On Tue, 2 Jun 2015 10:13:54 -0400
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On 01 Jun 2015 10:15, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> > On Sun, 31 May 2015 11:17:50 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > (3) considering the glibc effort has been stalled for over a year,
> > > (1) is something we can help accomplish and make reason
On 03 Jun 2015 10:26, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Jun 2015 10:13:54 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On 01 Jun 2015 10:15, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> > > On Sun, 31 May 2015 11:17:50 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > > (3) considering the glibc effort has been stalled for over a year,
> > > > (1)
All,
here is the latest version of this news item. It will be submitted on 5
Jun if there is no feedback.
William
Title: udev-init-scripts-28 important changes
Author: William Hubbs
Content-Type: text/plain
Posted: 2015-06-05
Revision: 1
News-Item-Format: 1.0
Display-If-Installed: <=sys-fs/udev-
Dear devs,
i've just hit the constraint CHECKREQS_MEMORY=3G in
>=www-client/chromium-44.* on a 2 GiB RAM machine.. (having additionally
5G Swap on SSD..)
I personally doubt that check-reqs_memory() in the eclass should only
check for *physical* rather than *virtual* RAM to fulfill this
constraint
On Wed, 03 Jun 2015 22:22:39 +0200
> i've just hit the constraint CHECKREQS_MEMORY=3G in
> >=www-client/chromium-44.* on a 2 GiB RAM machine.. (having
> >additionally
> 5G Swap on SSD..)
>
> I personally doubt that check-reqs_memory() in the eclass should only
> check for *physical* rather than *v
Am 03.06.2015 um 22:32 schrieb Ciaran McCreesh:
> On Wed, 03 Jun 2015 22:22:39 +0200
>> i've just hit the constraint CHECKREQS_MEMORY=3G in
>>> =www-client/chromium-44.* on a 2 GiB RAM machine.. (having
>>> additionally
>> 5G Swap on SSD..)
>>
>> I personally doubt that check-reqs_memory() in the e
Dnia 2015-06-03, o godz. 22:39:10
Christian Bricart napisał(a):
> Am 03.06.2015 um 22:32 schrieb Ciaran McCreesh:
> > On Wed, 03 Jun 2015 22:22:39 +0200
> >> i've just hit the constraint CHECKREQS_MEMORY=3G in
> >>> =www-client/chromium-44.* on a 2 GiB RAM machine.. (having
> >>> additionally
> >
On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 4:22 PM, Christian Bricart wrote:
> Dear devs,
>
> i've just hit the constraint CHECKREQS_MEMORY=3G in
>>=www-client/chromium-44.* on a 2 GiB RAM machine.. (having additionally
> 5G Swap on SSD..)
>
> I personally doubt that check-reqs_memory() in the eclass should only
> ch
On Wed, 3 Jun 2015 21:32:34 +0100
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>
> Swap is horrifically slow. It's better to fail than to use swap for
> stuff...
>
Is it better to fail when you have already lost several hours in
compilations? Or is it better to use some additional parallel swap on a
bunch of HDDs o
