Hi,
I would like to add neomutt to the tree. This new package is meant
as an alternative and not a replacement of the existing mutt
package.
Thanks,
Nick
--
Nicolas Bock
From 63f5d569aec514d67645b1c2e891e51810bb7ab5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nicolas Bock
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2017 09:06:
On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 09:11:19AM +0200, Nicolas Bock wrote:
Hi,
I would like to add neomutt to the tree. This new package is meant as
an alternative and not a replacement of the existing mutt package.
I should have inlined the patch. Sorry.
From 63f5d569aec514d67645b1c2e891e51810bb7ab5 M
Dnia 31 lipca 2017 09:11:19 CEST, Nicolas Bock
napisał(a):
>Hi,
>
>I would like to add neomutt to the tree. This new package is meant
>as an alternative and not a replacement of the existing mutt
>package.
Aren't you looking for gentoo-proxy-maint ml?
>
>Thanks,
>
>Nick
--
Best regards,
M
On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 09:44:55AM +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
Dnia 31 lipca 2017 09:11:19 CEST, Nicolas Bock
napisał(a):
Hi,
I would like to add neomutt to the tree. This new package is meant
as an alternative and not a replacement of the existing mutt
package.
Aren't you looking for gentoo
Hi Nicolas
See my comments inline.
Monday 31 Jul 2017 09:23:51, Nicolas Bock wrote :
> On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 09:11:19AM +0200, Nicolas Bock wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >I would like to add neomutt to the tree. This new package is meant as
> >an alternative and not a replacement of the existing mutt pa
On 17-07-31 09:11:19, Nicolas Bock wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to add neomutt to the tree. This new package is meant
> as an alternative and not a replacement of the existing mutt
> package.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Nick
>
> --
> Nicolas Bock
It was my understanding that neomutt was mainly mutt w
On 31-07-2017 04:55:58 -0500, Matthew Thode wrote:
> On 17-07-31 09:11:19, Nicolas Bock wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would like to add neomutt to the tree. This new package is meant
> > as an alternative and not a replacement of the existing mutt
> > package.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Nick
> >
> >
Hi Nicolas,
below just some remarks from me.
On Mo, 31 Jul 09:23:51 +0200
Nicolas Bock wrote:
On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 09:11:19AM +0200, Nicolas Bock wrote:
Hi,
I would like to add neomutt to the tree. This new package is meant
as an alternative and not a replacement of the existing mutt
pa
Am Montag, 31. Juli 2017, 04:44:58 CEST schrieb William L. Thomson Jr.:
>
> How about no foundation. Not even a legal entity. No certifications
> from vendors, nor for employees. No one to hire for official support.
> There are so many things far beyond anything having to do with a stable
> tree o
On Mon, 31 Jul 2017 14:59:25 +0200
"Andreas K. Huettel" wrote:
> Am Montag, 31. Juli 2017, 04:44:58 CEST schrieb William L. Thomson
> Jr.:
> >
> > How about no foundation. Not even a legal entity. No certifications
> > from vendors, nor for employees. No one to hire for official
> > support. The
On Mon, 2017-07-31 at 10:43 -0400, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
> On Mon, 31 Jul 2017 14:59:25 +0200
> "Andreas K. Huettel" wrote:
>
> > Am Montag, 31. Juli 2017, 04:44:58 CEST schrieb William L. Thomson
> > Jr.:
> > >
> > > How about no foundation. Not even a legal entity. No
> > > certificati
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 9:05 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 3:44 PM, Alec Warner wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 3:44 AM, Andreas K. Huettel <
> dilfri...@gentoo.org>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Am Dienstag, 25. Juli 2017, 01:22:44 CEST schrieb Peter Stuge:
> >> >
> >> > I hol
On Mon, 31 Jul 2017 12:56:18 +1000
Sam Jorna wrote:
>
> Sorry, I thought this thread was about whether to keep or discontinue
> the separation between stable and testing branches.
Yes and it was others that said lack of stable would effect
enterprise/professional usage. I simply said that argume
On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 10:52 AM, Alec Warner wrote:
>
>
> Sorry, to be clear the conclusion I was hoping to draw is that one has 2
> repos instead of 1.
>
> 1) Rolling.
> 2) Stable.
>
> Rolling is typical ~arch Gentoo. People in rolling can do whatever they
> want; they can't affect stable at all
On pon, 2017-07-31 at 10:52 -0400, Alec Warner wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 9:05 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 3:44 PM, Alec Warner wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 3:44 AM, Andreas K. Huettel <
> >
> > dilfri...@gentoo.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > A
On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 6:11 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 10:52 AM, Alec Warner wrote:
> > Sorry, to be clear the conclusion I was hoping to draw is that one has 2
> > repos instead of 1.
> >
> > 1) Rolling.
> > 2) Stable.
> >
> > Rolling is typical ~arch Gentoo. People in r
Rich Freeman posted on Mon, 31 Jul 2017 11:11:24 -0400 as excerpted:
> On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 10:52 AM, Alec Warner
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Sorry, to be clear the conclusion I was hoping to draw is that one has
>> 2 repos instead of 1.
>>
>> 1) Rolling.
>> 2) Stable.
>>
>> Rolling is typical ~arch Gen
On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 8:24 PM, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
> Rich Freeman posted on Mon, 31 Jul 2017 11:11:24 -0400 as excerpted:
>
>> On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 10:52 AM, Alec Warner
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Sorry, to be clear the conclusion I was hoping to draw is that one has
>>> 2 repos i
Rich Freeman posted on Mon, 31 Jul 2017 20:55:05 -0400 as excerpted:
> On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 8:24 PM, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
>> Rich Freeman posted on Mon, 31 Jul 2017 11:11:24 -0400 as excerpted:
>>
>>> On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 10:52 AM, Alec Warner
>>> wrote:
[T]he conc
19 matches
Mail list logo
