On Mon, 15 Dec 2008 23:47:47 + (UTC)
Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
> While I'm at it, is there anything useful to display metadata.xml?
> In particular, the long descriptions and use flags can be useful.
> With use.desc and especially the local version thereof going
> deprecated, and wi
On Sat, 10 Jan 2009 16:22:50 -0500
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> not to be out done, gcc-4.3.2-r3 will include changes like some other
> distros are now carrying:
> - the -Wformat-security flag is enabled by default
> - the -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 flag is enabled by default
>
> if you dont want this stu
On Sun, 11 Jan 2009 00:06:45 +
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Jan 2009 18:03:17 -0600
> Ryan Hill wrote:
> > I'm really hoping this isn't a stable candidate. :P
>
> Is an earlier gcc 4.3 a stable candidate, or have those plans been
> abandoned?
>
&
On Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:31:03 +0100
Benedikt Böhm wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 01:56:52AM +0100, Friedrich Oslage wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > Benedikt Boehm (hollow) schrieb:
> > > hollow 09/01/10 21:41:41
> > >
> > > Modified: pack
On Mon, 26 Jan 2009 20:47:04 -0800
Alec Warner wrote:
> Is GuideXML in fact a barrier for submission (do we get complaints
> about it?)
I seem to remember doc/newsletter people stating on multiple occasions
that they're happy to accept plain text submissions (feel free to beat
me if i hallucinat
On Wed, 04 Feb 2009 18:36:15 +0200
Petteri Räty wrote:
> Angelo Arrifano wrote:
> > # manual document installation
> > [ -n "${DOCS}" ] && dodoc ${DOCS}
> >
> > }
> >
>
> dodoc should have || die with it
Dieing on dodoc is a complete waste of time and effort. No one wants
the ebuild
All bugs blocking #198121 having obviously correct (eg. missing header)
patches will be applied by me in the coming week. If you have concerns
about me touching your package (i swear i'll wash my hands first),
please let me know.
As always, applying these patches yourself makes me a happy monkey.
On Sun, 08 Feb 2009 19:07:58 +
Angelo Arrifano wrote:
> I would keep existing categories and add a new TAG metadata to
> existing ebuilds. Something like TAG="kde music player lyrics lastfm
> visualization" for amarok, as example.
>
> A public list of *ALLOWED* tags would be published on our
On Tue, 10 Feb 2009 13:51:14 -0600
Jeremy Olexa wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 1:54 AM, Ryan Hill
> wrote:
> > All bugs blocking #198121 having obviously correct (eg. missing
> > header) patches will be applied by me in the coming week. If you
> > have concerns about
On Wed, 11 Feb 2009 19:02:12 +0100
"Santiago M. Mola" wrote:
> net-p2p/nicotine+
I can take this one.
--
gcc-porting, by design, by neglect
treecleaner, for a fact or just for effect
wxwidgets @ gentoo EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2
On Fri, 13 Feb 2009 23:53:51 +
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Feb 2009 00:46:54 +0100
> Luca Barbato wrote:
> > master is just a name, you may have the main development happen in
> > another branch (say devel) and the stabler tree is kept on the
> > master branch and you may want to tr
On Mon, 16 Feb 2009 06:17:04 + (UTC)
Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
> Peter Alfredsen posted
> 20090215212907.00a73...@gentoo.org, excerpted below, on Sun, 15 Feb
> 2009 21:29:07 +0100:
>
> > +# Peter Alfredsen (15 Feb 2009)
> > +# Masking for removal in 30 days.
> > +# Fails to bui
On Sat, 21 Feb 2009 18:27:10 -0500
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> looks like bash-4.0 has broken semicolon escaping in subshells. this
> comes up when using find's -exec like we do in a few places in
> eclasses: ls=$(find "$1" -name '*.po' -exec basename {} .po \;); shift
> you can work around the issu
On Sat, 21 Feb 2009 18:55:37 -0500
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Saturday 21 February 2009 18:38:55 Ryan Hill wrote:
> > On Sat, 21 Feb 2009 18:27:10 -0500 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > looks like bash-4.0 has broken semicolon escaping in subshells.
> > > this comes up when
On Mon, 23 Feb 2009 08:43:09 -0700
Steve Dibb wrote:
> Richard Freeman wrote:
> > I still don't see why we need to be encoding metadata in filenames.
> > PERL doesn't care what a file extension is, python doesn't care,
> > bzip2 doesn't care, tar doesn't care, gzip doesn't care, and even
> > ld-l
On Mon, 23 Feb 2009 20:54:38 +
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Feb 2009 21:51:11 +0100
> Luca Barbato wrote:
> > > 2. (with myeclass.eclass containing EAPI=2)
> > > -
> > > EAPI=1
> > > inherit myeclass
> >
> > Invalid
>
> QA violation, but legal and a pain in the ass.
I didn't th
On Mon, 23 Feb 2009 16:15:25 -0600
Ryan Hill wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Feb 2009 20:54:38 +
> Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 23 Feb 2009 21:51:11 +0100
> > Luca Barbato wrote:
> > > > 2. (with myeclass.eclass containing EAPI=2)
> > > >
Alec Warner gentoo.org> writes:
> Somewhat ironically, had everyone been less stubborn last year when
> discussing this topic we could have embedded the EAPI in line X of the
> ebuild in 2008 and be using it now; instead of still discussing it.
>
> I don't expect new novel ideas out of this thre
On Wed, 25 Feb 2009 00:21:23 +0200
Petteri Räty wrote:
> Let's try something new. I would like to get opinions from as many
> people as possible about GLEP 55 and alternatives listed here in order
> to get some idea what the general developer pool thinks. Everyone is
> only allowed to post a sing
On Wed, 04 Mar 2009 04:01:36 +0200
Mart Raudsepp wrote:
> I'm collecting ideas from the wider development and contributing
> community on how to help maintainers and contributors get work done
> quicker, or rephrased - how to get more done in the limited time we
> have.
>
> This basically means
On Tue, 03 Mar 2009 17:47:58 +0100
Alex Legler wrote:
> Hey,
>
> we have some changes to be made in gems.eclass for Ruby 1.9.1.
> Basically this introduces the possibility to install gems for multiple
> versions of Ruby.
>
> If anyone feels like reviewing, please review the following
> changes:
On Sun, 8 Mar 2009 21:20:14 +0100
Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
> Hi,
> lately i see that in our bugzilla most of the build reports are
> reported with localized build logs which we dont understand. This
> leads to us asking the user to run the emerge once more with LC_ALL=C.
>
> Wont it be nice to have
On Tue, 17 Mar 2009 00:22:36 +0100
Tiziano Müller wrote:
> > * Am I to take it src_test is to remain in its current worthless
> > state?
> Yes, I'd like to see it enable by default as well, but we have to
> discuss that further. So, not suited for a fast eapi release.
Please fix all 'pkg fails t
On Mon, 16 Mar 2009 23:54:02 +
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Mar 2009 17:51:00 -0600
> Ryan Hill wrote:
> > On Tue, 17 Mar 2009 00:22:36 +0100
> > Tiziano Müller wrote:
> > > > * Am I to take it src_test is to remain in its current worthless
> > &
On Sun, 22 Mar 2009 17:50:26 +0100
Alin Năstac wrote:
> Please do not apply patches that have ${P} prefix in other ebuild
> versions than ${PV}.
> Is that hard to create a new patch with a proper name?
Um, why?
I'm not having six identical patches with different version numbers in
FILESDIR.
--
On Sun, 22 Mar 2009 13:24:26 -0400
Mounir Lamouri wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 1:18 PM, Ulrich Mueller
> wrote:
> >> On Sun, 22 Mar 2009, mrness wrote:
> >
> >> Please do not apply patches that have ${P} prefix in other ebuild
> >> versions than ${PV}.
> >> Is that hard to create a new p
These herds have no members:
afterstep:
net-mail/asmail
x11-plugins/asapm
x11-plugins/asclock
x11-plugins/ascpu
x11-plugins/asmem
x11-plugins/asmon
x11-plugins/astime
x11-wm/afterstep
Upstream is willing to maintain, just needs a contact.
https://bugs.gentoo.org/180765
--
secure-tunneling:
net-
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 01:19:26 +0100
Alin Năstac wrote:
> Fine, then remove $PV from patch name and use it in any ebuild version
> you want. Or just decouple the patch version from the ebuild version
> (foo-bar-r1.patch sounds OK to me).
No. It's done this way for a reason.
--
gcc-porting,
On Sun, 22 Mar 2009 17:38:16 -0700
"Robin H. Johnson" wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 05:55:38PM -0600, Ryan Hill wrote:
> > secure-tunneling:
> > net-analyzer/mping
> > net-misc/corkscrew
> > net-misc/ghamachi
> > net-misc/hamachi
> > ne
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 06:55:48 +0100
Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Mar 2009 17:55:38 -0600
> Ryan Hill wrote:
>
> > These herds have no members:
>
> > ... <
>
> > live-cd:
> > app-admin/pwgen
> > app-arch/pbzip2
> > app-misc/live
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 09:04:32 +0100
Alin Năstac wrote:
> I suppose what everyone does in their part of the tree is their
> business, but a small subset of packages I maintain have other
> maintainers as well. It is annoying to see rules you assume being
> respected on your ebuilds being broken at
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 11:51:28 +0100
Fabian Groffen wrote:
> On 23-03-2009 11:41:08 +0100, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
> > People split into three groups:
> >
> > - Friends of ${P}-fix-issue.patch naming
> > - Friends of ${PN}-fix-issue.patch naming
> > - Friends of ${PN}-1.2.3-fix-issue.p
On Sat, 04 Apr 2009 17:57:54 +
"Fabian Groffen (grobian)" wrote:
> grobian 09/04/04 17:57:54
>
> Modified: flag-o-matic.eclass
> Log:
> backport fix for x86-macos in filter-flags from Prefix
>
> Revision ChangesPath
> 1.133eclass/flag-o-matic.eclas
On Mon, 6 Apr 2009 08:21:07 +0200
Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> Is the following description for the category metadata O.K.?
> More translations are welcome.
>
> en: The www-plugins category contains plugins for Web browsers.
> de: Die Kategorie www-plugins enthält Plugins für Webbrowser.
en_CA: The
On Thu, 9 Apr 2009 23:36:16 +0530
Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 10:15 PM, Tiziano Müller wrote:
> > roughly 90% packages depending on one of:
> >
> > sys-libs/db
>
> Why the hell does this have so many slots in-tree? I am unaware of the
> reasons for it. Horribly changed API
On Thu, 09 Apr 2009 19:20:39 +0300
Mart Raudsepp wrote:
> All developers should enable it (a QA enforcement), but users by default
> - no, NO.
> There is more to a distribution than technical considerations.
Yes, please, and can we do it now? I am frankly sick of failing testsuites
and would r
On Sun, 10 May 2009 07:38:43 +
"Samuli Suominen (ssuominen)" wrote:
> ssuominen09/05/10 07:38:43
>
> Modified: ChangeLog cdrdao-1.2.2-r3.ebuild
> Log:
> Doesn't compile with distcc wrt #264170.
> (Portage version: 2.1.6.13/cvs/Linux x86_64)
> +pkg_setup() {
> + i
On Sun, 10 May 2009 02:00:17 -0600
Ryan Hill wrote:
> On Sun, 10 May 2009 07:38:43 +
> "Samuli Suominen (ssuominen)" wrote:
>
> > ssuominen09/05/10 07:38:43
> >
> > Modified: ChangeLog cdrdao-1.2.2-r3.ebuild
> > Log:
&g
On Sun, 10 May 2009 10:41:03 +0100
David Leverton wrote:
> On Sunday 10 May 2009 09:58:22 Ryan Hill wrote:
> > On Sun, 10 May 2009 02:00:17 -0600
> >
> > Ryan Hill wrote:
> > > You can't test FEATURES in an ebuild. It's portage-specific.
> &
On Wed, 6 May 2009 08:49:53 +0200
Christian Faulhammer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> any project lead/member can post an answer to this mail for a status
> report:
I miss these. ;)
GCC-Porting:
Thanks to a load of help from darkside, loki_val, fauli, and others, GCC 4.3
is now stable on our primary archs
On Mon, 11 May 2009 23:29:10 +1200
Alistair Bush wrote:
> I would assume it would be better to directly test whether the user is
> root, than test that userpriv is set?
AFAIK:
if [[ ${EUID} -eq 0 ]]; then
rootstuff
else
nonrootstuff
fi
But for tests that fail with userpriv just because the
Could I ask that people stop closing bugs against the gold linker with
such classy witticisms as "patches welcome". There is no patch a user can
provide to make a package build with the gold linker. These bugs should be
assigned to toolchain, not the maintainer of the package that gold happens to
On Fri, 15 May 2009 23:31:25 +0200
Tiziano Müller wrote:
> Wrong. For example:
> - stuff like docompress may change the content being installed depending
> on the package manager
> - --disable-static (maybe in a later EAPI) changes content
> - slot-dep-operators change the rdepend of installed pa
On Thu, 14 May 2009 03:32:12 +0300
Mart Raudsepp wrote:
> Project maintainer-wanted
> =
>
> Abstract:
> There are currently quite some package requests (over 3000) languishing
> on bugzilla waiting for a developer or team to get interested and
> package it in the official
On Sun, 17 May 2009 17:56:06 +0200
Piotr Jaroszyński wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have just updated GLEP 55 [1], hopefully making it a bit clearer.
>
> Just FYI, my order of preference of solutions is:
>
> 1. EAPI-suffixed ebuilds (obviously)
> 2. EAPI in the filename with one-time extension change
>
On Sun, 17 May 2009 19:18:14 +0100
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sun, 17 May 2009 12:15:24 -0600
> Ryan Hill wrote:
> > I'd like 2 if we could have multiple same-versioned ebuilds of
> > different EAPI. 3 is good enough for me.
>
> We couldn't. Allowing multipl
On Sun, 17 May 2009 21:03:46 +0200
Tiziano Müller wrote:
> Am Sonntag, den 17.05.2009, 11:11 -0600 schrieb Ryan Hill:
> > On Fri, 15 May 2009 23:31:25 +0200
> > Tiziano Müller wrote:
> >
> > > Wrong. For example:
> > > - stuff like docompress may chang
On Sun, 17 May 2009 20:40:41 + (UTC)
Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
> Ryan Hill posted
> 2009051752.133c7...@halo.dirtyepic.sk.ca, excerpted below, on Sun, 17
> May 2009 11:11:52 -0600:
>
> >> Do we want to document the following? (do we have already?
On Sun, 17 May 2009 23:00:21 +0200
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
> 2009-05-17 22:51:50 Ryan Hill napisał(a):
> > On Sun, 17 May 2009 21:03:46 +0200
> > Tiziano Müller wrote:
> > > So, unless you're doing a pkgmove
> > > it's a danger
On Sun, 17 May 2009 15:19:17 -0600
Ryan Hill wrote:
> On Sun, 17 May 2009 23:00:21 +0200
> Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
>
> > 2009-05-17 22:51:50 Ryan Hill napisał(a):
> > > On Sun, 17 May 2009 21:03:46 +0200
> > > Tiziano Müller wrote:
> >
Masked this a couple weeks ago but forgot to announce it:
- old old old docs for the AFS file system, which get installed with
net-fs/openafs USE=doc anyways
- not touched since 2005
- unmaintained
--
gcc-porting, by design, by neglect
treecleaner,
On Wed, 20 May 2009 19:44:27 +0300
Petteri Räty wrote:
> Ryan Hill wrote:
> > Masked this a couple weeks ago but forgot to announce it:
> >
> > - old old old docs for the AFS file system, which get installed with
> > net-fs/openafs USE=doc anyways
> > - not touc
On Thu, 28 May 2009 08:28:12 +0200
Patrick Lauer wrote:
> This is becoming a rather lengthy email ping pong, but as people seem to be
> unable to discuss things I had to highlight a few issues there.
I'm sorry to be rude, but ever consider that the reason people keep repeating
things to you is
On Fri, 29 May 2009 23:49:26 +0200
Patrick Lauer wrote:
> On Friday 29 May 2009 04:12:04 Ryan Hill wrote:
> > Patrick Lauer wrote:
> > but ever consider that the reason people keep
> > repeating things to you is that you continually misunderstand what they're
> &g
On Tue, 2 Jun 2009 19:39:57 +0100
David Leverton wrote:
> On Monday 01 June 2009 05:25:06 Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
> > Hello fellow developers and users.
> >
> > Nominations for the Gentoo Council 2009/2010 are now open for the next
> > two weeks (until 23:59 UTC, 14/06/2009).
>
> I wou
On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 19:03:13 -0600
Ryan Hill wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 21:34:14 +0100
> Pacho Ramos wrote:
>
> > I don't know if this has been discussed before but, what issues are
> > preventing us from unmasking gcc-4.6 (and think on a near
> > stab
On Thu, 01 Mar 2012 22:17:12 +
Markos Chandras wrote:
> app-text/chm2pdf
I maintain a bunch of chm stuff, so I'll help with this.
> sys-apps/cpuid
Got it.
--
fonts, gcc-porting
toolchain, wxwidgets
@ gentoo.org
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Sat, 10 Mar 2012 20:27:06 -0600
William Hubbs wrote:
> An initramfs which does this is created by >=sys-kernel/genkernel-3.4.25 or
> >=sys-kernel/dracut-017-r1. If you do not want to use these tools, be
> sure any initramfs you create pre-mounts /usr.
We should really have some documentatio
On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 18:34:37 +
Sven Vermeulen wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 12:49:11AM -0600, Ryan Hill wrote:
> > We should really have some documentation on how to create a minimal
> > initramfs
> > that mounts /usr (if we don't already, I haven't look
On Sun, 11 Mar 2012 21:08:47 +
"Robin H. Johnson" wrote:
> The quickest initramfs, assuming that ALL kernel modules you need to
> boot are already compiled into your kernel:
> genkernel --install --no-ramdisk-modules initramfs
>
> Plus optionally, If you know you don't need any of these, inc
On Sun, 18 Mar 2012 13:54:03 + (UTC)
"Alexis Ballier (aballier)" wrote:
> aballier12/03/18 13:54:03
>
> Modified: ChangeLog
> Added:ffmpeg-0.10.2.ebuild
> Log:
> version bump
>
> (Portage version: 2.2.0_alpha91/cvs/Linux x86_64)
> FFTOOLS="avioc
On Sun, 18 Mar 2012 20:25:58 +0100
Pacho Ramos wrote:
> Due his retirement the following packages need a new maintainer:
> app-doc/ebookmerge
This is something bass wrote that grabs html manuals from
http://htmlhelp.berlios.de (which doesn't exist anymore - it moved to
http://code.google.com/p/
On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 15:05:46 -0300
Alexis Ballier wrote:
> imho it doesnt hurt anyone to have fine-grained control
>
> what could be discussed is to put these into a use expand variable, to
> better distinguish between important useflags and less important ones
>
> is that what you mean by 'put
On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 09:34:22 +0100
Pacho Ramos wrote:
> El dom, 18-03-2012 a las 23:56 -0600, Ryan Hill escribió:
> > On Sun, 18 Mar 2012 20:25:58 +0100
> > Pacho Ramos wrote:
> >
> > > Due his retirement the following packages need a new maintainer:
> >
&g
On Sat, 07 Apr 2012 00:02:17 +0200
Pacho Ramos wrote:
> dev-util/dialogblocks
> dev-util/helpblocks
wxwidgets will take these.
--
fonts, gcc-porting
toolchain, wxwidgets
@ gentoo.org
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, 03 Apr 2012 00:09:39 +0200
Pacho Ramos wrote:
> El lun, 19-03-2012 a las 21:20 -0600, Ryan Hill escribió:
> > On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 09:34:22 +0100
> > Pacho Ramos wrote:
> >
> > > El dom, 18-03-2012 a las 23:56 -0600, Ryan Hill escribió:
> > &g
On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 22:21:20 +0200
Pacho Ramos wrote:
> OK, looks like I misunderstood how wxwidgets work and most opinions
> point to enable wxwidgets by default in gnome profiles, ok with that
> solution?
As I mentioned in the bug I'd like it default for desktop. There's nothing
inherently "g
> > > From time to time I see old bug reports that are still wrongly opened
> > > and referring to old packages no longer in the tree. Would be possible
> > > to add a way to periodically check for bugs referring in summary to
> > > obsolete packages and, then, allow us to have a cleaner bug list?
On Sun, 15 Apr 2012 01:35:40 -0700
Zac Medico wrote:
> On 04/15/2012 01:16 AM, Ryan Hill wrote:
> > Right now we have support in some packages for user patches - those being
> > patches dropped into /etc/portage/patches/pkgname/ - which are automatically
> > applied. Be
Right now we have support in some packages for user patches - those being
patches dropped into /etc/portage/patches/pkgname/ - which are automatically
applied. Because this feature is implemented by epatch_user() in
eutils.eclass, it is only available for ebuilds that inherit eutils and
explicitly
On Sun, 15 Apr 2012 16:53:04 +0800
Patrick Lauer wrote:
> On 04/15/12 16:16, Ryan Hill wrote:
> > Right now we have support in some packages for user patches - those being
> > patches dropped into /etc/portage/patches/pkgname/ - which are automatically
> > applied. Be
On Sun, 15 Apr 2012 12:00:45 +0200
Pacho Ramos wrote:
> Also, the idea is to simply generate a list with possible obsolete bug
> reports, closing would still be done manually after checking for false
> positives ;)
Ah, okay. I thought you wanted something automatically closing them.
--
fonts
On Sun, 15 Apr 2012 18:59:11 +0200
Pacho Ramos wrote:
> OK then to enable wxwidgets in desktop profile?
Yes.
--
fonts, gcc-porting
toolchain, wxwidgets
@ gentoo.org
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, 18 Apr 2012 22:41:39 +0100
David Leverton wrote:
> The point I was trying to get at was that it seems a bit heavyweight to
> rely on a whole eclass for a minor use-case, as well as a bit
> error-prone to expect people to remember it every time, but maybe that's
> the least bad option a
On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 22:45:36 -0500
Doug Goldstein wrote:
> So I've just had one reservation when using epatch_user for allowing
> users to apply patches. And that's figuring out when to run
> eautoreconf. I don't necessarily want to run it unconditionally but
> sometimes users have patches which
On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 20:12:46 + (UTC)
"Jim Ramsay (lack)" wrote:
24 Apr 2012; Jim Ramsay
adobe-flash-11.2.202.228.ebuild, metadata.xml:
On darkside's suggestion, providing a USE flag (IUSE=+sse2check) that can be
turned off to allow binpkg users to override this check (or at least red
On Wed, 25 Apr 2012 22:03:18 -0700
Zac Medico wrote:
> On 04/25/2012 09:44 PM, Ryan Hill wrote:
> > Yeah the whole idea here was to make user patches available without ebuild
> > modifications or eclass dependence.
> Using the "apply_user_patches_here" approach [1]
On Thu, 26 Apr 2012 17:06:45 -0300
Alexis Ballier wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Apr 2012 15:15:34 -0400
> Matt Turner wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 1:01 PM, Christian Ruppert
> > wrote:
> > > I haven't followed the prev. conversation but what's wrong with a
> > > USE flag for SSE2? We already hav
On Thu, 26 Apr 2012 18:00:04 +0200
Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Apr 2012 23:04:08 -0600
> Ryan Hill wrote:
>
> > especially for an instruction set that every system has supported
> > for over a decade.
>
> Er, some of my teenage systems run desktops just fine
On Sat, 28 Apr 2012 12:17:55 +0200
Michael Weber wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> According to upstreams homepage [1],
> the current tagged v1.99.09 does support xulrunner 11.0.
>
> @dirtyepic: Any chance to bump the version in portage?
> I can take a look (and gra
On Fri, 4 May 2012 22:23:31 +0200
Michał Górny wrote:
> > There's all kinds of reasons to not use autotools-utils.eclass.
> > I wouldn't want to see another python.eclass bullying around the tree.
>
>504 autotools-utils.eclass
> 3186 python.eclass
>
> Do you have any real arguments?
I th
I've added 4.7.0 to the tree tonight (unkeyworded and masked as usual).
I've also keyworded the 4.6 series on all arches except amd64 (due to the
grub bug). This is a temporary measure until we figure out the best course of
action (at least we have some people looking at the problem now).
I pers
On Mon, 21 May 2012 21:50:33 -0500
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> On 16:27 Sun 13 May , Mike Gilbert wrote:
> > To make ebuilds utilizing python-distutils-ng.eclass usable
>
> I didn't read any farther because I couldn't stop laughing. What will
> the next version of this eclass be called, -ng-ng
On Sun, 20 May 2012 15:33:11 +0300
Samuli Suominen wrote:
> ChangeLog entries missing for every autotools.eclass modification today.
>
> On 05/20/2012 03:31 PM, Mike Frysinger (vapier) wrote:
> > vapier 12/05/20 12:31:33
One person doesn't do entries. OMG let's remove it!
--
fonts, gcc
On Wed, 23 May 2012 11:02:58 +0300
Samuli Suominen wrote:
> On 05/23/2012 05:36 AM, Ryan Hill wrote:
> > One person doesn't do entries. OMG let's remove it!
> absolutely because inconsitency renderess the file useless
Perfect is the enemy of good enough. Stuck in a
On Wed, 23 May 2012 11:28:13 +0300
Petteri Räty wrote:
> On 22.5.2012 8.53, Michał Górny wrote:
> >> Excuse me but the way this change was handled is a bit depressing.
> >> First, the ebuilds should have been fixed to inherit eutils and then
> >> remove eutils from autotools. Now, a bunch of ebui
On Mon, 21 May 2012 21:04:44 +0200
Pacho Ramos wrote:
> Looks like ebuilds not inheriting eutils directly even using epatch are
> a lot as I have seen running:
> grep inherit $(grep -r epatch */*/*.ebuild| cut -d: -f1) | grep -v
> eutils
>
> Maybe they should be checked and a repoman warning sho
On Wed, 23 May 2012 23:09:14 -0700
Zac Medico wrote:
> On 05/23/2012 11:11 PM, Ryan Hill wrote:
> > On Mon, 21 May 2012 21:04:44 +0200
> > Pacho Ramos wrote:
> >
> >> Looks like ebuilds not inheriting eutils directly even using epatch are
> >> a lot as
On Thu, 24 May 2012 14:02:05 +0100
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Thu, 24 May 2012 00:02:37 -0600
> Ryan Hill wrote:
> > I don't see how removing an inherit is breaking an eclass' API.
>
> The way eclasses are defined, the eclasses it inherits are itself part
>
On Thu, 24 May 2012 15:47:09 -0400
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> i implemented eclass checking for some of the most common ones in the tree,
> but Zac didn't particularly care for the maintaining of lists of functions
> used by eclasses directly in repoman (due to the concern of them getting out
> o
On Thu, 24 May 2012 21:47:23 -0600
Ryan Hill wrote:
> Is there any sane way to handle sub-eclasses? eg. foo-base inherits
> foo-functions.
Oh and even if there isn't, big +1 from me.
--
fonts, gcc-porting
toolchain, wxwidgets
@ gentoo.org
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
> maybe a new eclass-level keyword @INHERITED-API ? it takes a space delimited
> list of eclasses that are guaranteed by the API. so in distutils.eclass,
> we'd
> add:
> # @INHERITED-API: python
>
> and repoman would use this to build a tree of implicit funcs to allow w/out a
> direct inher
On Sat, 26 May 2012 02:33:06 +0200
hasufell wrote:
> What's the official policy, so everyone can be clear about this?
It's not a requirement, except when it is. :)
Some projects are territorial. Games is one. I imagine adding something
to kde, gnome, or xfce categories without contacting tho
On Mon, 28 May 2012 09:58:56 +0200
Michał Górny wrote:
> As autotools-utils exports phase functions, it will be better if
> remove_libtool_files() functions would be somewhere else.
Thank you.
--
fonts, gcc-porting
toolchain, wxwidgets
@ gentoo.org
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
I'm not sure if you're supposed to announce these things or not, so here goes.
The app-doc herd will maintain packages in app-doc/ that don't otherwise
have a maintainer. Most of this stuff is either static or updated
infrequently by script, but if you're interested feel free to join.
Because th
On Mon, 14 May 2012 19:58:13 +0100
Markos Chandras wrote:
> On 05/14/2012 06:03 PM, hasufell wrote:
> > So, I will file a documentation bug unless someone can point me in
> > the right direction. I didn't find a reference to that issue.
> Open a bug, write a devmanual patch and I will be happy t
On Sun, 6 May 2012 15:25:02 +0100
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sun, 6 May 2012 07:33:59 -0400
> Rich Freeman wrote:
> > Some other questionable ones:
> > emboss - Adds support for the European Molecular Biology Open
>
> We've had this discussion before... The question is not "are people
> likely
On Sun, 12 Aug 2012 16:19:59 +0200
Agostino Sarubbo wrote:
> So it calls gcc directly.
>
> I see we don't like gcc called directly from the tracker[1], but this is for
> packages/ebuild. Should this bug block that tracker or it is invalid?
>
>
> [1]: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=cc
On Thu, 23 Aug 2012 22:36:09 +0200
Fabian Groffen wrote:
> On 23-08-2012 20:10:55 +, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 07:07:40PM +0200, Fabian Groffen wrote:
> > > it doesn't contain everything CIA has, but for a large deal -commits ML
> > > is indeed much better
> > What's
On Sun, 26 Aug 2012 21:35:53 +0200
Fabian Groffen wrote:
> On 26-08-2012 12:22:16 -0600, Ryan Hill wrote:
> > On Thu, 23 Aug 2012 22:36:09 +0200
> > Fabian Groffen wrote:
> >
> > > On 23-08-2012 20:10:55 +, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> > >
101 - 200 of 906 matches
Mail list logo
