Hi Johnson,
Thanks for the interest.
I know there are some issues with shipping second hand computers into China.
I could ask SF here in HK about if they feel it would make it thought customs.
Your thoughts?
Thanks
Brendan (irc : undersys)
- On 6 Sep, 2017, at 8:41 AM, Johnson Steward i..
Hi Lucas,
Its a tough moment that is for sure!
Its a Zx2000, not Zx6000.
Single Itanium2 Deerfield.
Let me know if your still interested.
Thanks
Brendan (irc : undersys)
- On 6 Sep, 2017, at 9:11 AM, Lucas Ramage ramage.luca...@gmail.com wrote:
> I'm sorry that you must part with your mac
Hi R0b0t1,
Sounds good to me.
Shipping a 30kg+ system by it self will not be cheep.
This is originally why I had the idea to ship all the systems together.
Specs are :
http://www-01.ibm.com/common/ssi/ShowDoc.wss?docURL=/common/ssi/rep_sm/1/872/ENUS8203-_h01/index.html&lang=en&request_locale=en
On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 2:52 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>> On Tue, 5 Sep 2017, Gordon Pettey wrote:
>
>> Can these package.mask notes stop saying "no alternative found" when
>> it's obvious five seconds of Google searching was not even performed
>> to find an alternative?
>> https://neverwinterv
On Wednesday, September 6, 2017, Brendan Horan wrote:
> Hi R0b0t1,
>
> Sounds good to me.
> Shipping a 30kg+ system by it self will not be cheep.
> This is originally why I had the idea to ship all the systems together.
>
I thought so. Shipping will still be cheaper than a used unit from someone
On Wednesday, September 6, 2017, R0b0t1 wrote:
> On Wednesday, September 6, 2017, Brendan Horan wrote:
>> Hi R0b0t1,
>>
>> Sounds good to me.
>> Shipping a 30kg+ system by it self will not be cheep.
>> This is originally why I had the idea to ship all the systems together.
>>
>
> I thought so. Sh
On 03/09/17 22:22, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 09/03/2017 11:56 AM, Chris Mayo wrote:
>> #
>> # The following snippet would suggest app-misc/foo for optional foo support,
>> # app-misc/bar or app-misc/baz[bar] for optional bar support
>>
>
> Would the @EXAMPLE tag[0] make sense here?
>
>
> [
On 09/06/2017 02:39 PM, Chris Mayo wrote:
>
> I believe @EXAMPLE is only for the first documentation block introducing the
> eclass.
>
> At least where it is used for functions the text doesn't show up in the man
> page.
> e.g. prefix.eclass hprefixify() and prefixify_ro()
>
Looks like you're
This time, use bash 4.0, but limit the use of this function to ebuild that have
EAPI >= 6.
Display a warning for maintainers to upgrade their ebuilds, or remove the call.
Thanks to mgorny for the suggestion.
Signed-off-by: Mike Pagano
---
eclass/kernel-2.eclass | 20 +---
1 file
Hello,
some remarks below ...
On Mi, 06 Sep 23:40:50 +
Mike Pagano wrote:
This time, use bash 4.0, but limit the use of this function to ebuild that have
EAPI >= 6.
Display a warning for maintainers to upgrade their ebuilds, or remove the call.
Thanks to mgorny for the suggestion.
Signe
Dnia 7 września 2017 01:40:50 CEST, Mike Pagano napisał(a):
>This time, use bash 4.0, but limit the use of this function to ebuild
>that have EAPI >= 6.
>Display a warning for maintainers to upgrade their ebuilds, or remove
>the call.
>Thanks to mgorny for the suggestion.
>
>Signed-off-by: Mike Pa
11 matches
Mail list logo
