addressing before making a
> world-editable wiki.
If you're talking about the offical wiki, we are addressing that
problem. If you are talking about the unofficial one, I can only
agree.
Cheers,
--
Ben de Groot
Gentoo Qt project lead developer
Gentoo Wiki project lead
There is no libfoo. This bug is about libpng. Don't try to hide the
problem by renaming it.
Cheers,
Ben
-- Forwarded message --
From:
Date: 27 May 2010 10:44
Subject: [Bug 319061] media-libs/libfoo-1.4.2 update not handled by
preserved-libs due to uninstall of older SLOT
To: yn
On 27 May 2010 22:52, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> On 05/27/2010 11:27 PM, Ben de Groot wrote:
>> There is no libfoo. This bug is about libpng. Don't try to hide the
>> problem by renaming it.
>
> No, the bug is about Portage 2.2 and @preserved-libs feature.
>
> It w
On 3 June 2010 20:54, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> There is a real problem with herds that have a single or no
> maintainer, the former mainly because that could very well lead to
> another case of the latter, and we should certainly address both
> problems, but we should create as little as possible n
On 3 June 2010 22:44, René 'Necoro' Neumann wrote:
> Am 03.04.2010 15:19, schrieb Ben de Groot:
>> On 3 April 2010 11:46, Patrick Lauer wrote:
>>> On 04/03/10 11:16, Tobias Scherbaum wrote:
>>>> People are constantly asking for a documentation wiki,
On 4 June 2010 00:55, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Jun 2010 22:35:04 +0200
> Ben de Groot wrote:
>
>> Also, there are herds that have several members, but none of them is
>> really active (games, most of the desktop-* herds, etc.). This also
>> leads to users be
As I'm retiring, the following packages I maintained need someone else
to look after them:
media-video/avidemux - video and qt herds (this one needs a version bump)
media-video/smplayer - qt and video herds
x11-themes/haematite-xcursors - desktop-misc herd
x11-themes/obsidian-xcursors - ,,
x11-the
On 11 June 2010 21:12, Ben de Groot wrote:
> As I'm retiring, the following packages I maintained need someone else
> to look after them:
>
> media-video/avidemux - video and qt herds (this one needs a version bump)
> media-video/smplayer - qt and video herds
> x11-th
I guess I should have done a proper grep on the tree before my first
message. I missed a few more that are now up for grabs:
media-sound/ncmpcpp - tanderson?, sound herd
app-text/convertlit
app-admin/makepasswd
app-backup/rsnapshot - proxy maintainer needs new contact
app-cdr/recorder - media-opti
On 17 June 2010 02:33, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
wrote:
> On 17-06-2010 00:00, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
>> yngwin's devaway message still reads
>>
>> "inactive, pending resolution of devrel issue".
>>
>> yngwin retired. I woudn't go as far as saying that his case made him
>> retire but I defin
On 17 June 2010 02:01, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
wrote:
> On 16-06-2010 16:39, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
>> On 6/16/10 5:33 AM, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
>>> - With these Code of Conduct rules in place how come DevRel
>>> is not publicly reminding of these rules where necessary?
>>
>> I think
On 17 June 2010 17:45, Petteri Räty wrote:
> We communicate in English but that doesn't mean we all the same cultural
> background. My native language doesn't do small talk and doesn't have a
> word for please.
I'm sorry, but that is simply not true. Unless Finnish is not your
native language. On
On 19 June 2010 09:10, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
> On 6/19/10 8:43 AM, Patrick Lauer wrote:
>> As long as it doesn't get actively hostile we can continue with a
>> pretty large amount of friction. Read the archives of this mailing
>> list if you want to see how much :)
>
> I think that is the poi
On 19 June 2010 19:50, Wulf C. Krueger wrote:
>> If #gentoo-infra bangs their moms the rest of the community deserves to
>> know.
>
> Oh? What do you do at night with your girlfriend (or boyfriend or yourself)?
> The community deserves to know!
Take it somewhere else. We dont want this here.
>>
On 19 June 2010 19:59, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Jun 2010 12:54:25 +0200
> Ben de Groot wrote:
>> This is a point that deserves more consideration. One of the top
>> reasons (as witnessed in forum discussions)
>
> Unfortunately, that's selecting a rather
On 9 August 2010 14:29, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> sure would be nice if someone picked up the installer again ...
No, it wouldn't. Best leave that dead and buried.
Cheers,
Ben
On 7 August 2010 02:18, Brian Harring wrote:
> The thing you're ignoring out of this g55 idiocy is that people don't
> particularly seem to want it. There has been an extremely vocal
> subgroup of paludis/exherbo devs pushing for it while everyone else
> seems to have less than an interest in it.
On 12 August 2010 17:13, Thilo Bangert wrote:
> Ben de Groot said:
>> On 9 August 2010 14:29, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> > sure would be nice if someone picked up the installer again ...
>>
>> No, it wouldn't. Best leave that dead and buried.
>
> Could yo
On 17 August 2010 02:43, Joshua Saddler wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Aug 2010 16:34:08 +0300
> Markos Chandras wrote:
>
>> You should talk directly to the teams how are responsible for this part of
>> the
>> webpage like dosc or pr teams
>
> Common misconception. Neither the GDP, PR, or even Releng is di
On 23 December 2014 at 00:11, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> +1 for an "archive overlay"
I set up the graveyard overlay for such purposes, a couple of years ago.
But it hasn't taken off: https://github.com/gentoo/graveyard
Feel free to resurrect it. (pun intended)
--
Cheers,
Ben | yngwin
Gentoo
On 28 December 2014 at 11:36, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> We are now running gitolite-gentoo-3.6.2.1, a huge jump from our prior
> 2.3.3.
>
> File a bug if you see anything weird, and ping me in IRC (#gentoo-dev)
> if you think it's urgent.
There still is no web interface for browsing the repositor
On 3 February 2015 at 00:00, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 02/02/2015 10:50 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
>>
>> Maybe. Though it still will keep the confusion of !libav meaning ffmpeg.
>>
>
> We could remove USE=libav from the tree, leaving only USE=ffmpeg. Then
> ffmpeg_impl_libav would switch the imple
On 4 February 2015 at 17:21, Michał Górny wrote:
> Dnia 2015-02-04, o godz. 10:12:12
> Ulrich Mueller napisał(a):
>
>> With the recent introduction of the libav USE flag, the Gentoo default
>> for ffmpeg vs libav is more pronounced than it was before (with libav
>> being listed first in || ( ) de
On 4 February 2015 at 17:55, Michał Górny wrote:
> Dnia 2015-02-04, o godz. 17:24:03
> Ben de Groot napisał(a):
>
>> From an upstream that I care about:
>> https://github.com/mpv-player/mpv/wiki/FFmpeg-versus-Libav
>>
>> Based on that I would say we should
On 4 February 2015 at 21:49, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
wrote:
> Ulrich Mueller schrieb:
>>
>> In the replies to http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?p=7694982
>> several users have expressed their preference for ffmpeg.
>
> To help finding out what users actually think, I added a poll to the
On 4 February 2015 at 20:43, Mike Auty wrote:
> Whilst the default *is* still in place (and particularly after the
> recent news article detailing that users should be using libav), could
> we please keep commits like the following until *after* we've made an
> agreed upon decision please?
>
> htt
On 6 February 2015 at 00:20, hasufell wrote:
> Ben de Groot:
>> On 4 February 2015 at 21:49, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
>> wrote:
>>> Ulrich Mueller schrieb:
>>>>
>>>> In the replies to http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?p=7694982
>&g
On 7 February 2015 at 10:08, Mike Auty wrote:
> [...] I
> was concerned that a warning which had been in place in package.mask
> since September was removed by a different developer than the one who
> put it in place,
I discussed this beforehand with said developer on IRC.
> and that a package w
On 7 February 2015 at 07:03, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> Welp, the votes clearly show ffmpeg is desired by users.
>
> Can we stop this nonsense and just do that? The people have spoken.
>
> Ffmpeg shall be default.
Except Gentoo is not a democracy.
It is still important data to take into conside
On 7 February 2015 at 00:59, hasufell wrote:
> Ben de Groot (yngwin):
>> yngwin 15/02/05 20:09:33
>>
>> Added:stockfish-6.ebuild metadata.xml Manifest ChangeLog
>> Log:
>> Initial commit (bug #318337)
>>
First off: thank you f
On 7 February 2015 at 23:06, hasufell wrote:
DEPEND=""
>>>
>>> unzip is missing from DEPEND
>>
>> I thought portage auto-depends on this. But I can add || ( unzip zip )
>> to be explicit.
>>
>
> I don't know, but it's definitely not in @system. Afair we are only
> allowed to omit deps from th
On 8 February 2015 at 18:38, Michał Górny wrote:
> Hello, everyone.
>
> I would like to announce that our little rsync->git band-aid mirror [1]
> is doing fine and we're actively working towards improving Gentoo
> development experience.
>
>
> First of all, we have enabled tree-wide repoman scans
On 4 February 2015 at 17:26, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Feb 2015 10:12:12 +0100
> Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>
>> With the recent introduction of the libav USE flag, the Gentoo default
>> for ffmpeg vs libav is more pronounced than it was before (with libav
>> being listed first in || ( ) depen
The attached patch proposes two helper functions to be added to
qmake-utils.eclass. These functions echo the correct directory where
qt binaries such as moc and lrelease are located. They can be used in
ebuilds when such binaries need to be called directly. (Ebuilds should
not rely on qtchooser for
At the suggestion of radhermit, I'm putting my neovim & deps ebuilds
up here for review, before I commit them to the official tree. Do you
see any possible improvements?
Right now the neovim ebuild does not install any global default nvimrc
like we do with vim. We should probably consider doing so
# Ben de Groot (21 Feb 2015)
# Duplicates media-fonts/culmus[ancient] (bug #486814).
# Masked for removal in 30 days.
media-fonts/culmus-ancient
--
Cheers,
Ben | yngwin
Gentoo developer
On 21 February 2015 at 16:18, Michał Górny wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Don't you think it sucks to review a few ebuilds in one e-mail? :)
No. :)
> neovim:
>
>> # Copyright 1999-2015 Gentoo Foundation
>> # Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2
>> # $Header: $
>>
>> EAPI=5
>> inher
To anyone within Gentoo who is interested in fonts
I would like to announce a meeting to be held in #gentoo-meetings on
Freenode, on Friday February 27 at 06:00 UTC, unless another date
and/or time will be suggested by people who want to attend.
There hasn't been much activity in the fonts area o
To anyone within Gentoo who is interested in fonts
I would like to announce a meeting to be held in #gentoo-meetings on
Freenode, on Friday February 27 at 06:00 UTC, unless another date
and/or time will be suggested by people who want to attend.
There hasn't been much activity in the fonts area o
On 23 February 2015 at 01:39, William Hubbs wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 09:18:08AM +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
>> neovim:
>>
>> > # Copyright 1999-2015 Gentoo Foundation
>> > # Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2
>> > # $Header: $
>> >
>> > EAPI=5
>> > inherit cmak
On 22 February 2015 at 20:05, Tushar Rajput wrote:
>
> I am novice programmer and wants to contribute to gentoo.Can you give me
> some details?
> Thanks
>
We actually have a wiki page that does:
https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Contributing_to_Gentoo
--
Cheers,
Ben | yngwin
Gentoo developer
On 22 February 2015 at 17:52, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> On Sun, 22 Feb 2015 03:43:33 +0800
> Ben de Groot wrote:
>
>> To anyone within Gentoo who is interested in fonts
>>
>> I would like to announce a meeting to be held in #gentoo-meetings on
>>
On 22 February 2015 at 23:27, Guilherme Amadio wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 03:43:33AM +0800, Ben de Groot wrote:
>> To anyone within Gentoo who is interested in fonts
>>
>> I would like to announce a meeting to be held in #gentoo-meetings on
>> F
On 23 February 2015 at 14:17, Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov wrote:
> I'd also say:
>
> neovim:
>
>> CDEPEND="dev-lang/luajit
>> <...>
>> dev-lua/LuaBitOp
>
> 1) I'm not sure luajit:1 fits the dep
> 2) LuaJIT:2 has it's own bit modules and is unneded LuaBitOp
Thanks! I don't know that much about
On 20 February 2015 at 04:06, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Feb 2015 19:58:29 +0800
> Ben de Groot wrote:
>
>> The attached patch proposes two helper functions to be added to
>> qmake-utils.eclass. These functions echo the correct directory where
>> qt binaries s
% quse -D luajit
local:luajit:app-editors/gvim: Use dev-lang/luajit instead of dev-lang/lua
local:luajit:app-editors/vim: Use dev-lang/luajit instead of dev-lang/lua
local:luajit:app-editors/vim-qt: Use dev-lang/luajit instead of dev-lang/lua
local:luajit:games-action/minetest: Use dev-lang/lu
On 22 February 2015 at 03:43, Ben de Groot wrote:
> To anyone within Gentoo who is interested in fonts
>
> I would like to announce a meeting to be held in #gentoo-meetings on
> Freenode, on Friday February 27 at 06:00 UTC, unless another date
> and/or time will be suggested by peo
On 27 February 2015 at 18:34, Peter Stuge wrote:
> Ben de Groot wrote:
>> I propose that we prefer installing just OpenType. But this should
>> be user configurable, so in those cases I propose we do:
>>
>> IUSE="+opentype"
>> if use open
On 28 February 2015 at 00:26, Guilherme Amadio wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 03:45:23PM +0800, Ben de Groot wrote:
>>
>> 1. lu_zero, matsuu, pva: do you still want to be members of the Fonts
>> project? Then add yourselves to the new project page:
>> https://wiki.ge
On 26 February 2015 at 22:44, Michał Górny wrote:
>
>
> Ben de Groot napisał:
>
>> % quse -D luajit
>>local:luajit:app-editors/gvim: Use dev-lang/luajit instead of
>>dev-lang/lua
>>local:luajit:app-editors/vim: Use dev-lang/luajit instead of
>>dev-lang/
On 28 February 2015 at 19:52, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 02/28/2015 01:47 AM, Ben de Groot wrote:
>>>
>>> Since this is mostly used for web developers, I recommend to leave it
>>> off for desktop users, but possibly on for servers, for example.
>>
>> I
On 1 March 2015 at 23:36, Guilherme Amadio wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 01, 2015 at 08:59:38PM +0800, Ben de Groot wrote:
>> On 28 February 2015 at 19:52, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
>> > On 02/28/2015 01:47 AM, Ben de Groot wrote:
>> >>
>> >> If we do the use expa
On 9 March 2015 at 04:17, Johannes Huber wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 8. März 2015, 21:50:02 schrieb Nikos Chantziaras:
>> On 08/03/15 21:35, Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote:
>> > On Sun, 2015-03-08 at 21:31 +0200, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
>> >> Some ebuilds in portage for Qt-based software support both Qt4 as
On 15 March 2015 at 06:34, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> imho,
>
>> Questions:
>> 0. What names for the tree/repository.
>
> "gentoo"
> (it's also the repo_name)
Our repo is already named "gentoo", so this makes the most sense.
But I wouldn't mind "gentoo-main" either. But then we should also
chan
> mr_bones_15/03/09 18:15:22
>
> Modified: package.use.mask
> Log:
> hide the qt5 stuff for yabause for now
>
> [...]
> +# Michael Sterrett (09 Mar 2015)
> +# Mask qt5 support until qt5 is stable so as to not
> +# hold up making yabause stable.
> +games-emulation/yabause qt5
# Ben de Groot (15 Mar 2015)
# These projects have been abandoned upstream. Most mplayer2 devs have moved
# on to media-video/mpv, and users are suggested to do the same. We have
# media-video/baka-mplayer and media-video/smplayer available as Qt-based GUIs.
# See bugs 452484, 485994, 512082
On 15 March 2015 at 22:43, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>> On Sun, 15 Mar 2015, Michał Górny wrote:
>
>> Hello, everyone. Here's the first draft of news item for
>> gx86-multilib. I tried to cover all the important aspects. Please
>> review and let me know what you think.
>
>> Title: True multilib su
On 16 March 2015 at 19:17, Alexander Berntsen wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On 16/03/15 11:09, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
>>> On 16/03/15 11:58, Alexander Berntsen wrote:
Does smplayer work with mpv?
>> Version 14.9.0.6690 and up supports mpv.
> Then I would enc
On 16 March 2015 at 21:54, Юра Цимбалов wrote:
>> That would be great, but it depends on getting newer mpv stable, while
>> (s)mplayer2 is dead and broken right now.
>
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=mplayer2&list_id=2703540
>
> Why it's broken?
As stated in my original message:
On 17 March 2015 at 23:33, Michał Górny wrote:
> Dnia 2015-03-15, o godz. 15:11:47
> Michał Górny napisał(a):
>
>
> Here's -r1:
> [...]
I think this is really great! Just one small nitpick:
> Note that after performing this step, 32-bit applications on user's
> system may become temporarily bro
On 18 March 2015 at 20:46, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
> Ben de Groot posted on Wed, 18 Mar 2015 15:40:02 +0800 as excerpted:
>
>> On 17 March 2015 at 23:33, Michał Górny wrote:
>>> Dnia 2015-03-15, o godz. 15:11:47 Michał Górny
>>> napisał(a):
>&
On 27 March 2015 at 00:51, William Hubbs wrote:
> The other method is shown by dev-vcs/hub at least, and maybe several
> other packages -- e.g. unconditionally installing the completions
> according to our small files installation practice and not reflecting
> the rdepend on app-shells/zsh.
This
On 29 March 2015 at 04:47, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> Now the number of eselect-* packages in the app-admin category has
> grown to 52. Should we create a new app-eselect category for them?
I think this is a good idea. So +1 from me.
--
Cheers,
Ben | yngwin
Gentoo developer
# Ben de Groot (29 Mar 2015)
# Merged with qtcurve-qt4 into x11-themes/qtcurve (with gtk useflag)
# Removal in 30 days. See also bug #544406.
x11-themes/gtk-engines-qtcurve
--
Cheers,
Ben | yngwin
Gentoo developer
Title: FFmpeg default
Author: Ben de Groot
Content-Type: text/plain
Posted: 2015-04-01
Revision: 1
News-Item-Format: 1.0
Display-If-Installed: virtual/ffmpeg
Since the choice between ffmpeg and libav has been made more
explicit, there has been a lot of discussion about what the
default
On 30 March 2015 at 00:23, Michał Górny wrote:
> Dnia 2015-03-30, o godz. 00:07:16
>
> Include example code.
>
Updated version:
Title: FFmpeg default
Author: Ben de Groot
Content-Type: text/plain
Posted: 2015-04-07
Revision: 1
News-Item-Format: 1.0
Display-If-Installed: media-
On 6 April 2015 at 17:35, Michał Górny wrote:
> Dnia 2015-04-06, o godz. 14:10:12
> Ben de Groot napisał(a):
>
>> On 30 March 2015 at 00:23, Michał Górny wrote:
>> > Dnia 2015-03-30, o godz. 00:07:16
>> >
>> > Include example code.
>> >
On 7 April 2015 at 06:07, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> Solution:
>
> Packages that will compile against either one get "|| (openssl libressl)".
> Packages that require a specific one will just have that one listed. Openssl
> will block Libressl and vice versa.
This would result in a similar mess a
On 7 April 2015 at 15:00, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Apr 2015 07:13:16 +0800
> Ben de Groot wrote:
>
>> >> Please also note that some packages support only one of the two
>> >> implementations. An attempt to install one of those packages may
>> &
On 11 April 2015 at 15:19, Ben de Groot wrote:
>
> And since this is now on the Council's agenda, we're waiting for their
> decision.
>
Since the Council had no objections, this has now been committed.
Thanks for all the feedback.
--
Cheers,
Ben | yngwin
Gentoo developer
On 6 July 2015 at 03:25, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
> On 05.07.2015 20:44, Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote:
>> What I usually end up doing is listing my installed dev-qt/qt* ebuilds, and
>> updating all of them together explicitly:
>>
>> emerge -1 qtcore:4 qtgui:4 qtsql:4 etc.
>
> That's what I tried but
On 20 July 2015 at 00:03, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> If there are no objections, I would like to enable python3.4 by
> default on Saturday, July 25. That means making the following change:
>
> profiles/base/make.defaults:
> PYTHON_TARGETS="python2_7 python3_4"
I would like to note that we only have ar
On 20 July 2015 at 01:01, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
> On 7/19/15 12:42 PM, Ben de Groot wrote:
>>
>> On 20 July 2015 at 00:03, Mike Gilbert wrote:
>>>
>>> If there are no objections, I would like to enable python3.4 by
>>> default on Saturday, July
On 20 July 2015 at 02:31, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 12:42 PM, Ben de Groot wrote:
>> On 20 July 2015 at 00:03, Mike Gilbert wrote:
>>> If there are no objections, I would like to enable python3.4 by
>>> default on Saturday, July 25. That means
On 20 July 2015 at 17:27, Jason Zaman wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 10:39:25AM +0200, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 6:03 AM, Ben de Groot wrote:
>> > I would like to hear from the other team members, yes.
>>
>> I have sympathy towards tho
Recently some team members of the Qt project have adopted these ebuild
policies: https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Qt/Policies
I have an issue with the policy adopted under "Requires one of two Qt
versions". In my opinion, in the case where a package offers a choice
between qt4 or qt5, we shoul
On 3 August 2015 at 09:37, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 2, 2015 at 9:03 PM, Patrick Lauer wrote:
>> I find setting USE="qt4 -qt5" a lot more obvious than having USE="qt" (why
>> not
>> USE="X" ?) which then does different things based on another useflag,
>> sometimes. Maybe. It's horribly i
On 3 August 2015 at 01:33, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Aug 2015 00:34:51 +0800 Ben de Groot wrote:
> [...]
> This policy will allow to USE both qt versions whichever is
> available preferring newer one. Quite reasonable approach.
> Alternatives (^^() and ??()) will require
On 3 August 2015 at 11:30, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 2, 2015 at 11:24 PM, Ben de Groot wrote:
>>> I want to use fooplayer and bargrapher which are two qt-based
>>> applications. fooplayer only supports qt4, and bargrapher only
>>> supports qt5. What U
On 4 August 2015 at 04:20, Rich Freeman wrote:
> [...]
> Gentoo should be the best of both worlds. We should give users the
> power to tweak things, but we shouldn't force them to play with config
> files all day long just to have a functional system. If users want to
> care we let them care ins
On 4 August 2015 at 22:56, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> Are there any cases where things actually break if a package has both
> flags enabled? IE, is three a package with IUSE="qt4 qt5" that when
> both flags are enabled would build for qt5 only, and happens to be a
> dependency atom of something els
On 5 August 2015 at 03:09, Davide Pesavento wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 8:59 PM, Ben de Groot wrote:
>> On 4 August 2015 at 04:20, Rich Freeman wrote:
>>> [...]
>>> Gentoo should be the best of both worlds. We should give users the
>>> power to tweak th
I vote for a simple
Bug: 333531
If it is going to be any longer than that, then you need to make sure
it is part of the commit message template magic. Because I'm surely
not the only one who is lazy and thus averse to typing anything longer
for the most common use case: Gentoo bugs.
--
Cheers,
On 14 August 2015 at 14:02, Michał Górny wrote:
> Dnia 2015-08-13, o godz. 21:17:22
> Patrick McLean napisał(a):
>> We should have common editor artifacts and backup files in there, I
>> generally use this in just about every repository I touch:
>>
>> *~
>> .*.sw[po]
>> .*.un~
>> *#
>> .#*
>>
>>
401 - 484 of 484 matches
Mail list logo
