On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 9:52 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> I would appreciate examples of some common tasks like validating
> projects.xml, but since we don't have those now, it's not critical.
> This used to be kinda straightforward with xmllint,
>
> $ xmllint --valid --noout projects.xml && ec
On Tue, 26 Jan 2016 20:52:09 +0100
Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
> All,
>
> TL;DR: I think we should switch from DTD to RELAX NG (compact syntax,
> ideally) for our XML validation needs. It is more expressive and more
> readable.
>
> Most people who know anything about XML stuff know that DTDs are not
On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 1:09 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> Could you post a generated .rng and XML Schema files for comparison?
> They don't have to be perfect conversions, just to see how different
> they are.
Here's the RNG, generated with dev-python/rnc2rng:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/djc/
On Wed, 27 Jan 2016 14:39:02 +0100
Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 1:09 PM, Michał Górny
> wrote:
> > Could you post a generated .rng and XML Schema files for comparison?
> > They don't have to be perfect conversions, just to see how different
> > they are.
>
> Here's the RNG
On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 3:20 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
> Advanced notice, please
Committed 2016-01-27-upgrading-to-apache-2_4 to news.
Time to request stabilization?
Cheers,
Dirkjan
On 01/27/2016 04:22 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 9:52 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
>> I would appreciate examples of some common tasks like validating
>> projects.xml, but since we don't have those now, it's not critical.
>> This used to be kinda straightforward with xmllint
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 01/27/2016 03:17 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 3:20 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand
> wrote:
>> Advanced notice, please
>
> Committed 2016-01-27-upgrading-to-apache-2_4 to news.
>
> Time to request stabilization?
I'm not aware
On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 3:21 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
>> But libxml2 does not seem to support it; that is, substituting the
>> DOCTYPE for an xml-model processing instruction and then using xmllint
>> --valid does not do the right thing (it complains there's no DOCTYPE).
>
> But does it /compla
> On Wed, 27 Jan 2016, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
> Here's the RNG, generated with dev-python/rnc2rng:
> https://raw.githubusercontent.com/djc/gentoo-data-dtd/metadata-rnc/metadata.rng
> The best way to convert from RELAX NG to XML Schema seems to be with
> trang; I downloaded an older binary an
On Wed, 27 Jan 2016 14:39:02 +0100
Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 1:09 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> > Could you post a generated .rng and XML Schema files for comparison?
> > They don't have to be perfect conversions, just to see how different
> > they are.
>
> Here's the RNG,
> On Wed, 27 Jan 2016, Michał Górny wrote:
> First of all, I don't like RELAX-NG Compact at all. It looks like
> someone tried hard to combine some variation of BNF, DOCTYPE and
> something else in order to get something that is both readable and
> compact. And got a result that doesn't meet e
On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 4:20 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> First of all, I don't like RELAX-NG Compact at all. It looks like
> someone tried hard to combine some variation of BNF, DOCTYPE
> and something else in order to get something that is both readable
> and compact. And got a result that doesn't
On Wed, 27 Jan 2016 16:28:13 +0100
Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 4:20 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> > First of all, I don't like RELAX-NG Compact at all. It looks like
> > someone tried hard to combine some variation of BNF, DOCTYPE
> > and something else in order to get something
On Tue, 26 Jan 2016 20:52:09 +0100
Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
> TL;DR: I think we should switch from DTD to RELAX NG (compact syntax,
> ideally) for our XML validation needs. It is more expressive and more
> readable.
Oh, one more thing.
Do we use the variant anywhere? If not, I suggest we drop
it
> On Wed, 27 Jan 2016, Michał Górny wrote:
> Do we use the variant anywhere? If not, I suggest we
> drop it since it's completely unclear to me and only pollutes the
> schema.
+1
Here is the commit (from 2003) that had introduced the packages
element:
https://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/view
On 01/27/2016 09:49 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
>
> Can I ask what your interest is?
>
An easy, automated way to make sure that I didn't screw up the file
before I commit it. For personal use, it can hit the network, but I was
also considering a pre-commit hook that would need to look locally (bu
On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 4:43 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> Yes, that part makes some sense. Except that it immediately follows
> braces which makes me think it applies only to the thing in the braces.
> Furthermore, the use of {} vs () seems pretty much random, and the &
> is completely unclear what i
On 01/27/2016 10:28 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
>
>> Therefore, I'd suggest we just ship properly hand-written XML Schema,
>> with some nice comments. I don't see a reason to ship any RELAX-NG
>> files unless we actually have tools that support only that.
>
> I'd be curious what Michael, Ulrich, a
> This came up in bug 572348. Question, especially to maintainers of
> eselect modules, is it safe to globally set "umask +rx" in eselect,
> or are there any circumstances where files should be created with
> more restrictive permissions when root's umask asks for it?
No reply, therefore this is i
Please find below a patch which will enable EAPI 6 support in
latex-package.eclass. The main change is that it won't inherit base
any more.
Ulrich
From 990fce89a3ec1a462399089541b67bbcc6baff87 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Ulrich=20M=C3=BCller?=
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 17:15:23 +0100
[Re-sent, with good GPG signature this time.]
Please find below a patch which will enable EAPI 6 support in
latex-package.eclass. The main change is that it won't inherit base
any more.
Ulrich
From 990fce89a3ec1a462399089541b67bbcc6baff87 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Ulrich=20M=C3=B
On Wed, 27 Jan 2016 20:59:21 +0100
Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> Please find below a patch which will enable EAPI 6 support in
> latex-package.eclass. The main change is that it won't inherit base
> any more.
>
> Ulrich
lgtm, thanks
22 matches
Mail list logo
