Hello everyone,
I would like to announce Gentoo Containers project[1]. Gentoo Containers project
aims to provide automatically generated, minimal container images for
a variety of
formats (i.e. Docker[2], LMCTFY, LXC) and architectures using Gentoo.
This allows users of the containers to have a go
Remove the code responsible for recognizing which branch HEAD pointed
out to since it was unsafe and unnecessarily complex. A proper match is
not really necessary since all operations can be safely performed on
an opaque 'HEAD' (or rather refs/git-r3/HEAD since fetching to HEAD
directly breaks git
Hi all,
since Perl is a fairly central package and it's hard to debug problems without
the exact version, the perl team would like to add dev-lang/perl to
profiles/info_pkgs.
This has the effect that the installed version of dev-lang/perl is by default
included in every "emerge --info" outp
Michał Górny wrote:
> Remove the code responsible for recognizing which branch HEAD pointed
> out to since it was unsafe and unnecessarily complex. A proper match is
> not really necessary since all operations can be safely performed on
> an opaque 'HEAD' (or rather refs/git-r3/HEAD since fetching
On Sat, 4 Oct 2014 00:05:19 +0200 Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
>
>Hi all,
>
>since Perl is a fairly central package and it's hard to debug problems
>without the exact version, the perl team would like to add
>dev-lang/perl to profiles/info_pkgs.
>
>This has the effect that the installed version of
On Fri, Oct 03, 2014 at 05:01:20AM +0200, Peter Stuge wrote:
> Steven J. Long wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 07:52:02AM -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
> > > The IPC implementation that I've suggested does not involve an SUID
> > > helper, so it is much more secure. Security would rely on the permissi
Steven J. Long wrote:
> > It's a lot more secure to have a single well-defined privileged trust
> > anchor (the privileged process) with a well-defined protocol, than to
> > have built-in privilege escalation which allows arbitrary actions.
>
> You appear to have missed the point of what it does.
Peter Stuge wrote:
> Steven J. Long wrote:
> > > It's a lot more secure to have a single well-defined privileged trust
> > > anchor (the privileged process) with a well-defined protocol, than to
> > > have built-in privilege escalation which allows arbitrary actions.
> >
> > the whole point is to
