On Sonntag, 21. März 2021 08:58:34 CET James Le Cuirot wrote:
> How about making emerge --config dynamic, copying if it's on a
> different partition and symlinking if it's not? You can't accurately
> determine the use of an initramfs but at least this is closer to what
> we want.
We will not be ab
Hi Kaibo,
I'd like to suggest an alternative to using a local Maven repository for
making Portage-built artifacts available to Maven builds.
Maven also makes it possible to use a "Maven extension" for providing
artifacts that do not come from a remote Maven repository. If a Maven
extension provi
oasis.eclass: mark as @DEAD (last-rite eclass)
Removal on 2021-04-05 when the rest of the Oasis packages, including
Oasis (dev-ml/oasis) is removed.
There's no point in keeping the eclass when Oasis itself is gone and nothing
should be able to use this right now anyway due to the large number of
On Mon, 22 Mar 2021 09:59:11 +0100 Andreas Sturmlechner wrote:
>On Sonntag, 21. März 2021 08:58:34 CET James Le Cuirot wrote:
>> How about making emerge --config dynamic, copying if it's on a
>> different partition and symlinking if it's not? You can't accurately
>> determine the use of an initram
> > Council decided years ago that we don't support separate /usr without
> > an initramfs, but we haven't completed that transition yet.
>
> Which doesn't imply that we deliberately break things.
That's right. Though we should at some point start thinking about an end of
support for separate us
---
eclass/mate-desktop.org.eclass | 8
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/eclass/mate-desktop.org.eclass b/eclass/mate-desktop.org.eclass
index 418f3f8ce076..740751066d0a 100644
--- a/eclass/mate-desktop.org.eclass
+++ b/eclass/mate-desktop.org.eclass
@@ -6,7 +
---
eclass/mate.eclass | 10 +++---
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/eclass/mate.eclass b/eclass/mate.eclass
index 34d5e47acc22..a3b4cfd0b602 100644
--- a/eclass/mate.eclass
+++ b/eclass/mate.eclass
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
# @AUTHOR:
# Authors: NP-Hardass based upon the
On Monday, 22 March 2021 21:18:32 CET Lars Wendler wrote:
> With enough motivation we can carry that revert for a very long time. I
> know that because I still carry reverts in my udev packages from when
> it was devoured by systemd.
It is 11.2 KiB worth of patch that at least I know I won't take
>What do you think about this alternative idea?
It looks pretty straightforward at a first glance, but I think it would
require
other components because you are not providing any information of
the direct dependencies of the java packages/artifacts, which
means it might have to consult other sourc
> It looks pretty straightforward at a first glance, but I think it
> would require
> other components because you are not providing any information of
> the direct dependencies of the java packages/artifacts, which
> means it might have to consult other sources (probably a remote repo)
> first, a
10 matches
Mail list logo
