Re: [gentoo-dev] Migrate away from python-2 or not

2019-11-25 Thread Jaco Kroon
Hi Benda, On 2019/11/24 14:15, Benda Xu wrote: > What do you think? Is it possible to disable python2_7 by default, even if python2 is installed, and only enable python2_7 for those packages specifically requiring it (ie, being a dep for one of the packages that only supports python2_7? I tried

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 0/6] nix and guix GID/UID assignments

2019-11-25 Thread David Seifert
On Sun, 2019-11-24 at 20:35 +, Sergei Trofimovich wrote: > On Sun, 24 Nov 2019 17:19:36 +0100 > Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > > > > > > > On Sun, 24 Nov 2019, Sergei Trofimovich wrote: > > > I interpreted 'reserved' as 'free to use' on > > > > > > https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Quali

[gentoo-dev] [RFC] dev-python/setuptools deps in distutils-r1 packages

2019-11-25 Thread Michał Górny
Hi, TL;DR: should we depend on setuptools by default? Alternatively, should we add distutils_enable_setuptools API to provide at least partial validity checks. The problem === The vast majority of Python packages nowadays uses setuptools as their build system. According to a cheap grep

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] dev-python/setuptools deps in distutils-r1 packages

2019-11-25 Thread Joonas Niilola
Hey, On 11/25/19 7:38 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > Hi, > > TL;DR: should we depend on setuptools by default? Alternatively, should > we add distutils_enable_setuptools API to provide at least partial > validity checks. > > > The problem > === > The vast majority of Python packages nowadays

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] dev-python/setuptools deps in distutils-r1 packages

2019-11-25 Thread Michał Górny
On Mon, 2019-11-25 at 20:39 +0200, Joonas Niilola wrote: > Hey, > > > On 11/25/19 7:38 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > > Hi, > > > > TL;DR: should we depend on setuptools by default? Alternatively, should > > we add distutils_enable_setuptools API to provide at least partial > > validity checks. > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 0/6] nix and guix GID/UID assignments

2019-11-25 Thread Sergei Trofimovich
On Mon, 25 Nov 2019 17:24:08 +0100 David Seifert wrote: > On Sun, 2019-11-24 at 20:35 +, Sergei Trofimovich wrote: > > On Sun, 24 Nov 2019 17:19:36 +0100 > > Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, 24 Nov 2019, Sergei Trofimovich wrote: > > > > I interpreted 'reserved' as 'f

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 0/6] nix and guix GID/UID assignments

2019-11-25 Thread Michał Górny
On Mon, 2019-11-25 at 20:28 +, Sergei Trofimovich wrote: > On Mon, 25 Nov 2019 17:24:08 +0100 > David Seifert wrote: > > > On Sun, 2019-11-24 at 20:35 +, Sergei Trofimovich wrote: > > > On Sun, 24 Nov 2019 17:19:36 +0100 > > > Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, 24 N

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 0/6] nix and guix GID/UID assignments

2019-11-25 Thread Sergei Trofimovich
On Mon, 25 Nov 2019 21:32:18 +0100 Michał Górny wrote: > On Mon, 2019-11-25 at 20:28 +, Sergei Trofimovich wrote: > > On Mon, 25 Nov 2019 17:24:08 +0100 > > David Seifert wrote: > > > > > On Sun, 2019-11-24 at 20:35 +, Sergei Trofimovich wrote: > > > > On Sun, 24 Nov 2019 17:19:36 +

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: sys-apps/nix and sys-apps/guix

2019-11-25 Thread Sergei Trofimovich
# Sergei Trofimovich (2019-11-25) # Mask for removal from main tree into ::nix-guix overlay. # Removal in 30 days. sys-apps/nix sys-apps/guix -- Sergei

[gentoo-dev] [RFC] News Item: sys-boot/raspberrypi-firmware will not install device tree files

2019-11-25 Thread Andrey Utkin
Title: sys-boot/raspberrypi-firmware will not install device tree files Author: Andrey Utkin Content-Type: text/plain Posted: 2019-11-25 Revision: 1 News-Item-Format: 1.0 Display-If-Installed: sys-boot/raspberrypi-firmware sys-boot/raspberrypi-firmware up to and including version 1.20190709 insta