On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 1:32 AM, Kent Fredric wrote:
>
> On 23 April 2015 at 21:02, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
>>
>> with patches already in
>> the live-git version, and I believe lessons were learned about
>> coordinating repo updates when a major host changes as well, so
>> hopefully,
On 04/24/15 14:56, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 24/04/15 02:42 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Fri, 24 Apr 2015 21:12:32 +0300 Maxim Koltsov
wrote:
Hello. My previous email was sent from the wrong address and it
seems it did not make it into the lis
Anthony G. Basile wrote:
> The way gcc is dealing with this is that it is NOT bumping the soname
> so we can get libraries linking aginst libstdc++.so with the wrong abi
> and you get breakage.
..
> I'm not sure how to solve this one
Is there any alternative to implementing the different sonames i
gcc upstream has at least unified the C++98(03) and C++11 abis in gcc-5
[1] and declared the C++11 abi stable. This could resolve [2] in the
"near" future..
Best,
Matthias
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/manual/using_dual_abi.html
[2] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=542482
Peter Stuge posted on Sat, 25 Apr 2015 17:23:17 +0200 as excerpted:
> Anthony G. Basile wrote:
>> The way gcc is dealing with this is that it is NOT bumping the soname
>> so we can get libraries linking aginst libstdc++.so with the wrong abi
>> and you get breakage.
> ..
>> I'm not sure how to sol
Our bug queue has 95 bugs!
If you have some spare time, please help assign/sort a few bugs.
To view the bug queue, click here: http://bit.ly/m8PQS5
Thanks!
