Alexis Ballier posted on Mon, 23 Jan 2017 21:27:06 +0100 as excerpted:
> well then 'ihateudev' masking udev, 'ihateeudev' masking eudev and
> 'ihatesystemd' masking systemd; what are the blockers here?
Should be solvable with the "ilovestaticdev" mixin, but of course
throwing in the "ihatestatic
We are working to provide some tools for the
stabilization process.
Unfortunately, there isn't atm something able to
manage the requests with the ALLARCHES keyword,
So, *everyone* with the commit access can keyword for
all after a stabilization/keyword happened at least for
one arch.
Thanks
> well then 'ihateudev' masking udev, 'ihateeudev' masking eudev and
> 'ihatesystemd' masking systemd; what are the blockers here?
You make three profiles, 'udev', 'eudev', 'systemd' and put them in one
group and let them block said group.
From: Kent Fredric
Greetings,
Following are a series of suggested utilities I want to add to
perl-functions.eclass and additional eyes and feedback are desired
before I finally commit them.
Included are 3 utilities for varying levels of detail in querying
the status of installed Perl Modules fr
From: Kent Fredric
This is an incredibly fast way to check if Perl considers a module
of the given name installed in any capacity, including broken.
As long as "Foo.pm" is somewhere in @INC, `perl_has_module Foo` will
return true.
Even `perl_has_module threads` will return true on non-threaded
From: Kent Fredric
This is a utility for runtime checking if a module of a given version
is installed from the perspective of Perl, whos opinion could be
different than portage in the event of perl-core/* dual life effects
shortly after a major Perl upgrade.
Use this only if perl_has_module is i
From: Kent Fredric
This utility provides informational data describing the given module
names state of installation, either as a version, or as an error
message describing the grade of failure incurred in module loading.
It has the side effect that it most load the module (and its
dependencies)
From: Kent Fredric
---
eclass/perl-functions.eclass | 18 ++
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
diff --git a/eclass/perl-functions.eclass b/eclass/perl-functions.eclass
index 027cb0cf7e..3f73ac87c7 100644
--- a/eclass/perl-functions.eclass
+++ b/eclass/perl-functions.eclass
@@ -43
From: Kent Fredric
---
eclass/perl-functions.eclass | 19 +++
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)
diff --git a/eclass/perl-functions.eclass b/eclass/perl-functions.eclass
index 3f73ac87c7..1652ceaa10 100644
--- a/eclass/perl-functions.eclass
+++ b/eclass/perl-functions.eclass
@@ -4
From: Kent Fredric
---
eclass/perl-functions.eclass | 75 +++-
1 file changed, 74 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/eclass/perl-functions.eclass b/eclass/perl-functions.eclass
index 1652ceaa10..9eed888f75 100644
--- a/eclass/perl-functions.eclass
On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 09:04:37 -0600
Matthias Maier wrote:
> > well then 'ihateudev' masking udev, 'ihateeudev' masking eudev and
> > 'ihatesystemd' masking systemd; what are the blockers here?
>
> You make three profiles, 'udev', 'eudev', 'systemd' and put them in
> one group and let them block
On 01/24/2017 07:54 AM, Agostino Sarubbo wrote:
> We are working to provide some tools for the stabilization process.
>
>
>
>
>
> Unfortunately, there isn't atm something able to manage the requests
> with the ALLARCHES keyword,
>
>
>
> So, *everyone* with the commit access can keyword f
Ühel kenal päeval, T, 24.01.2017 kell 09:55, kirjutas Matthew Thode:
> So, to be clear, we need to wait for an AT to mark stable for one
> arch
> on an ALLARCHES package. Once that is done any dev can mark the rest
> of
> the arches stable.
Currently this seems to be resulting in broken deptrees
On 01/24/2017 11:11 AM, Mart Raudsepp wrote:
>
> Currently this seems to be resulting in broken deptrees for arches that
> don't have a stable profile. arm64 in particular.
ALLARCHES should not include the unstable ones unless they are
specifically in CC, and of course you should be running repom
On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 11:11 AM, Mart Raudsepp wrote:
> Currently this seems to be resulting in broken deptrees for arches that
> don't have a stable profile. arm64 in particular.
Last I checked, "ekeyword all foo.ebuild" will skip arches that have
no stable profiles. Ago must be using some othe
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 10:23:35AM +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
> Hi, everyone.
>
> I've written a short proposal that aims to provide basic infrastructure
> for defining mix-in profiles in Gentoo. I've tried to keep it simple,
> and backwards compatible. The main goal is to be able to start definin
On 24/01/17 17:20, Jason Zaman wrote:
> This is awesome! thanks for working on it, ive wanted it for a while
> now.
>
> The main issue I see with it is ordering. For the hardened and selinux
> profiles, the order matters a lot. eg hardened defaults the jit useflag
> off and the desktop profile defa
# Matt Turner (24 Jan 2017)
# Depends on xorg-server-1.16, which is going away. Unresolved security bug
# #602764. Maintainer no longer interested in package. Masked for removal in 30
# days.
net-misc/x11rdp
net-misc/xrdp
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi!
The traditional Gentoo Dinner @ FOSDEM 2017 comes back!
If you are interested, please edit the Wiki page[1].
I see some "possible" or "maybe", can you please confirm to "yes" or
"no" as soon as possible?
Like the previous years, I will take contact with "Wok and Roll" [2],
budget is really c
/erratum/
Le 24/01/17 à 20:30, Xavier Miller a écrit :
> Hi!
>
> The traditional Gentoo Dinner @ FOSDEM 2017 comes back!
> If you are interested, please edit the Wiki page[1].
>
> I see some "possible" or "maybe", can you please confirm to "yes" or
> "no" as soon as possible?
>
> Like the previ
20 matches
Mail list logo
