# Michał Górny (2020-08-09)
# Python 2 only. No commits since 2015.
# Removal in 30 days. Bug #735334.
dev-vcs/git-bz
--
Best regards,
Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Hello,
I've taken over www-apps/jekyll* for Infra back in the day but I'm no
longer really maintaining it. Two of the packages have another
maintainer but the two listed below are now maintainer-needed:
www-apps/jekyll-coffeescript
www-apps/jekyll-sass-converter
The first one has a test failure
# Michał Górny (2020-08-09)
# Build tool with no revdeps left.
# Removal in 30 days. Bug #736517.
dev-python/paver
--
Best regards,
Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Sat, Aug 8, 2020 at 6:57 PM William Hubbs wrote:
> Hi Rich,
>
> > William - can you actually elaborate on WHY you want to change things?
> > Is there some problem with eudev? Is it actively maintained and
> > generally tracking upstream udev commits (minus whatever they
> > intentionally don
On 2020-08-08 20:51, William Hubbs wrote:
> What do people think?
Like others already asked: What's the reason for this?
What do you expect from this change?
Is there a problem when new Gentoo installations will use EUDEV by
default? Or is there a benefit if new installations would use sys-fs/ud
On Sun, Aug 09, 2020 at 06:40:07PM +0200, Thomas Deutschmann wrote:
> On 2020-08-08 20:51, William Hubbs wrote:
> > What do people think?
>
> Like others already asked: What's the reason for this?
Like others have said on the thread, the reason for the switch away
from udev in the past was mos
Dear all
the following packages are up for grabs after retirement
of the proxied maintainer:
app-admin/gentoo-rsync-mirror
https://packages.gentoo.org/packages/app-admin/gentoo-rsync-mirror
This package should really have a maintainer, if it is still used by our
mirrors.
app-misc/screenie
https:
On Sun, Aug 9, 2020 at 11:22 AM William Hubbs wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 09, 2020 at 06:40:07PM +0200, Thomas Deutschmann wrote:
> > On 2020-08-08 20:51, William Hubbs wrote:
> > > What do people think?
> >
> > Like others already asked: What's the reason for this?
>
> Like others have said on the thr
On Sun, Aug 09, 2020 at 01:22:44PM -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 09, 2020 at 06:40:07PM +0200, Thomas Deutschmann wrote:
> > On 2020-08-08 20:51, William Hubbs wrote:
> > > What do people think?
> >
> > Like others already asked: What's the reason for this?
>
> Like others have said
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
from the tree, for the week ending 2020-08-09 23:59 UTC.
Removals:
dev-tex/cjk-latex20200804-10:02 zlogene 814a4d02b1d
kde-apps/kblog 20200807-18:21 asturm f9300873b60
virtual/wiregu
William Hubbs writes:
>> William - can you actually elaborate on WHY you want to change things?
>> Is there some problem with eudev? Is it actively maintained and
>> generally tracking upstream udev commits (minus whatever they
>> intentionally don't want to accept)?
>
> It is maintained pri
On 8/8/2020 14:51, William Hubbs wrote:
> All,
>
> I would like to propose that we switch the default udev provider on new
> systems from eudev to udev.
>
> This is not a lastrites, and it will not affect current systems since
> they have to migrate manually. Also, this change can be overridden a
12 matches
Mail list logo
