Re: [gentoo-dev] Profile-enforced big-endian USE flag

2017-06-29 Thread Joshua Kinard
On 06/28/2017 18:29, James Le Cuirot wrote: > On Wed, 28 Jun 2017 17:52:26 -0400 > Mike Gilbert wrote: > >> On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 6:44 PM, James Le Cuirot wrote: >>> I am therefore proposing a new global big-endian flag. This could be >>> masked by default and unmasked + forced in the relevant

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] Profile-enforced big-endian USE flag

2017-06-29 Thread James Le Cuirot
On Wed, 28 Jun 2017 23:29:03 +0100 James Le Cuirot wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 6:44 PM, James Le Cuirot wrote: > > > I am therefore proposing a new global big-endian flag. This could be > > > masked by default and unmasked + forced in the relevant profiles under > > > arch. I will apply

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] Profile-enforced big-endian USE flag

2017-06-29 Thread Matt Turner
On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 2:19 PM, James Le Cuirot wrote: > On Wed, 28 Jun 2017 23:29:03 +0100 > James Le Cuirot wrote: > >> > On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 6:44 PM, James Le Cuirot wrote: >> > > I am therefore proposing a new global big-endian flag. This could be >> > > masked by default and unmasked +

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] Profile-enforced big-endian USE flag

2017-06-29 Thread James Le Cuirot
On Thu, 29 Jun 2017 14:37:49 -0700 Matt Turner wrote: > On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 2:19 PM, James Le Cuirot wrote: > > On Wed, 28 Jun 2017 23:29:03 +0100 > > James Le Cuirot wrote: > > > >> > On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 6:44 PM, James Le Cuirot > >> > wrote: > >> > > I am therefore proposing a n