when I used Gentoo (mid-2003 through Nov. 2005), I remember there
> being a "-static" flag that could be set. I don't remember if that was
> in FEATURES or USE though; and not all ebuilds honored it. :| Is there
> similar functionality in modern Portage?
As was explaine
Hi all,
I'm sure I'm not the only one with a number of projects I'll never get
to, but I'd really like them to happen anyway. I suggest we create some
sort of page that aggregates all of these personal projects together, so
anyone can browse through them and look for stuff that sounds fun.
The go
Alec Warner wrote:
> The benefits include making the layout cleaner, obsoleting the
> categories file.
You talked a lot about how to do this, but I'd like to see you expand on
the reasoning for why. Balancing the breakage and extra work against the
reasons for making the change is hard to do witho
Jan Kundrát wrote:
> Matti Bickel wrote:
>> It's main additions are a "timely response clause", which
>> requires us to get the same keywords for a newly released version as the
>> previous had within 28 days. Another point is the "no patches" clause,
>> which prohibits distributions from carrying
Christian Heim wrote:
> It's my pleasure to welcome back Deedra Waters (also known as dmwaters on
> IRC).
It's good to see you return, Deedra. Your spirit always brightened up
Gentoo.
Thanks,
Donnie
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi all,
I'm back for my yearly posting about creating a gentoo-dev-announce
list [1]. Fedora recently created a fedora-devel-announce list with a
great description of how it works, what's posted to it, etc [2], which
got me excited about making this happen in Gentoo.
Last time the issue came up,
On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 21:28:44 +0300
Petteri Räty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yeh the PMASKED KEYWORD is for packages waiting removal.
Is there some place people are supposed to find out about this stuff?
I've seen two random Bugzilla keywords mentioned in here in the past
week or so as if they wer
On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 22:02:28 +0300
Petteri Räty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes. When you click the Keywords link it takes you to a description
> page: https://bugs.gentoo.org/describekeywords.cgi
Sure, I'm aware of that. But where do I hear about the addition of new
ones? Am I supposed to random
Luca Barbato wrote:
> gcc-4.2.0 won't rape your house and burn your pet anymore?
>
> I'll give a test on ppc* soonish.
I've been using it on x86 and ppc32 (ibook g4) for a week or two with no
issues.
Thanks,
Donnie
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Sat, 7 Jul 2007 00:34:39 + (UTC)
Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When I open or CC on a bug that then gets fixed, I often feel like
> adding a thanks to the bug. However, while it may be polite in other
> circumstances, in this case it could be viewed as bug spam, so I've
> hesitated
On Fri, 13 Jul 2007 03:11:55 -0400
Seemant Kulleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've said for a while now (on this list, on my blogs) -- bad behaviour
> happens on this list because we (as a community) allow it to happen.
> If it's not encouraged and trolls are not fed, they die out. Part of
> the
On Thu, 12 Jul 2007 18:41:33 -0700
Daniel Ostrow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1). Create 1 (ONE) new list, which, for the purposes of this
> discussion I will call it gentoo-dev-info (the name matters not). The
> requirement for subscription for all devs would shift from gentoo-dev
> to gentoo-dev-
Matthias Langer wrote:
> no offense, but this is one of the worst proposals i've ever read on
> this list; why? because, one of gentoo's major problems is that it is
> becoming more and more a toy exclusively for its own developers.
Gentoo's always been exclusively for the developers. Nobody's pa
On Mon, 16 Jul 2007 08:42:44 -0400
Michael Cummings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Talk like this, especially from people I respected, makes me question
> just what its worth to keep going. If Gentoo is only about the devs,
> well, I'm happy with the way things are now, they work for me, so no
> sens
On Mon, 16 Jul 2007 13:34:31 +0100
Steve Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It also happens that bugs are reported, and patches provided, by
> users. Not to mention documentation written, support provided on irc
> and in forums, which are the envy of every OS out there. Oh and the
> small matter of
On Mon, 16 Jul 2007 19:16:45 +0100
George Prowse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> > Matthias Langer wrote:
> >
> >> no offense, but this is one of the worst proposals i've ever read
> >> on this list; why? because, one of gentoo&
On Tue, 17 Jul 2007 06:37:43 +0200
Marius Mauch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Jul 2007 07:25:02 +0300
> Alin Năstac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I was asked to discuss here a portage enhancement proposed by me
> > [1].
> >
> > Basically I need a pkg_create() that will be executed o
On Fri, 20 Jul 2007 14:48:12 -0700
Chris Gianelloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anyway, some things I think we could/should do are:
> - GWN
> - gentoo-announce
> - gentoo-stats (or whatever we have now, if anything)
Smolt, which is Fedora's new hardware-profiling program, is actively
porting to o
On Fri, 20 Jul 2007 15:20:24 -0700
Chris Gianelloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> gentoo-dev-announce: This is the announcement list for
> development-related stuff. Now, there's two ideas for how to run the
> list, that I can think of, but I'm sure there's others.
>
> - Make the list set reply-to
On Fri, 20 Jul 2007 15:29:10 -0700
Chris Gianelloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I could have sworn genone was working on something stats-related.
He was. I asked him about it a while ago and that's where I got the
"hiatus" bit.
00:30 <@dberkholz> genone__: anything ever happen with the stats app
nput appreciated.
Thanks,
Donnie
Original Message
Subject: [gentoo-dev-announce] New gentoo-dev-announce list
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 11:55:53 -0700
From: Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gentoo-dev-announce is now
On Sat, 21 Jul 2007 10:47:13 +0100
Peter Weller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd particularly want to ensure that there is
> better communication between us (Gentoo) and projects such as Sabayon
> Linux and Ainkaboot, as I believe that we can all make use of each
> other's skills and ideas to provi
On Sat, 21 Jul 2007 19:48:48 -0500
Steev Klimaszewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Donnie wants to remove virtual/x11 (can ya blame him?) and since
> Josh_B has retired (for now! ;) ) I wanted to help Donnie out a bit,
> since he is busy and X is a massive undertaking... a "quick" grep of
> the tre
Hi all,
I'm giving a short talk Thursday at OSCON on Gentoo's progress in the
past year. If you have any ideas for cool new features we've added, or
whatever else, please email me _off-list_ with your responses.
I'm sending this to -dev because I'm looking for _technical_ progress in
areas I may
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> Well, we'd be the second distribution, as Debian uses the SFC. Also,
> realize that we've already gone through all of this with the SFC and
> wouldn't even be bringing it up as an option if the SFC hadn't already
> approved us. They are aware of the state of our tree and
On Mon, 23 Jul 2007 18:03:50 -0700
Chris Gianelloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-07-23 at 14:06 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> > Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> > > Well, we'd be the second distribution, as Debian uses the SFC.
> > > Also, realize
On Mon, 23 Jul 2007 17:38:16 -0700
Christina Fullam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1) What you will do
> 2) Why you will do it
> 3) How you will do it
> 4) What is the timescale for doing it
> 5) What experience do you have with this or a similar role
> 6) Why do you think you are qualified
> 7) How
Doug Goldstein wrote:
> There are no maintainers of ati-drivers. So you're not prodding anyone.
Luca? Did you stop maintaining it?
Thanks,
Donnie
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Thu, 2 Aug 2007 19:31:09 -0400
Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> if the driver blows dead goats and the vendor isnt willing to help
> and no Gentoo dev wants to touch it, what other solution is there ?
There's an open-source driver for the r5xx stuff called the avivo
driver [1]. It's
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-08-02 at 11:27 +0200, Martin Schwier wrote:
>> +ppds (everyone has a printer, and this is needed to configure it
>> without further investigations. cups is already in)
>> +startup-notification
>
> Well, we don't add local USE flags to the default profile
William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-08-02 at 16:55 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
>> On Thu, 2 Aug 2007 19:31:09 -0400
>> Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> if the driver blows dead goats and the vendor isnt willing to help
>>> and no G
William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
> FYI, the patches in bug #183480 [1] allow one to use the most current
> ati-drivers with a 2.6.22 kernel. As I am now while I am composing this
> message. Having applied said patches and bumped ebuild locally. Just
> needs to happen in tree :)
01 Aug 2007; Jeff Ga
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> my point though wasnt to knock ati (although it was fun), the point was that
> i
> do not believe any closed source driver in our tree should ever be grounds
> for preventing stabilization of a kernel ebuild
>
> so next time dsd (or whoever the ninja kernel maintainer ha
Petteri Räty wrote:
> Philipp Riegger kirjoitti:
>> On Fri, 2007-08-03 at 15:06 -0700, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
>>> So, what do you guys think?
>> One problem i see is changing versions in the tree but not puting the
>> changes to the wip ebuilds in an overlay or somewhere else. Is there a
>> system
Lars Weiler wrote:
> * Robin H. Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [07/08/03 16:20 -0700]:
>> X-VCS-Repository: gentoo-x86
>> X-VCS-Directories: profiles/ licenses/
>> X-VCS-Files: profiles/foo licenses/bar
>
> Everything implemented :-P At least for all commits to
> gentoo-x86.
>
> Well, I reactivated
On 00:04 Tue 07 Aug , Bernard Cafarelli wrote:
> Latest version of the base eclass (sent with this mail) can be found at:
> http://overlays.gentoo.org/proj/gnustep/browser/overlay/eclass/gnustep-base.eclass
>
> This one does most of the hard work, especially in egnustep_env which
> sets up an
On 08:28 Tue 07 Aug , Lars Weiler wrote:
> Last night some of us infra-folk had a chat in #gentoo-infra
> about this commitlog-mailinglist. solar stated that the
> ammount of messages in the dev-mailboxes was the reason to
> shut down that list some years ago (I have to fetch my
> archives to
On 12:40 Fri 10 Aug , Duncan wrote:
> Agreed. Within the limited scope of dodoc, under what legitimate
> circumstances might a file /not/ be there to "dodoc" for a user, when
> it's there for a maintainer? (OTOH, now that portage is recompressing
> all such files based on the PORTAGE_COMPR
On 22:09 Fri 10 Aug , Petteri Räty wrote:
> And you think maintainers are not needed to test use flags they think
> are uncommon?
I think my computer isn't powerful enough to rebuild xorg-server with every
possible combination of USE flags every time I commit to it, at 45 minutes per
build.
T
On 00:25 Sat 11 Aug , Petteri Räty wrote:
> It's not really about the amount of combinations but the amount of code
> paths in the ebuild.
Yes, you have a good point, as it applies to ebuilds. But there are still
potential incompatibilities in the source itself that this cannot solve.
At least
On 11:15 Wed 15 Aug , Mike Auty wrote:
> Could you please describe the problem you faced? From the detail you
> gave, it sounds as though you might not have moved /etc/conf.d/cryptfs
> to /etc/conf.d/dmcrypt. There's currently several ewarn lines saying
> that this must be done before t
On 13:40 Fri 17 Aug , Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Friday 17 August 2007, Hans de Graaff wrote:
> > On Fri, 2007-08-17 at 18:43 +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> > > Also known as FEATURES=stricter.
> >
> > Unfortunately FEATURES=stricter stopped being really useful when it
> > started to die on ba
On 00:11 Sat 18 Aug , Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Friday 17 August 2007, Alec Warner wrote:
> > On 8/17/07, Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > what do you think of comment #14 in Bug 185567 ?
> > >
> > > i think that plus having hooks for all phase funcs ...
> >
> > +1 for pkg_maint
On 05:58 Wed 22 Aug , Hanno Böck wrote:
> With compiz 0.5.4, we get the first version that depends on xcb.
> While we still have an open bug asking for use-masking xcb
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=174434
> I'd like to open the question just the other way round: When can we make xcb
On 00:18 Wed 22 Aug , Olivier Crête wrote:
> Can't we just install xcb alongside regular Xlib ? If we can't, I would
> favor making xcb the default. Its significantly better than the old
> Xlib.
You could try it, but you might get inconsistent results when running a
non-XCB Xlib with apps that
On 10:27 Wed 22 Aug , Rémi Cardona wrote:
> Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> > On 00:18 Wed 22 Aug , Olivier Crête wrote:
> >> Can't we just install xcb alongside regular Xlib ? If we can't, I would
> >> favor making xcb the default. Its significantly better
On 04:53 Mon 03 Sep , Luis Francisco Araujo wrote:
> Our main idea is to develop and collect all the necessary applications
> to offer GUI's (keeping Gentoo flexibility) for most of our system
> tasks, offering an alternative for those users who like these kind of
> interfaces.
Please keep in m
On 00:01 Fri 07 Sep , Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> After much toiling, Infra has finally got the commits list active.
> You can subscribe to it as per normal, but be aware that it is high traffic.
> Only CVS traffic is live so far, but SVN will follow soon.
Huge thanks to both of y
On 17:52 Sat 08 Sep , Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Saturday 08 September 2007, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > buy Alex a beer
>
> and then buy Alec one :x
Way to review!
Donnie
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Hi all,
I finished adding X.Org 7.3 to the tree tonight. The X server has an ABI
break, so drivers compiled for xorg-server 1.3 or earlier will break. As
per the "2.6.22 stable plans" thread around the beginning of August, the
X team is moving to the same policy as the kernel team. We will no
On 03:55 Tue 11 Sep , Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 07:58:07PM +0200, Lars Weiler wrote:
> > * Robin H. Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [07/09/07 00:01 -0700]:
> > > For the "From" field, we are populating it using your GECOS data
> > > from LDAP followed by your username. I'm awar
Just a couple comments on this ...
On 07:19 Sat 15 Sep , Hans de Graaff (graaff) wrote:
> SITEPACKAGE=/usr/lib/xemacs/site-packages
Is using get_libdir() a concern here?
> xemacs-elisp-compile () {
> ${XEMACS_BATCH_CLEAN} -f batch-byte-compile "$@"
> xemacs-elisp-make-autoload-fi
On 05:56 Sat 15 Sep , Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Saturday 15 September 2007, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> > Also, try using { } around a block of code instead of ( ), which creates
> > a subshell.
>
> erm, what ? () is a subshell, {} is a list of grouped commands ...
Righ
On 16:52 Sat 15 Sep , Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Saturday 15 September 2007, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> > On 05:56 Sat 15 Sep , Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > On Saturday 15 September 2007, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> > > > Also, try using { } around a block
On 02:20 Sun 16 Sep , Ryan Hill (dirtyepic) wrote:
> dirtyepic07/09/16 02:20:05
>
> Modified: font.eclass
> Log:
> Forgot to remove -v flag from chmod.
> @@ -85,7 +85,7 @@
> for suffix in ${FONT_SUFFIX}; do
> doins *.${suffix}
> # ensure
On 18:32 Wed 19 Sep , Olivier Fisette (ribosome) wrote:
> Modified: ChangeLog
> Added:phylip-3.67.ebuild
> Log:
> New upstream version.
> (Portage version: 2.1.3.9)
>
> file :
> http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/sci-biology/phylip/ChangeLog
On 08:35 Thu 20 Sep , Christian Zoffoli (xmerlin) wrote:
> xmerlin 07/09/20 08:35:22
>
> Modified: ChangeLog
> Added:drbd-8.0.6.ebuild
> Log:
> Version Bump.
> (Portage version: 2.1.2.2)
> 1.1 sys-cluster/drbd/drbd-8.0.6.ebuild
>
> f
On 08:49 Thu 20 Sep , Christian Zoffoli (xmerlin) wrote:
> xmerlin 07/09/20 08:49:25
>
> Modified: ChangeLog
> Added:csync2-1.34.ebuild
> Log:
> Version bump.
> (Portage version: 2.1.2.2)
> 1.1 sys-cluster/csync2/csync2-1.34.ebuild
>
On 14:35 Thu 20 Sep , Santiago M. Mola (coldwind) wrote:
> coldwind07/09/20 14:35:18
>
> Modified: stride-20011129.ebuild ChangeLog
> Log:
> Change sed separator to :, now it doesn't fail if CC contains a path.
> (Portage version: 2.1.3.9)
>
> Revision ChangesPath
On 23:20 Thu 20 Sep , Alistair Bush wrote:
> - # Create package.env
> - (
> - echo "DESCRIPTION=\"${DESCRIPTION}\""
> - echo "GENERATION=\"2\""
> -
> - [[ -n "${JAVA_PKG_CLASSPATH}" ]] && echo
> "CLASSPATH=\"${
On 19:31 Thu 20 Sep , Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
> > > src_compile() {
> > > econf \
> > > --localstatedir=/var \
> > > --sysconfdir=/etc/csync2 \
> > > || die
> > >
> > > emake || die
> >
> > These could really use some die() messages, so you
On 06:58 Fri 21 Sep , Alistair Bush wrote:
> normally java-pkg_do_write_ is called to write the package.env out, as
> can be seen, and is the default behavior for the function. What I am
> adding is the ability to _do_write of a "[virtual|provider].env" file.
> While at present it only contain
On 09:12 Sat 22 Sep , Robin H. Johnson (robbat2) wrote:
> robbat2 07/09/22 09:12:37
>
> Modified: ChangeLog
> Added:keepalived-1.1.15.ebuild
> Log:
> Version bump.
> (Portage version: 2.1.3.7)
> file :
> http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x8
On 07:34 Sun 23 Sep , Christian Faulhammer (opfer) wrote:
> opfer 07/09/23 07:34:43
>
> Modified: ChangeLog erlang-11.2.5-r2.ebuild
> Log:
> add patch provided by Paul Bonser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> in bug193452 to
> prevent a doubled statement in hipe installation
> (P
On 11:48 Sun 23 Sep , Michael Januszewski (spock) wrote:
> spock 07/09/23 11:48:45
>
> Modified: ChangeLog
> Added:splashutils-1.5.2.1.ebuild
> Log:
> Version bump (bugfix release).
> (Portage version: 2.1.3.9)
> 1.1 media-gfx/splas
On 15:06 Sun 23 Sep , Marijn Schouten (hkbst) wrote:
> hkbst 07/09/23 15:06:01
>
> Modified: ChangeLog
> Added:lilypond-2.11.33.ebuild lilypond-2.10.33.ebuild
> Log:
> bump 2.1[01].33
> (Portage version: 2.1.3.9)
> emake DESTDIR=${D} vimdir=/u
On 15:32 Sun 23 Sep , Ferris McCormick (fmccor) wrote:
> fmccor 07/09/23 15:32:57
>
> Modified: yafc-1.1.1-r1.ebuild ChangeLog
> Log:
> Apply patch for heimdal fix, Bug #113052 --- thanks to jmbsvicetto (Jorge M.
> B. S. Vicetto).
> (Portage version: 2.1.3.9)
>
> Rev
On 16:27 Sun 23 Sep , Andrej Kacian (ticho) wrote:
> ticho 07/09/23 16:27:55
>
> Modified: ChangeLog
> Added:fusesmb-0.8.7.ebuild
> Log:
> Version bump. Bug #191762, by Algardas Pelakauskas .
> (Portage version: 2.1.3.7)
> 1.1 net-f
701 - 800 of 1428 matches
Mail list logo
