On Thu, 2019-12-05 at 19:04 +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Thu, 2019-12-05 at 18:59 +0100, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> > On Thu, 2019-12-05 at 18:39 +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2019-12-05 at 17:36 +0100, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 2019-12-05 at 1
On Fri, 2019-12-06 at 03:23 -0500, Tim Harder wrote:
> On 2019-12-05 Thu 17:00, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> > > > pkgcheck is mostly used by your CI checks for
> > > > producing huge reports, which is nice but addresses a different
> > > > problem
> >
On Fri, 6 Dec 2019 04:33:36 -0500
Tim Harder wrote:
> On 2019-12-06 Fri 04:03, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> > it's not just like repoman and cvs since repoman commit did push ;)
> > it will never be perfect but i really like repoman commit to refuse
> > to even commit if t
On Fri, 6 Dec 2019 10:41:56 -0500
Matt Turner wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 6, 2019 at 5:51 AM Alexis Ballier
> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 6 Dec 2019 04:33:36 -0500
> > Tim Harder wrote:
> >
> > > On 2019-12-06 Fri 04:03, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> > > > it&#
On Fri, 2019-12-06 at 21:28 +0100, Thomas Deutschmann wrote:
> On 2019-12-06 21:10, Andreas Sturmlechner wrote:
> > Just so we're on the same page, a recent example of what some
> > people
> > suggesting to keep py27 ad nauseam are asking users to deal with:
> > [...]
> > WARNING: One or more upda
On Thu, 2019-12-12 at 12:14 -0500, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 12:02 PM NP-Hardass
> wrote:
> > On 12/11/19 9:58 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> > > Append RESTRICT="!test? ( test )" in the default case when
> > > virtualx
> > > is conditional to USE=test. This fixes 440 MissingTestRe
On Thu, 2019-12-19 at 20:40 +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Here's another potential EAPI 8 feature I'd like to discuss. Please
> note that this is about *new dependency type*, so please don't hijack
> it
> into the big 'let's steal Exherbo syntax' debate.
>
> Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.or
On Fri, 2019-12-20 at 18:55 +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > > > > > On Fri, 20 Dec 2019, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> > Should we use this to drop RDEPEND from pkg_*inst/rm phases ?
> > PMS states "RDEPEND (unless the particular dependency results in a
> > cir
On Thu, 2020-03-12 at 09:06 +0100, ha...@gentoo.org wrote:
> As this native Win32 support is considered highly experimental still,
> I
> would like to apply the libtool patches for parity via elibtoolize
> only,
> without applying them in sys-devel/libtool itself yet.
>
IIRC you need to do it thi
On Thu, 2020-03-12 at 20:59 +, James Le Cuirot wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Mar 2020 11:23:04 +0100
> Alexis Ballier wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2020-03-12 at 09:06 +0100, ha...@gentoo.org wrote:
> > > As this native Win32 support is considered highly experimental
> > > s
On Sun, 7 Dec 2014 11:37:57 +0100
Michał Górny wrote:
> 1. No cross-compilation support. If the project proves being a success
> it will be readded at some point. However, I will likely fork glibc
> first and work on a sane crossdev alternative.
Could you please elaborate on this ?
How and why t
On Tue, 9 Dec 2014 17:21:22 +0100
Michał Górny wrote:
> Dnia 2014-12-08, o godz. 09:56:11
> Alexis Ballier napisał(a):
>
> > On Sun, 7 Dec 2014 11:37:57 +0100
> > Michał Górny wrote:
> >
> > > 1. No cross-compilation support. If the project proves being a
On Thu, 11 Dec 2014 11:36:29 +0100
Michał Górny wrote:
> Hello, everyone.
>
> Following a similar change in distutils-r1, I would like to remove
> the parallel run support in multilib eclasses, and effectively from
> multibuild completely.
[...]
> Your thoughts?
+1
I hate parallel builds as I
On Wed, 14 Jan 2015 12:58:21 +0100
Michał Górny wrote:
> Any specific comments? I can handle x86 but I'd appreciate specific
> arch teams replying about more exotic arches.
+1
i like the idea, but with a list of useflags that would get converted
this could "reach" more people i think
profiles/
On Wed, 14 Jan 2015 21:59:37 +0100
"Andreas K. Huettel" wrote:
> That said, long time ago I was taught that "instruction set
> use-flags" should be avoided as much as possible. I don't remember
> the source for that anymore.
>
> Question to all, is that documented anywhere, and what are the
> s
On Thu, 15 Jan 2015 10:20:15 + (UTC)
Martin Vaeth wrote:
> Christopher Head wrote:
> >
> > All that requires is knowing the names, though; it would be
> > fine if no package actually uses the feature yet.
>
> ++
>
> More precisely: When changing the names anyway,
> IMHO it would be a very
On Thu, 15 Jan 2015 11:50:25 +0100
"viv...@gmail.com" wrote:
> Il 15/01/2015 11:30, Alexis Ballier ha scritto:
> > On Thu, 15 Jan 2015 10:20:15 + (UTC)
> > Martin Vaeth wrote:
> >
> >> Christopher Head wrote:
> >>> All that requires is
On Thu, 15 Jan 2015 12:03:27 + (UTC)
Martin Vaeth wrote:
> Alexis Ballier wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> More precisely: When changing the names anyway,
> >> >> IMHO it would be a very good idea to follow the convention of
> >> >>
On Sun, 18 Jan 2015 21:44:05 +0100
Michał Górny wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to commit the following flags as cpu_flags_x86_desc.
> The list combines global USE flags with some local USE flags I've been
> able to find.
>
>
> 3dnow - Use the 3DNow! instruction set
> 3dnowext - Use the Enhan
On Sun, 18 Jan 2015 15:15:22 -0800
Matt Turner wrote:
> > mmx - Use the MMX instruction set
> > mmxext - Use the Extended MMX instruction set (intersection of
> > Enhanced 3DNow! and SSE instruction sets) (3dnowext or sse in
> > cpuinfo) padlock - Use VIA padlock instructions popcnt - Enable
> > p
On Mon, 19 Jan 2015 08:13:46 +0800
Patrick Lauer wrote:
>
> So half of those are obsolete/dead, and the other half you need to do
> proper feature detection - why do we want that as useflags again?
>
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/94299
Hi all,
As I was the one wanting amd64-fbsd profiles 'stable' to ensure a sane
deptree, and seeing the number of (re)keywording bugs growing and
growing while I don't have time to process them and no-one else is doing
it, I just switched them to 'dev' state.
For users, this means they can no long
On Mon, 19 Jan 2015 20:31:45 +0100
Michał Górny wrote:
> Hello,
>
> As we've discussed multiple times, the following kind of dependencies
> is completely broken and can't work:
>
> || ( media-libs/libav:= media-libs/ffmpeg:= )
See end of the email.
> For this reason, I would like to employ
On Tue, 20 Jan 2015 08:57:43 +0100
Michał Górny wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Since you didn't like the previous hacky idea, here's a new one.
>
> The basic flags correspond to features and are used if the relevant
> support is optional:
>
> avcodec - Enables audio/video decoding support via libavcodec
>
On Mon, 19 Jan 2015 23:43:19 -0800
Christopher Head wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Jan 2015 11:01:16 -0800
> Zac Medico wrote:
>
> > Why should we have to foresee the future? We can easily add support
> > for new flags in CPU_FLAGS_* variables at any time.
>
> Ah, what I meant was that whoever maintains
On Tue, 20 Jan 2015 00:29:22 -0800
Christopher Head wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Jan 2015 09:21:54 +0100
> Alexis Ballier wrote:
>
> > you will not see it if no package use it.
>
> I guess you mean I wouldn’t see it in emerge output if no package uses
> it, even if it is USE-
On Tue, 20 Jan 2015 09:52:40 +0100
Michał Górny wrote:
> Dnia 2015-01-19, o godz. 11:38:26
> Alexis Ballier napisał(a):
>
> > On Sun, 18 Jan 2015 21:44:05 +0100
> > Michał Górny wrote:
> >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I would like to commi
On Tue, 20 Jan 2015 01:01:41 -0800
Zac Medico wrote:
> On 01/20/2015 12:13 AM, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> > On Mon, 19 Jan 2015 20:31:45 +0100
> > Michał Górny wrote:
> >> 2. Subslots work correctly. Rebuilds are forced when the chosen
> >> library is upgraded. M
On Tue, 20 Jan 2015 09:28:21 -0800
Zac Medico wrote:
> On 01/20/2015 01:11 AM, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> > On Tue, 20 Jan 2015 01:01:41 -0800
> > Zac Medico wrote:
> >
> >> On 01/20/2015 12:13 AM, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> >>> On Mon, 19 Jan 2015 20:31:45
On Tue, 20 Jan 2015 22:43:52 +0100
Michał Górny wrote:
> Dnia 2015-01-20, o godz. 09:13:19
> Alexis Ballier napisał(a):
>
> > > For this reason, I would like to employ the solution used by
> > > Exherbo. More specifically, use:
> > >
> > >
On Tue, 20 Jan 2015 10:33:49 -0800
Zac Medico wrote:
> On 01/20/2015 10:20 AM, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> > On Tue, 20 Jan 2015 09:28:21 -0800
> > Zac Medico wrote:
> >
> >> On 01/20/2015 01:11 AM, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> >>> I think we can onl
On Wed, 21 Jan 2015 11:15:04 +0100
Michał Górny wrote:
> Dnia 2015-01-21, o godz. 11:05:01
> Alexis Ballier napisał(a):
>
> > > > > 2. Subslots work correctly. Rebuilds are forced when the
> > > > > chosen library is upgraded. Moreover, USE flag chan
On Wed, 21 Jan 2015 11:05:34 +0100
Michał Górny wrote:
> Hello, developers.
>
> As you may recall, the main blocker for wide-establishment of
> FEATURES=network-sandbox prohibiting network access within the build
> environment is distcc. Since all connectivity is disabled, distcc can
> no longer
On Wed, 21 Jan 2015 19:21:28 +0100
Michał Górny wrote:
[...]
> > > 1. What does || ( a b:= c:= ) mean? i.e. only some having
> > > subslots.
> >
> > This makes sense only when in DEPEND+RDEPEND (because of the :=), so
> > apply this (mostly copy/paste) for all such deps:
> > for a in 'a' 'b' 'c'
On Thu, 22 Jan 2015 02:50:44 -0800
Zac Medico wrote:
> On 01/21/2015 11:25 PM, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> > 1. If portage uses crafted depstrings in its depgraph when
> > rebuilding a package and nobody is able to give me a good reason
> > _why_ this is needed, I really do no
On Thu, 22 Jan 2015 09:06:39 -0800
Zac Medico wrote:
[...]
> > That's what I understand from Michał's comment (quoting him):
> >
> >> 1. if you have dynamic-deps enabled, portage will want to install
> >> both ffmpeg (because of :=) and libav (because of ||). The
> >> effective deps will look li
On Sat, 24 Jan 2015 00:39:04 +0100
Michał Górny wrote:
> Users who want to use the ffmpeg fork
> instead need to specify USE=-libav explicitly.
As Peter said, please avoid such controversial statements.
> The most notable example of such package is
> media-video/mplayer which relies on deprecat
On Sat, 24 Jan 2015 00:35:39 +0100
Michał Górny wrote:
> Title: CPU_FLAGS_X86 introduction
> Author: Michał Górny
> Content-Type: text/plain
> Posted: 2015-01-xx
> Revision: 1
> News-Item-Format: 1.0
> Display-If-Keyword: amd64 ~amd64 x86 ~x86
but why ?
will you write another news item for
On Sat, 24 Jan 2015 11:20:54 +0100
Michał Górny wrote:
> > Where is libav USE and package set as default over ffmpeg? I haven't
> > found that in profiles/ dir :/ (or is it going to be done when
> > implementing this?)
>
> Right now in virtual/ffmpeg.
not entirely true since the virtual won't t
On Fri, 23 Jan 2015 09:19:19 -0800
Zac Medico wrote:
> > what Michał claims is that 'foo' will want ffmpeg, no matter what.
>
> Maybe he's talking about some case where portage failed to trigger a
> rebuild when appropriate. We've had a number of bugs like this that
> have been fixed. The most r
On Mon, 26 Jan 2015 12:37:09 +0100
Alexis Ballier wrote:
> > media-video/mplayer2 or media-video/mpv may be used as a more
> > modern replacement.
>
> Don't recommend mplayer2, afaik it's dead.
Also, I'd drop "modern" from there: I don't see
On Mon, 26 Jan 2015 07:18:13 -0500
Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 7:00 AM, Alexis Ballier
> wrote:
> > On Mon, 26 Jan 2015 12:37:09 +0100
> > Alexis Ballier wrote:
> >
> >> > media-video/mplayer2 or media-video/mpv may be used as a more
> &
On Mon, 26 Jan 2015 16:20:10 +0100
Michał Górny wrote:
> Dnia 2015-01-26, o godz. 12:41:00
> Alexis Ballier napisał(a):
>
> > On Sat, 24 Jan 2015 00:35:39 +0100
> > Michał Górny wrote:
> >
> > > Title: CPU_FLAGS_X86 introduction
> > > Author:
On Mon, 26 Jan 2015 20:13:36 +0100
Michał Górny wrote:
>
> Thanks, applied your suggestions. Please read now ;).
>
LGTM, thanks
On Mon, 26 Jan 2015 20:09:18 +0100
Michał Górny wrote:
> Dnia 2015-01-26, o godz. 16:40:35
> Alexis Ballier napisał(a):
>
> > On Mon, 26 Jan 2015 16:20:10 +0100
> > Michał Górny wrote:
> >
> > > Dnia 2015-01-26, o godz. 12:41:00
> > > Alexis Balli
On Mon, 2 Feb 2015 15:12:50 +0100
Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > What are your thoughts?
>
> In a nutshell, you have a binary choice here, namely ffmpeg or libav
> as implementation, and instead of one USE flag you want to introduce
> two (ffmpeg_impl_ffmpeg and ffmpeg_impl_libav), but of the 4 possi
On Mon, 2 Feb 2015 17:14:22 +0100
Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> >>>>> On Mon, 2 Feb 2015, Alexis Ballier wrote:
>
> > Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>
> >> In a nutshell, you have a binary choice here, namely ffmpeg or
> >> libav as implementation, and instea
On Mon, 2 Feb 2015 18:08:01 +0100
Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> >>>>> On Mon, 2 Feb 2015, Alexis Ballier wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2 Feb 2015 17:14:22 +0100
> > Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>
> >> Why? When you have USE="-ffmpeg", the libav flag is a &q
On Wed, 4 Feb 2015 10:12:12 +0100
Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> With the recent introduction of the libav USE flag, the Gentoo default
> for ffmpeg vs libav is more pronounced than it was before (with libav
> being listed first in || ( ) dependencies).
>
> In the replies to http://forums.gentoo.org/vi
On Wed, 04 Feb 2015 13:57:55 +0100
Luca Barbato wrote:
> On 04/02/15 11:40, Michał Górny wrote:
> > It's easiest to look at the trackers:
> >
> > - ffmpeg-2 [1] -- 26/26 fixed,
> > - ffmpeg-2.4 [2] -- 3/3 fixed (but unsure if there won't be more),
> > - libav-9 [3] -- 55/55 fixed,
> > - libav-10
On Wed, 04 Feb 2015 14:30:56 +0100
Michał Górny wrote:
>
> It wasn't only weak but quite inconsistent too. Some packages had
> their own || deps, with different order.
>
this was to reflect upstreams preferences
On Sun, 8 Feb 2015 12:19:18 +
Ian Whyman wrote:
> On 8 February 2015 at 03:20, Jason A. Donenfeld
> wrote:
> > The votes keep pouring in. Ffmpeg is the preference of Gentoo
> > users, as well as the majority of Gentoo developers, and by a very
> > relevant upstream author.
>
> I don't think
On Sun, 08 Feb 2015 23:34:57 +0100
Luca Barbato wrote:
> Sadly the time I can spend doing opensource stuff can be compressed
> from time to time and maybe is nicer develop interesting stuff such
> as useful API and features than write tons of s:CODEC_ID:AV_CODEC_ID:
> over countless packages.
ca
On Sun, 15 Feb 2015 01:32:40 +0800
Ben de Groot wrote:
> On 4 February 2015 at 17:26, Alexis Ballier
> wrote:
> > On Wed, 4 Feb 2015 10:12:12 +0100
> > Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> >
> >> With the recent introduction of the libav USE flag, the Gentoo
> &g
On Sat, 14 Feb 2015 17:10:36 +0100
"Andreas K. Huettel" wrote:
> Am Samstag, 14. Februar 2015, 16:00:46 schrieb Kristian Fiskerstrand:
>
> >
> > References:
> > [PHABRICATOR] http://phabricator.org
>
> Let me point at the other pink elephant in the room.
> https://about.gitlab.com/
>
+1
i'v
On Wed, 18 Feb 2015 22:48:27 +0100
Michał Górny wrote:
> Dnia 2015-02-18, o godz. 16:11:53
> "Mike Frysinger (vapier)" napisał(a):
>
> > vapier 15/02/18 16:11:53
> >
> > Modified: fcaps.eclass
> > Log:
> > clarify USE=filecaps intention #540430
> >
> > Revision Changes
On Thu, 19 Feb 2015 19:34:28 +0800
Patrick Lauer wrote:
> On Thursday 19 February 2015 12:31:27 Alexis Ballier wrote:
> > On Wed, 18 Feb 2015 22:48:27 +0100
> >
> > Michał Górny wrote:
> > > Dnia 2015-02-18, o godz. 16:11:53
> > >
> > > "
On Fri, 20 Feb 2015 16:23:41 +0300
Sergey Popov wrote:
> As said before - you can either provide other solution yourself or
> appeal to Council.
sadly, things I have no need for get at the bottom of my TODO list, if
at all, and usually never get done.
On Thu, 19 Feb 2015 14:39:28 +0200
Markos Chandras wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> On 02/19/15 13:38, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> > On Thu, 19 Feb 2015 19:34:28 +0800 Patrick Lauer
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On Thursday 19 Febr
On Thu, 19 Feb 2015 09:42:27 -0500
"Rick \"Zero_Chaos\" Farina" wrote:
[...]
> >> We've had this discussion before ... so ...
> >
> >
> > what i remember of it is someone adding a ChangeLog file to eclass/
> > and sending an email to ask people to fill it. Mind sharing a link ?
> >
> > I think
Hi Ben,
On Sun, 22 Feb 2015 03:43:33 +0800
Ben de Groot wrote:
> To anyone within Gentoo who is interested in fonts
>
> I would like to announce a meeting to be held in #gentoo-meetings on
> Freenode, on Friday February 27 at 06:00 UTC, unless another date
> and/or time will be suggested by peo
On Tue, 3 Mar 2015 22:12:07 +0100
Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> Hi,
> We currently have two mechanisms to influence building of packages
> that cannot be binary redistributed. Some 150 packages have
> RESTRICT=bindist (unconditional, or USE conditional), whereas
> 27 packages have the bindist flag in t
On Wed, 4 Mar 2015 20:51:44 +0800
Ben de Groot wrote:
> Alexis, can you shed some light on this from the TeX side? What font
> formats can be used by various TeX packages?
Ahah :)
Short answer: All. More or less properly depending on the font and its
format.
More detailed answer:
http://en.wi
On Mon, 16 Mar 2015 10:27:18 -0400
Rich Freeman wrote:
>
> As I recall libav is now the default, and the argument was that users
> should just use mplayer2 and such for compatibility.
mpv, not mplayer2; I insisted on not talking about mplayer2 :)
On Mon, 23 Mar 2015 13:22:25 -0400
Tim Harder wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> Having been around for a few years I've inherited or added quite a few
> pkgs to the tree that I wouldn't mind other people fixing/bumping/etc
> that don't fall into any current herds.
>
> With that in mind, I think it would be
On Sun, 5 Apr 2015 18:50:10 +0200
Michał Górny wrote:
> What are your thoughts?
if the version+slot restriction on foo in bar-1.ebuild contains foo
packages that don't have bar useflag then it's an error in
bar-1.ebuild (I think pms is pretty clear about this)
Alexis.
On Tue, 7 Apr 2015 07:13:16 +0800
Ben de Groot wrote:
> >> Please also note that some packages support only one of the two
> >> implementations. An attempt to install one of those packages may
> >> result in blockers requiring the user changes the global USE=libav
> >> state. The most notable e
On Fri, 1 May 2015 11:28:52 -0400
Mike Gilbert wrote:
> Due to popular demand, I have added a basic systemd profile for amd64:
what about we start telling people /etc/make.profile can be a dir
and that you can fill the 'parent' file in there just as well as you ln
-s it ?
Alexis.
On Sat, 2 May 2015 05:53:57 -0400
Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Sat, May 2, 2015 at 4:20 AM, Alexis Ballier
> wrote:
> > On Fri, 1 May 2015 11:28:52 -0400
> > Mike Gilbert wrote:
> >
> >> Due to popular demand, I have added a basic systemd profile for
> >>
On Mon, 11 May 2015 22:21:09 +0700
C Bergström wrote:
> On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 9:59 PM, Rich Freeman
> wrote:
> > On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 10:44 AM, C Bergström
> > wrote:
> >> What I'm describing is not "gmail" - it's everything that gmail has
> >> and offers, but @gentoo.org domain. I'm using
On Mon, 11 May 2015 17:20:01 +0100
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Mon, 11 May 2015 18:17:10 +0200
> Alexis Ballier wrote:
> > You should probably think about the difference between public code
> > being mirrored at github and giving some big company access to
> > privat
On Sat, 16 May 2015 10:59:20 -0400
Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 05/15/2015 10:51 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> > Title: SquashDelta syncing support
>
> Do we need a news item for this at all? Everything is backward
> compatible and most people don't need to do anything at all in
> response to the ne
On Sun, 17 May 2015 13:45:32 +0200
hasufell wrote:
> On 05/17/2015 10:16 AM, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> > On Sun, 17 May 2015 06:08:56 +1000
> > Michael Palimaka wrote:
> >
> >>> 15 May 2015; Michael Palimaka
> >>> kde4-base.eclass: Sync with KDE overlay - update SRC_URI.
> >>>
> >>
> >> This
On Mon, 18 May 2015 18:25:35 +0200
"Justin (jlec)" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am in trouble about he meaning of LINGUAS in a certain context.
>
> The program supports
>
> a) different interface languages
>
> and
>
> b) different languages for the content text, like hyphenation,
> localized loremipsu
On Fri, 29 May 2015 11:43:22 -0500
William Hubbs wrote:
> The second change is that, from this point forward, the init scripts
> will not be automatically added to the sysinit runlevel.
what will happen if i make a new install and forget to add udev to my
runlevels ?
On Sat, 30 May 2015 14:54:42 -0400
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> an example warning message:
> * QA Notice: The following files were not built with LFS support:
> * Please file a bug at http://bugs.gentoo.org/ and mark it as a
> blocker of 471102.
> * See that tracker bug (https://bugs.gentoo.or
On Fri, 29 May 2015 14:50:31 -0500
William Hubbs wrote:
[...]
> First, there is now a udev-trigger init script which you will need to
> add to the sysinit runlevel. You do this by issuing the following
> command:
>
> # rc-update add udev-trigger sysinit
Unrelated to the news items, but is there
On Fri, 29 May 2015 12:39:28 -0500
William Hubbs wrote:
> On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 12:20:58PM -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
> > On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 06:49:36PM +0200, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> > > On Fri, 29 May 2015 11:43:22 -0500
> > > William Hubbs wrote:
> >
On Sun, 31 May 2015 13:50:49 +0200
Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
> On 31 May 2015 at 12:59, Alexis Ballier wrote:
>
> > nice, but can't we add the lfs flags to our default toolchain flags
> > or even better patch glibc headers to always redefine these
> > fun
On Sun, 31 May 2015 09:46:30 -0400
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On 31 May 2015 12:59, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> > I don't understand why one should add append-lfs-flags to almost
> > every single package out there.
>
> no one is suggesting that route. append-lfs-flag
On Sun, 31 May 2015 10:17:02 -0400
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On 31 May 2015 15:52, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> > On Sun, 31 May 2015 13:50:49 +0200 Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
> > > On 31 May 2015 at 12:59, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> > > > nice, but can't we add the
On Sun, 31 May 2015 11:17:50 -0400
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> well if we're going to do arbitrary lists ;)
> (1) your options aren't mutually exclusive
> (2) implementing both are desirable
good to know your longterm plan :)
however, even if both can be done, i still don't see the point of going
th
On Tue, 2 Jun 2015 10:13:54 -0400
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On 01 Jun 2015 10:15, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> > On Sun, 31 May 2015 11:17:50 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > (3) considering the glibc effort has been stalled for over a year,
> > > (1) is something we c
On Sat, 6 Jun 2015 22:00:14 -0400
Mike Gilbert wrote:
> Compatibility with sed scripts is not something I care about.
and is something nobody should care about: xml is not a regular
language :)
On Wed, 10 Jun 2015 22:43:10 +0200
Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> Hi,
> The number of EAPI 1 ebuilds in the Portage tree has decreased to
> a total of 60, corresponding to 0.16 %.
>
> We briefly discussed in the QA team if we should demote EAPI 1 in
> layout.conf from "eapis-deprecated" to "eapis-banne
On Thu, 11 Jun 2015 13:13:18 +0200
Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > On Thu, 11 Jun 2015, Jason Zaman wrote:
> dev-lang/ocaml-3.12.1 in slot
in subslot not slot, but more importantly in stable
> > my bet would be that those 60 ebuilds are from packages barely
> > maintained,
On Thu, 11 Jun 2015 18:33:36 +0200
Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> >> Maintainers can still use --force if there is no other way.
>
> > i'm definitely not convinced it is good practice to encourage people
> > to do that ;)
>
> People are strongly encouraged to update their ebuilds to a newer
> EAPI. ;)
On Thu, 11 Jun 2015 14:38:35 -0400
Rich Freeman wrote:
>
> These errors are not user-visible. I really don't have a problem with
> repoman errors for deprecated features.
>
I don't have a problem with always using --force either. But then the
distinction between warnings and errors becomes much
On Thu, 11 Jun 2015 15:15:42 -0400
Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 3:12 PM, Alexis Ballier
> wrote:
> > On Thu, 11 Jun 2015 14:38:35 -0400
> > Rich Freeman wrote:
> >>
> >> These errors are not user-visible. I really don't have a proble
On Thu, 11 Jun 2015 21:55:14 +0200
Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> >> From previous ocaml stabilizations, I'd say that I'll have to use
> > --force for at least two months before it can be removed. I might
> > get bored and alias --force :)
>
> Unless the commit rate in dev-lang/ocaml (which was a total
On Sun, 28 Jun 2015 14:46:01 +0200
Patrice Clement wrote:
> man 3 glob
> man 3 fnmatch
> man 1 bash -> read the section called "Pattern Matching" under
> "EXPANSION".
>
> in this case, $(ls) would unnecessarily spawn a subshell for listing
> files. You can often get the same result by using wild
On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 16:01:05 +0200
Michał Górny wrote:
> Dnia 2015-08-11, o godz. 15:52:16
> Patrice Clement napisał(a):
>
> > Hi there
> >
> > According to
> > https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Gentoo_git_workflow#Branching_Model,
> > "there may be developer-specific, task-specific, project-specif
On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 16:19:12 +0200
hasufell wrote:
> On 08/11/2015 04:10 PM, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> > On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 16:01:05 +0200
> > Michał Górny wrote:
> >
> >> Dnia 2015-08-11, o godz. 15:52:16
> >> Patrice Clement napisał(a):
>
On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 10:26:46 -0400
"Anthony G. Basile" wrote:
> On 8/11/15 10:19 AM, hasufell wrote:
> > On 08/11/2015 04:10 PM, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> >> On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 16:01:05 +0200
> >> Michał Górny wrote:
> >>
> >>> Dnia 201
On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 11:11:43 -0400
Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On 11/08/15 10:01 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> > Dnia 2015-08-11, o godz. 15:52:16 Patrice Clement
> > napisał(a):
> >
> >> Hi there
> >>
> >> According to
> >> https://wiki.gentoo.
On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 11:51:14 -0400
Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On 11/08/15 11:21 AM, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> > On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 11:11:43 -0400 Ian Stakenvicius
> > wrote:
> >
> >> -BEG
On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 18:03:54 +0200
hasufell wrote:
> On 08/11/2015 05:21 PM, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> >
> > Big changes that that go in feature branches and are merged in one
> > pass are, from my experience, way too much prone to errors. Did
> > anyone ever t
On Wed, 12 Aug 2015 05:21:20 +0100
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 23:30:31 +1000
> Michael Palimaka wrote:
> > I invite you to reproduce the problem yourself then make the
> > judgement. Using REQUIRED_USE like this makes the affected packages
> > unusable.
>
> Can't we all (excep
On Wed, 12 Aug 2015 17:08:59 +0200
Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> >>>>> On Wed, 12 Aug 2015, Alexis Ballier wrote:
>
> > i.e. something that really tells the PM how to automate the choice:
> > - 'qt5 -> !qt4' is rather straightforward to solve and tells
On Wed, 12 Aug 2015 11:30:39 -0400
Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On 12/08/15 11:08 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> >>>>>> On Wed, 12 Aug 2015, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> >
> >> i.e. something that rea
701 - 800 of 944 matches
Mail list logo
