Signed-off-by: Michał Górny
---
eclass/distutils-r1.eclass | 4
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/eclass/distutils-r1.eclass b/eclass/distutils-r1.eclass
index ec1dd08b197c..6835444d3c5f 100644
--- a/eclass/distutils-r1.eclass
+++ b/eclass/distutils-r1.eclass
@@ -1828,6 +1828,10
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny
---
eclass/distutils-r1.eclass | 5 +
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/eclass/distutils-r1.eclass b/eclass/distutils-r1.eclass
index 6835444d3c5f..bea3cea56c99 100644
--- a/eclass/distutils-r1.eclass
+++ b/eclass/distutils-r1.eclass
@@ -925,6 +925,11 @
From: Arthur Zamarin
Signed-off-by: Arthur Zamarin
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny
---
eclass/distutils-r1.eclass | 18 +-
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/eclass/distutils-r1.eclass b/eclass/distutils-r1.eclass
index bea3cea56c99..0ccd59fb6c78 100644
-
From: Arthur Zamarin
Signed-off-by: Arthur Zamarin
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny
---
eclass/python-utils-r1.eclass | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/eclass/python-utils-r1.eclass b/eclass/python-utils-r1.eclass
index 40792714cc56..52e9e061d6bd 100644
--- a
On 26-05-2023 09:06:30 +0200, Fabian Groffen wrote:
> # Fabian Groffen (2023-05-26)
> # Cygwin package for which keyword/profile support was dropped
> # Removal on 2023-06-25. Bug #907194.
> app-admin/cygwin-rebase
These two packages are appended to mask:
dev-libs/pthreads4w
sys-devel/parity
In that case, is it worth it to enable USE=valgrind globally?
vin., 26 mai 2023, 10:44 Sam James a scris:
>
> Sam James writes:
>
> > [[PGP Signed Part:Undecided]]
> >
> > Sam James writes:
> >
> >> Alexe Stefan writes:
> >>
> >>> Does enabling USE=valgrind impact runtime performance in any w
Alexe Stefan writes:
> In that case, is it worth it to enable USE=valgrind globally?
I have, and I'd say others interested in using Valgrind should too.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
So it's only useful for developers that already use valgrind.
sâm., 27 mai 2023, 17:13 Sam James a scris:
>
> Alexe Stefan writes:
>
> > In that case, is it worth it to enable USE=valgrind globally?
>
> I have, and I'd say others interested in using Valgrind should too.
>
>
>
Alexe Stefan writes:
> So it's only useful for developers that already use valgrind.
Why would it be useful to anybody else? It can be useful if you suspect
you may want to use Valgrind with system packages at some point and you
don't want then to recompile, sure.
I'm not sure if I understand
