The varargs implementation in Ruby 3.2 is not compatible with gnu23. Ruby
3.1 is in security maintenance mode upstream so it is unlikely that the
fixes from Ruby 3.2 will be backported. Ruby 3.1 is EOL in March 2025
and will be removed from Gentoo around that time.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Graaff
-
On 12/8/24 4:45 PM, Sam James wrote:
>> I don't like the idea of spending hours building everything before I'm
>> even able to start running tests, just to learn that LLVM is broken
>> and there's no point in even starting to build the rest.
>
> I don't follow this bit -- you need the new LLVM mer
Michał Górny writes:
> On Sun, 2024-12-08 at 04:53 +, Sam James wrote:
>> I fear this sort of assumes we won't switch to monobuild any time soon.
>
> I don't see one precluding the other. Categories are cheap. Package
> moves not necessarily, but switching to monorepo will be complete pain
On Sun, 2024-12-08 at 17:23 -0500, Eli Schwartz wrote:
> On 12/8/24 4:45 PM, Sam James wrote:
> > > I don't like the idea of spending hours building everything before I'm
> > > even able to start running tests, just to learn that LLVM is broken
> > > and there's no point in even starting to build t
Hans de Graaff writes:
> The varargs implementation in Ruby 3.2 is not compatible with gnu23. Ruby
> 3.1 is in security maintenance mode upstream so it is unlikely that the
> fixes from Ruby 3.2 will be backported. Ruby 3.1 is EOL in March 2025
> and will be removed from Gentoo around that time.
On Sun, 2024-12-08 at 04:53 +, Sam James wrote:
> I fear this sort of assumes we won't switch to monobuild any time soon.
I don't see one precluding the other. Categories are cheap. Package
moves not necessarily, but switching to monorepo will be complete pain
whether one more package move i
On Sun, 2024-12-08 at 04:11 +, Sam James wrote:
> I'm not sure if I'm sold on *two*. What happens for stuff like mlir
> where it's not a runtime but it's arguably more of one than core?
>
> It just doesn't feel like the division works great. Or maybe it's just
> because I feel like llvm-core w
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny
---
llvm-core/metadata.xml | 14 ++
llvm-runtimes/metadata.xml | 14 ++
2 files changed, 28 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 llvm-core/metadata.xml
create mode 100644 llvm-runtimes/metadata.xml
diff --git a/llvm-core/metadata.xml b/llvm-c
