On Mon, 11 Apr 2016 22:04:10 -0400
NP-Hardass wrote:
> # Inherit happens below after declaration of GNOME2_LA_PUNT
>
> # @ECLASS-VARIABLE: MATE_LA_PUNT
> # @DESCRIPTION:
> # Available values for MATE_LA_PUNT:
> # - "no": will not clean any .la files
> # - "yes": will run prune_libtool_files --mo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 04/13/2016 05:32 AM, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Apr 2016 22:04:10 -0400 NP-Hardass
> wrote:
>
>> # Inherit happens below after declaration of GNOME2_LA_PUNT
>>
>> # @ECLASS-VARIABLE: MATE_LA_PUNT # @DESCRIPTION: # Available
>> values fo
On 13/04/16 07:49, Austin English wrote:
> On 04/11/2016 04:00 PM, Alex Alexander wrote:
> > Our bug queue has 82 bugs! > > If you have some spare time, please help
> > assign/sort a few bugs.
> > > To view the bug queue, click here: http://bit.ly/m8PQS5 > > Thanks!
> I got it down to 6. Enjoy.
>
On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 08:55:56 -0400
NP-Hardass wrote:
[...]
> The idea was partly due to consistency. Rather than calling mate_this
> gnome2_that, it'd provide one namespace. Additionally as mentioned in
> my initial email, since GNOME and MATE aren't always in synch, if the
> gnome2 eclass choos
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 04/13/2016 12:19 PM, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 08:55:56 -0400 NP-Hardass
> wrote: [...]
>> The idea was partly due to consistency. Rather than calling
>> mate_this gnome2_that, it'd provide one namespace. Additionally
>> as me
