On Tue, 2020-05-05 at 02:47 +0200, Thomas Deutschmann wrote:
> Yes it would be a signal but a useless signal, not?
>
You seem to aim for arbitrarily blocking developers from making
decisions by preventing them from having data. This won't work.
Firstly, because *we have* to make decisions, and
Hi, all.
I'm creating a ebuild and need to create user/group during it installation.
As i create a package/ebuild for our company internal use, it useless to
request uid/gid to be saved in uid-gid.txt. Also, i don't need a constant
uid/gid, just want a user/group creation. This package will be ins
On Tue, 2020-05-05 at 14:24 +0300, Oleg wrote:
> Hi, all.
>
> I'm creating a ebuild and need to create user/group during it installation.
> As i create a package/ebuild for our company internal use, it useless to
> request uid/gid to be saved in uid-gid.txt. Also, i don't need a constant
> uid/gid
On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 01:34:41PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
> You don't understand correctly. Read the doc for ACCT_GROUP_ID.
Found. Thanks.
--
Олег Неманов (Oleg Nemanov)
Hm. And what version should i choose for such ebuilds?..
--
Олег Неманов (Oleg Nemanov)
On Tue 05 May 2020 15:23:34 GMT, lego12...@yandex.ru wrote:
> Hm. And what version should i choose for such ebuilds?..
It usually on version 0.
--
Alarig
Hi all,
I find the idea of having data great, but agree that it can lead to a false
sense of having a correct data base. Therefor two thoughts:
First, therefore I'd like to propose that you introduce gentoostats as a
*strictly timed experiment* and evaluate if it actually changed anything within
Hi Michał, and the rest of the Gentoo devs,
I've been patiently sitting and watching this discussion.
I raised some ideas with another developer (Not Michał) just days before
he raised this thread to the ML.
I believe all points raised to this point is valid, I'll try to summarise:
1. This mus
On 4/26/20 10:08 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> I don't think we really want to try to investigate
> which files are actually used but focus on what's installed.
Hi,
I do wonder if the http://www.portagefilelist.de/site/start (package
app-portage/pfl) would be part of that or not?
The maintainer of th
On Tue, 5 May 2020 02:47:48 +0200
Thomas Deutschmann wrote:
> Yes it would be a signal but a useless signal, not?
"There are no users reported using this dist, so we can nuke it" is
still far far superior to "there are no reverse dependencies, so we can
nuke it"
*Even* when the former is false
Hi,
TL;DR: should NATTkA reject request to keyword on arch if the ebuild has
'-arch' (or '-*') in KEYWORDS already?
Background: I've recently been rekeywording two packages that gained
dependency on gevent. When I was mass-requesting rekeywording, it
escaped my attention that gevent is explicit
Hi,
I'm trying something out over here and I'm surprised to find that
acct-group/* do not work with ROOT+SYSROOT != "/".
Should I file yet another bug about this?
I suppose the limitation is in user.eclass, but what about the 11 bugs
already filed about exactly this problem?
They are easy to se
Am May 5, 2020 7:31:34 PM UTC schrieb "Toralf Förster" :
>On 4/26/20 10:08 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
>> I don't think we really want to try to investigate
>> which files are actually used but focus on what's installed.
>Hi,
>
>I do wonder if the http://www.portagefilelist.de/site/start (package
>app-
On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 4:22 PM Peter Stuge wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying something out over here and I'm surprised to find that
> acct-group/* do not work with ROOT+SYSROOT != "/".
>
> Should I file yet another bug about this?
>
> I suppose the limitation is in user.eclass, but what about the 11 bug
On 5/5/20 10:26 PM, Daniel Pielmeier wrote:
> Actually the maintainer decided to continue the project.
> The code is now hosted at Github [1].
> The site moved to a new server and the upload is working again.
>
> [1] https://github.com/portagefilelist
>
> --
> Best regards
> Daniel
Indeed - I'm
On Tue, 05 May 2020 22:19:59 +0200
Michał Górny wrote:
> Hi,
>
> TL;DR: should NATTkA reject request to keyword on arch if the ebuild has
> '-arch' (or '-*') in KEYWORDS already?
>
>
> Background: I've recently been rekeywording two packages that gained
> dependency on gevent. When I was mass
On 2020-05-05 21:22, Peter Stuge wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying something out over here and I'm surprised to find that
acct-group/* do not work with ROOT+SYSROOT != "/".
Should I file yet another bug about this
Correct, https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=541406 is tracking this
and has some back
On 2020-05-06 00:52, James Le Cuirot wrote:
> On Tue, 05 May 2020 22:19:59 +0200
> Michał Górny wrote:
>>
>> WDYT?
>
> Play it safe. -* is frequently used for binary packages where an arch
> will simply either work or it won't, with little likelihood of the
> situation changing. -arch is so rare
18 matches
Mail list logo
