Signed-off-by: Michał Górny
---
eclass/kernel-2.eclass | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/eclass/kernel-2.eclass b/eclass/kernel-2.eclass
index 1b2b5d3e8b60..d672b295c37c 100644
--- a/eclass/kernel-2.eclass
+++ b/eclass/kernel-2.eclass
@@ -193,7 +193,7 @@
PY
I would like to reserve UID/GID 53 for knot (net-dns/knot).
The UID and GID 53 are assigned by Fedora to tomcat, which is currently
265 on Gentoo; and nsfnobody by RedHat (along with 65 and 4).
The knot user and group don't have any fixed UID/GID on others
distributions. 53 is the ID initially de
From: Kent Fredric
These are already committed to tree [ :( ] just relaying to the list
for added oversight/feedback and to make sure any EAPI7 specific
changes like BROOT/BDEPENDS etc get checked off before widespread usage
starts happening.
Any follow-up submissions will be relayed to the list
From: Andreas K. Hüttel
Signed-off-by: Andreas K. Hüttel
---
eclass/perl-functions.eclass | 10 +-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/eclass/perl-functions.eclass b/eclass/perl-functions.eclass
index e7775f31b8e..e6168a07534 100644
--- a/eclass/perl-functions.
From: Andreas K. Hüttel
Signed-off-by: Andreas K. Hüttel
---
eclass/perl-module.eclass | 30 +++---
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/eclass/perl-module.eclass b/eclass/perl-module.eclass
index 20b9947caca..81f79992d76 100644
--- a/eclass/pe
I would like to reserve UID/GID 81 for apache (www-servers/apache).
This is the historical UID/GID for apache user in Gentoo.
Fedora and RedHat use UID/GID 48. Arch Linux has no
"apache" user but a "http" user with UID/GID 33 (which is already
reserved in Gentoo).
Here are the commits for possibl
On 8/13/19 1:14 PM, Lars Wendler wrote:
> I would like to reserve UID/GID 81 for apache (www-servers/apache).
>
> This is the historical UID/GID for apache user in Gentoo.
> Fedora and RedHat use UID/GID 48. Arch Linux has no
> "apache" user but a "http" user with UID/GID 33 (which is already
> re
Hi Michael,
On Tue, 13 Aug 2019 13:39:34 -0400 Michael Orlitzky wrote:
>On 8/13/19 1:14 PM, Lars Wendler wrote:
>> I would like to reserve UID/GID 81 for apache (www-servers/apache).
>>
>> This is the historical UID/GID for apache user in Gentoo.
>> Fedora and RedHat use UID/GID 48. Arch Linux h
On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 1:39 PM Michael Orlitzky wrote:
>
> On 8/13/19 1:14 PM, Lars Wendler wrote:
> > I would like to reserve UID/GID 81 for apache (www-servers/apache).
> >
> > This is the historical UID/GID for apache user in Gentoo.
> > Fedora and RedHat use UID/GID 48. Arch Linux has no
> >
On 8/13/19 1:53 PM, Lars Wendler wrote:
>
> thanks for the review. I've force-pushed the acct-user/apache commit
> with ACCT_USER_HOME_OWNER being set to root:root.
>
Is there any benefit to
ACCT_USER_HOME=/var/www
ACCT_USER_HOME_OWNER=root:root
versus
keepdir /var/www
in the eclass?
On Tue, 13 Aug 2019 14:21:29 -0400 Michael Orlitzky wrote:
>On 8/13/19 1:53 PM, Lars Wendler wrote:
>>
>> thanks for the review. I've force-pushed the acct-user/apache commit
>> with ACCT_USER_HOME_OWNER being set to root:root.
>>
>
>Is there any benefit to
>
> ACCT_USER_HOME=/var/www
> ACCT_U
On 8/13/19 2:30 PM, Lars Wendler wrote:
>
> If we leave ACCT_USER_HOME empty HOME will be set to
> /dev/null for apache user. I don't know if this is what we want.
I'm not 100% sure either, but it's pretty likely that if an unwritable
root-owned home directory would work, then so would /dev/null.
On Tue, 13 Aug 2019 14:43:11 -0400 Michael Orlitzky wrote:
>On 8/13/19 2:30 PM, Lars Wendler wrote:
>>
>> If we leave ACCT_USER_HOME empty HOME will be set to
>> /dev/null for apache user. I don't know if this is what we want.
>I'm not 100% sure either, but it's pretty likely that if an unwritabl
On Wed, 14 Aug 2019 03:43:12 +1200
ken...@gentoo.org wrote:
> From: Andreas K. Hüttel
>
> Signed-off-by: Andreas K. Hüttel
> ---
> eclass/perl-module.eclass | 30 +++---
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/eclass/perl-module.eclass b/ec
On 8/13/19 3:15 PM, Lars Wendler wrote:
>
> I'm not really sure what the impact might be. I have only one single
> apache installation and that is a productive one. I do not want to mess
> with that installation.
>
I'm not trying to hassle you, but now's the time to get it right. The
old enewuse
On Tue, 13 Aug 2019 20:39:01 +0100
James Le Cuirot wrote:
> Unfortunately there's currently no way to say that the versions of a
> package across BDEPEND, DEPEND, and RDEPEND must be (roughly?) equal so
> there's nothing to stop an ancient Perl in / building a module for a
> newer Perl in ROOT bu
16 matches
Mail list logo
