On 09/02/20 21:16, Michael 'veremitz' Everitt wrote:
> On 09/02/20 20:59, Michael 'veremitz' Everitt wrote:
>> On 09/02/20 20:57, Michael 'veremitz' Everitt wrote:
>>> On 09/02/20 20:55, Michał Górny wrote:
On Sun, 2020-02-09 at 20:38 +, Michael 'veremitz' Everitt wrote:
> Hrm, pardon
Ühel kenal päeval, E, 10.02.2020 kell 00:43, kirjutas Stefan Strogin:
> Upd.
> The port to Python 3 is not finished in the upstream.
> Particularly it is still using pygtk, it seems no work in porting to
> gtk+3 has been done yet.
Just to be clear of misunderstanding here:
A port away from py2-on
Hi all!
I'd like to reserve uid/gid 34 (3D printing) for www-apps/octoprint (cups
analog for 3d printing)
--
Best regards,
Alexey 'Alexxy' Shvetsov
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Tue, 2020-02-11 at 13:06 +0300, Alexey 'Alexxy' Shvetsov wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> I'd like to reserve uid/gid 34 (3D printing) for www-apps/octoprint (cups
> analog for 3d printing)
What is the rationale for taking UID/GID from the low range?
--
Best regards,
Michał Górny
signature.asc
Descr
В письме от вторник, 11 февраля 2020 г. 13:15:48 MSK пользователь Michał Górny
написал:
> On Tue, 2020-02-11 at 13:06 +0300, Alexey 'Alexxy' Shvetsov wrote:
> > Hi all!
> >
> > I'd like to reserve uid/gid 34 (3D printing) for www-apps/octoprint (cups
> > analog for 3d printing)
>
> What is the r
В письме от вторник, 11 февраля 2020 г. 13:15:48 MSK пользователь Michał Górny
написал:
> On Tue, 2020-02-11 at 13:06 +0300, Alexey 'Alexxy' Shvetsov wrote:
> > Hi all!
> >
> > I'd like to reserve uid/gid 34 (3D printing) for www-apps/octoprint (cups
> > analog for 3d printing)
>
> What is the r
Il giorno lun 10 feb 2020 alle ore 08:20 Michał Górny
ha scritto:
> On Sun, 2020-02-09 at 22:51 -0800, Zac Medico wrote:
> > In that case, I suppose we'll have to apply consistency manually? Can we
> > all agree on a global order of preference for the relevant packages?
>
> That would be my idea,
On Tue, 2020-02-11 at 13:18 +0300, Alexey 'Alexxy' Shvetsov wrote:
> В письме от вторник, 11 февраля 2020 г. 13:15:48 MSK пользователь Michał
> Górny
> написал:
> > On Tue, 2020-02-11 at 13:06 +0300, Alexey 'Alexxy' Shvetsov wrote:
> > > Hi all!
> > >
> > > I'd like to reserve uid/gid 34 (3D pri
В письме от вторник, 11 февраля 2020 г. 13:52:46 MSK пользователь Michał Górny
написал:
> On Tue, 2020-02-11 at 13:18 +0300, Alexey 'Alexxy' Shvetsov wrote:
> > В письме от вторник, 11 февраля 2020 г. 13:15:48 MSK пользователь Michał
> > Górny>
> > написал:
> > > On Tue, 2020-02-11 at 13:06 +0300
On Tue, 2020-02-11 at 14:15 +0300, Alexey 'Alexxy' Shvetsov wrote:
> В письме от вторник, 11 февраля 2020 г. 13:52:46 MSK пользователь Michał
> Górny
> написал:
> > On Tue, 2020-02-11 at 13:18 +0300, Alexey 'Alexxy' Shvetsov wrote:
> > > В письме от вторник, 11 февраля 2020 г. 13:15:48 MSK пользо
Ok.
So it can be 340 for both uid an gid (its free)
В письме от вторник, 11 февраля 2020 г. 14:17:48 MSK пользователь Michał Górny
написал:
> On Tue, 2020-02-11 at 14:15 +0300, Alexey 'Alexxy' Shvetsov wrote:
> > В письме от вторник, 11 февраля 2020 г. 13:52:46 MSK пользователь Michał
> > Górny>
> On Tue, 11 Feb 2020, Alexey 'Alexxy' Shvetsov wrote:
> Ok. What is you're suggestion?
If you really need that kind of mnemonics, how about 368 (68 being the
ASCII code for "D")?
Ulrich
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
В письме от вторник, 11 февраля 2020 г. 14:27:08 MSK пользователь Ulrich
Mueller написал:
> > On Tue, 11 Feb 2020, Alexey 'Alexxy' Shvetsov wrote:
> > Ok. What is you're suggestion?
>
> If you really need that kind of mnemonics, how about 368 (68 being the
> ASCII code for "D")?
>
> Ulrich
# David Seifert (2020-02-11)
# Unmaintained, EAPI 4, last release over 9 years ago, ebuild has QA
# issues, no revdeps. Removal in 30 days. Bug #558354.
net-im/coccinella
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
# David Seifert (2020-02-11)
# Unmaintained, EAPI 4, last release over 9 years ago, no revdeps.
# Removal in 30 days.
app-vim/cream
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On 2/11/20 12:32 PM, Francesco Riosa wrote:
>
>
> Il giorno lun 10 feb 2020 alle ore 08:20 Michał Górny
> mailto:mgo...@gentoo.org>> ha scritto:
>
> On Sun, 2020-02-09 at 22:51 -0800, Zac Medico wrote:
> > In that case, I suppose we'll have to apply consistency
> manually? Can we
>
[2020-01-30 08:19:08-0500] Rich Freeman:
> On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 6:20 AM Haelwenn (lanodan) Monnier
> wrote:
> > [2020-01-27 12:41:26+0100] Ulrich Mueller:
> > > So, the question is, should we allow ebuilds
> > > # Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License, v2 or
> > > later
For historical curiosity there was also
https://github.com/domenkozar/g-pypi at one point (similar to
https://github.com/rafaelmartins/g-octave). Having used g-octave, the
primary issue is as Michał says, there are a lot of corner cases that
the generation doesn't handle correctly which lead to bro
Hi all,
I have submitted a pull request
(https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/14224) that allows
dev-lang/clojure-1.9.0 and 1.10.0 to build. Two related bugs are
https://bugs.gentoo.org/670680 and https://bugs.gentoo.org/684536. I
have also attached the changes as patches below. Given that th
On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 10:05 AM Haelwenn (lanodan) Monnier
wrote:
>
> Maybe it could for now be a simple agreement on putting your code to
> the Gentoo Foundation under the GPL-2+ but it would be published under
> the GPL-{2,3,…}?
>
Well, if we were going to get people to start signing things I
# Andreas Sturmlechner (2020-02-11)
# Upstream "unable to port away from" dev-python/pygtk, bug #708156
# Masked for removal in 30 days.
sci-calculators/gonvert
Tom Gillespie writes:
> For historical curiosity there was also
> https://github.com/domenkozar/g-pypi at one point (similar to
> https://github.com/rafaelmartins/g-octave). Having used g-octave, the
> primary issue is as Michał says, there are a lot of corner cases that
> the generation doesn't
Note that some of the packages in this list might have other
maintainers, but I'm sure they wouldn't mind co-maintainers.
dev-util/pkgcheck
sys-apps/pkgcore
dev-python/snakeoil
dev-python/pychroot
app-arch/vimball
[2020-02-11 10:52:57-0500] Rich Freeman:
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 10:05 AM Haelwenn (lanodan) Monnier
> wrote:
> >
> > Maybe it could for now be a simple agreement on putting your code to
> > the Gentoo Foundation under the GPL-2+ but it would be published under
> > the GPL-{2,3,…}?
> >
>
> Well
On Monday, 10 February 2020 7:55:01 AM AEDT Michał Górny wrote:
> On Sun, 2020-02-09 at 20:38 +, Michael 'veremitz' Everitt wrote:
> > Hrm, pardon my ignorance, but do 'we' really need to review 232 lines of
> > Manifest?!
>
> Pardon mine but do 'we' really need to read your useless comments
>
Am Dienstag, 11. Februar 2020, 16:18:44 CET schrieb Tom Gillespie:
> For historical curiosity there was also
> https://github.com/domenkozar/g-pypi at one point (similar to
> https://github.com/rafaelmartins/g-octave). Having used g-octave, the
> primary issue is as Michał says, there are a lot of
26 matches
Mail list logo
