Hi!
This got a bit rambly, sorry 'bout that.
tl;dr: Continuous Integration is a neat idea if you have the
Hardware. The off-mainstream arch teams don't.
On Tue, 07 Jul 2015, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Tue, 07 Jul 2015 08:04:47 +0800
> Patrick Lauer wrote:
> > I'll laugh about it next time I
On Wed, 8 Jul 2015 20:07:34 +0200
Tobias Klausmann wrote:
> In essence, assuming we can "just scale" to make CI work is
> ignoring the matter of the slower archs. And I suspect the "it
> works on amd64, fuck everyone else" is not something we want to
> pick as a motto.
"It works on amd64 on a cle
On Sun, Jul 05, 2015 at 09:05:12PM -0400, Rich Freeman wrote:
> All the gpg stuff really exposes the weakness of git being based on
> sha1 though. I wouldn't think that it would be that hard to change
> git's hash function, with the caveat that the resulting repositories
> might not be backwards-c
On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 11:07 AM, Tobias Klausmann
wrote:
> Hi!
>
> This got a bit rambly, sorry 'bout that.
>
> tl;dr: Continuous Integration is a neat idea if you have the
> Hardware. The off-mainstream arch teams don't.
>
Clearly because we cannot be perfect, we should not even try!
Realistica
Hi!
On Wed, 08 Jul 2015, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Jul 2015 20:07:34 +0200
> Tobias Klausmann wrote:
> > In essence, assuming we can "just scale" to make CI work is
> > ignoring the matter of the slower archs. And I suspect the "it
> > works on amd64, fuck everyone else" is not somethin
Hi!
On Wed, 08 Jul 2015, Alec Warner wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 11:07 AM, Tobias Klausmann
> wrote:
>
> > tl;dr: Continuous Integration is a neat idea if you have the
> > Hardware. The off-mainstream arch teams don't.
>
> Clearly because we cannot be perfect, we should not even try!
> Re
How can I unsucribe from this mailing list
On May 9, 2015 1:25 AM, "Dmitry Yu Okunev" wrote:
> 08.05.2015 23:05, Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov пишет:
>
>> I had been trying to push the idea of creating an united FOSS community
>>> to solve problems of the higher school of the Russian Federation. But
On 07/08/2015 09:14 PM, Tobias Klausmann wrote:
>
> I explicitly point out that amd64
> is welcome to do whatever they want regarding CI, but that I
> suspect that the rift between it and the "lesser" architectures
> will become wider.
>
That is technically correct, but it's not really an argume
Tyler Pohl wrote:
>
> How can I unsucribe from this mailing list
>
>
https://gentoo.org/get-involved/mailing-lists/instructions.html
Dale
:-) :-)
On Wed, 2015-07-08 at 21:11 +0200, Tobias Klausmann wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Wed, 08 Jul 2015, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > On Wed, 8 Jul 2015 20:07:34 +0200
> > Tobias Klausmann wrote:
> > > In essence, assuming we can "just scale" to make CI work is
> > > ignoring the matter of the slower archs. And
On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 10:11 PM, Steev Klimaszewski
wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-07-08 at 21:11 +0200, Tobias Klausmann wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > On Wed, 08 Jul 2015, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > > On Wed, 8 Jul 2015 20:07:34 +0200
> > > Tobias Klausmann wrote:
> > > > In essence, assuming we can "just scal
11 matches
Mail list logo
