I would like to reserve UID/GID 270 for logstash (app-admin/logstash-bin).
I haven't found the ID in other databases.
Pending PR:
https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/12375
Thanks,
Tomas
> On Wed, 07 Aug 2019, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Tue, 2019-08-06 at 13:41 +0200, Jaco Kroon wrote:
>> Attaching. It seems for some reason if I inline the patches they don't
>> come through. If I mail to myself only it works just fine.
> Actually, I think it should be changed the other way a
Hi Ulrich,
> >> I don't see any reason to prohibit having a user/group package for
>> root. > > Is creation of (additional) users with UID 0 a good idea
from a > security point of view? Maybe it is better to explicitly forbid
it? > I believe the current code already prevents re-use of an already
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/690686
---
eclass/toolchain.eclass | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/eclass/toolchain.eclass b/eclass/toolchain.eclass
index 6bc04b4cbfe..40d46ed0707 100644
--- a/eclass/toolchain.eclass
+++ b/eclass/toolchain.eclass
@@ -687,9 +
On 8/8/19 3:37 AM, Tomas Mozes wrote:
>
> Pending PR:
> https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/12375
>
Is the group-writability really needed here?
> ACCT_USER_HOME_PERMS=0770
I don't think the existing ebuilds change the permissions on that
directory. In any case,
> keepdir "/var/lib/${MY_PN
On Thu, 8 Aug 2019 12:53:37 +0200
Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
> Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/690686
> ---
> eclass/toolchain.eclass | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Looks good!
> diff --git a/eclass/toolchain.eclass b/eclass/toolchain.eclass
> index 6bc04b4cbfe.
/usr/portage is no longer the default repository location.
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller
---
This looks larger than it is, because most of it is caused by
rewrapping of paragraphs. The only text changes are:
"/usr/portage/eclass/" -> "the eclass/ directory"
"/usr/portage/licenses/" -> "the licen
