Re: [gentoo-dev] Add USE_PYTHON to profiles/info_vars

On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 18:10, Mike Gilbert wrote: > python.eclass looks at the USE_PYTHON variable to determine which > python versions to target when building python packages which support > installation for multiple python abis. Having it in the emerge --info > output would be useful for diagnos

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: media-sound/qsampler

# It has been broken for more than 2 years (bug 380589), # last upstream release in 2009, uses deprecated qt4 eclass, # long list of QA issues (bug 379663). # Masked for removal in 30 days. media-sound/qsampler signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [gentoo-dev] add global useflag: webkit

On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 2:34 AM, hasufell wrote: > # grep :webkit use.local.desc | wc -l > 33 > > I would vote to make this a global useflag: > > webkit - Adds support for the webkit library/module > I suggest the following description: "Add support for the WebKit HTML rendering/layout engine."

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: media-sound/qsampler

On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 11:42 PM, Natanael Olaiz wrote: > Hi, > > Here I attach a version that removes the eclass use. > I then replaced a "eqmake4" for "qmake". I don't know if there is a > better solution, but at least removes the deprecated eclass and > hopefully the mask (the live ebuild is new

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Enable FEATURES="userpriv usersandbox" by default?

On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 11:34 PM, Zac Medico wrote: > Hi, > > In case you aren't familiar with FEATURES=userpriv, here's the > description from the make.conf(5) man page: > >  Allow portage to drop root privileges and compile packages as >  portage:portage without a sandbox (unless usersandbox is

Re: [gentoo-dev] About forcing rebuilds of other packages issue

On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Sat, 09 Jun 2012 13:55:53 -0700 > Zac Medico wrote: >> A dependency atom will have optional SLOT and ABI_SLOT parts. Using >> the dbus-glib depedency on glib:2 as an example [1], the dbus-glib >> dependency will be expressed with an ato

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: dev-python/apiextractor, dev-python/generatorrunner

# Both have been merged into >=dev-python/shiboken-1.1.1. # Removal in 30 days. dev-python/apiextractor dev-python/generatorrunner signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: using array variables in qt4-r2.eclass

On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 2:34 PM, Alexis Ballier wrote: > On Fri, 13 Jul 2012 20:02:19 +0800 > Ben de Groot wrote: > >> --- /usr/portage/eclass/qt4-r2.eclass 2012-04-20 >> 07:01:13.0 +0800 +++ qt4-r2.eclass.new2012-07-13 >> 19:45:59.259773917 +0800 @@ -19,6 +19,22 @@ >> >> export

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: using array variables in qt4-r2.eclass

On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Alexis Ballier wrote: > On Fri, 13 Jul 2012 15:26:58 +0200 > Davide Pesavento wrote: > >> > [...] >> >> + # backward compatibility for non-array variables >> >> + if [[ -n ${DOCS} ]] && [[ "$(

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: using array variables in qt4-r2.eclass

On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > On Sat, 14 Jul 2012 12:29:59 +0200 > Davide Pesavento wrote: > >> On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Alexis Ballier >> wrote: >> > On Fri, 13 Jul 2012 15:26:58 +0200 >> > Davide Pesavento wrote: >&

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: using array variables in qt4-r2.eclass

On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 3:42 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > On Sun, 15 Jul 2012 13:00:47 +0200 > Davide Pesavento wrote: > >> On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Michał Górny >> wrote: >> > On Sat, 14 Jul 2012 12:29:59 +0200 >> > Davide Pesavento wrote: >

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: using array variables in qt4-r2.eclass

On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 5:53 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > On Sun, 15 Jul 2012 17:36:05 +0200 > Davide Pesavento wrote: > >> On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 3:42 PM, Michał Górny >> wrote: >> > On Sun, 15 Jul 2012 13:00:47 +0200 >> > Davide Pesavento wrote: >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Don't require assignment of empty variables in ebuilds?

On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 07:53:37PM +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote: >> Our current policy [1] requires that ebuilds must assign the seven >> variables DESCRIPTION, HOMEPAGE, SRC_URI, LICENSE, SLOT, KEYWORDS, and >> IUSE, even if their value i

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Fwd: Heads up for Qt5

On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 11:27 PM, Ben de Groot wrote: > On 28 July 2012 13:59, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: >> On 28/07/12 08:22, Ben de Groot wrote: >>> >>> In preparation for that, we want to ask maintainers of all ebuilds in >>> the tree with dependencies on Qt4, to make sure that they have the >>

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Fwd: Heads up for Qt5

On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 11:56 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > On 28/07/12 09:46, Davide Pesavento wrote: >> >> On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 11:27 PM, Ben de Groot wrote: >>> >>> On 28 July 2012 13:59, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: >>>> >>>> [...]

Re: [gentoo-dev] packages which won't support x32

On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 7:28 AM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote: > This is the case with dev-lang/v8: it doesn't build on x32 > (), and upstream said they *won't* > support x32 > (). > > Note that with v8

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/2] Set default EGIT_SOURCEDIR to point to standard ${WORKDIR}/${P}. It allows "${S}" overriding in user's code as other eclasses do:

git-src"} > > -- > 1.8.0 > > While in theory this makes sense, it also has the potential to break ebuilds setting S="${WORKDIR}/foo" and then expecting the sources to be inside "foo". IOW it's not backward compatible, is it? Thanks, Davide Pesavento (pesa)

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] app-portage/eclass-manpages: @DEFAULT_UNSET -> @DEFAULT-UNSET

On Sat, Apr 29, 2017 at 1:57 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > On sob, 2017-04-29 at 05:41 +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote: >> > > > > > On Fri, 28 Apr 2017, Michał Górny wrote: >> > (and hyphens do not require holding shift). >> >> So they are awkward to type inside a string that is all-caps? >> > > Funny en

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] app-portage/eclass-manpages: @DEFAULT_UNSET -> @DEFAULT-UNSET

On Sat, Apr 29, 2017 at 1:40 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > Dnia 29 kwietnia 2017 19:23:49 CEST, Davide Pesavento > napisał(a): >>On Sat, Apr 29, 2017 at 1:57 AM, Michał Górny >>wrote: >>> On sob, 2017-04-29 at 05:41 +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote: >>>> >

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 4/4] package.use.mask: Mask ICU supprt of Qt:4 on 17.0 profiles

On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 4:48 PM, wrote: > From: Andreas K. Hüttel > > --- > profiles/releases/17.0/package.use.mask | 5 + > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/profiles/releases/17.0/package.use.mask > b/profiles/releases/17.0/package.use.mask > index 8eefcfe631ea..9a6609274ad

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 3/3] cmake-utils.eclass: Define default EAPI to 0

On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 9:29 PM, Justin Lecher wrote: > Signed-off-by: Justin Lecher > --- > eclass/cmake-utils.eclass | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass b/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass > index 01de9a5..23339ab 100644 > --- a/eclass/cma

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 3/3] cmake-utils.eclass: Define default EAPI to 0

On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 1:50 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > Dnia 26 stycznia 2016 13:36:00 CET, Davide Pesavento > napisał(a): >>On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 9:29 PM, Justin Lecher wrote: >>> Signed-off-by: Justin Lecher >>> --- >>> eclass/cmake-utils.eclass

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: dev-python/PyQtMobility

# Davide Pesavento (06 Feb 2016) # Masked for removal in 30 days. Doesn't build against recent PyQt4 # versions, bug 527572, not trivial to fix. Upstream doesn't seem to # care anymore, last release was in 2012. Zero reverse deps. dev-python/PyQtMobility

Re: [gentoo-dev] XML Schema files for metadata.xml, projects.xml and repositories.xml, for review and testing

On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 12:04 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > On Sun, 6 Mar 2016 12:01:19 +0100 > Michał Górny wrote: > >> Please test and review. I'm going to reply to this mail with the list >> of current metadata.xml validation failures (it's quite long). > > And here's the list: > ... > /var/db/repo

Re: [gentoo-dev] XML Schema files for metadata.xml, projects.xml and repositories.xml, for review and testing

On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 7:18 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > On Sun, 6 Mar 2016 18:12:03 + > "Justin " wrote: > >> On 06/03/16 12:24, Davide Pesavento wrote: >> > On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 12:04 PM, Michał Górny wrote: >> >> On Sun, 6 Mar

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] l10n.eclass: Sort and normalize PLOCALES in l10n_find_plocales_change

On Sat, May 7, 2016 at 10:13 PM, James Le Cuirot wrote: > l10n_find_plocales_change assumes that PLOCALES is sorted > alphanumerically with a single space between each entry and no > surrounding whitespace. This is not a bad assumption but it isn't > documented and it's inconvenient in at least on

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] l10n.eclass: Sort and normalize PLOCALES in l10n_find_plocales_change

On Sat, May 7, 2016 at 11:23 PM, James Le Cuirot wrote: > On Sat, 7 May 2016 23:13:11 +0200 > Davide Pesavento wrote: > >> On Sat, May 7, 2016 at 10:13 PM, James Le Cuirot >> wrote: >> > l10n_find_plocales_change assumes that PLOCALES is sorted >> > alpha

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] New global USE flag: webp

On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 12:45 PM, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote: > Suggested description: Add support for the WebP image format > Currently in use by the following packages: > > app-text/tesseract:webp - Enable support for webp image format. > dev-games/aseprite:webp - Enable webp image format

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] 'Gentoo Linux' bugzilla component reorganization

On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 9:11 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > I would personally go for the following layout: > > - All packages, > - Core system [includes baselayout], > - Eclasses and Profiles, > - GCC Porting, > - Hardened, > - Keywording & Stabilization, > - New packages ('New ebuilds' previously), >

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] 'Gentoo Linux' bugzilla component reorganization

On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 2:04 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > On Wed, 15 Jun 2016 21:11:30 +0200 > Michał Górny wrote: > >> Right now we have the following components: >> >> - Applications, >> - baselayout, >> - Core system, >> - Development, >> - Eclasses and Profiles, >> - Games, >> - GCC Porting, >>

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] bugs.g.o: Killing VERIFIED state, possibly introducing STABILIZED

On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 3:02 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > Hello, everyone. > > Here's the third bugs.g.o redesign RFC. > > This time it's about closed bugs. Right now we have two states for > them: RESOLVED and VERIFIED. > > RESOLVED is the usual state that the developers use when they close > a bug.

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] bugs.g.o: Merging UNCONFIRMED & CONFIRMED into NEW

On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 4:39 PM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: > On 16/06/16 09:47 AM, Michał Górny wrote: >> On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 16:22:32 +0300 >> Andrew Savchenko wrote: >>> >>> CONFIRMED state is useful, it means that dev or powerful user >>> confirmed this bug and gives it more value. I'd like to k

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: dev-util/eric:5

# Davide Pesavento (21 Dec 2016) # Fails to install (bug 587376 and 584988), upstream stopped maintaining # the 5.x release series 2 years ago. Use dev-util/eric:6 instead. # Masked for removal in 14 days. dev-util/eric:5

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: leechcraft

On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 9:50 AM, Georg Rudoy <0xd34df...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2017-01-31 3:22 GMT-05:00 David Seifert : >> Proxy-maint has always been there, so no real excuse for all those bugs >> rotting away. > > I didn't bother with finding another maint who'd proxy it for me, > yeah, that's my

Re: [gentoo-dev] USE flags dri, cups, pppd

On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: > > During the server profile discussion, it became clear that we could clean up > the base profiles a bit. This is unrelated to the profile versions, as the > change would affect all versions (well, at least without bigger changes). > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Qt category move

On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: > On 17/02/2013 23:04, Markos Chandras wrote: >>> > >> We will use qt* instead of qt-*[1] to match the way upstream names the >> modules. So that would be dev-qt/qtcore etc > > Thanks, and thanks for the link, as I wouldn't have known how

Re: [gentoo-dev] The Gentoo Qt Project wants your help!

On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 6:35 AM, Tom Wijsman wrote: > On Sat, 02 Mar 2013 15:29:38 +0200 > Samuli Suominen wrote: > >> The embedded FFmpeg in avidemux is only patched to convert UNIX line >> endings to DOS line endings to match rest of the avidemux source tree > > Nope, it does various patches: >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] multilib-build.eclass and restricting unsupported ABIs

On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 10:59 AM, Thomas Sachau wrote: > Alexis Ballier schrieb: >> On Mon, 04 Mar 2013 21:17:50 +0100 >> Thomas Sachau wrote: >>> dev-db/mysql abiwrapper >>> dev-lang/perl abiwrapper >>> dev-lang/python abiwrapper >>> dev-lang/ruby abiwrapper >>> dev-libs/gobject-introspection abi

Re: [gentoo-dev] revbumping ebuilds after USE dependency changes

On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 9:15 AM, Mike Gilbert wrote: > On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 8:49 AM, Alex Alexander wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Please revbump an ebuild after changing its USE dependencies. >> >> Using net-p2p/transmission as an example, it used to depend on >> dev-qt/qtgui:4=[dbus] >> howe

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Policy for migrating library consumers to subslots

On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Kent Fredric wrote: > > On 26 September 2013 19:53, Michał Górny wrote: >> >> How do we handle packages which install multiple libraries? I'm afraid >> forcing such a policy and/or hurrying developers to adapt will only >> cause more of poppler-like issues to occu

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Policy for migrating library consumers to subslots

On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 7:39 PM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > On 26/09/13 11:24 AM, Davide Pesavento wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Kent Fredric >> wrote: >>> >>> On 26 September 2013 19:53,

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Policy for migrating library consumers to subslots

On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 4:44 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > Dnia 2013-09-26, o godz. 17:24:49 > Davide Pesavento napisał(a): > >> On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Kent Fredric wrote: >> > >> > On 26 September 2013 19:53, Michał Górny wrote: >> >>

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: enabling ipc-sandbox & network-sandbox by default

On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 11:42 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > Hi, everyone. > > Almost 9 months ago I've committed three new FEATURES for portage: > cgroup, ipc-sandbox and network-sandbox. Today I'd like to propose > enabling at least the latter two by default. > +1 I've been using all three of them

[gentoo-dev] Re: [PATCH] qt4-r2.eclass: simplify doc handling

On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 12:43 PM, Sergey Popov wrote: > As we should not do anything crazy with DOCS and HTML_DOCS, let's > simplify our eclass > It's not about doing "anything crazy"... einstalldocs simply didn't exist at the time. Anyway, ACK from me. And please remember to update the qt overl

[gentoo-dev] [RFC] qt5-build.eclass

Hi guys, In preparation for moving Qt5 to gentoo-x86 (finally!), please review the attached eclass that is inherited by every Qt5 ebuild. If you want to get an idea about how the ebuild code looks like, see any ebuild in the dev-qt category of our overlay that inherits the eclass: https://gi

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] qt5-build.eclass

On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 8:56 PM, Maxim Koltsov wrote: > > For the record: I /think/ that an eclass for packages supporting both qt4 > and qt5 (using multibuild.eclass) /might/ be useful. Looking forward to > hearing Qt team opinion. Maybe. But you'll have to convince me. We aren't planning on wri

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] qt5-build.eclass

On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 10:07 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > Dnia 2014-08-17, o godz. 20:38:18 > Davide Pesavento napisał(a): > >> # @FUNCTION: qt5-build_src_unpack >> # @DESCRIPTION: >> # Unpacks the sources. >> qt5-build_src_unpack() { >> if [[ $(gcc-ma

[gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] qt5-build.eclass

On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 11:38 AM, Davide Pesavento wrote: > I will commit the eclass in about 7-10 days from now, unless major > problems are found during the review. The actual Qt5 packages will > follow soon thereafter, initially under package.mask. > The eclass is now in tre

Re: [gentoo-dev] My masterplan for git migration (+ looking for infra to test it)

On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 2:03 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > We have main developer repo where developers work & commit and are > relatively happy. For every push into developer repo, automated magic > thingie merges stuff into user sync repo and updates the metadata cache > there. How long does the md

Re: [gentoo-dev] My masterplan for git migration (+ looking for infra to test it)

On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 3:55 PM, hasufell wrote: > Davide Pesavento: >>> In any case, we would likely strip the history anyway to get a small >>> repo to work with. >>> >>> I have prepared a basic git update hook that keeps master clean >>> a

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: kde5 and kde5-functions eclass

kde5-functions.eclass > inherit versionator versionator doesn't export any phase functions so it can stay inside the _KDE5_FUNCTIONS_ECLASS conditional block. > case ${EAPI:-0} in I believe :-0 is unnecessary here, "*)" will match anyway, but it doesn't hurt either. > *) die "EAPI=${EAPI} is n

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: kde5 and kde5-functions eclass

kde5.eclass > case ${KDE_TEST} in > false) ;; > *) > IUSE+=" test" > DEPEND+=" test? ( dev-qt/qttest:5 )" No >=${QT_MINIMAL} in this dep? > else > unpack ${A} I think you can use `default` > if ! in_iuse examples || ! use examples ; then if ! use_if_iuse examples ; then > if ! in_iuse test |

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: net-im/qutim

# Davide Pesavento (20 Oct 2014) # Does not build with any in-tree version of cmake since 20140713 (bug 506614). # Jabber plugin is broken (bug 464690). Masked for removal in 30 days. net-im/qutim

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/2] multibuild.eclass: make sure BUILD_DIR exists before pushd'ing into it.

Index: multibuild.eclass === RCS file: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/eclass/multibuild.eclass,v retrieving revision 1.18 diff -u -r1.18 multibuild.eclass --- multibuild.eclass 10 May 2014 21:36:49 - 1.18 +++ multibuild.eclass 23 Oct 2014

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 2/2] multilib-minimal.eclass: use run_in_build_dir().

Index: multilib-minimal.eclass === RCS file: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/eclass/multilib-minimal.eclass,v retrieving revision 1.9 diff -u -r1.9 multilib-minimal.eclass --- multilib-minimal.eclass 2 May 2014 16:16:37 - 1.9 +++ multilib-

[gentoo-dev] Re: [PATCH 1/2] multibuild.eclass: make sure BUILD_DIR exists before pushd'ing into it.

On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 10:30 PM, Davide Pesavento wrote: > Index: multibuild.eclass > === > RCS file: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/eclass/multibuild.eclass,v > retrieving revision 1.18 > diff -u -r1.18 mu

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 2/2] multilib-minimal.eclass: use run_in_build_dir().

On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 11:08 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > Dnia 2014-10-23, o godz. 22:31:39 > Davide Pesavento napisał(a): > >> Index: multilib-minimal.eclass >> === >> RCS file: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/ecl

[gentoo-dev] [RFC] qt4-build-multilib.eclass

g the existing one, to avoid destabilizing current consumers and to maintain code readability. While at it, we also refactored the code quite a bit, and rewrote some functions using a more modern style. Thanks, Davide Pesavento qt4-build-multilib.eclass Description: Binary data

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: x11-libs/qt

overlays) will pull in the split # modules they need as dependency. Unmasking this will most likely pull in # more than you need. # Davide Pesavento (08 Dec 2011) # Now superseded by x11-libs/qt-meta. Removal on 18 Dec 2011. =x11-libs/qt-4* (only 10 days of grace period before removal because the

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] use.desc: Improve description of USE=test

On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 11:00 AM Michał Górny wrote: > > Improve the description of USE=test to clearly indicate what the flag > does instead of claiming it workaround for Portage. > --- > profiles/use.desc | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > Changed in v2: added descripti

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] use.desc: Improve description of USE=test

On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 2:46 AM Michał Górny wrote: > > On Tue, 2018-08-21 at 01:54 -0400, Davide Pesavento wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 11:00 AM Michał Górny wrote: > > > > > > Improve the description of USE=test to clearly indicate what the flag >

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] use.desc: Improve description of USE=test

On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 11:57 AM Davide Pesavento wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 2:46 AM Michał Górny wrote: > > > > On Tue, 2018-08-21 at 01:54 -0400, Davide Pesavento wrote: > > > On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 11:00 AM Michał Górny wrote: > > > > > &g

[gentoo-dev] Re: [PATCH] qmake-utils.eclass: add qt{4,5}_get_bindir helper functions

On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 12:58 PM, Ben de Groot wrote: > The attached patch proposes two helper functions to be added to > qmake-utils.eclass. These functions echo the correct directory where > qt binaries such as moc and lrelease are located. They can be used in > ebuilds when such binaries need t

Re: [gentoo-dev] multilib and different CFLAGS for 32 and 64bit ABIs

On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 9:12 PM, Matthias Schwarzott wrote: > On 29.03.2015 20:58, Matthias Schwarzott wrote: >> Hi there! >> >> I updated my ~amd64 system recently to new hardware (Intel Core i3-4160). >> Since then valgrind did no longer work for 32bit programs because >> "-march=native" did cho

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-user] Re: This nite's switch to "full multilib"

On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 8:23 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: > I think we really need to either stabilize 4.8.6, or backport > qtchooser/multilib/etc to the current stable version. > Backporting is not an option. The introduction of multilib support in qt4 required extensive changes to the eclass (substa

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-user] Re: This nite's switch to "full multilib"

On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 1:12 AM, Rich Freeman wrote: > On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 5:56 PM, Davide Pesavento wrote: >> On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 8:23 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: >> >>> qt is a pretty significant package to have break with multilib, and >>> trying to run q

Re: [gentoo-dev] IA64 Arch status

On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 5:04 PM, Jack Morgan wrote: > I'm hoping to get some feedback from the community as to what should be > supported and what can be reduced. My overall plan as I mentioned in a > previous email to reduce the total number of keywords for ia64 to a more > manageable level. I'd

Re: [gentoo-dev] Sparc Arch status

On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 5:36 PM, Jack Morgan wrote: > I wanted to send out an update on the Sparc arch team status. My overall > plan is to reduce the total number of keywords for sparcto a more manageable > level. I'd like to continue to have sparc be a stable arch for gentoo for as > long as it

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in eclass: ChangeLog qt4-build-multilib.eclass

On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 6:43 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > Dnia 2015-06-12, o godz. 01:44:17 > "Davide Pesavento (pesa)" napisał(a): > >> pesa15/06/12 01:44:17 >> >> Modified: ChangeLog qt4-build-multilib.eclass >> Log: >&

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCHSET python-utils-r1] python & python-config wrapper cleanup

On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 12:37 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > While at it, I also added some 'unsupported' wrappers to ban trying to > use pythonY (accidental fallback to system python) when pythonX is > selected via wrapper, and changed the exit code for unsupp-scripts. Can you clarify the consequence

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCHSET python-utils-r1] python & python-config wrapper cleanup

On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 2:03 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > Dnia 2015-07-25, o godz. 13:37:03 > Davide Pesavento napisał(a): > >> On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 12:37 PM, Michał Górny wrote: >> > While at it, I also added some 'unsupported' wrappers to ban trying to >&g

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCHSET python-utils-r1] python & python-config wrapper cleanup

On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 2:48 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > Dnia 2015-07-25, o godz. 14:24:27 > Davide Pesavento napisał(a): > >> On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 2:03 PM, Michał Górny wrote: >> > Dnia 2015-07-25, o godz. 13:37:03 >> > Davide Pesavento napisał(a): >> &

Re: [gentoo-dev] useflag policies

On Sun, Aug 2, 2015 at 10:27 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > Dnia 2015-08-03, o godz. 00:34:51 > Ben de Groot napisał(a): > >> Recently some team members of the Qt project have adopted these ebuild >> policies: https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Qt/Policies >> >> I have an issue with the policy adopt

Re: [gentoo-dev] useflag policies

On Sun, Aug 2, 2015 at 12:12 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: > On Sun, Aug 2, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Andrew Savchenko wrote: >> >> This is a clean solution for developers and maintainers, but not >> for ordinary users — they will confused by "qt qt4 qt5": "what is >> 'qt', how is it different from 'qt4' and 'q

Re: [gentoo-dev] useflag policies

On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 10:10 PM, Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote: > On Tue, 2015-08-04 at 11:59 +0800, Ben de Groot wrote: >> On 4 August 2015 at 04:20, Rich Freeman wrote: >> > [...] >> > Gentoo should be the best of both worlds. We should give users the >> > power to tweak things, but we shouldn't

Re: [gentoo-dev] useflag policies

On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 8:59 PM, Ben de Groot wrote: > On 4 August 2015 at 04:20, Rich Freeman wrote: >> [...] >> Gentoo should be the best of both worlds. We should give users the >> power to tweak things, but we shouldn't force them to play with config >> files all day long just to have a funct

Re: [gentoo-dev] Referencing bug reports in git (WAS: Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: sci-libs/opencascade/)

On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 8:43 AM, Mike Gilbert wrote: > On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 11:30 AM, hasufell wrote: >> On 08/09/2015 05:19 PM, Tobias Klausmann wrote: >>> Hi! >>> >>> On Sun, 09 Aug 2015, Sven Vermeulen wrote: >>> On Sun, Aug 09, 2015 at 04:43:36PM +0200, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: >> I t

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: useflag policies

On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 12:38 PM, Sergey Popov wrote: > > > In short - apropriate REQUIRED_USE with setting recommended > USE-flag(e.g. USE="+qt4 qt5" or USE="qt4 +qt5") > > > > That's most painless decision for both developers and users. Developers > do not need to maintain ugly dependencies lik

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: dev-ruby/metasm/

On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 5:35 PM, hasufell wrote: > On 10/08/2015 11:04 PM, Richard Farina wrote: >> commit: f05eda22c275381c669e6f2a88dabd1356a3541f >> Author: Zero_Chaos gentoo org> >> AuthorDate: Thu Oct 8 20:45:33 2015 + >> Commit: Richard Farina gentoo org> >> CommitDate: T

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: dev-ruby/metasm/

On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 5:48 PM, Patrick Lauer wrote: > > > On 10/09/15 17:42, Davide Pesavento wrote: >> On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 5:35 PM, hasufell wrote: >>> On 10/08/2015 11:04 PM, Richard Farina wrote: >>> >>> +all_ruby_prepare() { >>> +

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: qt4-build.eclass

Unused since the removal of Qt 4.8.5 a few minutes ago, qt4-build.eclass will be removed in 30 days, i.e. on 2015-11-30. Best regards, Davide Pesavento

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: ban cmake-utils_use_* in EAPI 6

On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 11:53 AM, Michael Palimaka wrote: [...] > > What do you think? +1 for banning them. Thanks, Davide

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 11/29] python-utils-r1.eclass: Move ||die out of command substitution subshells

On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 8:50 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > --- > eclass/python-utils-r1.eclass | 15 +-- > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > Can't you fold this patch into the previous ones that introduced these die calls?

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/8] virtualx.eclass: Use case/esac to handle supported EAPIs

On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 2:24 PM, Justin Lecher wrote: > Signed-off-by: Justin Lecher > --- > eclass/virtualx.eclass | 14 -- > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/eclass/virtualx.eclass b/eclass/virtualx.eclass > index 5d27ed9..584fb29 100644 > --- a/ecl

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 8/8] virtualx.eclass: Simplify API into single virtx()

On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 2:24 PM, Justin Lecher wrote: > The new API runs all specified arguments to virtx() inside an XFVB, > instead of defining VIRTUALX_COMMAND and running that in virtualmake. > > Xemake and Xeconf should be replaced by "virtx emake" and "virtx econf". > > Signed-off-by: Justin

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] eutils.eclass: In EAPI conditionals, replace "has" by case statements.

On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 5:48 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > As suggested by mgorny, we could use bash internals instead of the > "has" function calls in global scope. > > The patch below replaces them by case statements. (Unfortunately we > cannot use fall-through (&;) because it is a bash 4 feature.

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] eutils.eclass: In EAPI conditionals, replace "has" by case statements.

On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 7:52 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: >>>>>> On Mon, 30 Nov 2015, Davide Pesavento wrote: > >>> The patch below replaces them by case statements. (Unfortunately we >>> cannot use fall-through (&;) because it is a bash 4 feature.) >

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 8/8] virtualx.eclass: Simplify API into single virtx()

On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 4:50 PM, Justin Lecher (jlec) wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > On 28/11/15 16:28, Davide Pesavento wrote: >>> else - nonfatal ${VIRTUALX_COMMAND} "$@" + >>> nonfatal "$@"

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH v2] glep-0063: Add section about the Gentoo keyserver

On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 1:12 PM Mike Gilbert wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Mike Gilbert > --- > > v2: Added "This upload is required in addition to uploading the SKS pool." > > glep-0063.rst | 24 > 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/glep-0063.