On 26-03-2017 22:02:38 +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > On Sun, 26 Mar 2017, Fabian Groffen wrote:
>
> > When you say "arch" you actually mean a keyword as per GLEP-53[1]
> > right?
>
> Which doesn't agree with actual usage in the tree, though.
That surprises me. Do you have an example of t
On Sun, 26 Mar 2017 13:04:18 -0700
Brian Dolbec wrote:
> While this can be read and split easily in python code. It
> is not future proof for additional data being added and/or removed.
This is why in my earlier comments to this proposal, I asked for
a: more descriptive terms than 'stable',
On Sun, 26 Mar 2017 22:10:23 -0400
"Walter Dnes" wrote:
> Hopefully, there's no need to go JSON format (bleagh). To simplify
> parsing, fields for one arch should be clustered together.
"should be committed only after running it through sort with LC_ALL=C"
pgpH0WtqWRRt_.pgp
Description: Open
> On Mon, 27 Mar 2017, Fabian Groffen wrote:
>> > When you say "arch" you actually mean a keyword as per GLEP-53[1]
>> > right?
>>
>> Which doesn't agree with actual usage in the tree, though.
> That surprises me. Do you have an example of that?
The GLEP says about the OS suffix:
"The rig
On 2017-03-26 21:50, aide...@gentoo.org wrote:
> app-backup/burp
I'll grab this one unless anyone minds.
--
MS
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 27-03-2017 09:56:50 +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > On Mon, 27 Mar 2017, Fabian Groffen wrote:
>
> >> > When you say "arch" you actually mean a keyword as per GLEP-53[1]
> >> > right?
> >>
> >> Which doesn't agree with actual usage in the tree, though.
>
> > That surprises me. Do you ha
Ühel kenal päeval, E, 27.03.2017 kell 11:07, kirjutas Fabian Groffen:
> On 27-03-2017 09:56:50 +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > > > > > > On Mon, 27 Mar 2017, Fabian Groffen wrote:
> > > > > When you say "arch" you actually mean a keyword as per GLEP-
> > > > > 53[1]
> > > > > right?
> > > >
> > >
> On Mon, 27 Mar 2017, Mart Raudsepp wrote:
> Ühel kenal päeval, E, 27.03.2017 kell 11:07, kirjutas Fabian Groffen:
>> Back to the topic of the thread, is it possible to make the
>> difference between e.g. x86, x86-linux, x86-solaris and x86-macos
>> in this proposal?
> I believe the intentio
This looks good overall, thanks.
If we stay with the whitespace separated columns, the spec should be
clear that implementations should be able to deal with future
additional "columns" in their parsing code.
Below some paint choices from me.
> We introduce a new file "arches.desc" which essentia
# Michał Górny (27 Mar 2017)
# No revdeps or real use case. Uses ECB mode for encryption which is
# a bad idea. Requires patching for dev-python/pycryptodome. Abandoned
# upstream and downstream. Removal in 30 days. Bug #611592.
dev-python/edpwd
--
Best regards,
Michał Górny
signature.asc
Desc
17.03.2017 19:05, Jason A. Donenfeld пишет:
> On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 4:05 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
>> On pią, 2017-03-17 at 14:57 +0100, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
>>> Done.
>>
>> It's nice that you waited for people to actually wake up around
>> the world to give you feedback.
>
> Yep, sorry. Alr
This is part of the usual for discussing new virtuals before addition.
I'm reaching the final stages of prep for migrating from
app-emulation/wine to several packages, one for each major patchset that
we support. This will enable us to get releases out quicker. In
addition, with the new packaging
# Patrice Clement (28 Mar 2017)
# Part of the JRE since Java 6. Removal in 30 days.
dev-java/swing-worker
--
Patrice Clement
Gentoo Linux developer
http://www.gentoo.org
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On 27/03/17 11:10, Mart Raudsepp wrote:
>
>> 3] Meaning of the three values "stable", "testing", "unstable" for
>> repoman
>>
>> * stable: When a profile of arch is tested, then repoman checks
>> consistency for
>> "arch" and for "~arch" separately.
>> Which profiles of the arch are tested is sti
> On Mon, 27 Mar 2017, NP-Hardass wrote:
> This is part of the usual for discussing new virtuals before
> addition. I'm reaching the final stages of prep for migrating from
> app-emulation/wine to several packages, one for each major patchset
> that we support. This will enable us to get rele
On 03/27/2017 08:55 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>> On Mon, 27 Mar 2017, NP-Hardass wrote:
>
>> This is part of the usual for discussing new virtuals before
>> addition. I'm reaching the final stages of prep for migrating from
>> app-emulation/wine to several packages, one for each major patchse
Does anyone mind if I remove empty assignments of optional variables
from virtual ebuilds? Especially: HOMEPAGE, SRC_URI, LICENSE, IUSE,
and DEPEND.
Ulrich
pgpYqVSXGIeY3.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, 28 Mar 2017 00:00:30 +0100
"M. J. Everitt" wrote:
> 'unstable' should surely be applied to masked packages, no? Everything
> not-stable and not-unstable becomes therefore 'testing' ...
Nah, he's trying to make the phrase "stable arch" mean something
in a way tools can understand.
Becaus
18 matches
Mail list logo
