On 10/28/2014 01:17 AM, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Oct 2014 19:58:15 +
> hasufell wrote:
>
>> I want to keep the over-long description unless we have some sort of
>> ebuild aliases.
>
>
>
Could you elaborate how to query that field via eix which is the
de-facto standard for findi
On Wed, 05 Nov 2014 17:06:52 +0100
hasufell wrote:
> Could you elaborate how to query that field via eix which is the
> de-facto standard for finding packages?
The official standard for finding packages is packages.gentoo.org. It
(and the somewhat popular eix) have no problems at all reading
the
On Wed, 5 Nov 2014 17:27:51 +0100
Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> On Wed, 05 Nov 2014 17:06:52 +0100
> hasufell wrote:
>
> > Could you elaborate how to query that field via eix which is the
> > de-facto standard for finding packages?
>
> The official standard for finding packages is packages.gentoo.or
On 11/05/2014 05:27 PM, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> On Wed, 05 Nov 2014 17:06:52 +0100
> hasufell wrote:
>
>> Could you elaborate how to query that field via eix which is the
>> de-facto standard for finding packages?
>
> The official standard for finding packages is packages.gentoo.org. It
> (and t
On Wed, 05 Nov 2014 17:36:34 +0100
hasufell wrote:
> You were proposing that I strip down the DESCRIPTION field in my
> ebuild and put the keywords relevant for finding the package into
> in tag metadata.xml.
No, I was proposing the overly long description should go to
. As for the DESCRIPTION
On Wed, 5 Nov 2014 17:34:06 +0100
Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Nov 2014 17:27:51 +0100
> Jeroen Roovers wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 05 Nov 2014 17:06:52 +0100
> > hasufell wrote:
> >
> > > Could you elaborate how to query that field via eix which is the
> > > de-facto standard for finding packa
On 05/11/14 02:16, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
When I was taking my ebuild quizzes, I asked for someone to clarify the
implicit system dependency that we have enshrined in the devmanual:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=485356
There is... some agreement, but also special cases and special
On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 12:30 PM, Luca Barbato wrote:
> On 05/11/14 02:16, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
>>
>> When I was taking my ebuild quizzes, I asked for someone to clarify the
>> implicit system dependency that we have enshrined in the devmanual:
>>
>>https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48
# Ulrich Müller (5 Nov 2014)
# Does not build with Emacs 24.4.
# Last visible upstream activity in 2011.
# Masked for removal in 30 days, bug #528374.
app-emacs/csharp-mode
pgp6x5SYzLxHT.pgp
Description: PGP signature
