[gentoo-dev] things becoming better and better

2018-03-19 Thread Toralf Förster
honestly. When I started with my tinderbox 2 or 3 years ago I had often a fair amount of manual work to made to get an image up and running - moslty tweaking USE flags to get blockers being solved. This yielded into a growing list of fixed USE flags settings for certain packages. But over the ti

Re: [gentoo-dev] things becoming better and better

2018-03-19 Thread M. J. Everitt
On 19/03/18 18:48, Toralf Förster wrote: > honestly. > > > When I started with my tinderbox 2 or 3 years ago I had often a fair > amount of manual work to made to get an image up and running - moslty > tweaking USE flags to get blockers being solved. This yielded into a > growing list of fixed USE

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH] cmake-utils.eclass: Make the new ASM-ATT rules actually work

2018-03-19 Thread James Le Cuirot
The previous attempt actually broke ASM in media-libs/vulkan-loader entirely so that it fell back to C code. After much experimentation and combing through strace output, I found that -x assembler is needed to handle non-standard file extentions and linking is done as a separate step. CMAKE_ASM-ATT

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] cmake-utils.eclass: Make the new ASM-ATT rules actually work

2018-03-19 Thread Matt Turner
Thanks for looking into this! I'm not sure I understand the -nostdlib portion. It's something about working around a side-effect of -x assembler?

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] cmake-utils.eclass: Make the new ASM-ATT rules actually work

2018-03-19 Thread James Le Cuirot
On Mon, 19 Mar 2018 15:16:47 -0700 Matt Turner wrote: > Thanks for looking into this! > > I'm not sure I understand the -nostdlib portion. It's something about > working around a side-effect of -x assembler? It's not related to that option. I think it's because this is normally built with "as"

Re: [gentoo-dev] things becoming better and better

2018-03-19 Thread Benda Xu
Hi Toralf, Toralf Förster writes: > When I started with my tinderbox 2 or 3 years ago I had often a fair > amount of manual work to made to get an image up and running - moslty > tweaking USE flags to get blockers being solved. This yielded into a > growing list of fixed USE flags settings for c

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

2018-03-19 Thread Andrey Utkin
On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 03:11:45PM +0100, Lars Wendler wrote: > On Tue, 13 Mar 2018 12:58:10 +0100 Pacho Ramos wrote: > > >net-wireless/hostapd > > In case nobody else wants to take it I can do. But I'm a mere user of > the package and don't know anything about its internals. So it would be > ver

Re: [gentoo-dev] things becoming better and better

2018-03-19 Thread Aaron Bauman
On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 07:48:01PM +0100, Toralf Förster wrote: > honestly. > > > When I started with my tinderbox 2 or 3 years ago I had often a fair > amount of manual work to made to get an image up and running - moslty > tweaking USE flags to get blockers being solved. This yielded into a > g

[gentoo-dev] FYI: Mastersync is down

2018-03-19 Thread Alec Warner
This is just an FYI: https://infra-status.gentoo.org/ Hoping to have this fixed in a couple of days. In the meantime you may see missing snapshots (for emerge webrsync) and no rsync propagation. -A

[gentoo-dev] bug queue size over time

2018-03-19 Thread Paweł Hajdan , Jr .
Is it possible to get graphs of bugs.g.o bug queue size for certain query (e.g. by assignee) over time? Best, Paweł signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] bug queue size over time

2018-03-19 Thread Kent Fredric
On Mon, 19 Mar 2018 19:33:11 -0700 "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote: > Is it possible to get graphs of bugs.g.o bug queue size for certain > query (e.g. by assignee) over time? > > Best, > Paweł > The *data* is there to do it, but its a bit of a pain, you have to extract all the individual "changed"

Re: [gentoo-dev] bug queue size over time

2018-03-19 Thread Alec Warner
On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 12:24 AM, Kent Fredric wrote: > On Mon, 19 Mar 2018 19:33:11 -0700 > "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote: > > > Is it possible to get graphs of bugs.g.o bug queue size for certain > > query (e.g. by assignee) over time? > > > > Best, > > Paweł > > > > The *data* is there to do it,

Re: [gentoo-dev] bug queue size over time

2018-03-19 Thread Matthew Thode
On 18-03-19 19:33:11, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote: > Is it possible to get graphs of bugs.g.o bug queue size for certain > query (e.g. by assignee) over time? > I suspect it's up and to the right. -- Matthew Thode (prometheanfire) signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] bug queue size over time

2018-03-19 Thread Paweł Hajdan , Jr .
On 19/03/2018 21:33, Alec Warner wrote: > I'd avoid the REST API here. If you want this data; I'd consider filing a > bug. Infra can do stuff like run nightly reports for this information and > hang them off of endpoints you can access. > This works well for public bugs; and not well for private on