Re: [gentoo-dev] Empty project: LXDE

2016-08-14 Thread Pacho Ramos
El sáb, 13-08-2016 a las 22:39 -0700, Hanno Böck escribió: > Ok, so it seems I'm currently the only one interested. > > While the wiki page lists no other devs, there are two more devs > listed > in the email alias, yet they haven't replied to my questions whether > they consider themselve still p

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: net-libs/libkfbapi

2016-08-14 Thread Michael Palimaka
# Michael Palimaka (14 Aug 2016) # Requires API that is no longer functional. # Masked for removal in 30 days. net-libs/libkfbapi

[gentoo-dev] New Working Group established to evaluate the stable tree

2016-08-14 Thread Kristian Fiskerstrand
During the latest Council meeting it was determined to set up a new Working Group to come up with recommendations for improving the state of the stable tree at a later Council meeting. Some initial items it was suggested the WG look into is * The b.g.o workflow, bugs should not be considered fixe

Re: [gentoo-dev] New Working Group established to evaluate the stable tree

2016-08-14 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Sun, 14 Aug 2016 23:35:58 +0200 Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: > During the latest Council meeting it was determined to set up a new > Working Group to come up with recommendations for improving the state > of the stable tree at a later Council meeting. What's a Working Group, and how is it rela

Re: [gentoo-dev] New Working Group established to evaluate the stable tree

2016-08-14 Thread Kristian Fiskerstrand
On 08/14/2016 11:45 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Sun, 14 Aug 2016 23:35:58 +0200 > Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: >> During the latest Council meeting it was determined to set up a new >> Working Group to come up with recommendations for improving the state >> of the stable tree at a later Counci

Re: [gentoo-dev] New Working Group established to evaluate the stable tree

2016-08-14 Thread Kent Fredric
On Sun, 14 Aug 2016 22:45:07 +0100 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > What's a Working Group, and how is it related to a Project? Shouldn't > there be a GLEP to define what a Working Group is first? So if a group of people wanted to write such a GLEP ... would they have to be part of a defined Project fir

Re: [gentoo-dev] New Working Group established to evaluate the stable tree

2016-08-14 Thread Anthony G. Basile
On 8/14/16 5:45 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Sun, 14 Aug 2016 23:35:58 +0200 > Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: >> During the latest Council meeting it was determined to set up a new >> Working Group to come up with recommendations for improving the state >> of the stable tree at a later Council me

Re: [gentoo-dev] New Working Group established to evaluate the stable tree

2016-08-14 Thread M. J. Everitt
On 14/08/16 22:49, Kent Fredric wrote: > On Sun, 14 Aug 2016 22:45:07 +0100 > Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > >> What's a Working Group, and how is it related to a Project? Shouldn't >> there be a GLEP to define what a Working Group is first? > So if a group of people wanted to write such a GLEP ... woul

Re: [gentoo-dev] New Working Group established to evaluate the stable tree

2016-08-14 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Sun, 14 Aug 2016 17:50:58 -0400 "Anthony G. Basile" wrote: > On 8/14/16 5:45 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > On Sun, 14 Aug 2016 23:35:58 +0200 > > Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: > >> During the latest Council meeting it was determined to set up a new > >> Working Group to come up with recommen

Re: [gentoo-dev] New Working Group established to evaluate the stable tree

2016-08-14 Thread Kent Fredric
On Sun, 14 Aug 2016 22:57:31 +0100 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > I'm not sure what a group is. Is it anything like a herd? Its a thing you get when more than one person does a thing. pgpMXkRM4x5eF.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] New Working Group established to evaluate the stable tree

2016-08-14 Thread Chris Reffett
On August 14, 2016 5:49:48 PM EDT, Kent Fredric wrote: >On Sun, 14 Aug 2016 22:45:07 +0100 >Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > >> What's a Working Group, and how is it related to a Project? Shouldn't >> there be a GLEP to define what a Working Group is first? > >So if a group of people wanted to write su

[gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2016-08-14 23:59 UTC

2016-08-14 Thread Robin H. Johnson
20160814-11:10 mgorny 8a16421 kde-apps/kgamma 20160809-07:01 johu 43fc375 kde-apps/ksnapshot 20160814-11:12 mgorny 4047253 www-client/luakit20160810-16:13 mgorny 2963b7d Additions: dev-libs/libpcre-debian

Re: [gentoo-dev] New Working Group established to evaluate the stable tree

2016-08-14 Thread Jason Zaman
On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 11:35:58PM +0200, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: > During the latest Council meeting it was determined to set up a new > Working Group to come up with recommendations for improving the state of > the stable tree at a later Council meeting. Sign me up! > > Some initial items

Re: [gentoo-dev] New Working Group established to evaluate the stable tree

2016-08-14 Thread Kent Fredric
On Mon, 15 Aug 2016 11:45:22 +0800 Jason Zaman wrote: > IN_PROGRESS == we've put the fix in the git repo > RESO/TESTREQ == new release and in ~arch TESTREQ was incidentally my first thought. Only needs me to study how much that's already used and whether or not existing bugs with that flag meet

Re: [gentoo-dev] New Working Group established to evaluate the stable tree

2016-08-14 Thread Jason Zaman
On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 03:53:26PM +1200, Kent Fredric wrote: > On Mon, 15 Aug 2016 11:45:22 +0800 > Jason Zaman wrote: > > > IN_PROGRESS == we've put the fix in the git repo > > RESO/TESTREQ == new release and in ~arch > > TESTREQ was incidentally my first thought. Only needs me to study how mu

#wg-stable: Reservations about a "STABLE" & "NeedsStable" bugzilla keywords (re: [gentoo-dev] New Working Group established to evaluate the stable tree)

2016-08-14 Thread Kent Fredric
On Sun, 14 Aug 2016 23:35:58 +0200 Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: > * The b.g.o workflow, bugs should not be considered fixed until the >fix has reached the stable tree. Today the InVCS keyword exists for >this purpose, but it is used to varying degree amongst developers. >Will a workf

Re: #wg-stable: Reservations about a "STABLE" & "NeedsStable" bugzilla keywords (re: [gentoo-dev] New Working Group established to evaluate the stable tree)

2016-08-14 Thread Kent Fredric
On Mon, 15 Aug 2016 16:29:43 +1200 Kent Fredric wrote: > > * The b.g.o workflow, bugs should not be considered fixed until the > >fix has reached the stable tree. Today the InVCS keyword exists for > >this purpose, but it is used to varying degree amongst developers. > >Will a workfl