> In order to solve bug #503802 [1], I would like to add a
> virtual/podofo-build package to pull in app-text/podofo and
> dev-libs/boost. Then packages like app-text/calibre can put
> virtual/podofo-build in DEPEND and app-text/podofo in RDEPEND.
This sounds a bit like a one-time solution for a
On 10/15/2014 04:42 AM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
>> In order to solve bug #503802 [1], I would like to add a
>> virtual/podofo-build package to pull in app-text/podofo and
>> dev-libs/boost. Then packages like app-text/calibre can put
>> virtual/podofo-build in DEPEND and app-text/podofo in RDEPEN
> On 10/15/2014 04:42 AM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> >> In order to solve bug #503802 [1], I would like to add a
> >> virtual/podofo-build package to pull in app-text/podofo and
> >> dev-libs/boost. Then packages like app-text/calibre can put
> >> virtual/podofo-build in DEPEND and app-text/podofo
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 7:42 AM, Andreas K. Huettel
wrote:
>> In order to solve bug #503802 [1], I would like to add a
>> virtual/podofo-build package to pull in app-text/podofo and
>> dev-libs/boost. Then packages like app-text/calibre can put
>> virtual/podofo-build in DEPEND and app-text/podofo
# Michael Palimaka (15 Oct 2014)
# No longer compatible with online service it depends on.
# Dead upstream. Masked for removal in 30 days. Bug #451868.
app-dicts/gnuvd
that's intended. repoman warns for missing *needed* dependencies, but won't
bother for unknown blockers exactly for cases like this.
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/
On 15 October 2014 01:25, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 10/13/2014 02:41 PM, Mike
On 10/12/14 17:22, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
On 10/12/14 15:55, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
On 10/12/14 15:46, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
On Sun, 12 Oct 2014, Dan Douglas wrote:
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 11:22 AM, Anthony G. Basile
wrote:
+# Returns true if gcc builds with fstack-check
+gcc-specs-stack
On Fri, 10 Oct 2014, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 5:31 PM, W. Trevor King wrote:
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 09:22:18PM +, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
In a similar vein, would releng be open to moving stage1/2/3 package
sets to virtual packages or package sets? Presently they are i
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 12:13:45AM +, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
> For stage1 and stage2 the *order* we build packages is relevant.
Is this really true? The stage1 is being built with ROOT, so it's
only using the seed stage3 packages. It's hard to have cyclic
dependencies when you're
