Hi, everyone.
I'd like to request Infra to establish a new mailing list that would
fill in the gap between our public mailing lists and the gentoo-core
mailing list.
Name: gentoo-dev-internal
Topic: technical discussions between active Gentoo contributors
Restrictions:
- public (open subscript
On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 12:31 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
>
> A. It gives a wider choice of tools for developers (and privileged
> contributors) -- they can choose either the open or restricted mailing
> list depending on the type of requested feedback.
>
> B. The gentoo-dev mailing list is still open
170523 Michał Górny wrote:
> Sadly, it is not uncommon for threads on that mailing list to turn into
> trollfests, get deranged or hijacked into completely different topics.
> Things are so bad that the mailing list stops serving its purpose. It
> involves a number of consequences:
As a user, I've
On Tue, 23 May 2017 21:31:18 +0200
Michał Górny wrote:
> - public (open subscription), initially we may optionally copy all
> subscribers from gentoo-dev so that they do not miss discussion,
What would be the result if somebody replied to a g-dev-internal ML
without permission?
I think there sh
On Tue, 23 May 2017 15:52:52 -0400
Philip Webb wrote:
> Is this proposal itself not just a waste of valuable developer time
> in moderating, censoring & deciding who is a sheep & who is a goat ?
Its not censorship, because censorship is the practice of preventing
something from being said in ent
I'snt the idea of creating a new mailing list to let gentoo-dev be mesy?,
in that case we could simply redirect all non-aproved posts from gen-int to
gen-dev.
/EKG
On 23 May 2017 22:04, "Kent Fredric" wrote:
> On Tue, 23 May 2017 21:31:18 +0200
> Michał Górny wrote:
>
> > - public (open subscr
On Tue, 23 May 2017 20:32:03 +
Erik Närström wrote:
> I'snt the idea of creating a new mailing list to let gentoo-dev be
> mesy?, in that case we could simply redirect all non-aproved posts
> from gen-int to gen-dev.
I mean, messy in the sense you'd have replies, but no obvious parent
for th
The same asnow with other words?, wouldn it be possible to repost peoples
mail in gen-dev?. I mean instead of leting people send mail to gen-int we
kidnapped the mail and send it to gen-dev so that all using gen-dev gets
the hole conversion, and does only subscribe to gen-int only get to se
posts
On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 09:31:18PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
> Hi, everyone.
>
> I'd like to request Infra to establish a new mailing list that would
> fill in the gap between our public mailing lists and the gentoo-core
> mailing list.
>
> Name: gentoo-dev-internal
>
> Topic: technical discuss
Hi all,
On 2017-05-23 21:08, William Hubbs wrote:
> On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 09:31:18PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
> > Hi, everyone.
> >
> > I'd like to request Infra to establish a new mailing list that would
> > fill in the gap between our public mailing lists and the gentoo-core
> > mailing lis
Hi Michał,
> Name: gentoo-dev-internal
>
> Topic: technical discussions between active Gentoo contributors
Basically I object to this proposal.
1. Another layer of hierarchy is not desirable for a non-profit
organization like us.
2. Useful discussion are diluted from 1 list into 2 lists.
> On Tue, 23 May 2017, William Hubbs wrote:
> On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 09:31:18PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
>> I'd like to request Infra to establish a new mailing list that would
>> fill in the gap between our public mailing lists and the gentoo-core
>> mailing list.
>>
>> Name: gentoo-dev-i
Let's step back a minute, and consider *WHY* non-developers feel the
need to join this list in the first place. Do you remember the acrimony
after the decision to not officially support a separate /usr without
initramfs? A lot of people who complained on the Gentoo-User list were
bluntly told t
On śro, 2017-05-24 at 14:21 +0900, Benda Xu wrote:
> Hi Michał,
>
> > Name: gentoo-dev-internal
> >
> > Topic: technical discussions between active Gentoo contributors
>
> Basically I object to this proposal.
>
> 1. Another layer of hierarchy is not desirable for a non-profit
>organizatio
On śro, 2017-05-24 at 07:29 +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > > > > > On Tue, 23 May 2017, William Hubbs wrote:
> > On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 09:31:18PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
> > > I'd like to request Infra to establish a new mailing list that would
> > > fill in the gap between our public mailin
On śro, 2017-05-24 at 01:55 -0400, Walter Dnes wrote:
> Let's step back a minute, and consider *WHY* non-developers feel the
> need to join this list in the first place. Do you remember the acrimony
> after the decision to not officially support a separate /usr without
> initramfs? A lot of peo
16 matches
Mail list logo
