On Wed, 30 Jul 2014 13:48:37 +0200
Luis Ressel wrote:
> I think I'd rather go with the original workflow. Okay, perhaps
> package.masking - is a bit uncommon and clutters package.mask, but
> it's not all *that* bad and it eases the workflow.
Depends on whose workflow you are referring to; it
On Sat, 9 Aug 2014 19:25:56 +0400
Igor wrote:
> In my experience - hacking into 96 system with a 0 door is much
> harder than in 2014. In most cases unless you're an expert on 96
> software which is difficult nowadays due to human memory.
Why does one need to be an expert?
How about known and/o
On Fri, 8 Aug 2014 15:32:37 +0200
Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> Nice capitalisation! Speaking of which, where is the US$ 1,000,000
> (ONE MILLION UNITED STATES DOLLARS) you promised in your last e-mail?
Nice placement of the space behind the dollar sign! No money for you.
> Don't bother to file bug r
On Sat, 9 Aug 2014 18:10:51 +0100
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sat, 09 Aug 2014 11:12:46 -0400
> Chris Reffett wrote:
> > Then write it. Portage's source is available to anyone.
>
> It's quicker to start from scratch than to try to add things to
> Portage's source...
But do we want to be quicke
On Fri, 08 Aug 2014 23:04:40 +0200
Johannes Huber wrote:
> /me is thinking:
> Your caps lock key is broken and about the content: man portage ||
> use linux from scratch
Caps lock highlighting is a common practice. Why do you tell him to read
a manual or use a distribution that both lack the r
On Mon, 11 Aug 2014 20:48:20 -0500
William Hubbs wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 03:22:11PM +0300, Sergei Trofimovich wrote:
> > Hello World!
> >
> > TL;DR:
> > This evening I plan to mangle ~3000 ebuilds in the main tree
> > by dropping trailing '.' in all 'DESCRIPTION=' fields (except
> >
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 12 Aug 2014 10:04:58 -0400
Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> I'm wondering what everyone thinks of having a --nonag option to
> repoman and shoving some of the more trivial/style-related repoman
> 'warnings' into a 'nag' level warning?
What is the p
Tom Wijsman:
> On Sat, 9 Aug 2014 18:10:51 +0100
> Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 09 Aug 2014 11:12:46 -0400
>> Chris Reffett wrote:
>>> Then write it. Portage's source is available to anyone.
>>
>> It's quicker to start from scratch than to try to add things to
>> Portage's source...
>
>
Tom Wijsman posted on Wed, 13 Aug 2014 10:38:45 +0200 as excerpted:
>> I don't recall a policy mandating that descriptions can't end with '.'.
>> I asked our QA lead about it and was told that he didn't recall that we
>> have an official policy about it either. Also, the devmanual never
>> mention
