On 01/01/2016 12:42 PM, Michael Palimaka wrote:
> I don't see the absurdity.
Two formally independent statements that are actually dependent because
of some implicit shared state:
>>
>> src_configure() {
>> local mycmakeargs=(
>> ...
>> )
>> cmake-utils_src_configure
>> }
>>
Hello all,
while working on bug #518422, I found out that while eclass calls the
relevant cache updates it has no idea whether or not it is called in a
multilib context or not.
Imho, this leads to avoidable human errors where one thinks eclass will
take care of lib dependent caches, which it does
# Pacho Ramos (01 Jan 2016)
# Fails to build in multiple ways, bug #250055
# Removal in a month.
dev-ada/adasockets
# Pacho Ramos (01 Jan 2016)
# Security issues, without maintainer, upstream dead, bug #261194
# Removal in a month.
net-dns/noip-updater
# Pacho Ramos (01 Jan 2016)
# Tests fail,
# Pacho Ramos (01 Jan 2016)
# Nothing requires this obsolete versions, bug #249418
# Removal in a month.
=dev-db/sqlite-2*
Good day,
I would like to announce the Samba project.
Its purpose is maintaining the packages which are currently in the
samba herd.
https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Samba
--
Regards,
Victor Ostorga
Gentoo Linux
>> > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=363631
>> >
>>
>>
>> 2011, that's quite old.
>
> Apparently no one cared (enough). Now you do.
>
>> I'm not quite sure what the next thing to do is.
>> Should I add a comment on bugs.gentoo.org or do we discuss it here.
>
> I don't see what you mean by "
> I had a look at the output of ./configure --help with
> gst-plugins-bad-1.6.2 and there is not "--enable-shm". There is just a
> "--disable-shm". I don't know if a new ebuild gst-plugins-shm is
> possible. So, the gst-plugins-bad-1.6.2 ebuild will have to be
> modified. I am new to writing ebuild
