> On Fri, 11 Nov 2016, Michał Górny wrote:
> Most of your comments don't make sense if you are commenting on the
> actual proposal. However, it seems that you immediately ignored the
> core part of the proposal, and then commented on stupidity of some
> distorted, imagined, half-ass proposal y
On Fri, 11 Nov 2016 09:25:30 +0100
Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > On Fri, 11 Nov 2016, Michał Górny wrote:
>
> > Most of your comments don't make sense if you are commenting on the
> > actual proposal. However, it seems that you immediately ignored the
> > core part of the proposal, and then co
> On Fri, 11 Nov 2016, Michał Górny wrote:
> ==, !=, <=, >= -- all consistent with one another. Same for ===,
> !==, <==, >==. Using some old ~ and = wouldn't fit that. The gain is
> greater than any benefit keeping old operator in a completely new
> syntax.
The gain is close to zero, if not
On Fri, 11 Nov 2016 11:31:17 +0100
Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> So, here is a counter proposal, following the KISS principle as much
> as possible:
>
> 1. Existing dependency syntax will be allowed indefinitely.
As long as I'm not forced to use that crap, I'm fine with it.
> 2. Version restrictions
On Thu, 10 Nov 2016 23:53:40 +0100
Michał Górny wrote:
> dev-foo/bar[>=3][foo]# version + USE
I kinda find this asking for problems with visual ambiguity.
Use different grouping symbols or supercede the USE syntax entirely.
dev-foo/bar[foo]#(>=3)
Or something. I'm also suggesting
# Kevin Simmons (11 Nov 2016)
# Is holding up removal of old versions of
# sci-geosciences/osm-gps-map.
# Removal in 30 days.
app-misc/gramps-3.4.9
