Re: [gentoo-dev] more help needed with gcc-4.8 stabilization, chromium starts heavily using C++11

2014-10-19 Thread Jeroen Roovers
On Sat, 18 Oct 2014 14:03:07 -0400 Michael Orlitzky wrote: > If this is what's holding up a tinderbox run, add me to the bug > template as a CC and I'll personally download and attach every log to > bugzilla. If the bugzilla API allows it, a very simple script should be able to do this, includin

Re: [gentoo-dev] more help needed with gcc-4.8 stabilization, chromium starts heavily using C++11

2014-10-19 Thread Jeroen Roovers
On Sun, 19 Oct 2014 10:14:18 +0200 Jeroen Roovers wrote: > On Sat, 18 Oct 2014 14:03:07 -0400 > Michael Orlitzky wrote: > > > If this is what's holding up a tinderbox run, add me to the bug > > template as a CC and I'll personally download and attach every log > > to bugzilla. > > If the bugzi

[gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2014-09-07 23:59 UTC

2014-10-19 Thread Robin H. Johnson
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed from the tree, for the week ending 2014-09-07 23:59 UTC. Removals: dev-python/amara2014-09-07 12:43:29 dev-zero dev-python/Bcryptor 2014-09-07 12:47:06 pacho d

[gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2014-11-24 23:59 UTC

2014-10-19 Thread Robin H. Johnson
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed from the tree, for the week ending 2014-11-24 23:59 UTC. Removals: Additions: -- Robin Hugh Johnson Gentoo Linux Developer E-Mail : robb...@gentoo.org GnuPG FP : 11AC BA4F 4778 E3F6 E4ED F38E B27B 944E 3488 4E85 Remove

[gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2014-09-21 23:59 UTC

2014-10-19 Thread Robin H. Johnson
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed from the tree, for the week ending 2014-09-21 23:59 UTC. Removals: www-client/opera-next 2014-09-15 14:44:52 jer www-apps/swish-e2014-09-19 18:12:13 dilfridge Additions: www-cl

[gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2014-09-14 23:59 UTC

2014-10-19 Thread Robin H. Johnson
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed from the tree, for the week ending 2014-09-14 23:59 UTC. Removals: games-action/minetest_build 2014-09-09 14:21:37 hasufell games-action/minetest_common2014-09-09 14:21:58 hasufell games-action/minetest_survival

[gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2014-09-28 23:59 UTC

2014-10-19 Thread Robin H. Johnson
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed from the tree, for the week ending 2014-09-28 23:59 UTC. Removals: Additions: net-libs/libndp 2014-09-22 18:03:01 pacho dev-python/keystonemiddleware 2014-09-22 21:29:58 prometheanfire media-libs/libb

[gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2014-10-05 23:59 UTC

2014-10-19 Thread Robin H. Johnson
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed from the tree, for the week ending 2014-10-05 23:59 UTC. Removals: dev-qt/qcustomplot 2014-09-29 07:32:58 jlec Additions: dev-libs/qcustomplot2014-09-29 07:17:26 jlec dev-python/webassets

[gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2014-10-12 23:59 UTC

2014-10-19 Thread Robin H. Johnson
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed from the tree, for the week ending 2014-10-12 23:59 UTC. Removals: media-sound/cowbell 2014-10-06 16:28:36 k_f x11-plugins/msn-pecan 2014-10-08 12:17:10 voyageur x11-plugins/pidgin-facebookchat 201

[gentoo-dev] Re: Last rites: net-im/kmess, net-im/amsn, x11-themes/amsn-skins

2014-10-19 Thread Nuno J. Silva (aka njsg)
On 2014-10-12, Nuno Silva (aka njsg) wrote: > On 2014-09-02, Markos Chandras wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> They were already masked, but because of >> http://www.forbes.com/sites/amitchowdhry/2014/08/31/msn-messenger-is-completely-shutting-down-on-october-31st/ >> , I see no point having these packages

Re: [gentoo-dev] News item review: bash-completion-2.1-r90

2014-10-19 Thread Michał Górny
Dnia 2014-10-13, o godz. 12:23:52 Pacho Ramos napisał(a): > El lun, 13-10-2014 a las 11:35 +0200, Michał Górny escribió: > > Please review the following news item. > [...] > > The current eselect-bashcomp setup will *not* be migrated. It may be > > necessary to rebuild packages installing complet

Re: [gentoo-dev] News item review: bash-completion-2.1-r90

2014-10-19 Thread Michał Górny
Dnia 2014-10-14, o godz. 02:41:58 Peter Stuge napisał(a): > Peter Stuge wrote: > > There is a severe behavioral penalty! > > Rich Freeman wrote: > > > I really do not want that to be chosen for me. > > > > Well, then all you need to do is tell eselect to disable them, etc. > > Well, but see ab

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: News item review: bash-completion-2.1-r90

2014-10-19 Thread Michał Górny
Dnia 2014-10-13, o godz. 10:25:26 Rich Freeman napisał(a): > On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 9:56 AM, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote: > > > > Many of our users do care what's going on, that's why they run gentoo, > > and for those that don't, a bit of extra information won't hurt 'em. > > > > Sure,

[gentoo-dev] Re: Last rites: net-im/kmess, net-im/amsn, x11-themes/amsn-skins

2014-10-19 Thread Nuno J. Silva (aka njsg)
On 2014-10-19, Nuno J. Silva (aka njsg) wrote: > On 2014-10-12, Nuno Silva (aka njsg) wrote: >> On 2014-09-02, Markos Chandras wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> They were already masked, but because of >>> http://www.forbes.com/sites/amitchowdhry/2014/08/31/msn-messenger-is-completely-shutting-down-on-

Re: [gentoo-dev] more help needed with gcc-4.8 stabilization, chromium starts heavily using C++11

2014-10-19 Thread Andreas K. Huettel
Am Samstag, 18. Oktober 2014, 19:34:52 schrieb Pacho Ramos: > > > > Perhaps a stupid question, but: why is it a problem if the logs are > > linked rather than attached? > > Supposedly we always must attach files to bug reports to ensure they are > kept forever with that bug reports instead of rel

Re: [gentoo-dev] more help needed with gcc-4.8 stabilization, chromium starts heavily using C++11

2014-10-19 Thread Rich Freeman
On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 8:10 AM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: > Am Samstag, 18. Oktober 2014, 19:34:52 schrieb Pacho Ramos: >> > >> > Perhaps a stupid question, but: why is it a problem if the logs are >> > linked rather than attached? >> >> Supposedly we always must attach files to bug reports to en

Re: [gentoo-dev] more help needed with gcc-4.8 stabilization, chromium starts heavily using C++11

2014-10-19 Thread hasufell
Rich Freeman: > > If maintainers want to NEEDINFO or WONTFIX a tinderbox bug, well, > they'll be the ones picking up the pieces when the gcc upgrade moves > ahead. We are all picking up the pieces. > I don't get why anybody wouldn't like seeing them. > I do, it's childish and uncollaborative b

[gentoo-dev] RFC: News item regarding c++98 vs c++11

2014-10-19 Thread Anthony G. Basile
Hi everyone, I debated about whether to write a news item about c++11 abi. Usually our news items are about some change which requires user intervention. But this is just precautionary. With more packages needing c++11 because of source changes, we may want to inform users about breakage at

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: News item regarding c++98 vs c++11

2014-10-19 Thread Jeroen Roovers
On Sun, 19 Oct 2014 18:53:43 -0400 "Anthony G. Basile" wrote: > we may want to inform users about breakage at the ABI level in case > they do something like add -std=c++11 to their global CXXFLAGS. You mean tell them they get to keep the pieces? jer

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: News item regarding c++98 vs c++11

2014-10-19 Thread Anthony G. Basile
On 10/19/14 18:57, Jeroen Roovers wrote: On Sun, 19 Oct 2014 18:53:43 -0400 "Anthony G. Basile" wrote: we may want to inform users about breakage at the ABI level in case they do something like add -std=c++11 to their global CXXFLAGS. You mean tell them they get to keep the pieces? je

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: News item regarding c++98 vs c++11

2014-10-19 Thread Alex Xu
On 19/10/14 06:53 PM, Anthony G. Basile wrote: > the default is still gnu++98 what does this mean, how does it differ from c++98? > in the older ABI, can lead to a crippled system. what do you mean, will other packages break too? maybe "may lead to non-functioning or possibly broken packages". a

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: net-im/qutim

2014-10-19 Thread Davide Pesavento
# Davide Pesavento (20 Oct 2014) # Does not build with any in-tree version of cmake since 20140713 (bug 506614). # Jabber plugin is broken (bug 464690). Masked for removal in 30 days. net-im/qutim

[gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: News item regarding c++98 vs c++11

2014-10-19 Thread Duncan
Anthony G. Basile posted on Sun, 19 Oct 2014 18:59:41 -0400 as excerpted: > On 10/19/14 18:57, Jeroen Roovers wrote: >> On Sun, 19 Oct 2014 18:53:43 -0400 "Anthony G. Basile" >> wrote: >> >>> we may want to inform users about breakage at the ABI level in case >>> they do something like add -std=c

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: News item regarding c++98 vs c++11

2014-10-19 Thread Luca Barbato
On 20/10/14 00:53, Anthony G. Basile wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I debated about whether to write a news item about c++11 abi. Usually > our news items are about some change which requires user intervention. > But this is just precautionary. With more packages needing c++11 > because of source cha