Hey,
On 11/26/19 8:33 PM, Thomas Deutschmann wrote:
> I am requesting uid and gid 59, both named "unbound", for
> net-dns/unbound.
>
>
59 was already requested for 'tss' few weeks before this mail was sent.
https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/message/d51402450201482f8e3678d2c071b41e
Since 'un
# Michał Górny (2019-12-08)
# Not touched by maintainer since mid-2018. Fails to build with gcc-9.
# Requires llvm:6 (which is being removed). Pending version bump.
# Removal in 30 days. Bug #686162.
sys-devel/byfl
--
Best regards,
Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitall
On Fri, 2019-12-06 at 21:28 +0100, Thomas Deutschmann wrote:
> On 2019-12-06 21:10, Andreas Sturmlechner wrote:
> > Just so we're on the same page, a recent example of what some
> > people
> > suggesting to keep py27 ad nauseam are asking users to deal with:
> > [...]
> > WARNING: One or more upda
# David Seifert (2019-12-08)
# No revdeps, py2 only, needs version bump, practically unmaintained
# in Gentoo. Removal in 30 days.
sci-chemistry/pymol-plugins-psico
# David Seifert (2019-12-08)
# Unmaintained, build hangs, tons of other build failures, missing
# dependencies. Bug #663794, #666916, #666922, #667062, #678068,
# #681678, #684420, #694488. Removal in 30 days.
dev-db/clickhouse
Hi everyone,
I know that is my third time requesting a uid/gid for stunnel, but it
seems that my previous request was already taken but not added to the
uid-gid.txt file, so I didn't know about the collision.
Speaking with mgorny on #gentoo-dev, he suggested that we start simply
making a request,
On Sun, 2019-12-08 at 14:48 -0500, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I know that is my third time requesting a uid/gid for stunnel, but it
> seems that my previous request was already taken but not added to the
> uid-gid.txt file, so I didn't know about the collision.
>
> Speaking with
On 12/8/19 2:53 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Sun, 2019-12-08 at 14:48 -0500, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> I know that is my third time requesting a uid/gid for stunnel, but it
>> seems that my previous request was already taken but not added to the
>> uid-gid.txt file, so I didn't
> On Sun, 08 Dec 2019, Anthony G Basile wrote:
> Okay, I'm requesting UID/GID = 492/492. I'm committing in a sec.
That's the ID used by arch for oprofile, so it's a bad choice.
Ulrich
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On 12/8/19 2:59 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>> On Sun, 08 Dec 2019, Anthony G Basile wrote:
>
>> Okay, I'm requesting UID/GID = 492/492. I'm committing in a sec.
>
> That's the ID used by arch for oprofile, so it's a bad choice.
>
> Ulrich
>
I give up! How am I supposed to know what to cho
> On Sun, 08 Dec 2019, Anthony G Basile wrote:
>>> Okay, I'm requesting UID/GID = 492/492. I'm committing in a sec.
>>
>> That's the ID used by arch for oprofile, so it's a bad choice.
> I give up! How am I supposed to know what to choose if it isn't
> requested in the uid-git.txt file?
Be
> On Sun, 08 Dec 2019, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> | We had skipped allocation for 492 and 493, because they're used for
> | oprofile and oidentd in Archlinux, and we have these packages too.
Anyway, stunnel is 341 now, and 492 is (provisionally) reserved
for oprofile.
Ulrich
signature.asc
Des
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
from the tree, for the week ending 2019-12-08 23:59 UTC.
Removals:
app-admin/certmgr 20191206-19:37 mgorny b3080e09829
app-admin/durep 20191208-19:05 bman 6fc710273d8
app
13 matches
Mail list logo
