Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

2014-06-02 Thread Jeroen Roovers
On Fri, 30 May 2014 23:07:55 +0100 Markos Chandras wrote: > On 05/28/2014 09:32 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: > > Perhaps it makes more sense to disband the herd and put all packages > > except the ones you use up for grabs? > I suppose so. Let me have a look and see how many packages belong to > t

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

2014-06-02 Thread Markos Chandras
On 06/02/2014 02:03 PM, Jeroen Roovers wrote: > On Fri, 30 May 2014 23:07:55 +0100 > Markos Chandras wrote: > >> On 05/28/2014 09:32 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: >>> Perhaps it makes more sense to disband the herd and put all packages >>> except the ones you use up for grabs? > >> I suppose so. Le

Re: [gentoo-dev] alpha, ia64, ppc, ppc64, sparc developers, need your attention

2014-06-02 Thread Jeroen Roovers
On Sun, 01 Jun 2014 13:33:22 +0200 Pacho Ramos wrote: > This makes me wonder about the real status of some of this arches. I > know that now we will probably see how Agostino goes ahead and does > all the work (that is nice and I really welcome his work trying to > keep this arches in shape), but

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: various ruby packages only hosting their source on rubyforge

2014-06-02 Thread Hans de Graaff
# Hans de Graaff (2 Jun 2014) # Mask old slots and packages for removal in 30 days since SRC_URI # still points to rubyforge mirrors, bug 512132. These are all leaf # packages, have not seen releases in a long time, and only provide # their code on rubyforge. dev-ruby/deprecated:2 dev-ruby/jruby-d

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

2014-06-02 Thread Parker Schmitt
I think we need to keep the opencl stuff. In a few weeks I'll have time to help. On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 2:10 AM, Kacper Kowalik wrote: > Hi All! > There's a bunch packages that I'm officially maintaining but due to the > lack of time I'm unable to do that properly. I'd be grateful if you > cou

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

2014-06-02 Thread C. Bergström
On 06/ 3/14 02:50 AM, Parker Schmitt wrote: I think we need to keep the opencl stuff. In a few weeks I'll have time to help. I work for PathScale and can probably take on dev-lang/ekopath path64 - while I'd like it to continue - it could(should?) be retired - I'd need someone to help p

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

2014-06-02 Thread Patrick Lauer
On Monday 02 June 2014 14:50:56 Parker Schmitt wrote: > I think we need to keep the opencl stuff. In a few weeks I'll have time to > help. > > > On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 2:10 AM, Kacper Kowalik > > wrote: > > Hi All! > > There's a bunch packages that I'm officially maintaining but due to the > >