On Mon, 14 Nov 2005 08:12:25 +0100 (CET)
Daniel Ahlberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is an automatically created email message.
> http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 14406 ebuilds.
Just FYI, it doesn't display correctly in Opera - I can provide screenshots if
you want
On Sun, 20 Nov 2005 20:39:43 -0600
R Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > * if ebuild installs COPYING and/or INSTALL into doc.
>
> Is this actually important? There are a hell of a lot of ebuilds that fail
> under this rule. I'd like to start filing patches for some of the packages
> in this li
On Wed, 21 Dec 2005 15:28:03 -0600
Mike Doty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> All-
>
> Please take a moment to welcome our newest developer, pva. Peter is
> joining to help out with netmon.
>
> In his own words, "I was born in Moscow (it's in Rus
it was Vladimir
Volkov, not Peter. :)
Anyway, welcome, Peter!
--
Andrej Kacian,
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Sun, 01 Jan 2006 21:35:34 +0100
Francesco Riosa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thoughts ? It's doable in some way ?
Whatever way will get chosen, a full copy of every ChangeLog should be made
available somewhere (somewhere other than CVS Attic), for future reference.
Kind regards,
--
Andrej "T
On Sun, 1 Jan 2006 22:55:19 +
Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 01 Jan 2006 21:35:34 +0100 Francesco Riosa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> | That said I can see only two ways to reduce the ChangeLog files (a
> | centralized one is obviously not viable)
>
> 5) Anyone who real
.
I there are no objections I will remove this package in a week.
Duncan
Hello,
could you please use your @gentoo.org address for such announcements?
Thanks.
Kind regards,
--
Andrej Kacian
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Mon, 13 Mar 2006 14:49:10 +0100
Jochen Maes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> /me gives a hot welcome hump to christel
>
> now yer branded :-)
I don't remember you branding *me* when I was new. :))
Anyway, welcome, Christel!
--
Andrej
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Dňa Fri, 24 Mar 2006 17:15:37 +0100
Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> napísal:
> Yeah, and the point is? It happens every day, there are already tons
> of third-party overlays used by Gentoo users, but once this thread
> about "official" overlays started, you came here to tell us "wow,
> this all will
Dňa Fri, 24 Mar 2006 15:23:14 +
"Stuart Herbert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> napísal:
> On 3/24/06, Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > so we're clear, users would be able to create their own overlays
> > and publish their ebuilds right ?
>
> Not on overlays.g.o, no.
>
FWIW, this is alrea
On Sun, 2 Apr 2006 18:42:50 -0300
"Marcelo Góes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 4/2/06, Carsten Lohrke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This is not the case. At least unless the user actively looks at
> > package.mask. Since Portage doesn't provide the information, this point is
> > void. And even
On Mon, 10 Apr 2006 12:21:14 -0400
Curtis Napier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Instead, I'm now the "Web Coordinator". I proposed this new role to
> the Infra Leads and met no resistance or objections so I have taken
> the initiative and created the role. Also, neysx and I together were
> approache
On Sat, 03 Jun 2006 02:05:42 +0100
Christel Dahlskjaer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It is my pleasure to inform you that after much discussion I can
> announce that Joshua Jackson (tsunam) has come onboard to act as my
> co-lead in Userrel[1].
Will that result in dramatic increase of anime smili
On Mon, 12 Jun 2006 20:14:02 -0400
Daniel Ostrow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One thing I do ask...Lets all start now getting used to calling the
> "portage tree" something different. I'm all for terms like "the tree" or
> "the ebuild tree" or "the package tree" but at this point, given the
> prom
On Tue, 13 Jun 2006 10:02:59 -0400
Chris Gianelloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You want the tree to
> be writable, too, so that you can sync from any machine and also because
> of distfiles.
Or you can put distfiles dir outside of portage by adjusting the $DISTDIR
variable in make.conf.
--
An
On Tue, 13 Jun 2006 16:17:57 -0400
Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's no such proof. Anyone who rolls a kernel, takes the time to learn
> what it entails, understands what he/she is intending to do, knows the
> ramifications of those actions. Gentoo users, in particular, by
> virtue of the fa
On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 18:59:26 +0200
"Mateusz A. Mierzwiński" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just want to know that Gentoo will be usable for me and my client's
> that I provide Gentoo Linux support. I recommending Gentoo whatever I
> can, but when I see what happens than I starting to worry.
If
On Tue, 27 Jun 2006 13:07:45 +0200
Enrico Weigelt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > As I have been swamped with emails, private messages and phone calls
> > from certain people, I will retract my resignation for the final time.
>
> I'm fairly new to Gentoo, but I'd like to help.
> So, what shall I d
On Tue, 27 Jun 2006 16:03:32 +0200
Enrico Weigelt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But:
>
> * I'm fairly new here and not familar with the development and
> qm process yet, so I need some assistance.
>
>
> Anything still onclear on my last posting ?
My apologies, Enrico, for snapping out on you
On Fri, 28 Jul 2006 09:41:09 -0400
Chris Gianelloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > That's actually how I read the first email, was that it's really
> > the majority of the _minor_ packages that get completely neglected,
> > and just sits in the tree for months or years marked unstable
> > becaus
Dňa Sun, 30 Jul 2006 23:21:38 +0200
Jan Kundrát <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> napísal:
> I'd like to nominate Andrej Kacian (ticho). He's quite a silent dev
> (speaking about -dev and -core flamefests :) ), so chances are that he
> won't go bananas. He also wrote nice articles
be adding an ebuild for it
tonight after I'm back from work).
Kind regards,
--
Andrej Kacian
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Thu, 24 Aug 2006 18:42:27 +0200
Robert Cernansky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thank You for the tip. I looked at mpd also (only on web page). It
> have probably good posibility to control it via command line. But what
> about xosd support? (Which I mention in my previous post.) I do not
> see
n. 3 people answer me and ask almost
> the same and I answer almost the same again ..
Then answer in only one subthread, and rest of them will die... :)
Kind regards,
--
Andrej Kacian
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Dňa Sat, 09 Sep 2006 19:07:02 +0100
Christel Dahlskjaer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> napísal:
> So, make sure you all welcome him onboard, and as he's Czech, I figure
> the beer is on him..
Uh-oh, the Czech conspiracy keeps growing!
--
Ticho
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, 6 Oct 2006 16:05:16 -0600
Jim Ramsay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Excellent, another member of the soon-to-be-famous Gentoo rock band! I
> think Joshua Jackson (tsunam) has already volunteered to be the
> singer :) What is it, three new musical devs so far in the last 2
> weeks?
Ahh, I'm
On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 10:06:39 +0200
Natanael Copa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Because of gentoo devs always seems to fight?
Don't get confused by all the flames. It's only 10-20 devs out of ~150 who are
always fighting - and that's usually only on mailinglists, they work together
quite well outsi
On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 18:31:32 +0200
Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Stephen Bennett napsal(a):
> > Which behaviour is this? All the gentoo mailing lists seem fine to me...
>
> The behaviour that _all_ other mailing lists get replies to the list by
> default when you hit Reply, just the _o
On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 22:10:37 +0200
Harald van Dijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Can anybody explain how that one list is different from the others? Are
> > the headers being munged differently for gentoo-core?
>
> This list sets Reply-to to direct replies to the list. gentoo-core
> doesn't. Pe
On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 22:45:04 +0300
Petteri Räty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's my pleasure to introduce to you Ryan "dirtyepic" Hill. He is
> joining us to help with the endless x86 testing effort, treecleaners,
> and gcc-porting.
Ryan, your biological and technological distinctiveness will be
On Mon, 23 Oct 2006 08:46:25 -0400
Chris Gianelloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is what happens when you let a bunch of hippies build an OS.
No need to involve council - just call Eric Cartman. He'll teach those hippies
all there is about "fun".
Kind regards,
--
Andrej "Ticho" Kacian
Pro
ves here :P).
Why? If someone does this, they need to be spanked - and for that, we
need to know who they are.
Kind regards,
--
Andrej Kacian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Sat, 16 Dec 2006 11:16:25 +0200
Petteri Räty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Upstream for net-misc/cidr has disappeared (their homepage has been dead
> > for a long long time according to archive.org), and a cursory check on
> > the Internets doesn't yield a new home. Masked accordingly, pendin
On Tue, 02 Jan 2007 00:40:55 +0200
Petteri Räty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's my pleasure to introduce to you Miroslav "fordforg" Šulc. He is
> joining the über cool java people. Expect him to spend endless night
> battling with the horrors of bundled jars and sucky build systems.
Welcome abo
Hi all,
as of today, x11-misc/gtk2mp has been masked, and is pending removal around
February 9th.
It is unmaintained, deprecated, and somewhat broken. Also, better MPD clients
exist as alternative - gmpc, glurp, qmpdclient, pympd, sonata.
Kind regard,
--
Andrej "Ticho" Kacian
Gentoo Linux Deve
On Thu, 11 Jan 2007 16:04:31 -0500
Chris Gianelloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Submit your ideas here, so we can discuss them. I will be choosing one
> idea that we think we can accomplish to test out the idea of
> Council-driven projects.
How about unified (and enforced) rules about Manifest
On Sat, 3 Feb 2007 17:17:40 -0500
Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> after all the pains we went through to enforce "if you want to stabilize on
> $ARCH, talk to the $ARCH team", how is this a good thing ?
I think Mike meant adding ~arch keywords - "if you own and use ${ARCH} then
you m
On Sun, 11 Feb 2007 19:50:02 +0100
Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Won't waste my time on your trollish rants any more.
Hehe, whenever you write this, there's always several more posts from you down
the same thread. It's kind of amusing.
--
Andrej "Ticho" Kacian
Gentoo Linux Developer -
"improve" the current way of defining keywords just because
some people got scary CVS conflict messages. Those happen all the time
in larger repositories.
Kind regards,
--
Andrej Kacian
Gentoo Linux developer - net-mail, antivirus, sound, x86
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, 21 Feb 2007 21:48:49 -0700
"Daniel Robbins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2/21/07, Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Are you insane? What on earth could Jakub possibly contribute? If
> > you want a rough indication of Jakub's level of ebuild
> > understanding, take a look at
On Sun, 25 Feb 2007 13:43:10 +0200
Samuli Suominen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What do YOU think about removing these from tree?
>
> gtk-engines/gtk-engines-0.12.ebuild:DEPEND="=x11-libs/gtk+-1.2*
> gtk-engines-begtk/gtk-engines-begtk-1.0.1-r2.ebuild:DEPEND="=x11-libs/gtk+-1.2*"
[snip]
As long
On Sun, 25 Feb 2007 09:37:33 -0600
Ryan Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Seriously, IMHO the less we have depending on GTK+-1 the better. Others
> will disagree loudly.
It makes sense slowly removing *applications* depending on gtk1. Themes should
go last, along with gtk1 itself.
Gtk1 is alrea
On Sun, 25 Feb 2007 18:51:51 +
Steve Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Like I said, tho, I'm happy if the council is. Although I'm starting to
> worry at the increasingly poisonous atmosphere, and that devs are leaving.
> Flameeyes was on the council, no? It concerns me that this atmosphere is
On Sun, 25 Feb 2007 23:10:16 + (UTC)
Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Keep in mind that those who have it already
> merged along with their favorite theme can keep them in overlay, so
> removing the themes from the tree simply keeps new users from merging
> something that's already on it
On Tue, 27 Feb 2007 19:06:17 +0200
Petteri Räty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's my please to introduce to you Daniel "drobbins" Robbins. Daniel is
> going to work with the amd64 arch team but will probably venture to
> other areas too. Daniel doesn't have much experience with Gentoo so
> let's g
s ourselves,
without package manager aid.
Kind regards,
--
Andrej Kacian
Gentoo Linux developer - net-mail, antivirus, sound, x86
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
(work on PMS doesn't require any commits there anyway) ?
Don't start again about the dubious "official status of Gentoo
developership" - since when is volunteer work about political (yes,
political) status?
Just. Drop. It.
Regards,
--
Andrej Kacian
Gentoo Linux developer - net-mail, antivirus, sound, x86
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
not going to actively "fight" your suggestion though, because I
have packages to maintain and only limited time, which you're
already cutting into with your nonsensical notions about boundaries.
--
Andrej Kacian
Gentoo Linux developer - net-mail, antivirus, sound, x86
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
kicked now
> contributing as a user is quite different IMHO.
No, in this context it is exactly the same.
--
Andrej Kacian
Gentoo Linux developer - net-mail, antivirus, sound, x86
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, 08 Mar 2007 20:02:50 +0200
Petteri Räty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How useful is the X use flag in gkrellm? Just thinking if it would be
> better to just remove the use flag and always build that code.
There is a possibility for headless servers to run gkrellmd, which runs in
background
On Sat, 10 Mar 2007 12:28:29 -0600
Andrew Gaffney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Thing is that kinda stuff just puts ppl off; i've seen you carry on
> > bugzilla but i always thought fair enough he's stressed and working on
> > loads a bugs; if you really wanted to say that crap to me, you could h
On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 14:47:16 -0500
Larry Lines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So maybe I will stick around and maybe I will find a niche to help out
> with that I can feel passionately enough to start a flame war.
Yes please, by all means, do that (the helping out part, not the flame war
part :) ).
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 22:46:30 +0100
Raphael Marichez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anyone willing to take care of this package in the future, please update
> metadata.xml and CC yourself on the bug.
Non-vulnerable version is in the tree, and I have added myself to metadata.xml
with description "Bac
On Fri, 30 Mar 2007 13:55:55 +0100
Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If Ubuntu or Fedora do the job better then Gentoo has failed in its
> goal of providing a near-ideal tool...
Semantically speaking, it hasn't failed - there's nothing about providing a
better (or "nearer-ideal") tool
On Sat, 31 Mar 2007 20:02:28 +0200
"Christopher Covington" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The first condition you list is a sort of nativism that I for one
> would expect not to find in a successful copyleft project created on
> the Internet. Why should the code Gentoo uses be written by Gentoo
> de
On Sat, 31 Mar 2007 15:24:03 -0400
Seemant Kulleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The point being made, then, is that for an official package manager to
> exist *for Gentoo*, it needs to be under *Gentoo's* control.
Well, the source is open, and there are already enough Gentoo devs working
on it, s
On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 14:28:52 +0200
Timothy Redaelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Imho is a waste of time to maintain two projects which does the same
> things (genloop and qlop)
Perhaps because each has features that the other doesn't (genlop's --date, for
example).
Also, as long as involved peo
On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 21:40:53 +0200
Jan Kundrát <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So just get a beer and be cool, okay? It's friday, after all...
No! No beer until my work shift ends! Then I'll join you.
--
Andrej
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 17:24:06 -0700
"Robin H. Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 02:57:59AM +0300, Mart Raudsepp wrote:
> > > This is exactly the reason that I proposed the contact=0 attribute - for
> > > some of the packages that I maintain, I do not want the bugs assign
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 00:11:26 -0400
Josh Sled <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> E.g., I don't know what genealogy has to do with theology, but I do see
> that both relate to the human condition.
The fact that Adam and Eve will be found at the beginning of every genealogy
graph.
Just kidding, just kidd
On Mon, 4 Jun 2007 18:08:48 +0200
Christian Heim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's my pleasure to welcome back Deedra Waters (also known as dmwaters on
> IRC).
>
> Deedra is joining us from Pensacola, FL. She is going to work on the
> accessibility stuff (she is blind), will be re-joining Develo
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 00:22:56 +0300
Petteri Räty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Your doc zombie Sven Vermeulen has risen from his grave and is back to
> beat www.gentoo.org/doc/en with his fingers. Give him the usual welcome
> with nice head shots.
Welcome back, Sven. And no, you can't have my brain
On Wed, 5 Sep 2007 20:08:29 +0200
Christian Heim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - app-admin/psmon (mcummings)
> - net-im/bitlbee (weeve)
I'll take these two unless someone else wants them more.
Regards,
--
Andrej "Ticho" Kacian
Gentoo Linux Developer - net-mail, antivirus, sound, x86
signatu
On Wed, 5 Sep 2007 23:03:39 +0200
Cédric Krier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 05/09/07 22:48 +0200, Andrej Kacian wrote:
> > On Wed, 5 Sep 2007 20:08:29 +0200
> > Christian Heim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > - app-admin/psmon (mcummings)
>
On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 21:49:25 -0500
Richard Freeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I cringe when I see a stable request for some dialup
> networking package - I doubt many devs even own modems these days.
I do own few modems, but alas, no phone line to hook them up to. :)
--
Andrej "Ticho" Kacian
Are .keep files necessary in a live filesystem? AFAIK they're only there
to keep portage from removing a directory from emerge-time image. Would it be
possible to just remove them from live filesystem after package files are
merged to / ?
Or do .keep files serve another purpose, not obvious to me?
On Sat, 21 May 2005 17:37:53 -0700
Drake Wyrm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I always thought that they were to keep 'emerge unmerge' from removing
> > an empty directory, but I could be wrong...
>
> That, and to keep portage from removing empty directories during the
> post-merge clean phase. We
As this package doesn't seem to be actively maintained upstream (and people
on amavis-user mailinglist suggest everyone upgrading to amavisd-new), has some
open bugs[1][2][3] about it, and noone seems to be maintaining the ebuild
itself, we (net- mail) would like to get rid of it, unless someone st
On Thu, 2 Jun 2005 23:39:41 +0200
Andrej Kacian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As this package doesn't seem to be actively maintained upstream (and people
> on amavis-user mailinglist suggest everyone upgrading to amavisd-new), has
> some open bugs[1][2][3] about it, a
On Fri, 3 Jun 2005 00:06:41 +0200
Andrej Kacian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Jun 2005 23:39:41 +0200
> Andrej Kacian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > As this package doesn't seem to be actively maintained upstream (and people
> > on amavis-user mai
On Mon, 13 Jun 2005 05:33:01 -0400
"Luis F. Araujo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I like this idea.
> I actually proposed a similar idea time ago in #-dev , but
> instead of doing it from bugzilla, to do it from the web site, (i like
> yours better)
> the main idea is to have a list of unmantained
On Mon, 13 Jun 2005 18:36:09 +0200
Maurice van der Pot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I definitely would like to see this. Just a few days ago I was
> considering adding a comment along the lines of "we need a maintainer
> for this package, that's why nothing is happening" to some bug reports.
> NEE
On Wed, 15 Jun 2005 11:49:28 +0900
Chris White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> on a minor note, I was thinking of maybe a somewhat small comprehensive list
> of major problems and ways to solve them. I know we do have bugzilla, but
> bugzilla is kind of full of noise (look at all them bugs!). There
On Wed, 15 Jun 2005 10:56:20 +0200
Thierry Carrez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, ChrisWhite in a protocol IRC bot. Also speaks a few million
> languages, including Japanese.
Who's R2D2 then?
--
Andrej "Ticho" Kacian
Gentoo Linux Developer - net-mail, antivirus, amd64
pgpx401uApuio.pgp
Des
On Wed, 15 Jun 2005 11:21:20 +0200
Paul de Vrieze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why not create a "voicebot" that would sit in the irc channel (the subject
> would refer to it), that developers could send a message to, and that
> would automatically be forwarded to a team of developers. If the bot
On Wed, 15 Jun 2005 11:54:20 +0200
Paul de Vrieze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It would be an easy contact point for users. The other way would certainly
> be still allowed, but it might be easier if there was a fixed "contact"
> even if that is actually multiple people.
Just out of curiosity -
On Wed, 15 Jun 2005 19:03:44 +0900
Jason Stubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is that not a win/win situation? Where exactly is the "bureaucracy"?
Maybe I used wrong term - I was thinking about time and effort spent on
setting up and maintaining the ircbot. I've been in charge of a large botnet
in
On Sat, 18 Jun 2005 05:39:37 -0700
Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> but the effect was that the top ten list was of little practical use at all
[...]
What was useful for me wasn't the topten feature at all, rather it was the
list of packages browsable by herd and architecture. It allowed
On Wed, 8 Jun 2005 22:30:37 +0200
Andrej Kacian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> mail-filter/amavis has been package.mask-ed, and will remain so until next
> Wednesday, or until someone picks it up.
My first mail never made it to the list, it seems, so again:
mail-filter/amavis is no l
Hi all,
I've been wondering - is there any eclass for fixing gcc warnings in $SUBJ
for C/C++ source files? I know it's upstream's job to fix these, and that they
have no effect on the compilation, but all there needs to be done is
'echo "" >> $file', and let's face it - it looks nicer when the co
On Thu, 23 Jun 2005 13:32:53 -0500
Grant Goodyear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear all,
> After quite some time "merely" being an infra dev, lcars has
> finally taken the leap and gained commit access to the tree. He's
> going to be officially taking over sendmail and supporting other
> packa
On Sun, 26 Jun 2005 18:20:27 -0400
Ned Ludd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-06-27 at 00:07 +0200, Matthias Schwarzott wrote:
> > Hi Gentoo developers!
> >
> > vdr and its environment has been quite productive and produced more than
> > 130 plugins for vdr.
> > Not all of them are suitab
On Sun, 10 Jul 2005 09:57:44 +0100
Stuart Herbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It'd perhaps make sense to extend the DTD for metadata.xml, so that the
> tag has 'type' and 'organisation' attributes. This would
> allow tools to tell the difference between an entry for a Gentoo
> maintainer, and a
On Sat, 15 Oct 2005 22:33:58 +0200
Luca Barbato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> zphoto: not maintained I'm afraid.
"Not maintained and working", or "not maintained and FUBARed" ?
--
Andrej "Ticho" Kacian
Gentoo Linux Developer - net-mail, antivirus, x86
pgpe9YBpjsses.pgp
Description: PGP signat
On Tue, 18 Oct 2005 22:58:51 +0300
Petteri Räty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am trying to solve http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109079. I
> asked on #gentoo-dev and ciaramn said that we do not have a policy on
> where to make a home directory. So I would now like the input of other
> deve
On Tue, 1 Nov 2005 01:51:25 +
Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The attached GLEP is a draft proposal for the emerge --news thing that's
> been under discussion. There are still some TODO items. These are calls
> for people to weigh in with suggestions. Of course, suggestions on oth
On Tue, 1 Nov 2005 18:18:55 +
Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | Before this, make pre-install and post-install emerge messages more
> | usable, instead of having them lost among thousands of gibberish text
> | in batch emerges.
>
> Separate issue. That one's the whole elog thing.
On Tue, 1 Nov 2005 13:44:17 -0600
Grant Goodyear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That seems a bit unfair to me. There's a complete logging facility in
> portage CVS for a version that's probably not going to be released, but
> I believe that the logging stuff is being back-ported to the current
> ve
88 matches
Mail list logo
